A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » General XP issues or comments
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

O.T. Faster way of send file to online storage



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old September 6th 16, 04:47 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Good Guy[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,354
Default O.T. Faster way of send file to online storage

On 05/09/2016 18:16, Mike Easter wrote:
Most people are going to be limited by their default 15G total storage
for gmail & drive.


I have 1TB storage given to me by Microsoft because of subscription to
Office 365. The cost was almost negligible at the time. It is due for
renewal next June.

--
With over 350 million devices now running Windows 10, customer
satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows.

Ads
  #17  
Old September 6th 16, 04:50 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Good Guy[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,354
Default O.T. Faster way of send file to online storage

On 06/09/2016 03:31, Andy wrote:
if you have any, did not inherit your lack of tactfulness.


Have you asked this man about it?

Godfather of tackfulness
https://s18.postimg.io/4z1inx22h/Donald_Trump_August_2015.png


Political correctness or lack of it is what made this man!!!




--
With over 350 million devices now running Windows 10, customer
satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows.

  #18  
Old September 6th 16, 03:01 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
JJ[_11_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 744
Default O.T. Faster way of send file to online storage

On Mon, 05 Sep 2016 12:45:16 -0700, mike wrote:
Or run your own http server that's only up when you want to transfer a file.
Can be accessed by anything with a web browser.

www.rejetto.com

I use it for local file transfer when I don't want to hassle with all
the setup and passwords and compatibility issues between operating
systems. Of course, you'd probably want to use passwords if you
expose it to the web. Just turn it off after she gets the file.


Good choice. More common and less complicated. Why didn't I think of that?

I hope HFS supports resumable download because it would likely be needed to
transfer large files.
  #19  
Old September 6th 16, 04:02 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Mike Easter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,064
Default O.T. Faster way of send file to online storage

JJ wrote:
I hope HFS supports resumable download because it would likely be needed to
transfer large files.


http://www.rejetto.com/forum/hfs-~-h...server/resume/ (posted
2003 Nov) //c&p//:

// I am not sure if HFS allows download resuming... If it doesn't...
that would be a really helpful feature.

it does, tested with Opera, Mozilla, Getright

FlashGet resumes with HFS, no problems at all! //


Of course, how you resume http dl/ing depends on the browser or some
extension; I saw an article about using wget to get around chrome resume
deficiency.

That would be one strength of having a more robust system such as ftp,
but then everything gets more 'complicated'.

--
Mike Easter
  #20  
Old September 6th 16, 04:24 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Mike Easter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,064
Default O.T. Faster way of send file to online storage

JJ wrote:
I hope HFS supports resumable download because it would likely be needed to
transfer large files.


More recent and more comprehensive answer from the developer in the faq,
which is a good one:

http://www.rejetto.com/wiki/index.ph...ons_(En glish)
13 My download is interrupted! Does HFS support resuming of partially
downloaded files?
14 Which download managers does HFS support?
15 Do I need to have my computer powered up and to be online?
16 My friend is uploading to my HFS server, but the upload got
interrupted. How could I resume the upload?

--
Mike Easter
  #21  
Old September 6th 16, 05:11 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Andy[_17_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 594
Default O.T. Faster way of send file to online storage

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 10:50:45 PM UTC-5, Good Guy wrote:
On 06/09/2016 03:31, Andy wrote:




if you have any, did not inherit your lack of tactfulness.





Have you asked this man about it?









Political correctness or lack of it is what made this man!!!













--




With over 350 million
devices now running Windows 10, customer satisfaction is
higher than any previous version of windows.


Why would I ?

Andy

With over 1 billion devices running Linux(especially servers and miltary), customers are so glad they left Windows. :-)

  #22  
Old September 7th 16, 04:00 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
JJ[_11_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 744
Default O.T. Faster way of send file to online storage

On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 08:24:31 -0700, Mike Easter wrote:
16 My friend is uploading to my HFS server, but the upload got
interrupted. How could I resume the upload?


This doesn't concren OP's problem, but this is sucks.

Quote from above FAQ answer:
"Currently, the HTTP 1.1 specification does not include commands for
resuming partial uploads. Therefore, this feature will not be implemented in
future versions of HFS. (Unless FTP support is implemented.) HFS can be
configured to delete partially uploaded files."

I didn't realize HTTP doesn't have any specifications for that. Not even
HTTP/2. I guess FTP is the simplest common way to go for uploading big
files.
  #23  
Old September 7th 16, 04:00 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
JJ[_11_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 744
Default O.T. Faster way of send file to online storage

On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 08:02:29 -0700, Mike Easter wrote:

http://www.rejetto.com/forum/hfs-~-h...server/resume/ (posted
2003 Nov) //c&p//:

// I am not sure if HFS allows download resuming... If it doesn't...
that would be a really helpful feature.

it does, tested with Opera, Mozilla, Getright

FlashGet resumes with HFS, no problems at all! //

Of course, how you resume http dl/ing depends on the browser or some
extension; I saw an article about using wget to get around chrome resume
deficiency.

That would be one strength of having a more robust system such as ftp,
but then everything gets more 'complicated'.


Nice.
  #24  
Old September 7th 16, 04:48 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Mike Easter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,064
Default O.T. Faster way of send file to online storage

JJ wrote:
I guess FTP is the simplest common way to go for uploading big
files.


Altho' they are hard to find, there are such things as free FTP file
hosts. I see one which could handle the OP request; it will allow a
free 2G file, but I can't tell about the bandwidth.

Then each end could use such as a filezilla or whatever.

--
Mike Easter
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.