update again?

For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)




--


|\ /|
| \/ |@rk
\../
\/os

Linea Recta wrote:
For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

The algorithm should be:

repeat (
visit Windows Update
install updates
reboot
) until no more updates show

Some updates show up, after the reboot, which
is why you enter Windows Update again (immediately),
to see whether it really is clean or not.

The other possibility, is your lone update is a
virus definitions file, and not a security patch
as such.

Paul

"Paul" schreef in bericht
...
Linea Recta wrote:
For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

The algorithm should be:

repeat (
visit Windows Update
install updates
reboot
) until no more updates show

Some updates show up, after the reboot, which
is why you enter Windows Update again (immediately),
to see whether it really is clean or not.

The other possibility, is your lone update is a
virus definitions file, and not a security patch
as such.



No, it was an Explorer update (in both cases).
Sometimes I do have a single update for virus defs, but luckily this doesn't
require a reboot each time.



--


|\ /|
| \/ |@rk
\../
\/os

"Ken1943" schreef in bericht
...
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:46:25 +0100, "Linea Recta"
wrote:

For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

Sometimes an update has to be installed before another one can be and a
restart done.

You have automatic updates selected and that is why you see another one
the next day.



Automatic update notification that is...



--


|\ /|
| \/ |@rk
\../
\/os

On 2/12/2015 7:46 AM, Linea Recta wrote:
For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

What I don't get is that though you know English yet you don't use it
for the names of the week.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:40:23 -0800, cameo wrote:

On 2/12/2015 7:46 AM, Linea Recta wrote:
For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

What I don't get is that though you know English yet you don't use it
for the names of the week.

Maybe he's quoting his messages literally - as he should.

It's easy enough to translate the names into English - rather obvious,
I'd say.

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:03:13 -0500, Paul wrote:

Linea Recta wrote:
For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

The algorithm should be:

repeat (
visit Windows Update
install updates
reboot
) until no more updates show

Some updates show up, after the reboot, which
is why you enter Windows Update again (immediately),
to see whether it really is clean or not.

In my case it showed up the next day (woensdag 11 februari 2015).

The other possibility, is your lone update is a
virus definitions file, and not a security patch
as such.

Mine was labeled Security update for Internet Explorer 11.

I do have a notification - new today, donderdag - for an update to MSE
definitions, but it's clearly a different animal.

OT - I can't figure out why MSE updates automatically and also notifies
me sometimes from inside Windows Update. ****es me off, truth to tell.

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

"Ken1943" schreef in bericht
...
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:50:38 +0100, "Linea Recta"
wrote:

"Paul" schreef in bericht
...
Linea Recta wrote:
For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

The algorithm should be:

repeat (
visit Windows Update
install updates
reboot
) until no more updates show

Some updates show up, after the reboot, which
is why you enter Windows Update again (immediately),
to see whether it really is clean or not.

The other possibility, is your lone update is a
virus definitions file, and not a security patch
as such.



No, it was an Explorer update (in both cases).
Sometimes I do have a single update for virus defs, but luckily this
doesn't
require a reboot each time.

Even with an IE update it is still wise to reboot. IE is so integrated
into the OS that it can't hurt. None of my 5 computers stay on all the
time so there is no problem. I view the updates and decide what to
install.


Me too.


If I don't do the reboot after the updates tell me to, I may
come back to the computer and have a warning that it will reboot in xx
minutes.




I didn't write that I didn't reboot after the Explorer update.
There's no way around it: user is forced to reboot.




--


|\ /|
| \/ |@rk
\../
\/os

"cameo" schreef in bericht
...
On 2/12/2015 7:46 AM, Linea Recta wrote:
For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

What I don't get is that though you know English yet you don't use it for
the names of the week.




I always insert the current dates with Notepad in my install log file, from
which I copied into the e-mail.



--


|\ /|
| \/ |@rk
\../
\/os

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:40:23 -0800, cameo wrote:

What I don't get is that though you know English yet you don't use it
for the names of the week.

Probably kopieer&plak.

--
s|b

Linea Recta wrote:
For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)




Provided later and only after the IE cumulative update was installed.

--
....winston
msft mvp consumer apps

"Linea Recta" wrote in message ...

"Ken1943" schreef in bericht
.. .
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:50:38 +0100, "Linea Recta"
wrote:

"Paul" schreef in bericht
...
Linea Recta wrote:
For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

The algorithm should be:

repeat (
visit Windows Update
install updates
reboot
) until no more updates show

Some updates show up, after the reboot, which
is why you enter Windows Update again (immediately),
to see whether it really is clean or not.

The other possibility, is your lone update is a
virus definitions file, and not a security patch
as such.



No, it was an Explorer update (in both cases).
Sometimes I do have a single update for virus defs, but luckily this
doesn't
require a reboot each time.

Even with an IE update it is still wise to reboot. IE is so integrated
into the OS that it can't hurt. None of my 5 computers stay on all the
time so there is no problem. I view the updates and decide what to
install.


Me too.


If I don't do the reboot after the updates tell me to, I may
come back to the computer and have a warning that it will reboot in xx
minutes.




I didn't write that I didn't reboot after the Explorer update.
There's no way around it: user is forced to reboot.


Remember, Explorer and Internet Explorer are two completely different
animals.
Always wondered why MS named them so. Easy to confuse and causes confusion
when reporting problems.
--
Buffalo

On 2/13/2015 6:54 PM, Buffalo wrote:
"Linea Recta" wrote in message ...




Snip

Remember, Explorer and Internet Explorer are two completely different
animals.
Always wondered why MS named them so. Easy to confuse and causes
confusion when reporting problems.


Windows Explorer (explore the file systems) was the replacement for File
manager, and predates "Internet Explorer" which is a somewhat logical
extension of the practice.

Bob I wrote:


On 2/13/2015 6:54 PM, Buffalo wrote:
"Linea Recta" wrote in message ...




Snip

Remember, Explorer and Internet Explorer are two completely different
animals.
Always wondered why MS named them so. Easy to confuse and causes
confusion when reporting problems.


Windows Explorer (explore the file systems) was the replacement for File
manager, and predates "Internet Explorer" which is a somewhat logical
extension of the practice.

And...on Win8 it's called File Explorer (fka Windows Explorer)

--
....winston
msft mvp consumer apps

"Buffalo" schreef in bericht
...
"Linea Recta" wrote in message ...

"Ken1943" schreef in bericht
. ..
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:50:38 +0100, "Linea Recta"
wrote:

"Paul" schreef in bericht
...
Linea Recta wrote:
For Windows 7 I had:

dinsdag 10 februari 2015
- 9 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day again:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

I suppose they forgot that one yesterday?

Same story for Vista:

woensdag 11 februari 2015
- 6 MS security updates (reboot)

and next day:

donderdag 12 februari 2015
- 1 MS security update (reboot)

The algorithm should be:

repeat (
visit Windows Update
install updates
reboot
) until no more updates show

Some updates show up, after the reboot, which
is why you enter Windows Update again (immediately),
to see whether it really is clean or not.

The other possibility, is your lone update is a
virus definitions file, and not a security patch
as such.



No, it was an Explorer update (in both cases).
Sometimes I do have a single update for virus defs, but luckily this
doesn't
require a reboot each time.

Even with an IE update it is still wise to reboot. IE is so integrated
into the OS that it can't hurt. None of my 5 computers stay on all the
time so there is no problem. I view the updates and decide what to
install.


Me too.


If I don't do the reboot after the updates tell me to, I may
come back to the computer and have a warning that it will reboot in xx
minutes.




I didn't write that I didn't reboot after the Explorer update.
There's no way around it: user is forced to reboot.


Remember, Explorer and Internet Explorer are two completely different
animals.
Always wondered why MS named them so. Easy to confuse and causes confusion
when reporting problems.
--



And that's not the only confusion they created.



--


|\ /|
| \/ |@rk
\../
\/os