A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » General XP issues or comments
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

anti virus tools



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 29th 10, 03:14 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
gordon[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default anti virus tools

I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup for the
Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I use avast antivirus, and my question is
it it advisable to have both running in real time?


Ads
  #2  
Old August 29th 10, 03:21 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Richard in AZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,051
Default anti virus tools

Malwarebytes requires the paid-for version to have it run in the background real-time.
Advisable? Too many personal opinions to get a fair answer to that question.
Yes, it will operate along with Avast and there is a good chance that what one misses the other will
catch.
Anti-malware and anti-virus programs can co-exist, but two antivirus programs usually just fight
each other.

"gordon" wrote in message ...
I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup for the Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I
use avast antivirus, and my question is it it advisable to have both running in real time?



  #3  
Old August 29th 10, 03:21 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Richard in AZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,051
Default anti virus tools

Malwarebytes requires the paid-for version to have it run in the background real-time.
Advisable? Too many personal opinions to get a fair answer to that question.
Yes, it will operate along with Avast and there is a good chance that what one misses the other will
catch.
Anti-malware and anti-virus programs can co-exist, but two antivirus programs usually just fight
each other.

"gordon" wrote in message ...
I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup for the Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I
use avast antivirus, and my question is it it advisable to have both running in real time?



  #4  
Old August 29th 10, 05:28 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
gordon[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default anti virus tools

Yes that's what I understand what I dont seem to find an answer to is this,
is malwarebytes an antivirus tool or an antispyware tool and it seems that
there is a grey area between the two. At the moment I am running both in the
background and there does not seem to be a conflict. Oh and I know this is a
windows xp group so sorry for posting it here but you guys always seem to
be the most helpful.
"Richard in AZ" wrote in message
...
Malwarebytes requires the paid-for version to have it run in the
background real-time.
Advisable? Too many personal opinions to get a fair answer to that
question.
Yes, it will operate along with Avast and there is a good chance that what
one misses the other will catch.
Anti-malware and anti-virus programs can co-exist, but two antivirus
programs usually just fight each other.

"gordon" wrote in message
...
I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup for the
Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I use avast antivirus, and my question is
it it advisable to have both running in real time?





  #5  
Old August 29th 10, 05:28 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
gordon[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default anti virus tools

Yes that's what I understand what I dont seem to find an answer to is this,
is malwarebytes an antivirus tool or an antispyware tool and it seems that
there is a grey area between the two. At the moment I am running both in the
background and there does not seem to be a conflict. Oh and I know this is a
windows xp group so sorry for posting it here but you guys always seem to
be the most helpful.
"Richard in AZ" wrote in message
...
Malwarebytes requires the paid-for version to have it run in the
background real-time.
Advisable? Too many personal opinions to get a fair answer to that
question.
Yes, it will operate along with Avast and there is a good chance that what
one misses the other will catch.
Anti-malware and anti-virus programs can co-exist, but two antivirus
programs usually just fight each other.

"gordon" wrote in message
...
I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup for the
Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I use avast antivirus, and my question is
it it advisable to have both running in real time?





  #6  
Old August 29th 10, 08:56 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
PA Bear [MS MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,010
Default anti virus tools

MBAM is an anti-spyware utility, one that's usually updated at least
once-a-day. There's no reason whatsoever to keep the free version of MBAM
installed. (And should MBAM find & remove anything, chances are there's
more to do to remove all traces of all hijackware, something that's best
left to experts in such matters IMHO).

Only the paid version of MBAM provides realtime protection.
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Client - since 2002


gordon wrote:
I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup for the
Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I use avast antivirus, and my question is
it it advisable to have both running in real time?


  #7  
Old August 29th 10, 08:56 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
PA Bear [MS MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,010
Default anti virus tools

MBAM is an anti-spyware utility, one that's usually updated at least
once-a-day. There's no reason whatsoever to keep the free version of MBAM
installed. (And should MBAM find & remove anything, chances are there's
more to do to remove all traces of all hijackware, something that's best
left to experts in such matters IMHO).

Only the paid version of MBAM provides realtime protection.
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Client - since 2002


gordon wrote:
I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup for the
Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I use avast antivirus, and my question is
it it advisable to have both running in real time?


  #8  
Old August 29th 10, 09:34 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Unknown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,007
Default anti virus tools

I use Microsoft Security Essentilas and have never had a problem (virus,
spyware or malware).
"gordon" wrote in message
...
Yes that's what I understand what I dont seem to find an answer to is
this, is malwarebytes an antivirus tool or an antispyware tool and it
seems that there is a grey area between the two. At the moment I am
running both in the background and there does not seem to be a conflict.
Oh and I know this is a windows xp group so sorry for posting it here but
you guys always seem to be the most helpful.
"Richard in AZ" wrote in message
...
Malwarebytes requires the paid-for version to have it run in the
background real-time.
Advisable? Too many personal opinions to get a fair answer to that
question.
Yes, it will operate along with Avast and there is a good chance that
what one misses the other will catch.
Anti-malware and anti-virus programs can co-exist, but two antivirus
programs usually just fight each other.

"gordon" wrote in message
...
I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup for the
Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I use avast antivirus, and my question is
it it advisable to have both running in real time?







  #9  
Old August 29th 10, 09:34 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Unknown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,007
Default anti virus tools

I use Microsoft Security Essentilas and have never had a problem (virus,
spyware or malware).
"gordon" wrote in message
...
Yes that's what I understand what I dont seem to find an answer to is
this, is malwarebytes an antivirus tool or an antispyware tool and it
seems that there is a grey area between the two. At the moment I am
running both in the background and there does not seem to be a conflict.
Oh and I know this is a windows xp group so sorry for posting it here but
you guys always seem to be the most helpful.
"Richard in AZ" wrote in message
...
Malwarebytes requires the paid-for version to have it run in the
background real-time.
Advisable? Too many personal opinions to get a fair answer to that
question.
Yes, it will operate along with Avast and there is a good chance that
what one misses the other will catch.
Anti-malware and anti-virus programs can co-exist, but two antivirus
programs usually just fight each other.

"gordon" wrote in message
...
I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup for the
Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I use avast antivirus, and my question is
it it advisable to have both running in real time?







  #10  
Old August 29th 10, 10:40 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Nil[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,170
Default anti virus tools

On 29 Aug 2010, "PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:

MBAM is an anti-spyware utility, one that's usually updated at
least once-a-day. There's no reason whatsoever to keep the free
version of MBAM installed.


You're proposing to uninstall Malwarebytes and reinstall it every time
you want to do a scan?!?! That would be a colossal waste of my time,
not to mention that when you need it most you might not even be able to
get on the internet, or to their web site, or reinstall it even if you
can get there.
  #11  
Old August 29th 10, 10:40 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Nil[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,170
Default anti virus tools

On 29 Aug 2010, "PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:

MBAM is an anti-spyware utility, one that's usually updated at
least once-a-day. There's no reason whatsoever to keep the free
version of MBAM installed.


You're proposing to uninstall Malwarebytes and reinstall it every time
you want to do a scan?!?! That would be a colossal waste of my time,
not to mention that when you need it most you might not even be able to
get on the internet, or to their web site, or reinstall it even if you
can get there.
  #12  
Old August 30th 10, 12:18 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
PA Bear [MS MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,010
Default anti virus tools

Nil wrote:
MBAM is an anti-spyware utility, one that's usually updated at
least once-a-day. There's no reason whatsoever to keep the free
version of MBAM installed.


You're proposing to uninstall Malwarebytes and reinstall it every time
you want to do a scan?!?! That would be a colossal waste of my time,
not to mention that when you need it most you might not even be able to
get on the internet, or to their web site, or reinstall it even if you
can get there.


Who asked for your opinion?
  #13  
Old August 30th 10, 12:18 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
PA Bear [MS MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,010
Default anti virus tools

Nil wrote:
MBAM is an anti-spyware utility, one that's usually updated at
least once-a-day. There's no reason whatsoever to keep the free
version of MBAM installed.


You're proposing to uninstall Malwarebytes and reinstall it every time
you want to do a scan?!?! That would be a colossal waste of my time,
not to mention that when you need it most you might not even be able to
get on the internet, or to their web site, or reinstall it even if you
can get there.


Who asked for your opinion?
  #14  
Old August 30th 10, 01:45 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Twayne[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,073
Default anti virus tools

In ,
gordon typed:
I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup
for the Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I use avast
antivirus, and my question is it it advisable to have both
running in real time?


It is not advisable to have two anti-virus programs running in real time;
they can trip over each other and report on each other.
You can however run spyware detectors and malware detectors at the same
time; malwarebytes is more a malware detector & I haven't heard of it
creating problems plus had it running here ini addition to norton AV at one
tme.

HTH,

Twayne`


  #15  
Old August 30th 10, 01:45 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Twayne[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,073
Default anti virus tools

In ,
gordon typed:
I have read a number of recomendations on this newsgroup
for the Malwarebytes anti malware tool..I use avast
antivirus, and my question is it it advisable to have both
running in real time?


It is not advisable to have two anti-virus programs running in real time;
they can trip over each other and report on each other.
You can however run spyware detectors and malware detectors at the same
time; malwarebytes is more a malware detector & I haven't heard of it
creating problems plus had it running here ini addition to norton AV at one
tme.

HTH,

Twayne`


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.