Blocking Unwanted Connections with a Hosts File

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:42:17 +0000, "David B." "David
wrote:

On 10/01/2019 10:06, MikeS wrote:
To answer your question about the hosts file website, the MSVP who
operates it is responsible for it.

Really? And exactly who *IS* that MVP?

Creepy, dude. Stalking makes you one of the 'bad guys'. No wonder you
haven't found any after all these years.

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:15:09 +0000, "David B." "David
wrote:

On 10/01/2019 11:20, wasbit wrote:
"MikeS" wrote in message
...
On 10/01/2019 10:42, David B. wrote:
On 10/01/2019 10:06, MikeS wrote:

Don't see the OP
You've replied to a known INVESTIGATOR who believes that there were/are 'bad apples' in the MVP barrel!

You changed stalker to investigator, above. That wasn't honest of you.
Those terms aren't interchangeable.

It is the *WEBSITE* I'm interested in.

Of course. It's long been one of your primary stalking targets.

FWIW, I appreciate the honest answers given by MikeS. Thanks, Mike. :-)

Anything to pad the dossier, right?

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:08:55 +0000, "David B." "David
wrote:

Indeed. I expect you are aware that monitors and
posts in this group.

I'm not sure why he changed his 'nym' to '...w¡ñ§±¤ñ'

Probably not for the same reason(s) that you've changed your nym at
least 25-30 times, if not many more.

Remember, THIS SITE IS *NOT* ASSOCIATED WITH MICROSOFT!

A puzzle indeed!

Not a puzzle, just one of your primary stalking targets.

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:12:05 +0000, "David B." "David
wrote:

On 10/01/2019 13:33, Paul wrote:
We've had this kind of conversation before, Paul!

https://alt.windows7.general.narkive...-natoli#post19

The word you are looking for is PERSISTENT!

The word that *I'M* looking for is "STALKER". That word describes you
best.

There is ALWAYS a reason for everything. I *KNOW* I'm a 'good guy'
looking for the bad ones,

So after all these years, you haven't found a single 'bad guy'. You
literally wouldn't recognize a 'bad guy' if you looked in a mirror. Go
ahead, try it.

so if folk will not correspond with me/talk to
me then, more or less by default, they most probably ARE suspicious
characters! But I don't HATE anyone and I do NOT throw darts at their
photographs! ;-)

No, you just start another dossier when someone refuses to help you.
Like the first time I posted in a thread where you were openly stalking,
and you replied thusly: "Char, is THIS you?", with a link to a random
LinkedIn profile belonging to a young Black woman.

On 14/01/2019 19:33, Char Jackson wrote:
[....]
No, you just start another dossier when someone refuses to help you.
Like the first time I posted in a thread where you were openly stalking,
and you replied thusly: "Char, is THIS you?", with a link to a random
LinkedIn profile belonging to a young Black woman.

I've no idea why you've just capitalised the 'B' in black. Are you
prejudiced perchance?

You COULD have responded with "no, THIS is MY LinkedIn persona ....."
and we could thereafter have enjoyed a worthwhile posting relationship.

I had no idea at all whether 'Char' was/is a male or a female so it
should have been obvious that I was 'pulling your leg'!

Just lighten up, Char. Not everything posted on Usenet is serious! ;-)

--
David B.

In article
"David B." "David wrote:

On 14/01/2019 19:33, Char Jackson wrote:
[....]
No, you just start another dossier when someone refuses to help you.
Like the first time I posted in a thread where you were openly stalking,
and you replied thusly: "Char, is THIS you?", with a link to a random
LinkedIn profile belonging to a young Black woman.

I've no idea why you've just capitalised the 'B' in black. Are you
prejudiced perchance?

You COULD have responded with "no, THIS is MY LinkedIn persona ....."
and we could thereafter have enjoyed a worthwhile posting relationship.

I had no idea at all whether 'Char' was/is a male or a female so it
should have been obvious that I was 'pulling your leg'!

Just lighten up, Char. Not everything posted on Usenet is serious! ;-)

--
David B.

You must be bored and looking for further trouble, or you're memory
is slipping with age.

Remember my alert/warning from some time back?



Last reminder/discussion on the subject.

In article
"David B." "David wrote:

On 14/01/2019 19:33, Char Jackson wrote:
[....]
No, you just start another dossier when someone refuses to help you.
Like the first time I posted in a thread where you were openly stalking,
and you replied thusly: "Char, is THIS you?", with a link to a random
LinkedIn profile belonging to a young Black woman.

I've no idea why you've just capitalised the 'B' in black. Are you
prejudiced perchance?

You COULD have responded with "no, THIS is MY LinkedIn persona ....."
and we could thereafter have enjoyed a worthwhile posting relationship.

I had no idea at all whether 'Char' was/is a male or a female so it
should have been obvious that I was 'pulling your leg'!

Just lighten up, Char. Not everything posted on Usenet is serious! ;-)

--
David B.

You must be bored and looking for further trouble, or you're memory
is slipping with age.

Remember my alert/warning from some time back?



Last reminder/discussion on the subject.

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:09:33 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
wrote:

In article
"David B." "David wrote:

On 14/01/2019 19:33, Char Jackson wrote:
[....]
No, you just start another dossier when someone refuses to help you.
Like the first time I posted in a thread where you were openly stalking,
and you replied thusly: "Char, is THIS you?", with a link to a random
LinkedIn profile belonging to a young Black woman.

I've no idea why you've just capitalised the 'B' in black. Are you
prejudiced perchance?

You COULD have responded with "no, THIS is MY LinkedIn persona ....."
and we could thereafter have enjoyed a worthwhile posting relationship.

I had no idea at all whether 'Char' was/is a male or a female so it
should have been obvious that I was 'pulling your leg'!

Just lighten up, Char. Not everything posted on Usenet is serious! ;-)

--
David B.

You must be bored and looking for further trouble, or you're memory
is slipping with age.

Remember my alert/warning from some time back?



Last reminder/discussion on the subject.

Good, because it's wrong, but you knew that and posted anyway.

On 14/01/2019 21:09, Nomen Nescio wrote:
In article
"David B." "David wrote:

On 14/01/2019 19:33, Char Jackson wrote:
[....]
No, you just start another dossier when someone refuses to help you.
Like the first time I posted in a thread where you were openly stalking,
and you replied thusly: "Char, is THIS you?", with a link to a random
LinkedIn profile belonging to a young Black woman.

I've no idea why you've just capitalised the 'B' in black. Are you
prejudiced perchance?

You COULD have responded with "no, THIS is MY LinkedIn persona ....."
and we could thereafter have enjoyed a worthwhile posting relationship.

I had no idea at all whether 'Char' was/is a male or a female so it
should have been obvious that I was 'pulling your leg'!

Just lighten up, Char. Not everything posted on Usenet is serious! ;-)

--
David B.

You must be bored and looking for further trouble, or you're memory
is slipping with age.

Remember my alert/warning from some time back?



Last reminder/discussion on the subject.

I'd not forgotten!

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154749860600

Thanks for the reminder though. :-)
--
David B.

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:08:55 +0000, "David B." "David
wrote:

On 14/01/2019 19:33, Char Jackson wrote:
[....]
No, you just start another dossier when someone refuses to help you.
Like the first time I posted in a thread where you were openly stalking,
and you replied thusly: "Char, is THIS you?", with a link to a random
LinkedIn profile belonging to a young Black woman.

I've no idea why you've just capitalised the 'B' in black. Are you
prejudiced perchance?

Because that's the right way to write it.

You COULD have responded with "no, THIS is MY LinkedIn persona ....."
and we could thereafter have enjoyed a worthwhile posting relationship.

Yes, that's exactly what you were fishing for. Sorry to disappoint.

I had no idea at all whether 'Char' was/is a male or a female so it
should have been obvious that I was 'pulling your leg'!

It was obvious that you were trying to populate a new dossier.

Just lighten up, Char. Not everything posted on Usenet is serious! ;-)

True, but stalking is serious. It's serious enough to be illegal, even
where you live.

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:15:00 -0400, Michael Patil
wrote:

On 10/01/2019 16:31, Old Geezer wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:33:09 -0500, Paul wrote:

David knows exactly what an MVP is.

David hates anybody who bans him from various forums.
Paul is correct.

There is ALWAYS a reason for everything.
I *KNOW* I'm a 'good guy' looking for the bad ones,
David B. is dangerous, as is Good Guy (perhaps one & the same).
Similar to Diesel and the other psychopaths who get their jollies this way.

Psychologically unsound, perhaps certifiable so - perhaps not certifiable.
Dangerous nonetheless

I agree. They are into HTML and web pages. GG uses HTML (or was using
HTML) but now he is filtered so not sure.

That part is true.

DavidB is fascinated by web pages.

Not really. He asks questions to get info to help his stalking efforts,
but he doesn't understand or retain anything technical. If you were to
pay attention, which I don't recommend, you'd see that he asks the same
questions over and over, making it clear that he hasn't absorbed
anything.

Diesel has his own website techrider and he keeps posting here
using different nyms - David B, Good Guy and Nasty something. They are
now filtered so no sign of them here.

Those are three different people, not one person using three nyms, and
BTS owns the tekrider site, not Diesel.

Thanks for the heads up.

Anytime.

On 14/01/2019 23:35, Char Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:15:00 -0400, Michael Patil
wrote:

On 10/01/2019 16:31, Old Geezer wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:33:09 -0500, Paul wrote:

David knows exactly what an MVP is.

David hates anybody who bans him from various forums.
Paul is correct.

There is ALWAYS a reason for everything.
I *KNOW* I'm a 'good guy' looking for the bad ones,
David B. is dangerous, as is Good Guy (perhaps one & the same).
Similar to Diesel and the other psychopaths who get their jollies this way.

Psychologically unsound, perhaps certifiable so - perhaps not certifiable.
Dangerous nonetheless

I agree. They are into HTML and web pages. GG uses HTML (or was using
HTML) but now he is filtered so not sure.

That part is true.

DavidB is fascinated by web pages.

Not really. He asks questions to get info to help his stalking efforts,
but he doesn't understand or retain anything technical. If you were to
pay attention, which I don't recommend, you'd see that he asks the same
questions over and over, making it clear that he hasn't absorbed
anything.

Diesel has his own website techrider and he keeps posting here
using different nyms - David B, Good Guy and Nasty something. They are
now filtered so no sign of them here.

Those are three different people, not one person using three nyms, and
BTS owns the tekrider site, not Diesel.


Sounds to me as if *YOU* are the stalker, Char Jackson! :-P


--
David B.