If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT~How safe are Gun Free Zones?
Fort Hood was a gun free zone, implemented by the Clinton Administration
in 1993. However all that the gun free zone did was assure that law abiding and regulation abiding individuals would remain unarmed and allowed a nut case to take several lives and wound several other individuals over a 10 minute period. From: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/...gun-free-zone/ "Beginning in March 1993, under the Clinton administration, the army forbids military personnel from carrying their own personal firearms and mandates that "a credible and specific threat against [Department of the Army] personnel [exist] in that region" before military personnel "may be authorized to carry firearms for personal protection." Further down in the article: "Research shows that allowing individuals to defend themselves dramatically reduces the rates of multiple victim public shootings. Even if attacks still occur, having civilians with permitted concealed handguns limits the damage. A major factor in determining how many people are harmed by these killers is the amount of time that elapses between when the attack starts and someone is able to arrive on the scene with a gun. Ten minutes must have seemed like an eternity to those trapped in the attack at Ft. Hood. All the multiple victim public shootings in the U.S. -- in which more than three people have been killed -- have all occurred in places where concealed handguns have been banned." For those who don't trust Fox for any news, try he http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-base-gun-ban/ So I'm wondering if a couple of folks here would like to tell me again how I'm safer in a place that has a, "no guns allowed sign", posted at the door. -- "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." Theodore Roosevelt http://www.bobhatch.com http://www.tdsrvresort.com |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
OT~How safe are Gun Free Zones?
Bob Hatch wrote:
Fort Hood was a gun free zone, implemented by the Clinton Administration in 1993. However all that the gun free zone did was assure that law abiding and regulation abiding individuals would remain unarmed and allowed a nut case to take several lives and wound several other individuals over a 10 minute period. From: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/...gun-free-zone/ "Beginning in March 1993, under the Clinton administration, the army forbids military personnel from carrying their own personal firearms and mandates that "a credible and specific threat against [Department of the Army] personnel [exist] in that region" before military personnel "may be authorized to carry firearms for personal protection." Further down in the article: "Research shows that allowing individuals to defend themselves dramatically reduces the rates of multiple victim public shootings. Even if attacks still occur, having civilians with permitted concealed handguns limits the damage. A major factor in determining how many people are harmed by these killers is the amount of time that elapses between when the attack starts and someone is able to arrive on the scene with a gun. Ten minutes must have seemed like an eternity to those trapped in the attack at Ft. Hood. All the multiple victim public shootings in the U.S. -- in which more than three people have been killed -- have all occurred in places where concealed handguns have been banned." For those who don't trust Fox for any news, try he http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-base-gun-ban/ So I'm wondering if a couple of folks here would like to tell me again how I'm safer in a place that has a, "no guns allowed sign", posted at the door. I'm really sorry about this post. It was not supposed to be in this group but there is no way to kill it now. Damn, I need to pay closer attention. :-( -- "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." Theodore Roosevelt http://www.bobhatch.com http://www.tdsrvresort.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|