A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » New Users to Windows XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

now using a small ramdisk



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 12th 08, 01:05 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
umwhat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default now using a small ramdisk

Farstones ram disk.
I am curious, I have put the temp folder in a ram disk and I think it is
rendering that is now taking place much faster and the screensaver seems
remarkably improved following a farstone tech's advice...thank the lord for
him or her...anh...
What else can I do with the Ram Disk. It seems I can make some more ram
disks so what can I do with them to improve performance.
Farstones software lets the settings be saved after a reboot.
oh, I almost forgot. What is the maximum size for a Ram Disk in Windows XP
Home Editin. I tried 1GB but no, Windows complained. 256MBs is going ok. How
big would I want the ram disks I use anyway....?
I do play some computer games, the biggest size of the largest game
application is about 3.5GBs.

--
....scribble...scribble...scribble...
Ads
  #2  
Old October 13th 08, 06:46 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Xandros[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 184
Default now using a small ramdisk

To learn more about your software product consult the manufacturer.

--

Xandros


"umwhat" wrote in message
...
Farstones ram disk.
I am curious, I have put the temp folder in a ram disk and I think it is
rendering that is now taking place much faster and the screensaver seems
remarkably improved following a farstone tech's advice...thank the lord
for
him or her...anh...
What else can I do with the Ram Disk. It seems I can make some more ram
disks so what can I do with them to improve performance.
Farstones software lets the settings be saved after a reboot.
oh, I almost forgot. What is the maximum size for a Ram Disk in Windows XP
Home Editin. I tried 1GB but no, Windows complained. 256MBs is going ok.
How
big would I want the ram disks I use anyway....?
I do play some computer games, the biggest size of the largest game
application is about 3.5GBs.

--
...scribble...scribble...scribble...



  #3  
Old October 13th 08, 01:08 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
LVTravel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 378
Default now using a small ramdisk



While I am not familiar with the RAM disk program (Farstones) you are using
unless it can use RAM above 4 GB that may be installed, for Windows XP Home
Ed. I would think any RAM disk would be counterproductive. Using a RAM disk
takes away from the normal (base) RAM that the OS and any running programs
can use and then causes the computer to place extra data or program code in
the computer's swap drive if the RAM is totally occupied. Considering that
XP Home can use a maximum of about 3 - 3.5 GB of installed RAM (depending on
hardware installed) you would be taking memory away from your computer games
or other memory intensive programs you may run.

Another issue that you may encounter with transferring a temp folder to a
RAM disk is that it can only use the maximum size of that RAM set aside for
it. If it is on the hard disk it will expand out to the full size of the
drive which is probably many times the size available for any RAM disk. It
the maximum file size hits the RAM disk size "wall" the program is going to
crash and probably without any errors.

After writing the above, I actually went to the web site of the program,
http://www.farstone.com/software/virtual-hard-drive.htm, and while it is
fantastic reading as most advertising is, I really liked the part about
putting a data base on the RAM disk "Databases, Custom applications with
high input and output, high bandwidth, or high security requirements." Man
I can see having a power outage and having my database on a RAM disk. All
would be instantly lost. I saw nothing in their literature about using
extra RAM so what you are using is the RAM that the OS and programs could
use.

Sounds like SPAM to me!


  #4  
Old October 13th 08, 01:56 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
John John (MVP)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,010
Default now using a small ramdisk

LVTravel wrote:

While I am not familiar with the RAM disk program (Farstones) you are using
unless it can use RAM above 4 GB that may be installed,


RAM Disk utilities can only use the RAM that the operating system can
recognize and make available, these utilities cannot enable 32-bit
Windows client operating systems to see or use more RAM than the
operating system can, they (RAMDisks) still rely on the Windows Memory
Manager to obtain memory allocations.

John
  #5  
Old October 13th 08, 03:51 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Ken Blake, MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,402
Default now using a small ramdisk

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:08:26 -0400, "LVTravel"
wrote:



While I am not familiar with the RAM disk program (Farstones) you are using
unless it can use RAM above 4 GB that may be installed, for Windows XP Home
Ed. I would think any RAM disk would be counterproductive. Using a RAM disk
takes away from the normal (base) RAM that the OS and any running programs
can use and then causes the computer to place extra data or program code in
the computer's swap drive if the RAM is totally occupied. Considering that
XP Home can use a maximum of about 3 - 3.5 GB of installed RAM (depending on
hardware installed) you would be taking memory away from your computer games
or other memory intensive programs you may run.



The RAM disk is like any other application, and can only use the RAM
that's available to Windows. So if you have 4GB and 3GB Of it is
available, part of that is all that's available to the RAM Disk.

In general, using a RAM disk under Windows has been a poor idea, and
not good for performance, since it removes RAM from being available to
Windows and what it's normally doing. However if someone clearly has
more RAM than he can make use of (most people running XP with 4GB are
in that category) that's not a problem.


Another issue that you may encounter with transferring a temp
folder to a RAM disk is that it can only use the maximum size
of that RAM set aside for it. If it is on the hard disk it will
expand out to the full size of the drive which is probably many
times the size available for any RAM disk.



Correct, and a good example of a bad use of a RAM disk

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
  #6  
Old October 13th 08, 05:10 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
LVTravel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 378
Default now using a small ramdisk



"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:08:26 -0400, "LVTravel"
wrote:



While I am not familiar with the RAM disk program (Farstones) you are
using
unless it can use RAM above 4 GB that may be installed, for Windows XP
Home
Ed. I would think any RAM disk would be counterproductive. Using a RAM
disk
takes away from the normal (base) RAM that the OS and any running
programs
can use and then causes the computer to place extra data or program code
in
the computer's swap drive if the RAM is totally occupied. Considering
that
XP Home can use a maximum of about 3 - 3.5 GB of installed RAM (depending
on
hardware installed) you would be taking memory away from your computer
games
or other memory intensive programs you may run.



The RAM disk is like any other application, and can only use the RAM
that's available to Windows. So if you have 4GB and 3GB Of it is
available, part of that is all that's available to the RAM Disk.

In general, using a RAM disk under Windows has been a poor idea, and
not good for performance, since it removes RAM from being available to
Windows and what it's normally doing. However if someone clearly has
more RAM than he can make use of (most people running XP with 4GB are
in that category) that's not a problem.


Another issue that you may encounter with transferring a temp
folder to a RAM disk is that it can only use the maximum size
of that RAM set aside for it. If it is on the hard disk it will
expand out to the full size of the drive which is probably many
times the size available for any RAM disk.



Correct, and a good example of a bad use of a RAM disk

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup


To Ken & John John, that is why I stated "unless it can" in my response. I
know of no way for a program to "reach over" what is available in XP 32 or
Vista 32 bit systems and did not think this RAM disk program could do so.
The only reason I stated that "unless it can" was back in the old DOS days
DOS could only see 640 MB RAM and everything else was considered Extended
Memory that a RAM disk could access with the correct memory managers in
place.

You both generally just validated exactly what I said. Thanks.


  #7  
Old October 13th 08, 10:34 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Ken Blake, MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,402
Default now using a small ramdisk

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:10:57 -0400, "LVTravel"
wrote:



"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:08:26 -0400, "LVTravel"
wrote:



While I am not familiar with the RAM disk program (Farstones) you are
using
unless it can use RAM above 4 GB that may be installed, for Windows XP
Home
Ed. I would think any RAM disk would be counterproductive. Using a RAM
disk
takes away from the normal (base) RAM that the OS and any running
programs
can use and then causes the computer to place extra data or program code
in
the computer's swap drive if the RAM is totally occupied. Considering
that
XP Home can use a maximum of about 3 - 3.5 GB of installed RAM (depending
on
hardware installed) you would be taking memory away from your computer
games
or other memory intensive programs you may run.



The RAM disk is like any other application, and can only use the RAM
that's available to Windows. So if you have 4GB and 3GB Of it is
available, part of that is all that's available to the RAM Disk.

In general, using a RAM disk under Windows has been a poor idea, and
not good for performance, since it removes RAM from being available to
Windows and what it's normally doing. However if someone clearly has
more RAM than he can make use of (most people running XP with 4GB are
in that category) that's not a problem.


Another issue that you may encounter with transferring a temp
folder to a RAM disk is that it can only use the maximum size
of that RAM set aside for it. If it is on the hard disk it will
expand out to the full size of the drive which is probably many
times the size available for any RAM disk.



Correct, and a good example of a bad use of a RAM disk

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup


To Ken & John John, that is why I stated "unless it can" in my response. I
know of no way for a program to "reach over" what is available in XP 32 or
Vista 32 bit systems and did not think this RAM disk program could do so.
The only reason I stated that "unless it can" was back in the old DOS days
DOS could only see 640 MB RAM and everything else was considered Extended
Memory that a RAM disk could access with the correct memory managers in
place.

You both generally just validated exactly what I said. Thanks.



You're welcome. I didn't mean to disagree with you, just to clarify a
point or two.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.