A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » New Users to Windows XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 18th 09, 12:28 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly
attempt to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the
public will come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think
this group could use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any of
the upcoming links and references; they are simply that which the web
was/is intended for: The dispersal of information.

Although I didn't bother to read them, I did notice the latest cacophony
over Registry Cleaners by the typical group of misinformationists and
ignorant sock-puppets that usually accrue when someone disagrees with
any of them that Registry Cleaners do and will continue to, have a valid
place in most anyone's toolbox of troubleshooting utilities. I'm fairly
sure they'll repeat their silliness here. Oh, and I even came across a
white-paper dated in 2006 I hadn't seen before, but I'm not going to
expose it until one of the narcissistic egos here presents some valid
information for their own claims that there does not exist a Registry
Cleaner that is any good, that won't damage a system, and that will
eventually make the system unbootable, separate from the causes of ANY
program that could cause that to happen.

So whether you're just curious or are looking for a decent Registry
Cleaner, here's a list of reviews of them from several different places.
There are a lot more but I hoped I would find just one site that made a
full comparison of all of them in one place. Not finding that, I
settled for the following:

Ever wonder how Registry Cleaners compare?
Ever wonder if opinions on their outputs are similar from place to place
where different opinions appear?

http://registryrepaircompare.com/
RegCure was #1

Registry Cleaner Reviews:
http://www.registrycleanersreviewed.com/
RegCure made #1

Registry Cleaner Geeks
http://www.registrycleanergeeks.com/
RegCure came out #1

5 Registry Cleaner Reviews: Which Is The Best?
http://www.registrycleaner-reviews.org/
RegCure was on top

Advanced Registry Cleaner
http://registry-repair-software-revi...er-review.html
Not all that great. Techie. Limited Features.

Registry Cleaner Reviews
http://www.registrycleanerreviews4u....are_chart.html
RegistryEasy won, but ... they also sell that oneg.

Registry Cleaners Reviewed
http://www.registrycleanerreview.us/
and RegCure won yet again.

A discussion on cleaners (toward the bottom of the page)
http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=171203805

The "best" Registry Cleaner?
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-6138_102...hreadID=116309
Discussion

A pretty bad Registry Cleaner: Complete Registry Cleaner 1.0
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1585462,00.asp


RegCure seems to be doing pretty good even with their last little
glitch. What I'd really like to see is a comparison of the freebie
Registry Cleaners versus the pay-fors; maybe next time.

If you don't think a Registry Cleaner is worth using, that's fine and
your perogative. But forcing, intimidating and shoving others to share
your misguided opinions is just plain wrong.

Twayne`
--

--
Regards,

Wrong does not cease to be wrong
because the loud ones scream it consistently. -Me





Ads
  #2  
Old July 18th 09, 01:00 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Marianne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 55
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

What a fscking blithering idiot! You don't have a closed mind, you're
closed at the other end and it's coming out of your ears sideways! You
don't know anything about the registry and you repeatedly stick both feet in
your mouth every time you talk about it, why don't you just STFU and stop it
with your idiotic rambling! The last thing "New Users" need is stupid
registry advice from a troll like you!


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly attempt
to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the public will
come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think this group could
use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any of the
upcoming links and references;


Idiot! Of course you are spamming, you are posting *unsolicited* commercial
material, that is spam you fool. Go stick your head in a vise and leave us
alone with your stupid registry cleaners!

M


  #3  
Old July 18th 09, 01:00 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Marianne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 55
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

What a fscking blithering idiot! You don't have a closed mind, you're
closed at the other end and it's coming out of your ears sideways! You
don't know anything about the registry and you repeatedly stick both feet in
your mouth every time you talk about it, why don't you just STFU and stop it
with your idiotic rambling! The last thing "New Users" need is stupid
registry advice from a troll like you!


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly attempt
to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the public will
come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think this group could
use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any of the
upcoming links and references;


Idiot! Of course you are spamming, you are posting *unsolicited* commercial
material, that is spam you fool. Go stick your head in a vise and leave us
alone with your stupid registry cleaners!

M


  #4  
Old July 18th 09, 02:59 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
johnn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:00:17 -0300, "Marianne"
informed me that

What a fscking blithering idiot! You don't have a closed mind, you're
closed at the other end and it's coming out of your ears sideways! You
don't know anything about the registry and you repeatedly stick both feet in
your mouth every time you talk about it, why don't you just STFU and stop it
with your idiotic rambling! The last thing "New Users" need is stupid
registry advice from a troll like you!


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly attempt
to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the public will
come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think this group could
use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any of the
upcoming links and references;


Idiot! Of course you are spamming, you are posting *unsolicited* commercial
material, that is spam you fool. Go stick your head in a vise and leave us
alone with your stupid registry cleaners!

M


Mr. Twayne:

I'm not tecchnically knowledgeable enough to speak for or against
Rregistry Cleaners.

One thing I knowfor su
You can considere yourself taken to the woodshed (verbally, that is .
.. )

Cheers!

_________________________
John
_________________________

"God is dead"
-- Nietzsche (1844-1900)
"Nietzsche is dead"
-- God
  #5  
Old July 18th 09, 02:59 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
johnn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:00:17 -0300, "Marianne"
informed me that

What a fscking blithering idiot! You don't have a closed mind, you're
closed at the other end and it's coming out of your ears sideways! You
don't know anything about the registry and you repeatedly stick both feet in
your mouth every time you talk about it, why don't you just STFU and stop it
with your idiotic rambling! The last thing "New Users" need is stupid
registry advice from a troll like you!


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly attempt
to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the public will
come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think this group could
use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any of the
upcoming links and references;


Idiot! Of course you are spamming, you are posting *unsolicited* commercial
material, that is spam you fool. Go stick your head in a vise and leave us
alone with your stupid registry cleaners!

M


Mr. Twayne:

I'm not tecchnically knowledgeable enough to speak for or against
Rregistry Cleaners.

One thing I knowfor su
You can considere yourself taken to the woodshed (verbally, that is .
.. )

Cheers!

_________________________
John
_________________________

"God is dead"
-- Nietzsche (1844-1900)
"Nietzsche is dead"
-- God
  #6  
Old July 18th 09, 03:53 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Bruce Chambers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,208
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

Twayne wrote:
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly
attempt to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the
public will come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think
this group could use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any of
the upcoming links and references; they are simply that which the web
was/is intended for: The dispersal of information.

Although I didn't bother to read them, I did notice the latest cacophony
over Registry Cleaners by the typical group of misinformationists and
ignorant sock-puppets that usually accrue when someone disagrees with
any of them that Registry Cleaners do and will continue to, have a valid
place in most anyone's toolbox of troubleshooting utilities. I'm fairly
sure they'll repeat their silliness here. Oh, and I even came across a
white-paper dated in 2006 I hadn't seen before, but I'm not going to
expose it until one of the narcissistic egos here presents some valid
information for their own claims that there does not exist a Registry
Cleaner that is any good, that won't damage a system, and that will
eventually make the system unbootable, separate from the causes of ANY
program that could cause that to happen.

So whether you're just curious or are looking for a decent Registry
Cleaner, here's a list of reviews of them from several different places.
There are a lot more but I hoped I would find just one site that made a
full comparison of all of them in one place. Not finding that, I
settled for the following:

Ever wonder how Registry Cleaners compare?
Ever wonder if opinions on their outputs are similar from place to place
where different opinions appear?

http://registryrepaircompare.com/
RegCure was #1

Registry Cleaner Reviews:
http://www.registrycleanersreviewed.com/
RegCure made #1

Registry Cleaner Geeks
http://www.registrycleanergeeks.com/
RegCure came out #1

5 Registry Cleaner Reviews: Which Is The Best?
http://www.registrycleaner-reviews.org/
RegCure was on top

Advanced Registry Cleaner
http://registry-repair-software-revi...er-review.html
Not all that great. Techie. Limited Features.

Registry Cleaner Reviews
http://www.registrycleanerreviews4u....are_chart.html
RegistryEasy won, but ... they also sell that oneg.

Registry Cleaners Reviewed
http://www.registrycleanerreview.us/
and RegCure won yet again.

A discussion on cleaners (toward the bottom of the page)
http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=171203805

The "best" Registry Cleaner?
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-6138_102...hreadID=116309
Discussion

A pretty bad Registry Cleaner: Complete Registry Cleaner 1.0
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1585462,00.asp


RegCure seems to be doing pretty good even with their last little
glitch. What I'd really like to see is a comparison of the freebie
Registry Cleaners versus the pay-fors; maybe next time.

If you don't think a Registry Cleaner is worth using, that's fine and
your perogative. But forcing, intimidating and shoving others to share
your misguided opinions is just plain wrong.

Twayne`



Sorry, but mindlessly echoing pure marketing drivel (not a single
reputable technical or scientifically verifiable source in the lot) *IS*
spam, plain and simple. You really should find a new religion; I hear
Scientologists are looking for people just like you: totally lacking in
critical thinking abilities. Just give them money, and you're golden.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot
  #7  
Old July 18th 09, 03:53 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Bruce Chambers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,208
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

Twayne wrote:
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly
attempt to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the
public will come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think
this group could use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any of
the upcoming links and references; they are simply that which the web
was/is intended for: The dispersal of information.

Although I didn't bother to read them, I did notice the latest cacophony
over Registry Cleaners by the typical group of misinformationists and
ignorant sock-puppets that usually accrue when someone disagrees with
any of them that Registry Cleaners do and will continue to, have a valid
place in most anyone's toolbox of troubleshooting utilities. I'm fairly
sure they'll repeat their silliness here. Oh, and I even came across a
white-paper dated in 2006 I hadn't seen before, but I'm not going to
expose it until one of the narcissistic egos here presents some valid
information for their own claims that there does not exist a Registry
Cleaner that is any good, that won't damage a system, and that will
eventually make the system unbootable, separate from the causes of ANY
program that could cause that to happen.

So whether you're just curious or are looking for a decent Registry
Cleaner, here's a list of reviews of them from several different places.
There are a lot more but I hoped I would find just one site that made a
full comparison of all of them in one place. Not finding that, I
settled for the following:

Ever wonder how Registry Cleaners compare?
Ever wonder if opinions on their outputs are similar from place to place
where different opinions appear?

http://registryrepaircompare.com/
RegCure was #1

Registry Cleaner Reviews:
http://www.registrycleanersreviewed.com/
RegCure made #1

Registry Cleaner Geeks
http://www.registrycleanergeeks.com/
RegCure came out #1

5 Registry Cleaner Reviews: Which Is The Best?
http://www.registrycleaner-reviews.org/
RegCure was on top

Advanced Registry Cleaner
http://registry-repair-software-revi...er-review.html
Not all that great. Techie. Limited Features.

Registry Cleaner Reviews
http://www.registrycleanerreviews4u....are_chart.html
RegistryEasy won, but ... they also sell that oneg.

Registry Cleaners Reviewed
http://www.registrycleanerreview.us/
and RegCure won yet again.

A discussion on cleaners (toward the bottom of the page)
http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=171203805

The "best" Registry Cleaner?
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-6138_102...hreadID=116309
Discussion

A pretty bad Registry Cleaner: Complete Registry Cleaner 1.0
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1585462,00.asp


RegCure seems to be doing pretty good even with their last little
glitch. What I'd really like to see is a comparison of the freebie
Registry Cleaners versus the pay-fors; maybe next time.

If you don't think a Registry Cleaner is worth using, that's fine and
your perogative. But forcing, intimidating and shoving others to share
your misguided opinions is just plain wrong.

Twayne`



Sorry, but mindlessly echoing pure marketing drivel (not a single
reputable technical or scientifically verifiable source in the lot) *IS*
spam, plain and simple. You really should find a new religion; I hear
Scientologists are looking for people just like you: totally lacking in
critical thinking abilities. Just give them money, and you're golden.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot
  #8  
Old July 18th 09, 08:53 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
philo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,807
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

johnn wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:00:17 -0300, "Marianne"
informed me that

What a fscking blithering idiot! You don't have a closed mind, you're
closed at the other end and it's coming out of your ears sideways! You
don't know anything about the registry and you repeatedly stick both feet in
your mouth every time you talk about it, why don't you just STFU and stop it
with your idiotic rambling! The last thing "New Users" need is stupid
registry advice from a troll like you!


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly attempt
to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the public will
come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think this group could
use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any of the
upcoming links and references;

Idiot! Of course you are spamming, you are posting *unsolicited* commercial
material, that is spam you fool. Go stick your head in a vise and leave us
alone with your stupid registry cleaners!

M


Mr. Twayne:

I'm not tecchnically knowledgeable enough to speak for or against
Rregistry Cleaners.

One thing I knowfor su
You can considere yourself taken to the woodshed (verbally, that is .
. )

Cheers!



I have been repairing computers for many years and agree that a registry
cleaner can often do more harm than good.

If one wants to safely clean up their system...
best to either use a "cookie cleaner" program...
or simply use Windows' "disk cleanup"

  #9  
Old July 18th 09, 08:53 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
philo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,807
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

johnn wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:00:17 -0300, "Marianne"
informed me that

What a fscking blithering idiot! You don't have a closed mind, you're
closed at the other end and it's coming out of your ears sideways! You
don't know anything about the registry and you repeatedly stick both feet in
your mouth every time you talk about it, why don't you just STFU and stop it
with your idiotic rambling! The last thing "New Users" need is stupid
registry advice from a troll like you!


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly attempt
to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the public will
come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think this group could
use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any of the
upcoming links and references;

Idiot! Of course you are spamming, you are posting *unsolicited* commercial
material, that is spam you fool. Go stick your head in a vise and leave us
alone with your stupid registry cleaners!

M


Mr. Twayne:

I'm not tecchnically knowledgeable enough to speak for or against
Rregistry Cleaners.

One thing I knowfor su
You can considere yourself taken to the woodshed (verbally, that is .
. )

Cheers!



I have been repairing computers for many years and agree that a registry
cleaner can often do more harm than good.

If one wants to safely clean up their system...
best to either use a "cookie cleaner" program...
or simply use Windows' "disk cleanup"

  #10  
Old July 18th 09, 04:04 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

"Marianne" wrote in message

What a fscking blithering idiot! You don't have a closed mind, you're
closed at the other end and it's coming out of your ears sideways! You
don't know anything about the registry and you repeatedly stick
both feet in your mouth every time you talk about it, why don't you
just STFU and stop it with your idiotic rambling! The last thing
"New Users" need is stupid registry advice from a troll like you!


YOu're quite wrong; what they need is real data, not sock-puppets like
you who have never had an original thought.



"Twayne" wrote in message
...
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly
attempt to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto
the public will come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I
think this group could use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any
of the upcoming links and references;


Idiot! Of course you are spamming, you are posting *unsolicited*
commercial material, that is spam you fool. Go stick your head in a
vise and leave us alone with your stupid registry cleaners!

M




  #11  
Old July 18th 09, 04:04 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

"Marianne" wrote in message

What a fscking blithering idiot! You don't have a closed mind, you're
closed at the other end and it's coming out of your ears sideways! You
don't know anything about the registry and you repeatedly stick
both feet in your mouth every time you talk about it, why don't you
just STFU and stop it with your idiotic rambling! The last thing
"New Users" need is stupid registry advice from a troll like you!


YOu're quite wrong; what they need is real data, not sock-puppets like
you who have never had an original thought.



"Twayne" wrote in message
...
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly
attempt to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto
the public will come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I
think this group could use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any
of the upcoming links and references;


Idiot! Of course you are spamming, you are posting *unsolicited*
commercial material, that is spam you fool. Go stick your head in a
vise and leave us alone with your stupid registry cleaners!

M




  #12  
Old July 18th 09, 04:19 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

"Bruce Chambers" wrote in message

Twayne wrote:
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly
attempt to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the
public will come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think
this group could use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any
of the upcoming links and references; they are simply that which the
web was/is intended for: The dispersal of information.

Although I didn't bother to read them, I did notice the latest
cacophony over Registry Cleaners by the typical group of
misinformationists and ignorant sock-puppets that usually accrue
when someone disagrees with any of them that Registry Cleaners do
and will continue to, have a valid place in most anyone's toolbox of
troubleshooting utilities. I'm fairly sure they'll repeat their
silliness here. Oh, and I even came across a white-paper dated in
2006 I hadn't seen before, but I'm not going to expose it until one
of the narcissistic egos here presents some valid information for
their own claims that there does not exist a Registry Cleaner that is
any good, that won't damage a system, and that will eventually
make the system unbootable, separate from the causes of ANY program
that could cause that to happen. So whether you're just curious or
are looking for a decent Registry
Cleaner, here's a list of reviews of them from several different
places. There are a lot more but I hoped I would find just one site
that made a full comparison of all of them in one place. Not
finding that, I settled for the following:

Ever wonder how Registry Cleaners compare?
Ever wonder if opinions on their outputs are similar from place to
place where different opinions appear?

http://registryrepaircompare.com/
RegCure was #1

Registry Cleaner Reviews:
http://www.registrycleanersreviewed.com/
RegCure made #1

Registry Cleaner Geeks
http://www.registrycleanergeeks.com/
RegCure came out #1

5 Registry Cleaner Reviews: Which Is The Best?
http://www.registrycleaner-reviews.org/
RegCure was on top

Advanced Registry Cleaner
http://registry-repair-software-revi...er-review.html
Not all that great. Techie. Limited Features.

Registry Cleaner Reviews
http://www.registrycleanerreviews4u....are_chart.html
RegistryEasy won, but ... they also sell that oneg.

Registry Cleaners Reviewed
http://www.registrycleanerreview.us/
and RegCure won yet again.

A discussion on cleaners (toward the bottom of the page)
http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=171203805

The "best" Registry Cleaner?
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-6138_102...hreadID=116309
Discussion

A pretty bad Registry Cleaner: Complete Registry Cleaner 1.0
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1585462,00.asp


RegCure seems to be doing pretty good even with their last little
glitch. What I'd really like to see is a comparison of the freebie
Registry Cleaners versus the pay-fors; maybe next time.

If you don't think a Registry Cleaner is worth using, that's fine and
your perogative. But forcing, intimidating and shoving others to
share your misguided opinions is just plain wrong.

Twayne`



Sorry, but mindlessly echoing pure marketing drivel (not a single
reputable technical or scientifically verifiable source in the lot)
*IS* spam, plain and simple. You really should find a new religion;
I hear Scientologists are looking for people just like you: totally
lacking in critical thinking abilities. Just give them money, and
you're golden.

--

Bruce Chambers


Hey, where'd your boilerplate go to?!? lol, lost it or someting? You
need to reread your parenthetical and then reread the posts again, but
you never looked at them in the first place so ... it's not important.

Tell me something: Whose marketing hype is more prolific and more
abundant: That of Registry Cleaners or that of Microsoft? If "marketing
drivel" is the sign of bad software then EVERY product on the market is
drivel by your standards, MS among the highest and the worst. Like their
boast about how improved security has been for every system since
windows3.1.

Of course, your standards are incorrect and your mind closed because you
profess how terrible a class of programs is without the least bit of
verifiable backup ever having been presented. Never. Not a single
thing. Nothing.
You don't and haven't presented it because you have nothing but
occasional anecdotal evidence of unknown accuracy and source. And you
know I do have it, because I presented it long ago and even challenged
you to a project to evaluate and make public the results of controlled
tests using registry cleaners. As for the project, you became simply
a black hole- nowhere to be seen.

But I've accomplished what I wanted to do here; which was give people
some resources for the better cleaners around.

Twayne`







  #13  
Old July 18th 09, 04:19 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

"Bruce Chambers" wrote in message

Twayne wrote:
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly
attempt to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the
public will come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think
this group could use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any
of the upcoming links and references; they are simply that which the
web was/is intended for: The dispersal of information.

Although I didn't bother to read them, I did notice the latest
cacophony over Registry Cleaners by the typical group of
misinformationists and ignorant sock-puppets that usually accrue
when someone disagrees with any of them that Registry Cleaners do
and will continue to, have a valid place in most anyone's toolbox of
troubleshooting utilities. I'm fairly sure they'll repeat their
silliness here. Oh, and I even came across a white-paper dated in
2006 I hadn't seen before, but I'm not going to expose it until one
of the narcissistic egos here presents some valid information for
their own claims that there does not exist a Registry Cleaner that is
any good, that won't damage a system, and that will eventually
make the system unbootable, separate from the causes of ANY program
that could cause that to happen. So whether you're just curious or
are looking for a decent Registry
Cleaner, here's a list of reviews of them from several different
places. There are a lot more but I hoped I would find just one site
that made a full comparison of all of them in one place. Not
finding that, I settled for the following:

Ever wonder how Registry Cleaners compare?
Ever wonder if opinions on their outputs are similar from place to
place where different opinions appear?

http://registryrepaircompare.com/
RegCure was #1

Registry Cleaner Reviews:
http://www.registrycleanersreviewed.com/
RegCure made #1

Registry Cleaner Geeks
http://www.registrycleanergeeks.com/
RegCure came out #1

5 Registry Cleaner Reviews: Which Is The Best?
http://www.registrycleaner-reviews.org/
RegCure was on top

Advanced Registry Cleaner
http://registry-repair-software-revi...er-review.html
Not all that great. Techie. Limited Features.

Registry Cleaner Reviews
http://www.registrycleanerreviews4u....are_chart.html
RegistryEasy won, but ... they also sell that oneg.

Registry Cleaners Reviewed
http://www.registrycleanerreview.us/
and RegCure won yet again.

A discussion on cleaners (toward the bottom of the page)
http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=171203805

The "best" Registry Cleaner?
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-6138_102...hreadID=116309
Discussion

A pretty bad Registry Cleaner: Complete Registry Cleaner 1.0
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1585462,00.asp


RegCure seems to be doing pretty good even with their last little
glitch. What I'd really like to see is a comparison of the freebie
Registry Cleaners versus the pay-fors; maybe next time.

If you don't think a Registry Cleaner is worth using, that's fine and
your perogative. But forcing, intimidating and shoving others to
share your misguided opinions is just plain wrong.

Twayne`



Sorry, but mindlessly echoing pure marketing drivel (not a single
reputable technical or scientifically verifiable source in the lot)
*IS* spam, plain and simple. You really should find a new religion;
I hear Scientologists are looking for people just like you: totally
lacking in critical thinking abilities. Just give them money, and
you're golden.

--

Bruce Chambers


Hey, where'd your boilerplate go to?!? lol, lost it or someting? You
need to reread your parenthetical and then reread the posts again, but
you never looked at them in the first place so ... it's not important.

Tell me something: Whose marketing hype is more prolific and more
abundant: That of Registry Cleaners or that of Microsoft? If "marketing
drivel" is the sign of bad software then EVERY product on the market is
drivel by your standards, MS among the highest and the worst. Like their
boast about how improved security has been for every system since
windows3.1.

Of course, your standards are incorrect and your mind closed because you
profess how terrible a class of programs is without the least bit of
verifiable backup ever having been presented. Never. Not a single
thing. Nothing.
You don't and haven't presented it because you have nothing but
occasional anecdotal evidence of unknown accuracy and source. And you
know I do have it, because I presented it long ago and even challenged
you to a project to evaluate and make public the results of controlled
tests using registry cleaners. As for the project, you became simply
a black hole- nowhere to be seen.

But I've accomplished what I wanted to do here; which was give people
some resources for the better cleaners around.

Twayne`







  #14  
Old July 18th 09, 04:42 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Mike Hall - MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 402
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
"Bruce Chambers" wrote in message

Twayne wrote:
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly
attempt to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the
public will come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think
this group could use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any
of the upcoming links and references; they are simply that which the
web was/is intended for: The dispersal of information.

Although I didn't bother to read them, I did notice the latest
cacophony over Registry Cleaners by the typical group of
misinformationists and ignorant sock-puppets that usually accrue
when someone disagrees with any of them that Registry Cleaners do
and will continue to, have a valid place in most anyone's toolbox of
troubleshooting utilities. I'm fairly sure they'll repeat their
silliness here. Oh, and I even came across a white-paper dated in
2006 I hadn't seen before, but I'm not going to expose it until one
of the narcissistic egos here presents some valid information for
their own claims that there does not exist a Registry Cleaner that is
any good, that won't damage a system, and that will eventually
make the system unbootable, separate from the causes of ANY program
that could cause that to happen. So whether you're just curious or are
looking for a decent Registry
Cleaner, here's a list of reviews of them from several different
places. There are a lot more but I hoped I would find just one site
that made a full comparison of all of them in one place. Not
finding that, I settled for the following:

Ever wonder how Registry Cleaners compare?
Ever wonder if opinions on their outputs are similar from place to
place where different opinions appear?

http://registryrepaircompare.com/
RegCure was #1

Registry Cleaner Reviews:
http://www.registrycleanersreviewed.com/
RegCure made #1

Registry Cleaner Geeks
http://www.registrycleanergeeks.com/
RegCure came out #1

5 Registry Cleaner Reviews: Which Is The Best?
http://www.registrycleaner-reviews.org/
RegCure was on top

Advanced Registry Cleaner
http://registry-repair-software-revi...er-review.html
Not all that great. Techie. Limited Features.

Registry Cleaner Reviews
http://www.registrycleanerreviews4u....are_chart.html
RegistryEasy won, but ... they also sell that oneg.

Registry Cleaners Reviewed
http://www.registrycleanerreview.us/
and RegCure won yet again.

A discussion on cleaners (toward the bottom of the page)
http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=171203805

The "best" Registry Cleaner?
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-6138_102...hreadID=116309
Discussion

A pretty bad Registry Cleaner: Complete Registry Cleaner 1.0
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1585462,00.asp


RegCure seems to be doing pretty good even with their last little
glitch. What I'd really like to see is a comparison of the freebie
Registry Cleaners versus the pay-fors; maybe next time.

If you don't think a Registry Cleaner is worth using, that's fine and
your perogative. But forcing, intimidating and shoving others to
share your misguided opinions is just plain wrong.

Twayne`



Sorry, but mindlessly echoing pure marketing drivel (not a single
reputable technical or scientifically verifiable source in the lot)
*IS* spam, plain and simple. You really should find a new religion;
I hear Scientologists are looking for people just like you: totally
lacking in critical thinking abilities. Just give them money, and
you're golden.

--

Bruce Chambers


Hey, where'd your boilerplate go to?!? lol, lost it or someting? You
need to reread your parenthetical and then reread the posts again, but you
never looked at them in the first place so ... it's not important.

Tell me something: Whose marketing hype is more prolific and more
abundant: That of Registry Cleaners or that of Microsoft? If "marketing
drivel" is the sign of bad software then EVERY product on the market is
drivel by your standards, MS among the highest and the worst. Like their
boast about how improved security has been for every system since
windows3.1.

Of course, your standards are incorrect and your mind closed because you
profess how terrible a class of programs is without the least bit of
verifiable backup ever having been presented. Never. Not a single thing.
Nothing.
You don't and haven't presented it because you have nothing but
occasional anecdotal evidence of unknown accuracy and source. And you
know I do have it, because I presented it long ago and even challenged you
to a project to evaluate and make public the results of controlled tests
using registry cleaners. As for the project, you became simply a black
hole- nowhere to be seen.

But I've accomplished what I wanted to do here; which was give people some
resources for the better cleaners around.

Twayne`



So where in any of those links, most of which appeared to be sponsored by
RegCure, are the numbers which prove that they have any effect?

You have shown nothing but marketing blurb again..

--

Mike Hall - MVP Windows Experience
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/

  #15  
Old July 18th 09, 04:42 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Mike Hall - MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 402
Default Newly Updated Chart of Registry Cleaner Reviews!


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
"Bruce Chambers" wrote in message

Twayne wrote:
I know those who love to make spam accusations and who literally hate
Registry Cleaners so much that they closed mindedly and constantly
attempt to force their misguided opinions and misinformation onto the
public will come crawling out of the woodwork over this, but I think
this group could use this post anyway.
I'm not spamming because I have NO investment of any kind in any
of the upcoming links and references; they are simply that which the
web was/is intended for: The dispersal of information.

Although I didn't bother to read them, I did notice the latest
cacophony over Registry Cleaners by the typical group of
misinformationists and ignorant sock-puppets that usually accrue
when someone disagrees with any of them that Registry Cleaners do
and will continue to, have a valid place in most anyone's toolbox of
troubleshooting utilities. I'm fairly sure they'll repeat their
silliness here. Oh, and I even came across a white-paper dated in
2006 I hadn't seen before, but I'm not going to expose it until one
of the narcissistic egos here presents some valid information for
their own claims that there does not exist a Registry Cleaner that is
any good, that won't damage a system, and that will eventually
make the system unbootable, separate from the causes of ANY program
that could cause that to happen. So whether you're just curious or are
looking for a decent Registry
Cleaner, here's a list of reviews of them from several different
places. There are a lot more but I hoped I would find just one site
that made a full comparison of all of them in one place. Not
finding that, I settled for the following:

Ever wonder how Registry Cleaners compare?
Ever wonder if opinions on their outputs are similar from place to
place where different opinions appear?

http://registryrepaircompare.com/
RegCure was #1

Registry Cleaner Reviews:
http://www.registrycleanersreviewed.com/
RegCure made #1

Registry Cleaner Geeks
http://www.registrycleanergeeks.com/
RegCure came out #1

5 Registry Cleaner Reviews: Which Is The Best?
http://www.registrycleaner-reviews.org/
RegCure was on top

Advanced Registry Cleaner
http://registry-repair-software-revi...er-review.html
Not all that great. Techie. Limited Features.

Registry Cleaner Reviews
http://www.registrycleanerreviews4u....are_chart.html
RegistryEasy won, but ... they also sell that oneg.

Registry Cleaners Reviewed
http://www.registrycleanerreview.us/
and RegCure won yet again.

A discussion on cleaners (toward the bottom of the page)
http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=171203805

The "best" Registry Cleaner?
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-6138_102...hreadID=116309
Discussion

A pretty bad Registry Cleaner: Complete Registry Cleaner 1.0
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1585462,00.asp


RegCure seems to be doing pretty good even with their last little
glitch. What I'd really like to see is a comparison of the freebie
Registry Cleaners versus the pay-fors; maybe next time.

If you don't think a Registry Cleaner is worth using, that's fine and
your perogative. But forcing, intimidating and shoving others to
share your misguided opinions is just plain wrong.

Twayne`



Sorry, but mindlessly echoing pure marketing drivel (not a single
reputable technical or scientifically verifiable source in the lot)
*IS* spam, plain and simple. You really should find a new religion;
I hear Scientologists are looking for people just like you: totally
lacking in critical thinking abilities. Just give them money, and
you're golden.

--

Bruce Chambers


Hey, where'd your boilerplate go to?!? lol, lost it or someting? You
need to reread your parenthetical and then reread the posts again, but you
never looked at them in the first place so ... it's not important.

Tell me something: Whose marketing hype is more prolific and more
abundant: That of Registry Cleaners or that of Microsoft? If "marketing
drivel" is the sign of bad software then EVERY product on the market is
drivel by your standards, MS among the highest and the worst. Like their
boast about how improved security has been for every system since
windows3.1.

Of course, your standards are incorrect and your mind closed because you
profess how terrible a class of programs is without the least bit of
verifiable backup ever having been presented. Never. Not a single thing.
Nothing.
You don't and haven't presented it because you have nothing but
occasional anecdotal evidence of unknown accuracy and source. And you
know I do have it, because I presented it long ago and even challenged you
to a project to evaluate and make public the results of controlled tests
using registry cleaners. As for the project, you became simply a black
hole- nowhere to be seen.

But I've accomplished what I wanted to do here; which was give people some
resources for the better cleaners around.

Twayne`



So where in any of those links, most of which appeared to be sponsored by
RegCure, are the numbers which prove that they have any effect?

You have shown nothing but marketing blurb again..

--

Mike Hall - MVP Windows Experience
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.