If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
How to use Acronis to backup o/s ?
PA20Pilot wrote:
Hi again, Twain wrote ".......Sorry about the mis speak," No problem, I was pretty sure you let it slip by accidentally. ".......I do disagree that it's worth the lost time and machine cycles it takes to make clones" I just go watch TV ant let the box play with itself for a while. "......To me that's not a backup literally; it's a catastrophic recovery method" It's working well as my backup, everything is right here for the grabbing. ".......requiring a disk drive for each clone." I have ample disks so that's not a problem. ".......MBR and tables, etc., are in wrong places, so cloning that back to another hard disk would not result in a usable bootable drive." There's really no reason to clone back to anything, just run/boot the clone disk and when you get a chance reclone it to another spare drive. That's one of the reasons I like to clone instead of image, ease of recovery. If a master drive went to hell and all I had was an image I'd need to find another drive to put the image on while hoping I could find a non scratched CD to boot from. Since I've never played with image files, am I wrong in my assumption that an image file can't be restored to the disk it's on? It *can* be done, but it's generally a BAD idea to use it on the same drive. In Acronis True Image, that backup image would need to be put in the so-called Secure Zone (if on the same drive), and this adds a bit of complication (for one thing, the bootup process is somewhat modified). Another question of mine would be how much compression could I expect from an image? Let's say I have 10GB of data and image it. About what size would that image file be? With Acronis True Image, I have about 20 GB of data, and the corresponding image files are about 15 GB, so that's 75% of the original size. |
Ads |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Using Casper 5 disk-cloning program to clone multi-partitioned HDD
"Twayne" wrote:
... However, I have to add that there is no bar to using the Casper 5 disk-cloning program for that purpose as well. The only limitation(s) is the total amount of the user's data to be cloned and the disk-space available on the destination HDD, i.e., the recipient of the cloned contents. So, for example, if the user's data contents totaled 50 GB and the user's destination drive had a capacity of 500 GB, nearly ten (10) "generational" copies of the user's source drive could be maintained on the destination HDD. Anna I'm curious; I checked out Casper's site and I don't see references to things like that. There's probably good reason for that: they don't exist because the capability doesn't exist. From the past couple of days there seems to be strong evidence that "Anna" hasn't used Casper for anything other than cloning disk-to-disk. Have you actually ever created multiple "clones" to a single hard drive, and then used any of the interim clones to totally rebuild a new or formatted boot drive? And it worked? I have a suspicion it didn't/doesn't work; in fact, I'm reasonably sure, but ... would be interested in learning more about it if it's true. Here's some information I dug up: Each clone requires a hard drive. They do create a clone, and maintain the clone via copy/data management methods" Read about it he http://www.fssdev.com/products/casper/smartclone.aspx and here for Normal hype: http://www.fssdev.com/products/casper/ http://www.fssdev.com/ http://www.fssdev.com/products/casper/features.aspx It's classed as: Utilities : Backup/Copy Tools http://www.filebuzz.com/fileinfo/42540/Casper.html Some How tos: http://www.eggheadcafe.com/software/...ckup-of-a.aspx Backing up a complete system with either “Image” or “Cloning” software. What’s the difference? http://www.sctxca.org/export/sites/d...sperbackup.pdf Page 3 of the above has probably the clearest, concise definition of clone/image I've seen yet. Cloning vs IMaging: The two procedures are similar, but yet so different in how they are formed and how they can be used. To clone a hard drive the clone should be copied directly to another hard drive. That hard drive can either be external or internal. They need not be of the same size. To image a hard drive the image is much smaller that the original and can be place on many different storage devises such as CD, DVD and other hard drives. They can be internal or external. To recover with a clone it is only necessary to boot up the clone. Nothing else needs to be done. To recover an image a boot up disc (often the disk that made the clone) is placed in the CD drawer and the computer is booted from that. It then needs the image disc to restore the computer to its original state. Different programs handle this recover in different ways Recovery with a clone is faster and in my opinion more reliable, but it does necessitate having a second hard drive, preferable internal. Another point in favor of a clone is that is simple to check the clone to see if it works. Just reboot the computer and in the BIOS change the boot order of the drives. To check an image it is destructive and if is not good you have ruined your day. You can check the validity of a backup image by running a backup validate which completely rebuilds the disk image in memory and validates that the whole backup could be restored without error. Still? There's a lot more but that should assist anyone wanting to do some reading. I've purposely not bothered with anything negative because IMO it's not called for. What Casper has created is a new methodology for backup systems that can logically even take an existing clone and modify it (incremental, if you will) to create a new clone from the old one by moving data and inserting it where it needs to be in order to keep it as a "clone". So, the end result, even after running an incremental or differential clone, I forget what they called it, does actually create a new clone from the old one, rather than by creating a completly new clone copy. The first link above I think it was, shows that process rather well. They have managed to take one of the best concepts of imaging, incremental backups, and added it to the cloning feature but without creating new files and instead revising data locations in the current clone to place the new/changed data into the same data slots on the clone as they are onthe hard disk, thus maintaining the same addresses of data inthe clone as are used on the hard disk. AFAIK other low-priced Clone software programs don't do that, or even many of the pay-fors in the same price range as Casper. That's a good step forward. Imaging software doesn't do that until you go to Restore it. But, imaging software still carries the advantage of being to restore only an incremental as opposed to the entire backup, which the cloning operation can't to. So that part comes down to whether the user cares or not. I do, but many may not. There are a few other things like that too, but they all come down to user preference. As for time to make a clone and increment it, there is nothing special there. It works in the background like many do to create the first clone, a time consuing operation for any software, and depending on the amount of data in the incremental to the clone is a little slower than imaging because instead of simply creating another file, it has to move data around so it can be inserted into the right places inside the clone and that can take anything from a pretty short time to a long time, depending on how many changes there are and how much data has to be moved around inside the clone. If something is added at the end of the clone, it's quicker than if something were added at the beginning, requiring possibly many gigabytes of information to be slid over xx bytes to make room for the new data write. Again, see http://www.fssdev.com/products/casper/smartclone.aspx for an example of how that works. OTOH, time is of little consequence unless it occurs while the opearator is sitting at the keyboard. Any program worth its existance will do the monkey work in the background and works by schedule and unattended. So Casper isn't too shoddy at all. At $60-$70 I think it's priced a bit steeply for what it does, but ... if it's reliable and support is available, it could work well for a lot of people if they haven't built in auto-obsoletion a la Microsoft's practicesg. One will still get more features and better control over everything with most imaging applications than with Casper or one of its competitors. I'll be sticking with imaging because I use a lot of the features Casper can't offer plus I can also clone anytime I need to. This thread was good for getting me to thinking about my backup situation and to consider whether it was enough or not, and I think it is; I have the best of both worlds this way. Should anyone wonder, I use Ghost14 for backups; a tad more expensive than Acronis was, but the extra bells & whistles are handy too. And of course all recommend the all-important external disk drives, which are now very reasonably priced all the way up to a Terabyte. Of no consequence, but should anyone wonder: Machine 1: XP Pro SP3, Pentium 4, 2.7 GHz, 1 Gig RAM, 5 physical drives, two of the externals for swapping on alternate days for backups, 7 USB peripherals, no firewire. Machine 2: Dell dual Xeon, 1 Gig RAM, 2 SCSI drives, 1 IDE, Windows 2000 Server Edition SP4, used as a sandbox. Only the OS is backed up; carries little keepable data. Machine 3: Laptop, P4, 1.7 GHz, 512 RAM, 80 Gig drive. Carried off premises for whatever; kept synced with this machine, backed up to the 1 TB drive as required. . All are backed up to the 1 TB external drive monthly or as required, depending on use/activity. This machine does a full backup once per month, nightly incrementals in between. Other machines as required. Cheers, Twayne |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Using Casper 5 disk-cloning program to clone multi-partitioned HDD
Mike Torello wrote:
"Twayne" wrote: ... However, I have to add that there is no bar to using the Casper 5 disk-cloning program for that purpose as well. The only limitation(s) is the total amount of the user's data to be cloned and the disk-space available on the destination HDD, i.e., the recipient of the cloned contents. So, for example, if the user's data contents totaled 50 GB and the user's destination drive had a capacity of 500 GB, nearly ten (10) "generational" copies of the user's source drive could be maintained on the destination HDD. Anna I'm curious; I checked out Casper's site and I don't see references to things like that. There's probably good reason for that: they don't exist because the capability doesn't exist. From the past couple of days there seems to be strong evidence that "Anna" hasn't used Casper for anything other than cloning disk-to-disk. Wait a minute. Are you stating that Casper CANNOT do just partition copying? That is, simply backup a partition to unallocated space on the other drive? And that Casper can ONLY clone the entire source disk over to a destination disk, and NOT do multiple, generational, partition backups to the destination drive, like Partition Magic and Boot IT NG can? (Casper is the only program of the four we've discussed that I have no real experience with). |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
How to use Acronis to backup o/s ?
Hi Bill,
.......... that's 75% of the original size. That's about what I would have guessed. .......... an image file can't be restored to the disk it's on? It *can* be done, but it's generally a BAD idea to use it on the same drive. That also would have been my guess. So, if the master hard drive goes bad, throws a rod through the case and the oil starts running down the front of the desk, you better go out and buy another if you want to get up and running again anytime soon. I think I'll stick with my clones. Thanks! ---==X={}=X==--- Jim Self AVIATION ANIMATION, the internet's largest depository. http://avanimation.avsupport.com Your only internet source for spiral staircase plans. http://jself.com/stair/Stair.htm Experimental Aircraft Association #140897 EAA Technical Counselor #4562 |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
How to use Acronis to backup o/s ?
PA20Pilot wrote:
Hi Bill, ......... that's 75% of the original size. That's about what I would have guessed. ......... an image file can't be restored to the disk it's on? It *can* be done, but it's generally a BAD idea to use it on the same drive. That also would have been my guess. So, if the master hard drive goes bad, throws a rod through the case and the oil starts running down the front of the desk, you better go out and buy another if you want to get up and running again anytime soon. Plus some other disadvantages of using the Secure Zone, as I mentioned. I think I'll stick with my clones. Thanks! OR one can use images stored on a secondary drive (if using an imagining program). |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
Using Casper 5 disk-cloning program to clone multi-partitioned HDD
"Bill in Co." wrote:
Mike Torello wrote: "Twayne" wrote: ... However, I have to add that there is no bar to using the Casper 5 disk-cloning program for that purpose as well. The only limitation(s) is the total amount of the user's data to be cloned and the disk-space available on the destination HDD, i.e., the recipient of the cloned contents. So, for example, if the user's data contents totaled 50 GB and the user's destination drive had a capacity of 500 GB, nearly ten (10) "generational" copies of the user's source drive could be maintained on the destination HDD. Anna I'm curious; I checked out Casper's site and I don't see references to things like that. There's probably good reason for that: they don't exist because the capability doesn't exist. From the past couple of days there seems to be strong evidence that "Anna" hasn't used Casper for anything other than cloning disk-to-disk. Wait a minute. Are you stating that Casper CANNOT do just partition copying? That is, simply backup a partition to unallocated space on the other drive? And that Casper can ONLY clone the entire source disk over to a destination disk, and NOT do multiple, generational, partition backups to the destination drive, like Partition Magic and Boot IT NG can? (Casper is the only program of the four we've discussed that I have no real experience with). Someone here did testing trying to clone a multi-partitioned drive every-which-way-possible and said that Casper destroys everything on the destination disk when cloning and that there is even a warning message to that effect. Right after that "Anna" backtracked and said that person was correct. From that I gathered that yes, it WILL clone a partition to unallocated space - by making the entire drive unallocated space before performing the clone. I would download the trial version but it's crippled. |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Using Casper 5 disk-cloning program to clone multi-partitioned HDD
Mike Torello wrote:
"Bill in Co." wrote: Mike Torello wrote: "Twayne" wrote: ... However, I have to add that there is no bar to using the Casper 5 disk-cloning program for that purpose as well. The only limitation(s) is the total amount of the user's data to be cloned and the disk-space available on the destination HDD, i.e., the recipient of the cloned contents. So, for example, if the user's data contents totaled 50 GB and the user's destination drive had a capacity of 500 GB, nearly ten (10) "generational" copies of the user's source drive could be maintained on the destination HDD. Anna I'm curious; I checked out Casper's site and I don't see references to things like that. There's probably good reason for that: they don't exist because the capability doesn't exist. From the past couple of days there seems to be strong evidence that "Anna" hasn't used Casper for anything other than cloning disk-to-disk. Wait a minute. Are you stating that Casper CANNOT do just partition copying? That is, simply backup a partition to unallocated space on the other drive? And that Casper can ONLY clone the entire source disk over to a destination disk, and NOT do multiple, generational, partition backups to the destination drive, like Partition Magic and Boot IT NG can? (Casper is the only program of the four we've discussed that I have no real experience with). Someone here did testing trying to clone a multi-partitioned drive every-which-way-possible and said that Casper destroys everything on the destination disk when cloning and that there is even a warning message to that effect. Right after that "Anna" backtracked and said that person was correct. From that I gathered that yes, it WILL clone a partition to unallocated space - by making the entire drive unallocated space before performing the clone. Ahhhh. Now THAT is a key and important distinction!! So Casper will ONLY allow the source drive to be transferred to the destination drive and nothing else can remain on the destination drive? Not nice. But ok, IF you SOLELY want a clone of the source drive. With Partition Magic and BootIT NG you CAN do selective, individual partition copies, but I don't think you can simply make a clone of the source drive, per se, or at least not in one easy operation. (But I haven't ever investigated that possibility, however) |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
How to use Acronis to backup o/s ?
Hi again,
Twain wrote ".......Sorry about the mis speak," No problem, I was pretty sure you let it slip by accidentally. ".......I do disagree that it's worth the lost time and machine cycles it takes to make clones" I just go watch TV ant let the box play with itself for a while. "......To me that's not a backup literally; it's a catastrophic recovery method" It's working well as my backup, everything is right here for the grabbing. ".......requiring a disk drive for each clone." I have ample disks so that's not a problem. lol, Well, that would sure help the multi-version historical kind of thing! I can see where it would be workable though. ".......MBR and tables, etc., are in wrong places, so cloning that back to another hard disk would not result in a usable bootable drive." There's really no reason to clone back to anything, just run/boot the clone disk and when you get a chance reclone it to another spare drive. Right; I was referring to multiple cloes on one disk; only one would be able to occupy the boot sectors at a time, etc.. MInor detail in the overall scheme of things I guess. That's one of the reasons I like to clone instead of image, ease of recovery. If a master drive went to hell and all I had was an image I'd need to find another drive to put the image on while hoping I could find a non scratched CD to boot from. Umm, no. The imaging programs come with a .iso that you burn a bootable Emergency Recovery Disk CD from. That CD has, in my case, Ghost on it, is bootable, and when it comes up, lets me tell it where the images reside, which is normally on an external drive but could be any functioning drive connected to the machine. So you toss the CD in, boot on it, and browse to your images to tell it where they are, then pick which image you want to use to reset the drive to the time of the image. You only need the CD in the case of a belly-up system drive; otherwise just run the program; in my case Ghost. Since I've never played with image files, am I wrong in my assumption that an image file can't be restored to the disk it's on? Sure. The default is to return the files to the same folders/drive they were originally on, which is logical. You can choose an alternate location if you wish, or even to a flat folder if you want. So if you want to recover say a specific file, you use Explorer to locate it, mark it for recovery, tick the box if you don't want it to go back to where it came from, and click OK. Another question of mine would be how much compression could I expect from an image? Let's say I have 10GB of data and image it. About what size would that image file be? That would depend on what you're backing up and the compression provided by the imaging program, really. My version of Ghost claims a 40% average with a couple more intense settings of 45 & 50% IIRC. Other versions had different numbers. It's pretty much equivalent to zipping: Some files will shrink almost none, some a lot. My System Drive, mostly executables, DLLs and the like and a boatload of logs, compresses to about 80 - 85%. My E drive, which contains a lot of text or text-like programs and no executables or DLLs or the like, compresses to about 30-35% it original size in some of the incrementals. In the full backup, it's closer to 50% shrinkage overall. Just like a zip program, it depends on what's being zipped. I do have some images on that drive that don't compress (jpeg & png) so they tend to skew the numbers. I have experimented a but and neither XP's zip feature nor WinZip, unless you use the most aggressive zip setting, doesn't make the files any smaller, so ... I'd assume they're pretty much similar in the overall. I've no idea what Ghost uses for a compression algo, probably the public legacy zip algo, but it doesn't slow things down a lot. Since I only run backups at night 98% of the time and in real time they become low affinity tasks, I don't really care, but when I first got the program I was pretty curious. One of the things I like about Ghost (Acronis is probably the same) is whenever anything is installed or uninstalled, it makes a new backup right there in real time, immediately. If any other drive sees a space change of over 500 Meg (Programmable), added or deted, it'll also trigger an immediate real time backup for that drive. They're incrementals, of course. I don't use differentials but they're available, as are cloning features. Quite honeslty, I'm not sure which is better; a cloner or an imager, except that the imagers all seem to also clone, but cloners don't image. Newbies and those who don't want to see what goes on would probably benefit the most from cloning as Casper has set it up, but other clone programs don't do what Casper does, so it's caveat emptor there. Casper is closer to a one button solution where imaging provides more choices, features and controls, which are ony "good" if they're useful to the user and he wants to use them. If Casper weren't so expensive compared to its competitors & imagers I might get behind seeing if it's, to me, actually as recommendable as the users here think it is. But for a couple dollars more you can go to branded imaging software and actually have the best of both worlds, IMO. I have to admit it's an interesting program and I kind of wonder what it's going to be in the future - as in, adding imaging capabilities or ... ? Thanks! Happy to provide what I can. Cheers, Twayne ---==X={}=X==--- Jim Self AVIATION ANIMATION, the internet's largest depository. http://avanimation.avsupport.com Your only internet source for spiral staircase plans. http://jself.com/stair/Stair.htm Experimental Aircraft Association #140897 EAA Technical Counselor #4562 |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
How to use Acronis to backup o/s ?
PA20Pilot wrote:
Hi again, Twain wrote ".......Sorry about the mis speak," No problem, I was pretty sure you let it slip by accidentally. ".......I do disagree that it's worth the lost time and machine cycles it takes to make clones" I just go watch TV ant let the box play with itself for a while. "......To me that's not a backup literally; it's a catastrophic recovery method" It's working well as my backup, everything is right here for the grabbing. ".......requiring a disk drive for each clone." I have ample disks so that's not a problem. ".......MBR and tables, etc., are in wrong places, so cloning that back to another hard disk would not result in a usable bootable drive." There's really no reason to clone back to anything, just run/boot the clone disk and when you get a chance reclone it to another spare drive. That's one of the reasons I like to clone instead of image, ease of recovery. If a master drive went to hell and all I had was an image I'd need to find another drive to put the image on while hoping I could find a non scratched CD to boot from. Since I've never played with image files, am I wrong in my assumption that an image file can't be restored to the disk it's on? It *can* be done, but it's generally a BAD idea to use it on the same drive. In Acronis True Image, that backup image would need to be put in the so-called Secure Zone (if on the same drive), and this adds a bit of complication (for one thing, the bootup process is somewhat modified). Maybe a misunderstanding here? He asked about restoring to the same disk it's on. It would work fine but as you indicate isn't advisable if the image is being stored on the same drive it's backing up. Some programs would even go into a cyclic copy mode and never be able to get out of it. In other words, trying to back itself up, getting done, veryfying, finding the original changed, backing it up again, finding yet more new files and backing up again, and ... I think you get the pictureG. But w/r to Restoring, you can either let the default put the file back where it came from or choose an alternate location which could be anywhere, including the drive the image resides on. Assuming the disk were healty, it would work fine. Another question of mine would be how much compression could I expect from an image? Let's say I have 10GB of data and image it. About what size would that image file be? With Acronis True Image, I have about 20 GB of data, and the corresponding image files are about 15 GB, so that's 75% of the original size. Yup; the amount of compression depends on what's being compressed. Some things compress a lot, others not so much. I see values all over the map in my Ghost backup ratios, from 0 to around 50%, even more in some cases. Cheers, Twayne |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
Using Casper 5 disk-cloning program to clone multi-partitioned HDD
"Bill in Co." wrote:
Mike Torello wrote: "Bill in Co." wrote: Mike Torello wrote: "Twayne" wrote: ... However, I have to add that there is no bar to using the Casper 5 disk-cloning program for that purpose as well. The only limitation(s) is the total amount of the user's data to be cloned and the disk-space available on the destination HDD, i.e., the recipient of the cloned contents. So, for example, if the user's data contents totaled 50 GB and the user's destination drive had a capacity of 500 GB, nearly ten (10) "generational" copies of the user's source drive could be maintained on the destination HDD. Anna I'm curious; I checked out Casper's site and I don't see references to things like that. There's probably good reason for that: they don't exist because the capability doesn't exist. From the past couple of days there seems to be strong evidence that "Anna" hasn't used Casper for anything other than cloning disk-to-disk. Wait a minute. Are you stating that Casper CANNOT do just partition copying? That is, simply backup a partition to unallocated space on the other drive? And that Casper can ONLY clone the entire source disk over to a destination disk, and NOT do multiple, generational, partition backups to the destination drive, like Partition Magic and Boot IT NG can? (Casper is the only program of the four we've discussed that I have no real experience with). Someone here did testing trying to clone a multi-partitioned drive every-which-way-possible and said that Casper destroys everything on the destination disk when cloning and that there is even a warning message to that effect. Right after that "Anna" backtracked and said that person was correct. From that I gathered that yes, it WILL clone a partition to unallocated space - by making the entire drive unallocated space before performing the clone. Ahhhh. Now THAT is a key and important distinction!! So Casper will ONLY allow the source drive to be transferred to the destination drive and nothing else can remain on the destination drive? Not nice. But ok, IF you SOLELY want a clone of the source drive. With Partition Magic and BootIT NG you CAN do selective, individual partition copies, but I don't think you can simply make a clone of the source drive, per se, or at least not in one easy operation. (But I haven't ever investigated that possibility, however) Go for it. |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
Using Casper 5 disk-cloning program to clone multi-partitioned HDD
WaIIy wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:13:43 -0600, Mike Torello wrote: "Anna" wrote: However, I have to add that there is no bar to using the Casper 5 disk-cloning program for that purpose as well. The only limitation(s) is the total amount of the user's data to be cloned and the disk-space available on the destination HDD, i.e., the recipient of the cloned contents. So, for example, if the user's data contents totaled 50 GB and the user's destination drive had a capacity of 500 GB, nearly ten (10) "generational" copies of the user's source drive could be maintained on the destination HDD. HOW!? If Casper's "Copy Drive" is used, it destroys ALL data/partitions on the destination drive before making the clone. I thought that was firmly established in the past couple of days! me too With Casper you have the option to" Copy an entire hard disk" that option takes the whole destination drive and makes a clone. The other option to "Copy a specific drive" will not wipe out the destination disk and you can keep as many copies as you have room, but I think on different partitions of the destination disk. Have you tried that? I might just buy Casper and see for myself. I need something new to play with ;-D |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
Using Casper 5 disk-cloning program to clone multi-partitioned HDD
WaIIy wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:55:08 -0500, PA20Pilot wrote: Hi, Mike Torello wrote......"Have you ever restored from a clone on an external drive?" I use a removeable carraage so I can turn the key and place any hard drive I want in the holder. It's a lot like an external, but I an slap any drive I need to in there whenever it's needed. This setup works very well for me, might not be your choice though. I can handle that. Wally wrote......Here ! Here ! Pick me Pick me Sorry, I don't need any games right now. Oh, I see you are above it all. I've restored from an external drive in an enclosure and it works fine. I never questioned that. What I was questioning when I asked "Have you ever restored from a clone on an external drive?" was its speed compared to restoring from an image. I'll bet there is little if any difference. Ps Learn what a delimiter is, when you have the time that is. |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
Using Casper 5 disk-cloning program to clone multi-partitioned HDD
WaIIy wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:44:02 -0600, Mike Torello wrote: WaIIy wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:13:43 -0600, Mike Torello wrote: "Anna" wrote: However, I have to add that there is no bar to using the Casper 5 disk-cloning program for that purpose as well. The only limitation(s) is the total amount of the user's data to be cloned and the disk-space available on the destination HDD, i.e., the recipient of the cloned contents. So, for example, if the user's data contents totaled 50 GB and the user's destination drive had a capacity of 500 GB, nearly ten (10) "generational" copies of the user's source drive could be maintained on the destination HDD. HOW!? If Casper's "Copy Drive" is used, it destroys ALL data/partitions on the destination drive before making the clone. I thought that was firmly established in the past couple of days! me too With Casper you have the option to" Copy an entire hard disk" that option takes the whole destination drive and makes a clone. The other option to "Copy a specific drive" will not wipe out the destination disk and you can keep as many copies as you have room, but I think on different partitions of the destination disk. Have you tried that? The short answer is no. I clone my c drive to an external enclosure. I have an internal drive with two partitions. I copy my main drive to one of the partitions and have some misc, stuff on the second partition. Copying the drive (not cloning) doesn't touch my second partition. Casper just asks me where I want to copy to. OK. That answers it for me. You saved me fifty bucks (but it would still be fun to play with Casper, even if I don't need it). I "assume" it would not be a problem if I didn't have anything on the second partition and made a copy of my drive there, too. I might just buy Casper and see for myself. I need something new to play with ;-D |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
How to use Acronis to backup o/s ?
Hi again,
Thanks! ---==X={}=X==--- Jim Self AVIATION ANIMATION, the internet's largest depository. http://avanimation.avsupport.com Your only internet source for spiral staircase plans. http://jself.com/stair/Stair.htm Experimental Aircraft Association #140897 EAA Technical Counselor #4562 |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
Using Casper 5 disk-cloning program to clone multi-partitionedHDD
Wally wrote....."Oh, I see you are above it all." I'm glad you caught that on the first try. Good boy! ---==X={}=X==--- Jim Self AVIATION ANIMATION, the internet's largest depository. http://avanimation.avsupport.com Your only internet source for spiral staircase plans. http://jself.com/stair/Stair.htm Experimental Aircraft Association #140897 EAA Technical Counselor #4562 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|