If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Force format to extended partition
When partitioning/formatting a single large partition on a drive, Win7
apparently defaults to 'Primary' with no options for 'Extended' (as was the case with XP). Is there any way to force Win7 to create an extended partition rather than primary? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Force format to extended partition
"Bob" wrote in message ... When partitioning/formatting a single large partition on a drive, Win7 apparently defaults to 'Primary' with no options for 'Extended' (as was the case with XP). Is there any way to force Win7 to create an extended partition rather than primary? If that is the sole partition on the drive then it CAN'T be "extended". Never was in XP either.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Force format to extended partition
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:18:38 +0100, "Gordon"
wrote: "Bob" wrote in message .. . When partitioning/formatting a single large partition on a drive, Win7 apparently defaults to 'Primary' with no options for 'Extended' (as was the case with XP). Is there any way to force Win7 to create an extended partition rather than primary? If that is the sole partition on the drive then it CAN'T be "extended". Never was in XP either.... XP can indeed create an extended partition as the sole partition on a drive. Bring up XP's disk mgmt and it provides a choice between creating primary or extended. Then one large logical partition can be created within the extended partiton. It's also possible to create the extended/logical partition under XP, then format it under Win7. The obvious omission is the ability to create the extended partition under Win7. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Force format to extended partition
"Bob" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:18:38 +0100, "Gordon" wrote: "Bob" wrote in message . .. When partitioning/formatting a single large partition on a drive, Win7 apparently defaults to 'Primary' with no options for 'Extended' (as was the case with XP). Is there any way to force Win7 to create an extended partition rather than primary? If that is the sole partition on the drive then it CAN'T be "extended". Never was in XP either.... XP can indeed create an extended partition as the sole partition on a drive. Bring up XP's disk mgmt and it provides a choice between creating primary or extended. Then one large logical partition can be created within the extended partiton. It's also possible to create the extended/logical partition under XP, then format it under Win7. The obvious omission is the ability to create the extended partition under Win7. XP supported FAT32, but who would want it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Force format to extended partition
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:07:35 -0700, "nooneyouknow"
wrote: "Bob" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:18:38 +0100, "Gordon" wrote: "Bob" wrote in message ... When partitioning/formatting a single large partition on a drive, Win7 apparently defaults to 'Primary' with no options for 'Extended' (as was the case with XP). Is there any way to force Win7 to create an extended partition rather than primary? If that is the sole partition on the drive then it CAN'T be "extended". Never was in XP either.... XP can indeed create an extended partition as the sole partition on a drive. Bring up XP's disk mgmt and it provides a choice between creating primary or extended. Then one large logical partition can be created within the extended partiton. It's also possible to create the extended/logical partition under XP, then format it under Win7. The obvious omission is the ability to create the extended partition under Win7. XP supported FAT32, but who would want it. Anyone who wants transportability between systems that use FAT32 would want it (that includes various hardware video players, for example). And XP was only introduced because a previous poster said that XP could not create a sole partition as 'extended', which is not correct. Still that's not the point. Or are you aware of some inherent defect in extended partitions that merited the comparison with FAT32? I'd be curious to hear about that, as I've been using extended partitions for storage drives for many years. If not, then the question remains: Can Win7 create a sole partition on a drive as 'extended'? It does not seem to be provided as a direct option under the drive mgt snap-in, but that doesn't always mean that it can't be done. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Force format to extended partition
"Bob" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:07:35 -0700, "nooneyouknow" wrote: "Bob" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:18:38 +0100, "Gordon" wrote: "Bob" wrote in message m... When partitioning/formatting a single large partition on a drive, Win7 apparently defaults to 'Primary' with no options for 'Extended' (as was the case with XP). Is there any way to force Win7 to create an extended partition rather than primary? If that is the sole partition on the drive then it CAN'T be "extended". Never was in XP either.... XP can indeed create an extended partition as the sole partition on a drive. Bring up XP's disk mgmt and it provides a choice between creating primary or extended. Then one large logical partition can be created within the extended partiton. It's also possible to create the extended/logical partition under XP, then format it under Win7. The obvious omission is the ability to create the extended partition under Win7. XP supported FAT32, but who would want it. Anyone who wants transportability between systems that use FAT32 would want it (that includes various hardware video players, for example). And XP was only introduced because a previous poster said that XP could not create a sole partition as 'extended', which is not correct. Still that's not the point. Or are you aware of some inherent defect in extended partitions that merited the comparison with FAT32? I'd be curious to hear about that, as I've been using extended partitions for storage drives for many years. If not, then the question remains: Can Win7 create a sole partition on a drive as 'extended'? It does not seem to be provided as a direct option under the drive mgt snap-in, but that doesn't always mean that it can't be done. Extended partitions were 'popular' with FAT32; not so much with NTFS. You can do it with the diskpart command if you need more than 4 partitions. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/300415 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Force format to extended partition
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:59:49 -0700, "relic" wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:07:35 -0700, "nooneyouknow" wrote: "Bob" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:18:38 +0100, "Gordon" wrote: "Bob" wrote in message om... When partitioning/formatting a single large partition on a drive, Win7 apparently defaults to 'Primary' with no options for 'Extended' (as was the case with XP). Is there any way to force Win7 to create an extended partition rather than primary? If that is the sole partition on the drive then it CAN'T be "extended". Never was in XP either.... XP can indeed create an extended partition as the sole partition on a drive. Bring up XP's disk mgmt and it provides a choice between creating primary or extended. Then one large logical partition can be created within the extended partiton. It's also possible to create the extended/logical partition under XP, then format it under Win7. The obvious omission is the ability to create the extended partition under Win7. XP supported FAT32, but who would want it. Anyone who wants transportability between systems that use FAT32 would want it (that includes various hardware video players, for example). And XP was only introduced because a previous poster said that XP could not create a sole partition as 'extended', which is not correct. Still that's not the point. Or are you aware of some inherent defect in extended partitions that merited the comparison with FAT32? I'd be curious to hear about that, as I've been using extended partitions for storage drives for many years. If not, then the question remains: Can Win7 create a sole partition on a drive as 'extended'? It does not seem to be provided as a direct option under the drive mgt snap-in, but that doesn't always mean that it can't be done. Extended partitions were 'popular' with FAT32; not so much with NTFS. You can do it with the diskpart command if you need more than 4 partitions. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/300415 That's the answer then, thanks. I got in the habit of using extended partitions from the days when you couldn't control drive letter displacement. Never saw any reason to change that, but I suppose it's much less a factor now. Do you happen to know of any actual drawbacks in using extended partitions? Obviously I won't be installing bootable systems to them, but aside from that, I'm not aware of any adverse performance effects. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Force format to extended partition
"Bob" wrote in message news On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:59:49 -0700, "relic" wrote: "Bob" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:07:35 -0700, "nooneyouknow" wrote: "Bob" wrote in message m... On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:18:38 +0100, "Gordon" wrote: "Bob" wrote in message news:geles59gbbvhkddhmqcpbr3b4f1ihkpmn8@4ax. com... When partitioning/formatting a single large partition on a drive, Win7 apparently defaults to 'Primary' with no options for 'Extended' (as was the case with XP). Is there any way to force Win7 to create an extended partition rather than primary? If that is the sole partition on the drive then it CAN'T be "extended". Never was in XP either.... XP can indeed create an extended partition as the sole partition on a drive. Bring up XP's disk mgmt and it provides a choice between creating primary or extended. Then one large logical partition can be created within the extended partiton. It's also possible to create the extended/logical partition under XP, then format it under Win7. The obvious omission is the ability to create the extended partition under Win7. XP supported FAT32, but who would want it. Anyone who wants transportability between systems that use FAT32 would want it (that includes various hardware video players, for example). And XP was only introduced because a previous poster said that XP could not create a sole partition as 'extended', which is not correct. Still that's not the point. Or are you aware of some inherent defect in extended partitions that merited the comparison with FAT32? I'd be curious to hear about that, as I've been using extended partitions for storage drives for many years. If not, then the question remains: Can Win7 create a sole partition on a drive as 'extended'? It does not seem to be provided as a direct option under the drive mgt snap-in, but that doesn't always mean that it can't be done. Extended partitions were 'popular' with FAT32; not so much with NTFS. You can do it with the diskpart command if you need more than 4 partitions. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/300415 That's the answer then, thanks. I got in the habit of using extended partitions from the days when you couldn't control drive letter displacement. Never saw any reason to change that, but I suppose it's much less a factor now. Do you happen to know of any actual drawbacks in using extended partitions? Obviously I won't be installing bootable systems to them, but aside from that, I'm not aware of any adverse performance effects. No performance problems that I've ever heard of, just maintenance annoyances: e.g., removing an NTFS logical partition in an extended partition. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|