If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Application Data
When searching for files in Win7 x64 the program, Directory Opus, will
sometimes go into a loop with the Application Data folder. Such as searching in "C:\Users\dex\Local Settings\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data" Is it a fault with Directory Opus or something to do with Windows that can be corrected? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Application Data
Dex wrote:
When searching for files in Win7 x64 the program, Directory Opus, will sometimes go into a loop with the Application Data folder. Such as searching in "C:\Users\dex\Local Settings\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data\Application Data" Is it a fault with Directory Opus or something to do with Windows that can be corrected? You need to make sure, that the utilities you use, are compatible with NTFS Junction Points. In your example, the utility attempted to descend into a Junction Point, and a side-effect is that infinite-looking path. Even some Microsoft utilities have a problem with this, so being an employee at Microsoft does not give special immunity from bad design. Make sure the version of utility, is compatible with the usage of NTFS on a modern OS. In this 2008 entry from the Directory Opus site, the term "Junction Point" exists on the page, so they know about them. You would need to find a page that tells you which version of their software would be for Windows 7 or whatever. http://blog.dopus.com/2008_12_01_archive.html Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
OT Screen width
In this 2008 entry from the Directory Opus site, the term "Junction Point" exists on the page, so they know about them. You would need to find a page that tells you which version of their software would be for Windows 7 or whatever. http://blog.dopus.com/2008_12_01_archive.html Paul I've notice that you and a few other people have very short lines of text when you type posts. I'm just wondering is there a reason for it, do you use a different client? Not complaining, just curious. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
OT Screen width
Big Al wrote:
In this 2008 entry from the Directory Opus site, the term "Junction Point" exists on the page, so they know about them. You would need to find a page that tells you which version of their software would be for Windows 7 or whatever. http://blog.dopus.com/2008_12_01_archive.html Paul I've notice that you and a few other people have very short lines of text when you type posts. I'm just wondering is there a reason for it, do you use a different client? Not complaining, just curious. Preferences - "Wrap plain text messages at" 1000 "characters" This means the tool will never automatically wrap my message lines on purpose. Works sometimes, and preferred when I make ASCII-art. In particular, GoogleGroups takes great pride in overriding this, and removing any ASCII art white-space formatting, ruining any drawing I make, as stored in their archive. Header, ContentType - text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed === Could be the result of the about:config setting mailnews.send_plaintext_flowed: True See http://seamonkey.ilias.ca/mailnewsfaq/FormatFlowed for details on behavior. I don't really know if this helps readers or not. The hard returns I use probably defeat the flowed option. However, if I quote a flowed sender (GoogleGrouper), maybe the right thing happens with regard to their text ? The usage of hard returns. I use hard returns for formatting. HTH, Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
OT Screen width
On 18.06.16 19:18, Big Al wrote:
In this 2008 entry from the Directory Opus site, the term "Junction Point" exists on the page, so they know about them. You would need to find a page that tells you which version of their software would be for Windows 7 or whatever. http://blog.dopus.com/2008_12_01_archive.html Paul I've notice that you and a few other people have very short lines of text when you type posts. I'm just wondering is there a reason for it, do you use a different client? Not complaining, just curious. I use a "FINGER" to use the ENTER or RETURN key, whenever I think a line is long enough. Like just now. LOOOOONG lines read horrible. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
OT Screen width
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:53:25 +0200, Sjouke Burry
wrote: On 18.06.16 19:18, Big Al wrote: In this 2008 entry from the Directory Opus site, the term "Junction Point" exists on the page, so they know about them. You would need to find a page that tells you which version of their software would be for Windows 7 or whatever. http://blog.dopus.com/2008_12_01_archive.html Paul I've notice that you and a few other people have very short lines of text when you type posts. I'm just wondering is there a reason for it, do you use a different client? Not complaining, just curious. I use a "FINGER" to use the ENTER or RETURN key, whenever I think a line is long enough. Like just now. LOOOOONG lines read horrible. Does your client not have a config setting to help with that? User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131118 Thunderbird/17.0.11 -- Char Jackson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|