A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » General XP issues or comments
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Vista I will not be buying



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #166  
Old September 13th 05, 02:12 AM
David Schwartz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Shenan Stanley" wrote in message
...

Secondly - I did not compare missing features with features that would be
made impossible..
I gave a impossibility now that will likely continue to be an
impossibility.

It's not a missing feature - it is blocked.


What I'm concerned about is what people can legally do with their own
computers. If there is an intentional block but that block is not a
copyright enforcement mechanism, a person can legally circumvent that block.
It therefore doesn't affect what a person can legally do with their own
computers. However, blocks that constitute a copyright enforcement scheme
cannot be lawfully circumvented (unless each indvidual does it all by
himself with no help from anyone else) in the United States because of the
DMCA.

DS


Ads
  #169  
Old September 14th 05, 09:00 PM
Patrick Pierson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bush has a communications setup in Crwaford that enables him to chair
meeting with people all over the world. Everyone is on a tv screen and its
really no differnt from talking to them live.

So Bush could have responded as easily from Crawford as from the white
house. He did not respond quickly enough because he is not good at reacting
to new situaions. There is almost always a pause between when something
happens and when he starts to process it. But the problem is not the
communication set up, the problem is the speed of his internal respond time.









"Jone Doe" wrote in message
...
I'm thrilled you know so much about Mr. Bush. Do tell us more.

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
Bush has always been out of touch with anything that isn't WASPish and
Neuvo
O'leans is definatly not WASPish

"Leythos" wrote:

In article ,
says...
Like Bush staying on vacation for the last three days ignoring the
human
trajedy in the Gulf, instead doing EVERYTHING humanly possible to help
the Hurricane victims!

You really have no clue - do you really think that he's out of touch
when he's not in the white-house? Do you really think that he doesn't
have a group of advisors to communicate with all over the country for
all sorts of subjects....

Going back to the white-house and flying over the areas doesn't do
anything other than put a political spin on it so that people like you
can feel better that he's in his "place". In reality, he could run the
entire thing efficiently from just about anywhere in the country.

--


remove 999 in order to email me





  #170  
Old September 14th 05, 09:31 PM
holy dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Baaaaa Baaaa Baaaa you are a sheep

"Leythos" wrote:

In article , |@|.| says...
Between 12 and 24 hours later several reporters on the scene noted/saw
that Air Force I was flying at low altitude along the Gulf Coast.


You guys do understand that he doesn't have to be in the white house to
do his job, right?

He's fully in contact with the proper people no matter where he is in
the world.

--


remove 999 in order to email me

  #173  
Old September 15th 05, 09:31 PM
holy dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bush’s record speaks for itself. His illegal war in Iraq. Wanting to reverse
Roe Vs Wade. Making up words to try to hide the fact that he can’t
articulate. (Although this just shows his inability to speak properly).
Ignoring basic human rights in America. ETC ETC.

"Jone Doe" wrote:

Actions do indeed speak loudly.

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
i will not cast pearls before swine + actions speak louder than words

"Jone Doe" wrote:

I'm thrilled you know so much about Mr. Bush. Do tell us more.

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
Bush has always been out of touch with anything that isn't WASPish and
Neuvo
O'leans is definatly not WASPish

"Leythos" wrote:

In article ,
says...
Like Bush staying on vacation for the last three days ignoring the
human
trajedy in the Gulf, instead doing EVERYTHING humanly possible to
help
the Hurricane victims!

You really have no clue - do you really think that he's out of touch
when he's not in the white-house? Do you really think that he doesn't
have a group of advisors to communicate with all over the country for
all sorts of subjects....

Going back to the white-house and flying over the areas doesn't do
anything other than put a political spin on it so that people like you
can feel better that he's in his "place". In reality, he could run the
entire thing efficiently from just about anywhere in the country.

--


remove 999 in order to email me







  #174  
Old September 15th 05, 09:51 PM
Jone Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I was more referring to your actions. However..

..09/17/04 "ICH" -- During a BBC radio interview on Wednesday, UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan created a controversy by reiterating his long-held
position that the Iraq War was illegal because it breached the United
Nations Charter. On Thursday, the imperial leaders of the "Coalition of the
Willing" retaliated by vehemently arguing that their Iraq War was, to the
contrary, legal. http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle6917.htm

Was Voe v Wade legal in the first place? Is there anything in the
Constitution granting congress the right to kill the unborn in the first
place?

Want to give examples of your other two allegations?

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
Bush's record speaks for itself. His illegal war in Iraq. Wanting to
reverse
Roe Vs Wade. Making up words to try to hide the fact that he can't
articulate. (Although this just shows his inability to speak properly).
Ignoring basic human rights in America. ETC ETC.

"Jone Doe" wrote:

Actions do indeed speak loudly.

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
i will not cast pearls before swine + actions speak louder than words

"Jone Doe" wrote:

I'm thrilled you know so much about Mr. Bush. Do tell us more.

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
Bush has always been out of touch with anything that isn't WASPish
and
Neuvo
O'leans is definatly not WASPish

"Leythos" wrote:

In article ,
says...
Like Bush staying on vacation for the last three days ignoring
the
human
trajedy in the Gulf, instead doing EVERYTHING humanly possible to
help
the Hurricane victims!

You really have no clue - do you really think that he's out of
touch
when he's not in the white-house? Do you really think that he
doesn't
have a group of advisors to communicate with all over the country
for
all sorts of subjects....

Going back to the white-house and flying over the areas doesn't do
anything other than put a political spin on it so that people like
you
can feel better that he's in his "place". In reality, he could run
the
entire thing efficiently from just about anywhere in the country.

--


remove 999 in order to email me









  #175  
Old September 15th 05, 10:01 PM
holy dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Jone Doe" wrote:

Well, I was more referring to your actions. However..

..09/17/04 "ICH" -- During a BBC radio interview on Wednesday, UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan created a controversy by reiterating his long-held
position that the Iraq War was illegal because it breached the United
Nations Charter. On Thursday, the imperial leaders of the "Coalition of the
Willing" retaliated by vehemently arguing that their Iraq War was, to the
contrary, legal. http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle6917.htm

Was Voe v Wade legal in the first place? Is there anything in the
Constitution granting congress the right to kill the unborn in the first
place?


With a statement like that I can tell that you would not see the truth if it
hit in the face.

Want to give examples of your other two allegations?

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
Bush's record speaks for itself. His illegal war in Iraq. Wanting to
reverse
Roe Vs Wade. Making up words to try to hide the fact that he can't
articulate. (Although this just shows his inability to speak properly).
Ignoring basic human rights in America. ETC ETC.

"Jone Doe" wrote:

Actions do indeed speak loudly.

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
i will not cast pearls before swine + actions speak louder than words

"Jone Doe" wrote:

I'm thrilled you know so much about Mr. Bush. Do tell us more.

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
Bush has always been out of touch with anything that isn't WASPish
and
Neuvo
O'leans is definatly not WASPish

"Leythos" wrote:

In article ,
says...
Like Bush staying on vacation for the last three days ignoring
the
human
trajedy in the Gulf, instead doing EVERYTHING humanly possible to
help
the Hurricane victims!

You really have no clue - do you really think that he's out of
touch
when he's not in the white-house? Do you really think that he
doesn't
have a group of advisors to communicate with all over the country
for
all sorts of subjects....

Going back to the white-house and flying over the areas doesn't do
anything other than put a political spin on it so that people like
you
can feel better that he's in his "place". In reality, he could run
the
entire thing efficiently from just about anywhere in the country.

--


remove 999 in order to email me










  #176  
Old September 15th 05, 10:31 PM
Jone Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That's what I thought, you won't stand behind your comments.

"holy dog" wrote in message
...


"Jone Doe" wrote:

Well, I was more referring to your actions. However..

..09/17/04 "ICH" -- During a BBC radio interview on Wednesday, UN
Secretary
General Kofi Annan created a controversy by reiterating his long-held
position that the Iraq War was illegal because it breached the United
Nations Charter. On Thursday, the imperial leaders of the "Coalition of
the
Willing" retaliated by vehemently arguing that their Iraq War was, to the
contrary, legal.
http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle6917.htm

Was Voe v Wade legal in the first place? Is there anything in the
Constitution granting congress the right to kill the unborn in the first
place?


With a statement like that I can tell that you would not see the truth if
it
hit in the face.

Want to give examples of your other two allegations?

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
Bush's record speaks for itself. His illegal war in Iraq. Wanting to
reverse
Roe Vs Wade. Making up words to try to hide the fact that he can't
articulate. (Although this just shows his inability to speak properly).
Ignoring basic human rights in America. ETC ETC.

"Jone Doe" wrote:

Actions do indeed speak loudly.

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
i will not cast pearls before swine + actions speak louder than
words

"Jone Doe" wrote:

I'm thrilled you know so much about Mr. Bush. Do tell us more.

"holy dog" wrote in message
...
Bush has always been out of touch with anything that isn't
WASPish
and
Neuvo
O'leans is definatly not WASPish

"Leythos" wrote:

In article ,
says...
Like Bush staying on vacation for the last three days ignoring
the
human
trajedy in the Gulf, instead doing EVERYTHING humanly possible
to
help
the Hurricane victims!

You really have no clue - do you really think that he's out of
touch
when he's not in the white-house? Do you really think that he
doesn't
have a group of advisors to communicate with all over the
country
for
all sorts of subjects....

Going back to the white-house and flying over the areas doesn't
do
anything other than put a political spin on it so that people
like
you
can feel better that he's in his "place". In reality, he could
run
the
entire thing efficiently from just about anywhere in the
country.

--


remove 999 in order to email me












  #177  
Old September 16th 05, 05:52 AM
kurttrail
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jone Doe wrote:
Well, I was more referring to your actions. However..

.09/17/04 "ICH" -- During a BBC radio interview on Wednesday, UN
Secretary General Kofi Annan created a controversy by reiterating his
long-held position that the Iraq War was illegal because it breached
the United Nations Charter. On Thursday, the imperial leaders of the
"Coalition of the Willing" retaliated by vehemently arguing that
their Iraq War was, to the contrary, legal.
http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle6917.htm


Who cares? Iraq is the stupidest move by a President, since "Read My
Lips." It's even dumber than the stained blue dress since the only
person really hurt that didn't deserve it was Hillary.

The moment our troops leave Iraq, the Iraqi Civil War ratchets up into
high gear. The last helicopters to leave from the US embassy will be
under fire, just like Vietnam. The only difference between Vietnam and
Iraq will be that we won't be able to blame the French for getting
involved with Iraq.


Was Voe v Wade legal in the first place?


Yes. It is still legal precedent. It is a peculiar part of our gov't,
but when 5 or more members of the Supreme Court agree on something, that
something is legal, in every sense of the word.

Is there anything in the
Constitution granting congress the right to kill the unborn in the
first place? snip


Wrong way to look at it. Does the Constitution specifically grant a
bundle of stem cells growing in a woman's womb any rights at all?
Obviously not.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"


  #178  
Old September 16th 05, 01:45 PM
Plato
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

kurttrail wrote:

Who cares? Iraq is the stupidest move by a President, since "Read My
Lips." It's even dumber than the stained blue dress since the only
person really hurt that didn't deserve it was Hillary.


While the President can order a small military action at will, he is
limited by the Budget for the Department of Offense [misnamed the DOD or
dept of defense].

Any long term involvement HAS to be financed by the us congress, ie the
body that controls spending. If congress did not approve the last
several 100 billion dollars to invade iraq, the invasion would not have
occured.

  #179  
Old September 16th 05, 01:50 PM
Alias
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Plato" |@|.| wrote in message
...
kurttrail wrote:

Who cares? Iraq is the stupidest move by a President, since "Read My
Lips." It's even dumber than the stained blue dress since the only
person really hurt that didn't deserve it was Hillary.


While the President can order a small military action at will, he is
limited by the Budget for the Department of Offense [misnamed the DOD or
dept of defense].

Any long term involvement HAS to be financed by the us congress, ie the
body that controls spending. If congress did not approve the last
several 100 billion dollars to invade iraq, the invasion would not have
occured.


And had Bush told congress the truth, the funds would have never been
approved. The so called "coallition" went to war based on a pack of lies.

Alias


  #180  
Old September 16th 05, 03:28 PM
Peter A. Stavrakoglou
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Alias" wrote in message
...

And had Bush told congress the truth, the funds would have never been
approved. The so called "coallition" went to war based on a pack of lies.

Alias


So who was it that was doing the lying? Allow me to quote:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
is our bottom line."
President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We
want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9,
1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he
has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam
continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a
licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten
the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate
of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e
means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in
power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use
force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that
a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat,
and a grave threat, to our security and that of our allies in the Persian
Gulf region."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do"
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
.... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare,
and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
real..."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003


"I think that we were right to go. I think we were right to go to the United
Nations. I think we couldn’t let those who could veto in the Security
Council hold us hostage.

And I think Saddam Hussein, being gone is good. Good for the American
people, good for the security of that region of the world, and good for the
Iraqi people."
Sen. John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 13. 2003


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VISTA Operating System Peace General XP issues or comments 47 January 14th 06 01:30 AM
what programs will Windows Vista run? [email protected] General XP issues or comments 2 August 5th 05 06:10 PM
Microsoft Windows Vista Bulletin Board Frank Steinmetzger General XP issues or comments 4 August 4th 05 09:55 PM
Windows Vista Screenshots [email protected] General XP issues or comments 1 July 25th 05 04:31 AM
buying ram mathawk Windows XP Help and Support 4 January 23rd 05 03:38 AM






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.