|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
November 4th 08, 04:13 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
Hello,
in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
November 4th 08, 05:49 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by
Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#3
November 4th 08, 05:49 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by
Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#4
November 4th 08, 05:49 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by
Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#5
November 4th 08, 05:49 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by
Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#6
November 4th 08, 05:49 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by
Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#7
November 4th 08, 05:49 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by
Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#8
November 4th 08, 05:49 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by
Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#9
November 4th 08, 05:58 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
But they did not expire - the error seems to be that the cert is "not good
for requested usage". In which case it probably would be ignored alltogether. Depends though on the "requested usage" - I wonder what was it assumed to be when I just opened to view the certificate. Vadim "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#10
November 4th 08, 05:58 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
But they did not expire - the error seems to be that the cert is "not good
for requested usage". In which case it probably would be ignored alltogether. Depends though on the "requested usage" - I wonder what was it assumed to be when I just opened to view the certificate. Vadim "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#11
November 4th 08, 05:58 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
But they did not expire - the error seems to be that the cert is "not good
for requested usage". In which case it probably would be ignored alltogether. Depends though on the "requested usage" - I wonder what was it assumed to be when I just opened to view the certificate. Vadim "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#12
November 4th 08, 05:58 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
But they did not expire - the error seems to be that the cert is "not good
for requested usage". In which case it probably would be ignored alltogether. Depends though on the "requested usage" - I wonder what was it assumed to be when I just opened to view the certificate. Vadim "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#13
November 4th 08, 05:58 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
But they did not expire - the error seems to be that the cert is "not good
for requested usage". In which case it probably would be ignored alltogether. Depends though on the "requested usage" - I wonder what was it assumed to be when I just opened to view the certificate. Vadim "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#14
November 4th 08, 05:58 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
But they did not expire - the error seems to be that the cert is "not good
for requested usage". In which case it probably would be ignored alltogether. Depends though on the "requested usage" - I wonder what was it assumed to be when I just opened to view the certificate. Vadim "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
#15
November 4th 08, 05:58 PM
posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.windowsupdate,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
|
|||
|
|||
|
List of trusted authorities - invalid?
But they did not expire - the error seems to be that the cert is "not good
for requested usage". In which case it probably would be ignored alltogether. Depends though on the "requested usage" - I wonder what was it assumed to be when I just opened to view the certificate. Vadim "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Compare and contrast: Trusted root certificates that are required by Windows Server 2008, by Windows Vista, by Windows Server 2003, by Windows XP, and by Windows 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293781 Even if the certs have expired some are still needed for 'backwards compatibility'. So no, you don't need to worry. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2009] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Vadim Rapp wrote: Hello, in the event log of several machines, I noticed entries about failed attempt to download the lsit of trusted authorities from http://www.download.windowsupdate.co...uthrootstl.cab . The problem was in proxy server - I opened the port and it was then downloaded. But while I was trying it, I actually downloaded the cab, unpacked it, and looked at the file - certificate trust list "authroot"; when opened, it said that "this certificate trust list is not valid. The certifiate that signed the list is not valid". Viewing the signature shows: "The certificate is not valid for the requested usage". Should I worry? thanks, Vadim Rapp
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
