Why does A. Holder Persecute Others?

And waste so much time and energy doing this? Who really cares?

It's an adult question.

Just asking.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

RonM wrote:
And waste so much time and energy doing this? Who really cares?

It's an adult question.

Just asking.

I'm beginning to think it's a Turing Test.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl5pds sACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooFYdAf/bs9p9Jc/ymydp4otw2SDf+Zj6Oad15ltMDkhjGOZw9kje3PC0BCn+q0R
sdrIggad+BfbuGKm3EU8Nv0vM2m6uUZOOoS0CAazW84PPlYrtw itzLAKAwZLxhpz
ZjtKomMwvD7fnRjqO7V8MyCo7sXEPf0WOZuGmxg3FBQj4Kp3MI 7z7HVKvzdtMtws
xUKnqc/O8UUDiov5F6JMVG9sQdy1L2db53md31KQa7qGnrry9oN3ZUeKs cBlcHhw
WcTmku32SZNS80ndmwcpnaKsd5IdzFqqBDZIdK0VbiJ5VxTjNL zd9X4Gnz9NojdP
rISx+TTvhLC0X5sGEzEfUivwAR0sMA==
=CYjJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281

On 11 Mar 2020, Dan Purgert wrote
(in article ):

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

RonM wrote:
And waste so much time and energy doing this? Who really cares?

It's an adult question.

Just asking.

I'm beginning to think it's a Turing Test.

It’s definitely not intelligent. It might be an Artificial Stupid...

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:17:23 -0700, RonM wrote:

And waste so much time and energy doing this? Who really cares?

It's an adult question.

Just asking.

Hi RonM,

Please cite, RonM, a single thread of added value you've authored here.
o You only need to cite a _single_ thread to prove you _can_ add value.

Name just one.

My first question to you will _always_ be the adult question of what value
do you add to this newsgroup by asking you to simply cite a thread you've
authored to this newsgroup which added value.

Note if you can't cite even a single thread of yours that added value, then
you'll _never_ comprehend why I do what I do on Usenet.

You just won't have the adult skills to comprehend if you've never once
added value to this newsgroup, RonM.

Note: I'm not saying you've never added value to this newsgroup because I
simply didn't check - but I am saying that if you've never once added
value, then you can't possibly comprehend the adult _answer_ to your
question.

In short, if you can't add value, you can't comprehend the answer to your
own question since you'll have proven you own the mind of a mere child.

Even without the answer to that question from you (which I expect you to
answer as an adult should answer, since you're asking the same of me),
I will prove the obvious and _adult_ answer to your question.

In fact, I provided that adult answer in c.m.a just today, so I'll simply
point to that answer to your question, which every adult knows already.

The answer is in this post, posted to c.m.a just today.
o How to disable the Google Gmail app on Android Pie from communicating with Google servers
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/DAPSl_8pGvI/gBvujiqiAgAJ

Notice though, how the common trolls will lack value in _every_ post to
this thread, RonM, where all I ask of you is the same you ask of me.

Are you an adult, RonM?
o I don't know - but your response will _prove_ the answer for all of us.

Please cite, RonM, a single thread of added value you've authored here.
o You only need to cite a _single_ thread to prove you _can_ add value.

Name just one.
--
Only 2 kinds of people are on Usenet: Those adding value & those who can't.

On 2020-03-13 11:31, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:17:23 -0700, RonM wrote:

And waste so much time and energy doing this? Who really cares?

It's an adult question.

Just asking.

Hi RonM,

Please cite, RonM, a single thread of added value you've authored here.
o You only need to cite a _single_ thread to prove you _can_ add value.

Please cite your authority for demanding a single thing of anyone else
on this or any other newsgroup.

On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:13:37 -0400, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:

Please cite your authority for demanding a single thing of anyone else
on this or any other newsgroup.

Hi Panthera Tigris Altaica,

For the permanent Usenet record to record...

I do not expect you to own the adult cognitive skills to comprehend the
answer to your own question, where I _will_ expect the OP, RonM, whom I'm
not acquainted with since he doesn't normally unilaterally taunt me on the
value added threads, to respond as an adult could, and should respond.

Bear in mind I spend considerable time, effort, & energy to add value.
o The common trolls such as Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontagne, don't.

Worse, those common trolls _hate_ whenever someone _does_ add value!
o It's why they incessantly post their **** on threads of value they hate.

They can't stand it that people are on Usenet to actually add value.
o Because people like Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontagne _can't_ ever add value.

We've proven this, quite easily, simply by pointing out that very fact.
o Neither of them has ever posted a thread of value in their entire life!

So they'll never be able to even _comprehend_ what it takes to add value.
o People like Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontage just don't own adult cognition.

However ... to the point of _this_ thread (which RonM authored)...
o Not only will the adults note I answered RonM's question in an adult
manner... but the adults will note that I asked RonM an adult question.

How RonM responds to that _adult_ question, will tell us everything.

The _adults_ on this newsgroup will comprehend that if RonM has never even
once spent the considerable time it takes to research, document, and solve
technical issues, writing summaries & updates and tutorials galore, then
RonM likely doesn't have the skills to comprehend the answer to his own
question.

Likewise, you, PTA, already proved you do not own the adult skills to
comprehend the answer to _your_ own question, but, I will provide that
answer (again) since you clearly missed it the first time around.

1. I spend considerable effort documenting value-added threads on Usenet.
2. Here's just the most recent thread, I spent about 8 hours documenting:
o

3. When people like Dan Purgert or Rene Lamontagne _****_ on those threads,
I post a calculated strategic _response_ to their childish taunts.

While I expect _adults_ to comprehend this concept, I don't expect you,
PTA, to comprehend that I do not respond to these childish people in most
threads that I don't author (where mine are intended to be of high value).

In _those_ threads, which I don't author, I follow the Internet maxim:
a. Do not feed the trolls like Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontagne...
b. Because they will drop you down to their childish level...
c. Where they have more experience than I, as they own a child's mind.

However, if I spend an entire day documenting a valuable hint or problem
set solution or general purpose tutorial, you will simply need to expect me
to respond as an adult should, to the childish taunts of those like Dan
Purgert and Rene Lamontagne who have _never_ even once in their entire
lives ever added even a _single_ thread of adult topical value to this
newsgroup.

Why do you always expect less of an adult Panthera Tigris Altaica?
--
If you've never added any value - you'll never understand adults who do.

On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:42:41 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:

2. Here's just the most recent thread, I spent about 8 hours documenting:
o


Aurgh. I put placeholders for references, but I forget to fill them in!
Mea culpa. The trolls will have a field day as that's all they can do.

The OP, RonM, will note my threads are not random... but rather strategic.
o My response to RonM was an _adult_ response to his question.

And I expect RonM to respond to my question to him, as an adult should.

There's an excellent _adult_ reason I point out trolls from the likes of
o Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontagne

I spend a _lot_ of energy to add value, where all worthless trolls like Dan
Purgert & Rene Lamontagne can do is write worthless childish posts such as:
"*Who cares about adding value, twit*"

Notice these taunts and worthless trolls are unilateral.

They're completely unprovoked.
o All I do is post added value where the trolls _hate_ added value.

That's why trolls like Dan Purgert & Rene Lamongagne respond to value with:
"*Who cares about adding value, twit*?"

The _adult_ problem is that if we ignore worthless trolls like Dan Purgert
& Rene Lamongagne who simply hate that they can't add any value, this
simply emboldens them to incessantly troll any thread of value they find.

The fact is that worthless trolls like Dan & Rene _hate_ value added
threads.

These worthless trolls like Purgert & Lamontagne hate that _they_ don't
have any skills whatsoever to author a thread of any value.

Which is why Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontagne have never authored a thread of
any value to this newsgroup in the entire history of Usenet.

Dan and Rene _hate_ that other people _can_ add value that they can't.

Otherwise, why do they post their worthless crap such as Rene Lamontagne's
"*Who cares about adding value, twit?*"

Anyway, the permanent Usenet will show my latest added value tutorial is:
o Tutorial to add over a dozen useful tweaks to Android screenshot
capabilities & four methods for screenshotting snapshots
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rec.photo.digital/myHx83MFV-U

But that's one of so many tutorials, that even I can't count them all.

And yet, people like Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontagne, who **** on the threads
that do add value (because they _hate_ that they can't add value), can't
point to a _single_ thread in their entire lives they've authored which
added any value.

Hilariously (but more sadly so), I'm petrified for our species that the
_only_ thread Dan Purgert could find where he claims to have added adult
value is in _my_ thread on extending Wi-Fi range for miles on a PC.

Wouldn't _you_ be scared for our species if you comprehend what that
actually means in terms of Dan Purgert's & Rene Lamontagne's utter lack of
adult cognitive skills?

Bear in mind, for the permanent record, I only point this out for the
trolls who clearly _hate_ that I add tons of added value to this newsgroup
who then post their childish taunts because they hate themselves, of:
"*Who cares about adding value, twit*?"
--
If you've never added any value - you'll never understand those who do.

On 2020-03-13 12:41, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:13:37 -0400, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:

Please cite your authority for demanding a single thing of anyone else
on this or any other newsgroup.

Hi Panthera Tigris Altaica,

For the permanent Usenet record to record...

I do not expect you to own the adult cognitive skills to comprehend the
answer to your own question, where I _will_ expect the OP, RonM, whom I'm
not acquainted with since he doesn't normally unilaterally taunt me on the
value added threads, to respond as an adult could, and should respond.

Bear in mind I spend considerable time, effort, & energy to add value.
o The common trolls such as Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontagne, don't.

Worse, those common trolls _hate_ whenever someone _does_ add value!
o It's why they incessantly post their **** on threads of value they hate.

They can't stand it that people are on Usenet to actually add value.
o Because people like Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontagne _can't_ ever add value.

We've proven this, quite easily, simply by pointing out that very fact.
o Neither of them has ever posted a thread of value in their entire life!

So they'll never be able to even _comprehend_ what it takes to add value.
o People like Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontage just don't own adult cognition.

However ... to the point of _this_ thread (which RonM authored)...
o Not only will the adults note I answered RonM's question in an adult
manner... but the adults will note that I asked RonM an adult question.

How RonM responds to that _adult_ question, will tell us everything.

The _adults_ on this newsgroup will comprehend that if RonM has never even
once spent the considerable time it takes to research, document, and solve
technical issues, writing summaries & updates and tutorials galore, then
RonM likely doesn't have the skills to comprehend the answer to his own
question.

Likewise, you, PTA, already proved you do not own the adult skills to
comprehend the answer to _your_ own question, but, I will provide that
answer (again) since you clearly missed it the first time around.

1. I spend considerable effort documenting value-added threads on Usenet.
2. Here's just the most recent thread, I spent about 8 hours documenting:
o

3. When people like Dan Purgert or Rene Lamontagne _****_ on those threads,
I post a calculated strategic _response_ to their childish taunts.

While I expect _adults_ to comprehend this concept, I don't expect you,
PTA, to comprehend that I do not respond to these childish people in most
threads that I don't author (where mine are intended to be of high value).

In _those_ threads, which I don't author, I follow the Internet maxim:
a. Do not feed the trolls like Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontagne...
b. Because they will drop you down to their childish level...
c. Where they have more experience than I, as they own a child's mind.

However, if I spend an entire day documenting a valuable hint or problem
set solution or general purpose tutorial, you will simply need to expect me
to respond as an adult should, to the childish taunts of those like Dan
Purgert and Rene Lamontagne who have _never_ even once in their entire
lives ever added even a _single_ thread of adult topical value to this
newsgroup.

Why do you always expect less of an adult Panthera Tigris Altaica?


You have failed to cite any authority whatsoever,

On 2020-03-13 15:26, Andy wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:00:26 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder []
And yet, people like Dan Purgert & Rene Lamontagne, [] can't
point to a _single_ thread in their entire lives they've authored which
added any value.

Okay, so you've got 'the only gay in the village' syndrome. See it and get
help or keep confirming your oblivious narcissism in every post.


It is far too late for anything to help him.

On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 19:26:17 +0000, Andy wrote:

Okay, so you've got 'the only gay in the village' syndrome. See it and get
help or keep confirming your oblivious narcissism in every post.

For the permanent Usenet record...
a. If someone has _never_ even once added a thread of any value to Usenet;
b. Then they can't possibly comprehend the adult process of those who do.

They, almost certainly like the OP, and like this "Andy" piece of ****,
o Can only crap on other people's efforts to add value to this newsgroup.

It's what these worthless pieces of **** like Purgert & Lamontagne do.
o And it appears to be what this piece of **** Andy is attempting to do.

All they _can_ do, if they've never added any value, is claim, as Rene did:
"*Who cares about adding value, twit*

The _adult_ fact remains:

The OP asked a question, *which I answered*, as an _adult_ would answer.
o Now, we're all waiting to see the OP's _adult_ response to my question.

I ask the same question, btw, of all you worthless pieces of trash, Andy.
o Cite a single thread, in the history of Usenet, you authored to this ng
o that added value.

Any value.
o Name just one.

The point is that if you've never added value, then you proved you can't.

Name just one thread, Andy, you've authored here, that added any value.
o Name just one.

It's a simple three word test of all you worthless pieces of ****, Andy.
o Name just one.

Or, in the infamous words of Dan Purtert & Rene Lamontagne, do you respond:
"*Who cares about adding value, twit*"
--
If you've never added any value - you'll never understand adults who do.

On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:33:09 -0400, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:

It is far too late for anything to help him.

The permanent Usenet record will show that...
o (just as with *Dan Purgert* & *Rene Lamontagne*)...

These worthless pieces of ****, in this case, Panthera Tigris Altaica
o Failed, the _simplest_ 3-word test of all these worthless pieces of ****.

He can't even cite a _single_ thread, in his entire life, that added value.
o Not even one!

An _adult_, would easily be able to pass this simple 3-word test of worth:
o *Name a single thread, Panthera, of yours, to this ng, that added value*.

Name just one.
--
If you've never added any value - you'll never understand those who do.

On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:32:26 -0400, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:

You have failed to cite any authority whatsoever...

The permanent Usenet record will note...

Panthera Tigris Altaica, as expected, _failed_ the simple adult test.
o PTA asked his question, which I answered as an adult would.

Panthera Tigris Altaica then instantly proceeded to prove he couldn't even
comprehend even this simplest answer to his question in my sig below.
--
Those who lack ability to add value can't understand adults that don't.

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:17:23 -0700, RonM wrote:

And waste so much time and energy doing this? Who really cares?

It's an adult question.

Just asking.

FACT: (From: RonM )
1. This RonM sock boldly asked his "adult" question of the newsgroup;
2. I answered his "adult" question, & asked him for the same courtesy.

The permanent Usenet record will show...
o We're all still waiting for an _adult_ response from this RonM sock.
--
Those who have never even once added any value, already proved they can't.

On 13 Mar 2020, Arlen Holder wrote
(in article ):

On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:33:09 -0400, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:

It is far too late for anything to help him.

The permanent Usenet record will show that...
o (just as with *Dan Purgert* & *Rene Lamontagne*)...

These worthless pieces of ****, in this case, Panthera Tigris Altaica
o Failed, the _simplest_ 3-word test of all these worthless pieces of ****.

He can't even cite a _single_ thread, in his entire life, that added value.
o Not even one!

An _adult_, would easily be able to pass this simple 3-word test of worth:
o *Name a single thread, Panthera, of yours, to this ng, that added value*.

Name just one.

Ah. Everyone but you is wrong. Got it.

On 13 Mar 2020, Arlen Holder wrote
(in article ):

On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:32:26 -0400, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:

You have failed to cite any authority whatsoever...

The permanent Usenet record will note...

Panthera Tigris Altaica, as expected, _failed_ the simple adult test.
o PTA asked his question, which I answered as an adult would.

you didn’t answer the question.


Panthera Tigris Altaica then instantly proceeded to prove he couldn't even
comprehend even this simplest answer to his question in my sig below.