If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Searching with Search Companion
The behavior of the “Search Companion” in XP is different from the equivalent
feature in Win2K. Win2K simply searches ‘real filenames’ whereas XP seems to search INTO files which may contain other files in some compressed form – e.g. .cab files. When I search “Local Hard Drives” it takes only a few seconds to search some 60K files on two of the drives and nearly a minute to search for a name (one of only 36) on the Q:\ drive. The Q drive has few files but most of them are over 7GB! This is very painful. It should take only milleseconds to search Q. Is there any way to get Search Companion to behave the way the search function in Win2K works? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Searching with Search Companion
Steve
What type of drive is your Q drive? How large and how much free space does your Q drive have? -- Hope this helps. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Steve Behman" wrote in message ... The behavior of the "Search Companion" in XP is different from the equivalent feature in Win2K. Win2K simply searches 'real filenames' whereas XP seems to search INTO files which may contain other files in some compressed form - e.g. .cab files. When I search "Local Hard Drives" it takes only a few seconds to search some 60K files on two of the drives and nearly a minute to search for a name (one of only 36) on the Q:\ drive. The Q drive has few files but most of them are over 7GB! This is very painful. It should take only milleseconds to search Q. Is there any way to get Search Companion to behave the way the search function in Win2K works? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Searching with Search Companion
Hi Stave, You could try an alternative search utility, like Agent Ransack, available he http://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/download.aspx |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Searching with Search Companion
The drive is a 250 GB SATA II drive with about 170 GB free space. The used
space contains ONLY 30 or so files (Acronis TrueImage Backups with a .tib filetype). I am not sure how this would affect the behavior of a filename search utility. I am the author of the (very old) DOS WHIZ utility and would write a new one for XP myself but my vision has failed and it is now very difficult to write code. "Gerry Cornell" wrote: Steve What type of drive is your Q drive? How large and how much free space does your Q drive have? -- Hope this helps. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Steve Behman" wrote in message ... The behavior of the "Search Companion" in XP is different from the equivalent feature in Win2K. Win2K simply searches 'real filenames' whereas XP seems to search INTO files which may contain other files in some compressed form - e.g. .cab files. When I search "Local Hard Drives" it takes only a few seconds to search some 60K files on two of the drives and nearly a minute to search for a name (one of only 36) on the Q:\ drive. The Q drive has few files but most of them are over 7GB! This is very painful. It should take only milleseconds to search Q. Is there any way to get Search Companion to behave the way the search function in Win2K works? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Searching with Search Companion
Steve
Not sure whether this might be relevant but have you tried Disk Defragmenter? An 80 gb drive is some size to search. -- Hope this helps. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Steve Behman" wrote in message ... The drive is a 250 GB SATA II drive with about 170 GB free space. The used space contains ONLY 30 or so files (Acronis TrueImage Backups with a .tib filetype). I am not sure how this would affect the behavior of a filename search utility. I am the author of the (very old) DOS WHIZ utility and would write a new one for XP myself but my vision has failed and it is now very difficult to write code. "Gerry Cornell" wrote: Steve What type of drive is your Q drive? How large and how much free space does your Q drive have? -- Hope this helps. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Steve Behman" wrote in message ... The behavior of the "Search Companion" in XP is different from the equivalent feature in Win2K. Win2K simply searches 'real filenames' whereas XP seems to search INTO files which may contain other files in some compressed form - e.g. .cab files. When I search "Local Hard Drives" it takes only a few seconds to search some 60K files on two of the drives and nearly a minute to search for a name (one of only 36) on the Q:\ drive. The Q drive has few files but most of them are over 7GB! This is very painful. It should take only milleseconds to search Q. Is there any way to get Search Companion to behave the way the search function in Win2K works? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Searching with Search Companion
Thank you!
I was delighted with Agent Ransack and even more so with the 'full fledged' product FileLocator Pro by the same author. They are both great products and the latter is well worth it's $25 price. "Claymore" wrote: Hi Stave, You could try an alternative search utility, like Agent Ransack, available he http://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/download.aspx |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|