Why does A. Holder Persecute Others?

On 2020-03-16 14:50, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:55:18 +0000, Andy wrote:

Then I declare this unanimous agreement a permanent Usenet record. :-)

I've been on Usenet for decades, so I understand that these worthless
pieces of **** _hate_ that they lack any adult capacity to add value.

Notice how they _hate_ it's easy to prove they've never, even once in the
entire history of Usenet, authored a thread of any added technical value.


You have failed to show anything of the kind. There was no 'hate' in any
of the posts referenced.

And you still have utterly, totally, and completely failed to
demonstrate that you have any authority of any kind in any newsgroup. In
particular you have failed to demonstrate that you can make a demand of
any other poster, and you have failed to show that you are in any way a
judge of the actions of any other poster.

On 2020-03-16 14:47, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:31:12 -0500, Rene Lamontagne wrote:

Seconded here also, It's unanimous' :-)

Kudos to Dan Purgert, for standing at the top of the pack!

I thank these five POS for proving me correct _every_ time they post:

You would be incorrect. The fact that five posters are in agreement with
each other and disagreement with you is a strong pointer indicating that
you are in the wrong.

A stronger pointer is the simple fact that you have failed to address
the adult question and to show how you have the authority to demand
anything of any other poster in this or any other newsgroup.

On 2020-03-16 14:47, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 07:34:15 -0400, Wolffan wrote:

SHOW YOUR AUTHORITY FOR DEMANDING A SINGLE THING OF ANYONE ELSE ON THIS OR
ANY OTHER NEWSGROUP. Your pathetic attempts to dodge and to divert are even
more transparent than normal.

Those who can't add value ruin Usenet when they **** on those who can.


You have failed to show your authority for demanding a single thing of
anyone else on this or any other newsgroup.

You have also failed to show your authority to sit in judgement of
anyone else on this or any other newsgroup.

Your characterization of posters who point out your numerous failures
demonstrates your lack of judgement, lack of authority, and general lack
of intelligence.

On 2020-03-16 14:47, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 07:33:47 -0400, Wolffan wrote:

SHOW YOUR AUTHORITY FOR DEMANDING A SINGLE THING OF ANYONE ELSE ON THIS OR
ANY OTHER NEWSGROUP. Your pathetic attempts to dodge and to divert are even
more transparent than normal.

The permanent Usenet record will show that Wolffan _hates_ that it was
trivial for adults to prove Wolffan has never even once in his entire life
posted any thread of technical value to this newsgroup.

You have never demonstrated any such thing. You have demonstrated a lack
of judgement, authority, and intelligence.

On 2020-03-16 14:47, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:34:00 -0400, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:

He will never answer the question.

Hi there Panthera Tigris Altaica,

I know you well,

No, you do not.

On 2020-03-16 14:47, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:29:08 -0400, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:

You have still failed to cite any authority whatsoever showing why you
have the ability to demand that any other poster do anything whatsoever
that you wish them to do. You lack the authority to make demands. You
cannot enforce your demands. You are, literally, a sad sack of ****.

The permanent Usenet record will show the pathetic response above.


You have demonstrated a lack of judgement, authority, and intelligence.
Your opinion is without value.

On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:50:35 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:55:18 +0000, Andy wrote:

Then I declare this unanimous agreement a permanent Usenet record. :-)

I've been judged a "narcissistic, attention-seeking, would-be
bully and troll."

Yes, this unanimous agreement is now a permanent Usenet record.

The smell of his own feces gives him
sexual gratification.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2020-03-16 14:50, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:55:18 +0000, Andy wrote:

Then I declare this unanimous agreement a permanent Usenet record. :-)

I've been on Usenet for decades, so I understand that these worthless
pieces of **** _hate_ that they lack any adult capacity to add value.

Notice how they _hate_ it's easy to prove they've never, even once in the
entire history of Usenet, authored a thread of any added technical value.


You have failed to show anything of the kind. There was no 'hate' in any
of the posts referenced.

Not only that, but people have pulled up a post or three refuting the
absurd claims that the named people don't contribute provide value.

Although, he has changed the goalposts to "thread" rather than "post";
but then again his "threads" only offer any "technical value" because of
those same people correcting the errors he makes.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl5v3f oACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooEuhAf6A9uqJlyqx2bnqK22U4U6iaBzULHQySsgyYZmGGvSUw N+YRvZwsEAb3ms
xVOxSiAYRyxcT60l5SumsT69aQk2rMj4DagTi1qArNJRKPVG11 nrfiDLmCUT1E7y
ISwI9VpQ6bni2AtUOxXSWFaJUYrjAMks+EdK0YYsr5iOOHJMUV mjSDjTGg7Dnx2t
Z3YTI7gXCIhXRMzPO11WZJtU3G0wk/WfPj/32sE3okyZoNf6a7u4si8xXIFobpET
dHBvbbvC3HMmhxff2Rxck1xmxcpq2QS86EZlVQ7xSgYADf2GnP t623A92DlDH0hq
eyKHFIG9aZOG5riaD8mkKsxnMUmcKQ==
=NVi1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Andy wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:50:35 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:55:18 +0000, Andy wrote:

Then I declare this unanimous agreement a permanent Usenet record. :-)

I've been judged a "narcissistic, attention-seeking, would-be
bully and troll."

Yes, this unanimous agreement is now a permanent Usenet record.

Minor correction -- he's a narcissistic attention seeking troll and
would-be bully.

Can't have people misinterpreting "would-be" as a modifier of "troll"
now, can we?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl5v3p UACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooGOuAgAqhyQr0YZbdDoiCNBwlx7NetBynPGpBA89bFLBEf+N9 WcEI5ARRF00Rag
fI1qV7wFhFGLPKtOJU3+grf3wS7FQgGMlABzWIw26prTtCo1AG IygEyYLQOosh2k
h2zva7OsGZAXLIi5cwlyvzxWS+BhyLoabjTKqr9+SpZpeGaaeW nvz3HkWxmP4Rrz
zHZeTBBrqDvVuYSiRZEtSY/NptMIxjWdPYzi+QuWksOc/NTh65qWR0v50+8c7MBE
PkSJ5Ca03S2ph0TvKlfmNy3md1Wia8kEkeRLjWoCvIur50x3/gRqyyTHk3c3ANnO
6jLZ3Kwaq74wbMWW62C4nli7GszlHw==
=b1W8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281

On 2020-03-16 14:47, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 07:34:01 -0400, Wolffan wrote:

SHOW YOUR AUTHORITY FOR DEMANDING A SINGLE THING OF ANYONE ELSE ON THIS OR
ANY OTHER NEWSGROUP. Your pathetic attempts to dodge and to divert are even
more transparent than normal.

As with the other worthless pieces of **** like *Rene Lamontagne*...
o Rene -- "*Who cares about adding value, twit*" -- Lamontagne

Show us even one _article_, not thread, but article, to this newsgroup,
Wolffan, that wasn't easily shown to be from a worthless piece of ****?

Name just one.


No-one has to do anything you demand.

On 2020-03-16 14:47, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 07:31:15 -0400, Wolffan wrote:

no-body cares about your opinion, troll-bot. you have yet to show even one
reason why anyone should. eat **** and die.

Hi Wolffan,

1. I spend a ton of adult effort (as do others) striving to add value.

No, you do not.

On 2020-03-15 13:26, Andy wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:29:54 -0400, Wolffan wrote:

On 15 Mar 2020, Andy wrote
(in ):

On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:14:11 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote:

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:06:38 +0000, Andy wrote:

Well of course he isn't. He said it's me who's making a fool of myself, and
the enemy of your enemy is your friend, right? That's how ****ed up you
are.

Hi Andy,

The question asked of Kenny McCormick was a reasonable adult question:
o *Why don't you chastise those worthless pieces of **** for what they do?*

No, it is not a reasonable question, and anyone who's been around Usenet as
long as you claim to would recognise that that question is loaded with a
presupposition he can't respond to without incriminating himself. It
presupposes that the participants he must go after are "worthless pieces of
****" and demands a response. It's loaded, imperious and bound to make Kenny
subservient. So instead of being satisfied that he took a cheap shot at me
you set out to entrap him with a loaded question and get him to act as your
personal attack dog. That's very short-sighted of you and not the way to go
about recruiting allies in your war against other participants here. Do you
get any of that, dummy?

the troll-bot cannot learn. it’s an Artificial Stupid and is very, very
stupid.

Exactly right and, amusingly, his desperation to recruit allies as
subservients to attack others bespeaks a pathetic insecurity on his part.


Which is what it is.

On 2020-03-16 14:47, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 17:26:34 +0000, Andy wrote:

Exactly right and, amusingly, his desperation to recruit allies as
subservients to attack others bespeaks a pathetic insecurity on his part.

Hi Andy, (sock)

Provide proof for this. I don't think that you can.


For the permanent Usenet record...
o *What more do we need to know about you, Andy, than the 4 facts below*?

The only facts in evidence are that you have no authority to demand
anything of anyone, that you lack judgement and intelligence, and that
you try and fail to bully others.

On 2020-03-16 14:47, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:39:40 +0000, Andy wrote:

It
presupposes that the participants he must go after are "worthless pieces of
****" and demands a response.

Hi Andy,

For the adults on the permanent Usenet record...

Whenever you start out with this statement it is a fact that you have
nothing to say that anyone cares about other than yourself.