If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
*Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that he's worthless.*
Nil is an expert in the worthless Chit-Chat model of Usenet conversation. To Nil, Usenet is his only amusement. Nil can *never* add one iota of on-topic technical value to *any thread*. He proves my point in every post. Just watch. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On 25 Jun 2018, Arlen Holder wrote in
alt.comp.os.windows-10: *Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that he's worthless.* Nil is an expert in the worthless Chit-Chat model of Usenet conversation. To Nil, Usenet is his only amusement. Nil can *never* add one iota of on-topic technical value to *any thread*. He proves my point in every post. Just watch. So, let me try to understand... you starting hate threads about everybody you don't approve of is not the "chit-chat" model... how, exactly? Could you write us a tutorial about that? I want to search the tribal archive for it later. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
Trolling other users in the subject line,
especially without properly labeling your post is abusive. Regular troll... -- Arlen Holder arlenholder nospam.net wrote: Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Arlen Holder arlenholder nospam.net Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10 Subject: Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless. Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:00:31 -0000 (UTC) Organization: Mixmin Message-ID: pgr02e$5c8$1 news.mixmin.net Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:00:31 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="fed1ee4761a4640df0004e4cde28233f4efec5c6"; logging-data="5512"; mail-complaints-to="abuse mixmin.net" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org alt.comp.os.windows-10:72604 *Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that he's worthless.* rednoise9 REMOVETHIScomcast.net Nil is an expert in the worthless Chit-Chat model of Usenet conversation. To Nil, Usenet is his only amusement. Nil can *never* add one iota of on-topic technical value to *any thread*. He proves my point in every post. Just watch. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:27:09 -0400, Nil wrote:
So, let me try to understand... you starting hate threads about everybody you don't approve of is not the "chit-chat" model... how, exactly? Could you write us a tutorial about that? I want to search the tribal archive for it later. I'm trying to save this newsgroup from trolls like you, Nil: There's nothing stopping you, Nil, from plonking me, now is there. But you're a troll. So plonking me doesn't serve your purpose. You, Nil, always prove you're a troll so all I'm stating is a proven fact. You don't like facts - but that doesn't change that they're facts. to answer your question, Nil, I'm an open book, Nil. Nothing I do is by accident. I'm only trying to point out exactly what you do Nil. *If what you do bothers you ... then there is a ray of hope for us all.* NOTE: Even Wolf K. and Frank Slootweg, and Char Jackson have changed their stripes recently, and, even nospam has been thankfully silently trolling elsewhere.. Do you think those successes were purely by accident? Rest assured, Nil, while you are worthless - they actually can provide value. You can't. But they can. My intent is patently simple. Obvious. And focused on saving this ng. I have a strategic intent to save this group from infestations from the likes of you, Nil. My tactic is simply to point out that which you do. *Are you _afraid_, Nil, that I point out exactly that which you do?* Given I mirror the tone and intent of every respondent, and, since you actually asked an on-topic question (surprisingly), I'm going to directly answer your question in the same faith as I perceive the question to be made. It's my clear and obvious and strongly made assertion that you, Nil, , have never once in your entire life added any on-topic technical value to any difficult question ever asked on Usenet, and particularly in this newsgroup. It's also my assertion that you trolls, Nil, will eventually ruin this newsgroup, just as the barbarian Vandals, Ostrogoths, and Visigoths ruined the Roman Empire, if we allow the trolls like you, Nil, to run amuck amongst us. You're just a lowly troll, Nil. Nothing to be respect. *You prove you're a troll, Nil, in every single one of your worthless posts.* You can attempt to prove me wrong if you can find a single URL that negates that assumption, but you almost certainly won't (nobody I challenge is anything but a cowardly bully - which you decidedly are, Nil). Since you're simply a cowardly bully, and since you can't provide any value whatsoever to *any* thread on this newsgroup, there is zero risk in alienating you (and, in fact, it's a huge benefit to *everyone* if we can alienate you). I'm only trying to point out exactly what you do Nil. *If what you do bothers you ... then there is a ray of hope for us all.* As you are aware, I've seen plenty of newsgroups go to hell because of people like you, Nil, and Diesel, and Snit, and John Doe, etc.. It would be a shame if infestations of this newsgroup by people like you, Nil, and those like you (e.g., GoodGuy, Sam Hill, nospam, etc.) So, the tutorial for saving this group is rather simple: a. If trolls like Nil continues to post, this group is doomed. b. If trolls like Nil can be shamed into acting like adults, we're fine. All we ask of you, Nil, is for you to act like an adult, just once in your life. We realize it's almost impossible for you to act like an adult, and even more impossible for you to actually contribute on-topic technical value, but, then, guess what will happen? When you bully us ... I will bully you back, to save the newsgroup. You bullies are all cowards in the end - so I lose nothing in the process. Alienating you is a blessing. When you contribute on-topic technical value - then I will stop pointing out that you can never contribute on-topic technical value. It's a simple equation that even you trolls can understand, is it not? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:45:27 -0000 (UTC), John Doe wrote:
Trolling other users in the subject line, especially without properly labeling your post is abusive. John Doe ... Plonk Me. *You're on this newsgroup purely for your own amusement, John Doe.* You, John Doe, are nothing but a worthless troll: *John Doe * To be clear, you, John Doe, are not as bad as the troll Nil, nor the troll Diesel, nor the troll nospam, but you're as bad as the troll Sam Hill is. I'm an old hand at Usenet, John Doe, as likely are you. You trolls will infest any newsgroup that puts up with you. Until you ruin it. *You're no different, John Doe, than Snit or his many nyms, John Doe.* You're on this newsgroup purely for your own amusement, John Doe. This newsgroup is going the way of plenty of newsgroups before it, due to trolls like you, John Doe, who can't ever add a single bit of on-topic value to any question posed on this newsgroup. So, while you accuse me of being a troll, you are the troll who doesn't contribute any value. All you can do is leave dung on the public potluck picnic. You *hate* that I point this out, John Doe, but it's a fact nonetheless. You think these threads are by accident, John Doe? If you don't like me pointing out that you're a worthless troll, John Doe, then plonk me for heaven's sake. What's interesting is that you're likely not even intelligent enough to figure out my posts, which is hilarious, but you'll complain about my nyms because you're clearly too stupid, John Doe, to figure out the obivous). The obvious here is patently simple: *Don't troll, John Doe, & I won't point out that all you can do, is troll.* |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On 25 Jun 2018, Arlen Holder wrote in
alt.comp.os.windows-10: There's nothing stopping you, Nil, from plonking me, now is there. But you're a troll. So plonking me doesn't serve your purpose. There's nothing stopping you, trolling nymshifter, from plonking me, now is there. But you're a narcissist in a manic phase. So plonking me doesn't serve your purpose. Do you think those successes were purely by accident? Hmmm... Is you boring them to death to an accident or a success? I'll have to think about that one for a few seconds. My intent is patently simple. Obvious. And focused on saving this ng. I've been on Usenet for about 25 years, and I haven't killed this or any other newsgroup yet. Nothing you do is going to change my behavior a bit. I sense you're enjoying your chit-chat. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:44:02 -0400, Nil wrote:
I've been on Usenet for about 25 years *And in those 25 years on Usenet, you, Nil, haven't once added any value.* |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
Arlen Holder wrote:
[...] NOTE: Even Wolf K. and Frank Slootweg, and Char Jackson have changed their stripes recently Nope, we haven't! That you just happened to 'approve' some of our posts, does not mean that we've changed. Next time, all bets are off again. As long as you're unable to respond like an adult to things which - for some reason - you don't like, you will continue to have quibbles with nearly everbody everywhere. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:55:54 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote: On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:44:02 -0400, Nil wrote: I've been on Usenet for about 25 years *And in those 25 years on Usenet, you, Nil, haven't once added any value.* The days of "I only speak facts" seem so long ago now. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On 25 Jun 2018 21:03:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote:
Nope, we haven't! Frank Slootweg, If you continue to troll, I will continue to point out your trolling. Simple. Plonk me if you want to. Understand this: a. You plonk me, you lose value. b. I plonk you, I lose nothing of any value whatsoever. Nobody loses any value by plonking you, Frank Slootweg. Well, your troll buddies lose chit-chat currency - so they lose amusement. Pretty simple equation, is it not? Remember, Frank, let's repeat the facts for everyone to see clearly. Frank Slootweg ... you were one of the first to congratulate Snit on his hilariously wrong video... where you never once looked at the Y axis, for heaven's sake ... during the entire time of that idiotic video! https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo HINT: What kind of moron congratulates such a foolishly wrong endeavor where the entire problem set involved graphing signal strngth for all access points over time - and NOBODY - not you Frank Slootweg - certainly not Snit, nor nospam nor Lewis nor Jolly Roger, etc., even LOOKS once at the Y-axis of the moving graph? Your post is proof positive we're swimming in a sea of utter morons! https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0/VGtq9RzpBgAJ |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:17:13 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:
The days of "I only speak facts" seem so long ago now. I challenged Nil to show us just once, in all those 25 years of his nonsensical chit-chat on Usenet, all for his own amusement (and apparently that of yours), where he has added any on-topic value to a technical question. As expected of all you cowardly bullies, Nil can't find a single time he has added on-topic technical value in 25 years of posting. *Not once has Nil ever added on-topic technical value to *any* thread!* |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 19:02:47 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote: All we ask of you, Nil, snip We realize it's almost impossible snip When you bully us snip There's that 'we' stuff again. Just a friendly reminder that nobody but you can hear the voices in your head. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:14:24 -0400, Wolf K wrote:
Impossible. Anybody who wants to can post here, and will do so regardless of your attempts to prevent them. And that is also "added technical value", BTW. The funny thing about you Wolf K., is that I've added more on-topic technical value to this newsgroup in the past 24 hours than you've added in the past 24 years. *Think about the veracity of that fact, Wolf K., before you respond.* |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:24:00 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:
There's that 'we' stuff again. Just a friendly reminder that nobody but you can hear the voices in your head. Char Jackson, You can chit-chat all your fifth-grade silly semantics you want, but that doesn't change the facts, Char Jackson. The facts are that I've added more technical value to this ng in the past 24 hours than you've added in the past 24 years. *Think about the veracity of that fact, Char Jackson, before you respond.* |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.
Arlen Holder wrote:
On 25 Jun 2018 21:03:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote: Nope, we haven't! Frank Slootweg, If you continue to troll, I will continue to point out your trolling. I'm trembling in my wooden shoes! Simple. Plonk me if you want to. Understand this: a. You plonk me, you lose value. Entertainment value? Maybe. b. I plonk you, I lose nothing of any value whatsoever. Then why don't you? Lack the self control? [Rerun of rerun one of your recent stupidities deleted.] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|