Search result

"Andrew Taylor"
Fri, 24 Apr 2020 20:31:43 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

"David_B" wrote in message
...

I'm not sure I understand. Please clarify.

You know I worked in a Crematorium David. I dealt with crematorium
technicians and Funeral Directors

Please provide an active link to your profile at LinkedIn,
Andrew.

Nope, you know where it is is, you went there the last three days.

If you don't, you know he'll ask someone else to do it for him. It's
what he does. If you're online, according to David Brooks, the known
stalker of Devon, you have no right to privacy. If you own any gear
online that you're running one or more servers on, David has the right
to access YOUR gear any damn time he likes, for whatever reason he
likes. And if you disable his account on your gear, he'll create a new
one. You have to resort to blocking entire IP ranges to have a better
chance of keeping him off your system.

If you deny him access to YOUR gear for any reason, he'll slime,
besmirch, and stalk you for an unknown period of time. Evidently, not
even death can free you from his stalking. And, if at all possible,
he'll create additional accounts on your server/sites and continue
trespass onto your gear.

Lately, he's gotten into 'scanning' sites using tools he doesn't
understand which provide results, he (you guessed it) doesn't
understand. This consumes bandwidth the site admin might be paying out
of pocket for, David doesn't care. Infact, if site is costing owner
funds, and Davids scanning causes additional spendage, it's wise NOT to
let David know about this weakness; he will exploit it.

If you make David aware of the fact he doesn't have your permission to
be scanning your gear, and you'll contact his ISP if he continues,
he'll switch to an online scanner instead. Nice of him, isn't it?

And that, as you know, isn't all he's well known for doing. To hear the
n00bs here though, David is as innocent as the white snow on the first
snow fall.

I'm pretty sure KB has too. Odd.

Haha, you are surprised? You hounded the poor man, and his
misses!

Honest people do not run away from the truth. That's what they
did - run.

You stalked them and asked personal questions which they may or
may not have answered. They knew your MO for the forums. They
didn't run, they blocked your stalking.

Stalked is a strong word. We have it (well, previously two) on two
regular posters authority that we've all misunderstood the word,
stalker, stalking, etc. David is not actually any of those. Yes, I can
provide MIDs where these individuals stated this and continued to do so
for quite sometime.

I've got one even funnier than those though. A direct accusation of my
having bullied BD! Yep, that's right; the individual indicated they
thought David was a victim, of mine, of all people. Ayep, a victim of
me. Except that uhh, I didn't try to dox myself some years back. David
tried doing that for me. But, I'm the bully? rofl!

This is what Mike Easter wrote last year. I've asked questions about
the contents of the post, several times. Mike, like David does when
he's called out, hasn't answered a single post about it.


Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155278479000

OUAT onceuponatime BD mistreated/used various public personae,
then/now Diesel bullies BD (and others), now various mail2news
anonymizer/s bully Diesel.

*** end paste

Mike Easter is one of the same two individuals who claimed (i'm sure he
still does) that David is not a stalker. That everyone who's written
that he is is confused, somehow, in some way. Yep, that's what you're
dealing with. Apd was previously in the same camp as Mike concerning
David not being a stalker, but he went silent on the issue after a
period of time. Now, as you and others can see, Mike Easter is trying
to pass himself off as another critic when he was previously, defending
the arse licking toadie known as David Brooks; the stalker of Devon.
--
He who is content can never be ruined. - Lao-Tze
===============
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=ms...a.CDkG7 O3%3E
or
https://urlzs.com/YyLEx