A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Hardware and Windows XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 10th 03, 08:24 PM
Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.

--
Editor, Internet's Convenient and Unbiased Directory of Nutrition Software
http://nutritionsoftware.org



Ads
  #2  
Old December 10th 03, 08:24 PM
Shenan T. Stanley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

Editor wrote:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have
USB download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.


Simple - manufacturers choice.
Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the
option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order.

I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to
buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more.
Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy
drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs.

--
Shenan Stanley
"Just trying to help"


  #3  
Old December 10th 03, 08:24 PM
Bill Kiene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

I guess if that is important to someone they will order it.

Why pay for something you might never use?

If needed they will add them to their standard units in the future.

--
Bill Kiene

Dell fan


"Shenan T. Stanley" wrote in message
...

Editor wrote:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have
USB download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.


Simple - manufacturers choice.
Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the
option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order.

I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to
buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more.
Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy
drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs.

--
Shenan Stanley
"Just trying to help"




  #5  
Old December 10th 03, 08:24 PM
anonymous
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

find a usb to firewire converter

-----Original Message-----
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras:

my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My

cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there

are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.

--
Editor, Internet's Convenient and Unbiased Directory of

Nutrition Software
http://nutritionsoftware.org



.

  #6  
Old December 10th 03, 08:24 PM
Tony Spadaro
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

I added a Firewire card to my computer. If I can do it, you can do it. If
Dell won't do it - go to someone else - that's what I did because Dell
decided for a while that they weren't going to bother with "legacy ports" -
serial and parallel. I might go back to them with my next machine, but I
certainly won't add anything as basic as a serial port to a computer -- and
yes I still have a serial device, my graphics tablet.

--
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com
home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto
The Improved Links Pages are at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html
A sample chapter from my novel "Haight-Ashbury" is at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html
"Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org" nseditor2002 wrote in
message ...
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.

--
Editor, Internet's Convenient and Unbiased Directory of Nutrition Software
http://nutritionsoftware.org





  #7  
Old December 10th 03, 08:24 PM
?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?


"Shenan T. Stanley" wrote in message
...
Editor wrote:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have
USB download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.


Simple - manufacturers choice.
Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the
option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order.

I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to
buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more.
Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy
drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs.

--
Shenan Stanley
"Just trying to help"


I agree with Shenan, I too also have two Firewire ports and 6 USB ports on
the mother board I just built my new system with.
More bang for the buck when you build your own and much easier to either
upgrade or repair if ever necessary.

Ed


  #8  
Old December 10th 03, 08:24 PM
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org wrote:

My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.


I suspect that Firewire is a bit more expensive to implement, and more
popular on the Mac than the PC. However, a good Firewire board for the
PC should not be more than $50. Check with CompUSA, or Fry's.
  #9  
Old December 10th 03, 08:24 PM
Nik Simpson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org wrote:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have
USB download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.


The vast majority of ports you find built into a system come from one place,
the main system chipset, for example Intel's i865 and i875or SiS chipsets .
The capabilities of these chipsets tend to dictate what motherboard
manufactures build onto the motherboard, and these chipsets don't have
Firewire, but do have USB. So if the vendor wants to put Firewire on the
motherboard, then they have to add an additional chipset just to support
Firewire which adds cost to the motherboard in a market where their margins
are razor thin already.

To a degree it boils down to a decision Intel made in the late 90s when they
dropped Firewire support from their chipset roadmap in favor of USB
(probably over licencsing costs, but no real answer has ever been given)
hence you get USB built-in but no Firwire. I think you may find that some
NVIDIA/Athlon motherboard have onboard Firewire because I think the NVIDIA
main system chipset does support Firewaure, but I could be wrong.


  #10  
Old December 10th 03, 08:25 PM
Jeffery S. Jones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 05:52:20 -0500, "Nik Simpson"
wrote:

Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org wrote:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have
USB download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.


The vast majority of ports you find built into a system come from one place,
the main system chipset, for example Intel's i865 and i875or SiS chipsets .
The capabilities of these chipsets tend to dictate what motherboard
manufactures build onto the motherboard, and these chipsets don't have
Firewire, but do have USB. So if the vendor wants to put Firewire on the
motherboard, then they have to add an additional chipset just to support
Firewire which adds cost to the motherboard in a market where their margins
are razor thin already.


Yes, the vendors assume that you'll use a card slot to add firewire,
or use a soundcard or video card which has it on it, if you're into
video.

Pretty much, only camcorders *require* firewire. You can get USB2
hard drives and many other devices which also are available with
firewire interfaces, but the main purpose is camcorder interfacing.

To a degree it boils down to a decision Intel made in the late 90s when they
dropped Firewire support from their chipset roadmap in favor of USB
(probably over licencsing costs, but no real answer has ever been given)
hence you get USB built-in but no Firwire. I think you may find that some
NVIDIA/Athlon motherboard have onboard Firewire because I think the NVIDIA
main system chipset does support Firewaure, but I could be wrong.


NVIDIA's nForce motherboards, Athlon or Pentium, include firewire
and a host of other ports, including a very excellent onboard sound
system.

Pretty much, the inclusion of motherboard ports dictates what will
be included for free on a low end system. The MB ports are included
at no extra cost. Cards require extra work to install, and use slots
which are in short supply on most cheaper motherboards -- so the maker
isn't going to force buyers to give up a slot for a port they'll never
use.

--
*-__Jeffery Jones__________| *Starfire* |____________________-*
** Muskego WI Access Channel 14/25 http://www.execpc.com/~jeffsj/mach7/
*Starfire Design Studio* http://www.starfiredesign.com/
  #12  
Old December 10th 03, 08:26 PM
Kevin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

In rec.video.desktop Ron Hunter wrote:
I suspect that Firewire is a bit more expensive to implement, and more
popular on the Mac than the PC. However, a good Firewire board for the


It's a cost-cutting thing, no doubt. I don't think it would be "more"
expensive to implement on a PC, but in a cut-throat competitive world of
hundreds of PC makers, any way to shave a few pennies is going to make a
significant difference in sales. So they keep costs down by not giving you
Firewire.

Apple, on the other hand, is free to put whatever hardware they want onto
their machines, knowing that people will buy (not like they really have a
choice) -- and in so doing also give themselves a reputation for being an
innovator and market leader ("first to have Firewire as a standard feature!")

  #14  
Old December 10th 03, 08:26 PM
Webkatz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?


"Shenan T. Stanley" wrote in message
...
Editor wrote:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have
USB download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.


Simple - manufacturers choice.
Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the
option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order.

I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to
buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more.
Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy
drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs.



Thing change - my "new" PC is 2 years old. I've been looking at a new 2nd PC
for my wife. Turns out I can get one damn near twice as fast as my old one
for a third the money! None of them have floppy drives, or CR drives, for
that matter. The Gateway guy said they don't even sell a CD "player"
anymore. Everything is CD-R, starting at $50. Life is good.


  #15  
Old December 10th 03, 08:27 PM
Tom Monego
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

Just bought a firewire card for $18 and it came with a DV editor program. BTW I
have 1394 ports on two old Compaqs circa 1998 or 9 a PII 400 and PII450.
About Apple and SCSI they were the first to have it and the first to drop it
then charge $200 for a card every one else was selling for $100.

Tom



In article , says...

Editor
www.nutritionsoftware.org wrote:

My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.


I suspect that Firewire is a bit more expensive to implement, and more
popular on the Mac than the PC. However, a good Firewire board for the
PC should not be more than $50. Check with CompUSA, or Fry's.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.