Why does A. Holder Persecute Others?

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:29:03 -0400, Wolffan wrote:

you still haven¢t answered the question.

Wolffan,

The permanent Usenet record will show my _multiple_ answers to this "RonM"
sock, who has shot his wad and disappeared, as these cowardly bully socks
often do (since they literally have only negative value to add).

And please, yet again, I ask you a simple key related question, Wolffan,
given I know you well as you've long infested the Apple newsgroups.

Cite a _single_ thread you've authored to this newsgroup of any value.
o Name just one

Then, answer the same adult topical question I asked of Kenny McCormick:
o *Why don't you chastise those worthless pieces of **** for what they do?*
--
Those who never add value ruin Usenet when they **** on those who do.
They will _never_ stop until those with courage point that fact out.

On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 00:15:40 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:

No. We are waiting for you to respond to the question: «Please cite your
authority for demanding a single thing of anyone else on this or any
other newsgroup»

Hi Carlos,

Please stop proving you lack any semblance of adult cognitive skills.
o Just stop your childish games.

Given you've proven, multiple times, to lack the adult cognitive capacity
to understand that I provided the answer very many times already, I will
give you the answer, yet again, in as short and direct a method as I can
make it, using words that even you, Carlos, can (let's hope) understand...

*They who have never added any value - repeatedly **** on those who do*.
o ?Entiendes esta respuesta simple o no carlos?

Cowardly bullies will _never_ stop, unless we stand up to these bullies.
--
Those who never add value ruin Usenet when they **** on those who do.
They will _never_ stop until those with courage point that fact out.

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:06:38 +0000, Andy wrote:

Well of course he isn't. He said it's me who's making a fool of myself, and
the enemy of your enemy is your friend, right? That's how ****ed up you are.

Hi Andy,

The question asked of Kenny McCormick was a reasonable adult question:
o *Why don't you chastise those worthless pieces of **** for what they do?*

Given I'm only responding to these easily proven worthless piece of ****
like *Rene Lamontagne* & *Dan Purgert* who have _never_ added a thread of
value in their entire lives to this newsgroup, but who clearly and
incessantly **** on people who do strive to add value...

I asked Kenny McCormick a simple rational obvious adult question:
Q: Why don't you chastise those worthless pieces of **** for what they do?

While Kenny McCormick can easily pass the 3-word test of someone who has
added on-topic technical value to this newsgroup, I'll extend that courtesy
to you, Andy, even as you've clearly failed the simplest 3-word adult test:

I ask the same adult question of you, Andy.
o *Why don't you chastise those worthless pieces of **** for what they do?*
--
Those who've never added any value - can only **** on those who do.

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:28:27 -0400, Wolffan wrote:

And everyone but you is still wrong.
**** off, troll-bot.

For the permanent Usenet record, I've been on Usenet for decades, where
these worthless pieces of **** incessantly prove they lack any capacity to
add value.

Literally, not a single "post" (not thread, but "article") from this
Wolffran, in the entire history of Usenet, added any on-topic value to this
newsgroup (or to _any_ newsgroup).

That's how worthless the output of these worthless pieces of **** is.

These worthless pieces of **** akin to *Rene Lamontagne* literally
_deplore_ that they clearly lack any adult capacity to add on-topic value.

Since these easily proven worthless pieces of **** lack any capacity
whatsoever to add on-topic adult value to any technical thread on this ng.

FACT:
*Rene Lamontagne* post as this proven worthless piece of **** Wolfran did.
"*Who cares about adding on-topic technical value, twit*"
--
Rebe, who has never even once added any value, already proved he can't.

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:17:23 -0700, RonM wrote:

Who really cares?
It's an adult question.
Just asking.

The _adult_ questions asked of this "RonM" sock have remained unanswered.

The permanent Usenet record will show that this "RonM" sock has fired his
childish bolt, and then, like a cowardly fifth-grade bully, disappeared.

Just like the worthless piece of **** *Rene Lamontagne* often does.
"*Who cares about adding any on-topic value, twit*!"

They who have never even once added value, have proven that they can't.
--
If you've never added any value - you'll never understand those who do.

On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 00:15:47 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:

No, we are not. We are waiting for you to respond to the question:
«Please cite your authority for demanding a single thing of anyone else
on this or any other newsgroup»

Carlos,

Please stop proving you lack any semblance of adult cognitive skills.
o Just stop your childish games.

The fact you have seen the answer _multiple_ times & yet claim you haven't
o Indicates either you don't plan on comprehending the simple answer, or,
o You don't own adult cognitive skills sufficient to comprehend the answer.
(Pick one.)

See again:
Message-ID:

Comprendiste la respuesta simple o no Carlos?
--
Those who never add value ruin Usenet when they **** on those who do.
They will never stop ruining Usenet unless we stand up to these bullies.
I stand up to these cowardly bullies when they attack threads I author.
They are free to troll the hell out of threads not attempting to add value.

On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 00:16:35 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:

No, we are waiting for you to respond to the question: «Please cite your
authority for demanding a single thing of anyone else on this or any
other newsgroup»

Carlos,

Please stop proving you lack any semblance of adult cognitive skills.
o Just stop your childish games.

The fact you have seen the answer _multiple_ times & yet claim you haven't
o Indicates either you don't plan on comprehending the simple answer, or,
o You don't own adult cognitive skills sufficient to comprehend the answer.
(Pick one.)

See again:
Message-ID:

Comprendiste la respuesta simple o no Carlos?
--
Those who never add value ruin Usenet when they **** on those who do.
They will never stop ruining Usenet unless we stand up to these bullies.
I stand up to these cowardly bullies when they attack threads I author.
They are free to troll the hell out of threads not attempting to add value.

On 15 Mar 2020, Arlen Holder wrote
(in article ):

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:28:27 -0400, Wolffan wrote:

And everyone but you is still wrong.
**** off, troll-bot.

For the permanent Usenet record, I've been on Usenet for decades, where
these worthless pieces of **** incessantly prove they lack any capacity to
add value.
no-body cares about your opinion, troll-bot. you have yet to show even one
reason why anyone should. eat **** and die.

On 15 Mar 2020, Arlen Holder wrote
(in article ):

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:29:03 -0400, Wolffan wrote:

you still haven¢t answered the question.

Wolffan,

The permanent Usenet record will show my _multiple_ answers to this "RonM"
sock, who has shot his wad and disappeared, as these cowardly bully socks
often do (since they literally have only negative value to add).

SHOW YOUR AUTHORITY FOR DEMANDING A SINGLE THING OF ANYONE ELSE ON THIS OR
ANY OTHER NEWSGROUP. Your pathetic attempts to dodge and to divert are even
more transparent than normal.

On 15 Mar 2020, Arlen Holder wrote
(in article ):

On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 00:15:40 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:

No. We are waiting for you to respond to the question: «Please cite your
authority for demanding a single thing of anyone else on this or any
other newsgroup»

Hi Carlos,

Please stop proving you lack any semblance of adult cognitive skills.
o Just stop your childish games.
SHOW YOUR AUTHORITY FOR DEMANDING A SINGLE THING OF ANYONE ELSE ON THIS OR
ANY OTHER NEWSGROUP. Your pathetic attempts to dodge and to divert are even
more transparent than normal.

On 15 Mar 2020, Arlen Holder wrote
(in article ):

On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 00:16:35 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:

No, we are waiting for you to respond to the question: «Please cite your
authority for demanding a single thing of anyone else on this or any
other newsgroup»

Carlos,

Please stop proving you lack any semblance of adult cognitive skills.
o Just stop your childish games.
SHOW YOUR AUTHORITY FOR DEMANDING A SINGLE THING OF ANYONE ELSE ON THIS OR
ANY OTHER NEWSGROUP. Your pathetic attempts to dodge and to divert are even
more transparent than normal.

On 15 Mar 2020, Arlen Holder wrote
(in article ):

On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 00:15:47 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:

No, we are not. We are waiting for you to respond to the question:
«Please cite your authority for demanding a single thing of anyone else
on this or any other newsgroup»

Carlos,

Please stop proving you lack any semblance of adult cognitive skills.
o Just stop your childish games.
SHOW YOUR AUTHORITY FOR DEMANDING A SINGLE THING OF ANYONE ELSE ON THIS OR
ANY OTHER NEWSGROUP. Your pathetic attempts to dodge and to divert are even
more transparent than normal.

On 15 Mar 2020, Arlen Holder wrote
(in article ):

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:17:23 -0700, RonM wrote:

Who really cares?
It's an adult question.
Just asking.

The _adult_ questions asked of this "RonM" sock have remained unanswered.
SHOW YOUR AUTHORITY FOR DEMANDING A SINGLE THING OF ANYONE ELSE ON THIS OR
ANY OTHER NEWSGROUP. Your pathetic attempts to dodge and to divert are even
more transparent than normal.

On 11 Mar 2020, RonM wrote
(in article ):

And waste so much time and energy doing this? Who really cares?

It's an adult question.

Just asking.

It’s a troll-bot. It’s a _stupid_ troll-bot.

On 15 Mar 2020, Andy wrote
(in ):

On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:14:11 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote:

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:06:38 +0000, Andy wrote:

Well of course he isn't. He said it's me who's making a fool of myself, and
the enemy of your enemy is your friend, right? That's how ****ed up you
are.

Hi Andy,

The question asked of Kenny McCormick was a reasonable adult question:
o *Why don't you chastise those worthless pieces of **** for what they do?*

No, it is not a reasonable question, and anyone who's been around Usenet as
long as you claim to would recognise that that question is loaded with a
presupposition he can't respond to without incriminating himself. It
presupposes that the participants he must go after are "worthless pieces of
****" and demands a response. It's loaded, imperious and bound to make Kenny
subservient. So instead of being satisfied that he took a cheap shot at me
you set out to entrap him with a loaded question and get him to act as your
personal attack dog. That's very short-sighted of you and not the way to go
about recruiting allies in your war against other participants here. Do you
get any of that, dummy?

the troll-bot cannot learn. it’s an Artificial Stupid and is very, very
stupid.