Toppling the last taboo

On Mon, 4 May 2009 13:43:59 -0700 (PDT),
Peter Nyikos "pnyikos" wrote:

Toppling the last taboo.
Good!!! SCREW "taboos!!" Which only IGNORANT
and truly MORONIC people ever are concerned with.
There are valid reasons for the incest taboo. For one thing, it gives
parents too much power over their children, and older siblings over
younger siblings.

If OTHER people engage in things that are NONE of my business,
whatsoever, then I have NO problem with it. I make that my basic
rule of thumb about EVERYTHING and I mean EVERYTHING.

However, I think that any time there is a likelihood of minors
being victimized in any way, it is society's duty to PREVENT that.
Thus, if the incest wasn't being explored ONLY under the supervision
of an adult, I would object. A participating adult can add stability
and
guidance to the experience.

And, are you in favor of dropping the taboos against bestiality
and necrophilia?

That would be NONE of my business. I am NOT a busybody.
And it's totally HARMLESS.

Somehow I didn't think you were the sort to be against *all* taboos.

And you're right. I **should** have clarified that as I just
did above: Involvement with KIDS when it comes to incest, HARMLESS.

Incest can be fulfilling and enjoyable when practiced under the direct
supervision of a participating ADULT. The sex taboos are among the
last of the antiquated taboos left on the books.

And if the above aren't important enough, what about the taboo
against using racist language?

THAT can incite riots or do psychological damage. Or encourage
other people to be bigots. NONE of which should be acceptable to
any society. And that should include the same sort of verbiage
directed toward gays. Incest and necrophilia are TOTALLY harmless.

Only the unenlightened will meddle in something that isn't their
business in the first place and say expressing your love with a non
human
entity is unacceptable. WAKE UP! Most people don't care what the
person with
condescending opinions believes in the first place.

Necrophilia, incest and beastiality are victimless *crimes* and should
be decriminalized immediately.

--
Regards
David
fundamentalism (n.): fund = give cash to; amentalism = brainlessness

David wrote:

(snip completely off-topic stuff)

And you somehow feel you should be posting this in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web, a newsgroup for technical support
related to networking and the Windows XP operating system? Epic FAIL.

I don't know what you're playing at - I don't see how this is spam and if it
is trolling it is even more peculiar than the usual trolling - but you
should stop posting this stuff here. Your thoughts on this sort of thing
don't belong in a tech support newsgroup. I'm not sure *where* they belong
(and really don't want to know), but I do know it's not *here*.

Malke
--
MS-MVP
Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ

David wrote:

(snip completely off-topic stuff)

And you somehow feel you should be posting this in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web, a newsgroup for technical support
related to networking and the Windows XP operating system? Epic FAIL.

I don't know what you're playing at - I don't see how this is spam and if it
is trolling it is even more peculiar than the usual trolling - but you
should stop posting this stuff here. Your thoughts on this sort of thing
don't belong in a tech support newsgroup. I'm not sure *where* they belong
(and really don't want to know), but I do know it's not *here*.

Malke
--
MS-MVP
Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ

On Aug 14, 10:56*am, Malke wrote:
David wrote:

(snip completely off-topic stuff)

And you somehow feel you should be posting this in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web, a newsgroup for technical support
related to networking and the Windows XP operating system? Epic FAIL.

I don't know what you're playing at - I don't see how this is spam and if it
is trolling it is even more peculiar than the usual trolling - but you
should stop posting this stuff here. Your thoughts on this sort of thing
don't belong in a tech support newsgroup. I'm not sure *where* they belong
(and really don't want to know), but I do know it's not *here*.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

On Aug 14, 10:56*am, Malke wrote:
David wrote:

(snip completely off-topic stuff)

And you somehow feel you should be posting this in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web, a newsgroup for technical support
related to networking and the Windows XP operating system? Epic FAIL.

I don't know what you're playing at - I don't see how this is spam and if it
is trolling it is even more peculiar than the usual trolling - but you
should stop posting this stuff here. Your thoughts on this sort of thing
don't belong in a tech support newsgroup. I'm not sure *where* they belong
(and really don't want to know), but I do know it's not *here*.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.