No one and nothing could ever pry Paul Alsing's hands off his Kool-Aid.

On 2019-09-23 6:09 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
Paul Alsing replied ( to me ):
No one could ever pry Paul's hands off his Kool-Aid.

I've not tasted Kool-Aid and
I don't understand why you think otherwise.

Google: drinking the Kool-Aid

Four Climate Scientists Destroy Climate Change Alarmism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqejXs7XgsU

there is plenty of evidence in support of man-driven climate change.

Every time I mention your apocalypse cult, you always come back to:
" our climate is changing " -- thank you, Captain Obvious.

This video was produced by the Heartland Institute,
a well-known climate-contrarian organization funded, in part, by Exxon,

You attack the people ( Exxon ) who funded the research
so you don't have to examine it -- well done, scientist.

Exxon is evil, obviously, because they provide us
with the energy we need to survive -- May God have mercy on their souls.
I can't imagine a more sinister crime.

Tom Harris works for the International Climate Science Coalition

Right, so he isn't allowed to comment on your Apocalypse cult.
That'd be heresy, and you won't allow it.

Stanely B Goldenberg, is an actual meteorologist

Yes, and the hysteria he quoted from the American Meteorological Society,
1922, is no different from they're saying today:

" Within a few years, the sea will rise,
making most coastal cities uninhabitable. "

My hometown, Seattle used to be under a glacier.

Richard Keen, has a PhD in Geography!

Google: Richard Keen University of Colorado

Ph.D., Geography/Climatology, University of Colorado.
Richard A. Keen is instructor emeritus at the University of Colorado
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (ATOC).
And "Professor in the Astrophysical & Planetary Sci.".

Besides, what kind of credentials does one need
to denounce an Apocalypse cult ?

blatant cherry picking of historical data

Now we've come to the heart of the matter.
_ You _ have cherry picked the historical data.

Seattle used to be under a glacier.

Only 5 to 10 % of the time was our planet ever cooler than it is now.

440 million years ago, in the Earth's coldest period,
carbon dioxide levels were 11 times higher than they are today.

no it wasn't

Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
Paul Alsing replied ( to me ):

440 million years ago, in the Earth's coldest period,
carbon dioxide levels were 11 times higher than they are today.

Even if it was - you don't show any evidence - there weren't many humans
around then, were there?

Climate change is a problem for us and our ecosystem only. The planet (and
life on it) will survive as it already has done over four mass extinctions.
We may not.

Chronic nym-shifting psychopath troll...

--
Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder1.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm !border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com! npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news .xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx07.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type: Text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Jeff-Relf.Me @.
Message-ID:
References:
Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate
Subject: No one and nothing could ever pry Paul Alsing's hands off his Kool-Aid.
User-Agent: Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM
Lines: 13
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:07:09 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:07:05 -0700 (Seattle)
X-Received-Bytes: 1306
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3910839623
X-Original-Bytes: 1094
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org sci.physics:768167 alt.comp.os.windows-10:103407 comp.os.linux.advocacy:770585 alt.checkmate:375866

Unable to access Google, Paul Alsing imagined:
Still can't find an actual climate scientist
who denies climate change, eh ?

Change is obvious, doom and gloom is religious.
No one and nothing could ever pry Paul's hands off his Kool-Aid.

Four Climate Scientists Destroy Climate Change Alarmism:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqejXs7XgsU

Paul won't watch this video, I guarantee you.
It's against his religion.

On 2019-09-23 11:12 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article ,
says...



On 2019-09-23 6:09 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
Paul Alsing replied ( to me ):
No one could ever pry Paul's hands off his Kool-Aid.

I've not tasted Kool-Aid and
I don't understand why you think otherwise.

Google: drinking the Kool-Aid

Four Climate Scientists Destroy Climate Change Alarmism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqejXs7XgsU

there is plenty of evidence in support of man-driven climate change.

Every time I mention your apocalypse cult, you always come back to:
" our climate is changing " -- thank you, Captain Obvious.

This video was produced by the Heartland Institute,
a well-known climate-contrarian organization funded, in part, by Exxon,

You attack the people ( Exxon ) who funded the research
so you don't have to examine it -- well done, scientist.

Exxon is evil, obviously, because they provide us
with the energy we need to survive -- May God have mercy on their souls.
I can't imagine a more sinister crime.

Tom Harris works for the International Climate Science Coalition

Right, so he isn't allowed to comment on your Apocalypse cult.
That'd be heresy, and you won't allow it.

Stanely B Goldenberg, is an actual meteorologist

Yes, and the hysteria he quoted from the American Meteorological Society,
1922, is no different from they're saying today:

" Within a few years, the sea will rise,
making most coastal cities uninhabitable. "

My hometown, Seattle used to be under a glacier.

Richard Keen, has a PhD in Geography!

Google: Richard Keen University of Colorado

Ph.D., Geography/Climatology, University of Colorado.
Richard A. Keen is instructor emeritus at the University of Colorado
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (ATOC).
And "Professor in the Astrophysical & Planetary Sci.".

Besides, what kind of credentials does one need
to denounce an Apocalypse cult ?

blatant cherry picking of historical data

Now we've come to the heart of the matter.
_ You _ have cherry picked the historical data.

Seattle used to be under a glacier.

Only 5 to 10 % of the time was our planet ever cooler than it is now.





440 million years ago, in the Earth's coldest period,
carbon dioxide levels were 11 times higher than they are today.

no it wasn't

I wanna see what The Kensitard has to say about that.

let's just watch her edit that and deny it

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 01:27:29 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:

How continental glaciation could have formed when
carbon dioxide levels were so high has been a paradox.

Easy. No sunlight reaching the surface due to atmospheric
blockage/absorption. Thus, no solar heat = cold enough to form
glaciers whenever/wherever water could be frozen.

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:22:29 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:

Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
Paul Alsing replied ( to me ):

440 million years ago, in the Earth's coldest period,
carbon dioxide levels were 11 times higher than they are today.

Even if it was - you don't show any evidence - there weren't many humans
around then, were there?

Climate change is a problem for us and our ecosystem only. The planet (and
life on it) will survive as it already has done over four mass extinctions.
We may not.

Oh, shut up, you hysterical bitch. You are SOOOO stupid
if you actually believe humanity cannot adapt to a few
degrees rise in global average temperatures. Gimme
a ****ing break. You liberals are definitely an evolutionary
dead end. I hope you liberals ALL die off because two
degrees is just way more than you can cope with.

****ing moron!

--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory

Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily
ignored misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.

On 2019-09-24 12:32 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:22:29 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:

Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
Paul Alsing replied ( to me ):

440 million years ago, in the Earth's coldest period,
carbon dioxide levels were 11 times higher than they are today.

Even if it was - you don't show any evidence - there weren't many humans
around then, were there?

Climate change is a problem for us and our ecosystem only. The planet (and
life on it) will survive as it already has done over four mass extinctions.
We may not.

Oh, shut up, you hysterical bitch. You are SOOOO stupid
if you actually believe humanity cannot adapt to a few
degrees rise in global average temperatures. Gimme
a ****ing break. You liberals are definitely an evolutionary
dead end. I hope you liberals ALL die off because two
degrees is just way more than you can cope with.

****ing moron!

shut your stupid mouth fat face

On 2019-09-24 12:44 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, % wrote:

...

shut your stupid mouth fat face

Bugger off, wank stain for a brain.

meet me and fight me and the loser ,
leaves usenet and forks over all his stuff

On 9/24/2019 2:44 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, % wrote:

...

shut your stupid mouth fat face

Bugger off, wank stain for a brain.



OP = Seattle should be under a glacier

On 2019-09-24 1:05 p.m., Sergio wrote:
On 9/24/2019 2:44 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, % wrote:

...

shut your stupid mouth fat face

Bugger off, wank stain for a brain.



OP = Seattle should be under a glacier

it is

On 2019-09-24 1:49 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
AOC is Doctor Evil; if we don't do what she says, we're toast.
Her "science" is irrefutable, we're told.

Her "Green New Deal" reminds me of China's "Great Leap Backward" (1958),
its "Cultural Devolution" (1966), and today's "Mega Ghost Town" quotas.

Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?!

How many tons of nails must we produce this year, comrade ?

and you can't leave there's a wall

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, % wrote:
On 2019-09-24, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:

AOC is Doctor Evil; if we don't do what she says, we're toast.
Her "science" is irrefutable, we're told.

Her "Green New Deal" reminds me of China's "Great Leap Backward" (1958),
its "Cultural Devolution" (1966), and today's "Mega Ghost Town" quotas.

Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?!

How many tons of nails must we produce this year, comrade ?

and you can't leave there's a wall

So, you admit there's a wall around your nursing home
to keep you Alzheimer's victims from wandering off into
the woods and getting eaten by bears or kicked in the
head by a moose?

--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory

Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily
ignored misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.

On 9/24/19 1:49 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
AOC is Doctor Evil; if we don't do what she says, we're toast.
Her "science" is irrefutable, we're told.

Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should
accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is
not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting.

Her "Green New Deal" reminds me of China's "Great Leap Backward" (1958),
its "Cultural Devolution" (1966), and today's "Mega Ghost Town" quotas.

By all means offer quotes from it that show this.

Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?!

By all means offer quotes from it that show this.

How many tons of nails must we produce this year, comrade ?



--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2019-09-24 3:56 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, % wrote:
On 2019-09-24, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:

AOC is Doctor Evil; if we don't do what she says, we're toast.
Her "science" is irrefutable, we're told.

Her "Green New Deal" reminds me of China's "Great Leap Backward" (1958),
its "Cultural Devolution" (1966), and today's "Mega Ghost Town" quotas.

Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?!

How many tons of nails must we produce this year, comrade ?

and you can't leave there's a wall

So, you admit there's a wall around your nursing home
to keep you Alzheimer's victims from wandering off into
the woods and getting eaten by bears or kicked in the
head by a moose?


You're not too well educated are you Sonny,

Bears don't normally eat people.
Moose don't kick that high.
Back too school time.

Rene

On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote:
Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should
accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is
not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting.

What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly
falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type
environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Blake (Posts from Google Groups killfiled due to excess spam.)

NSA sedition and treason -- http://www.DeathToNSAthugs.com
Don't talk to cops! -- http://www.DontTalkToCops.com
Badges don't grant extra rights -- http://www.CopBlock.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------