If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:47:56 +0100, "David B."
wrote: Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll take the pressure off you. What pressure ? It's a fact page, people love to visit it. I know I do. To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
"David B."
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. STALKER wrote: On 24-May-18 5:31 PM, Diesel wrote: "David B." wrote: The site is NOT safe according to this warning. You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of the fact that the tool you used is well known for generating false positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's a false positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have been provided which back the statements up. Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other sites and forums where you have been BANNED. I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do the same for *me*. Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll take the pressure off you. What pressure? Are you so drunk as to think you're actually convincing anyone not to visit the site and learn more about you? If so, you're a damn fool! The amount of people who respond to you in a negative manner is growing. It's going to continue to grow because you won't stop doing what you do. You're oblivious to the fact that the majority of people do NOT condone or appreciate in any possible way what you typically do. And the following is but one example of it: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700 Btw, you also lied in the post you wrote; You blamed your deletion of the audio track from the original file you didn't preserve on me as well as claimed I have a lisp or other speech issue? I don't. So you actually lied twice, copyright infringed my video (you've done that so many times now, I've actually lost count) via a usenet post where you admitted it was to make it difficult if not impossible to remove and yet, still think you aren't deserving of the page hosted at tekrider. I really don't understand your reasoning. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = purrpetmeorIscratchyoureyesoutpurr - common feline term |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
"David B."
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of the fact that the tool you used is well known for generating false positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's a false positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have been provided which back the statements up. Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? How is the tekrider site misleading people, David? When posts like this exist: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700 It's rather difficult to deny that the contents of this: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php Are true. Not only did you copyright infringe my work (again), you *lied* about the reason the audio track is missing (well twice actually, but, let's not dwell on specifics rofl). All in the same post, no less. And, that's not your original post doing it. That's your second one (that I'm aware of, anyway) the first was where you also admitted to posting it to usenet to make it very difficult if not impossible for me to remove. You're an admitted copyright infringing stalker (who's had others content removed by administrators when you knowingly infringed their work) so it's only natural you'd continue to do it via other means. Especially since your impotent otherwise concerning options to deal with me. So really, how and in what possible way is anything provided via: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php Not true about you? Please, be specific! -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = For centuries, the English have had a love affair with all types of hunting. Early one morning, a fellow was blasting away at a clump of brush on a grouse hunt. Suddenly an outraged gentleman appeared and said "See here old man, you almost shot my wife with that volley." The hunter, properly shamed replied, "So sorry old chap. Here, have a go at mine, over there." |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote: David B. STALKER wrote: On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. STALKER wrote: [....] Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other sites and forums where you have been BANNED. I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do the same for *me*. Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll take the pressure off you. LOL! The only reason you even HAVE this 'Special Page' is because you have *earned it.* Everything on the page is true. You have (often) been told the page will go away if and when you *STOP STALKING*. I wouldn't expect that to happen anytime soon... http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700 One of several usenet sharing posts of his. The only issue is, he's sharing something he *knows he doesn't have permission* to be sharing. And! in that particular post, tried to blame me for his own Mac editing ****ups! The original video wasn't done with anything Apple, AND, had a working audio track; where incidently nobody else claimed I had a lisp..(too funny) Only David has made such a claim. And we all know how reliable those are. It's a damn shame that he feels the need to do that, as it prevents me from sharing some pretty cool (imho) videos of my doing various things or semi showing off the work I've done on various projects. I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip file which does contain the original video file. I really cannot tell you how proud I was to read his post with shared contents of a discussion between him and the lead malware researcher of Malwarebytes. His post only helps to prove that what I've written about Malwarebytes for several years now IS infact, true. They aren't a replacement for AV, and, there crypto skills leave much to be desired too; I've never seen someone forgo all known crypto analysis methods and instead, opt for simply trying to unzip an encrypted file with known, standard, archiving tools; and when it obviously fails to accomplish this task, declare the file to be garbage of some kind and not being what I told him it was. I know for a fact that because David had no idea of what she was writing about, he didn't take into consideration what sort of exposure it was going to provide for the support of my argument. Had he known, He would have kept the details he was so proud to share, a secret. [g] He mistook what she wrote for slime on me. And shared it! h0h0h0. And, icing on the cake for me, the individual he leaked a conversation with happens to be the 'lead malware researcher' for Malwarebytes Corporation. The company which markets a product that boldly claims it is a replacement for your current antivirus product. Outright, replacement. Uh huh. Proudly displaying the West Coast AV labs certification, but, umm, the problem is; they don't do anything with an actual virus so I can't fathom how they got AV certification? Yes, the product doesn't know a ****ing thing about an actual virus. It cannot do much to protect you from one. Your Antivirus knows about them and can offer you some protection against them, as well as the possible disinfection if you do catch a cold. Malwarebytes current cold rememdy is the death of the bug. In this case, since this is an actual viral beastie, that will result in the death of your computers operating system files which are carrying it along with any other executable program discovered to be carrying it; ASSUMING the virus in question has a static block of code which Malwarebytes can secure lock onto. If it's a poly/oglymorphic, sadly, the user who replaced his/her current av with Malwarebytes as Malwarebytes suggests and provides reasons to backup their suggestion as far as they are concerned, is now fuxored quite nicely. They will be resorting to backups (oh, they didn't make any? Oopsie!) or a fresh reinstall of everything. Malwarebytes on a good day in hell might hit it once out of every twenty or more thousand (or more) infections. Or, the user, can admit they would actually rather use an antivirus product, and pull one from the net, transport it's happy arse to their infected machine and have a decent chance of saving it by just killing the nasty cold. Obviously, their decision to make. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = Artificial Intelligence? I'll be impressed when they invent artificial cunning. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip file which does contain the original video file. THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a lisp, Dustin. ;-) -- D. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 27-May-18 6:20 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 12:33 PM, David B. wrote: On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. wrote: This is another reminder of what was found:- https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2...20Toolbox%20-% 20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0 It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once again, you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on the *SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever* going to learn even the tiniest technological fact? That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it? https://www.dropbox.com/s/56l2bn3wwq...re%21.JPG?dl=0 Who removed it - and why? It is run by a web hosting company, most if not all of them also handle email (smtp) services as well.Â* That cans be on a separate server from the http, traffic.Â* The company made a decision to separate the services, it can work essentially the same externally. BTS probably does not care, there is absolutely no reason why you should. You are probably right but tell me, FrozenNorth .... In fact SHOW me - PLEASE! - the result YOU currently get if you use the Sucuri facility to scan Tekrider.net Here's the relevant site:- https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/ TIA |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
"David B."
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote: I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip file which does contain the original video file. THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a lisp, Dustin. ;-) Actually, that's not how it works. You made the claim, it's on YOU to prove it. -- Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report? David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): , |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:53:43 +0100, "David B."
wrote: On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote: I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip file which does contain the original video file. THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a lisp, Dustin. I'm more interested in the video that proves you don't talk through your arse all the time. Do you have a link ? To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 2018-05-27 1:40 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 6:20 PM, Frozen North wrote: On 2018-05-27 12:33 PM, David B. wrote: On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. wrote: This is another reminder of what was found:- https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2...20Toolbox%20-% 20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0 It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once again, you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on the *SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever* going to learn even the tiniest technological fact? That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it? https://www.dropbox.com/s/56l2bn3wwq...re%21.JPG?dl=0 Who removed it - and why? It is run by a web hosting company, most if not all of them also handle email (smtp) services as well.Â* That cans be on a separate server from the http, traffic.Â* The company made a decision to separate the services, it can work essentially the same externally. BTS probably does not care, there is absolutely no reason why you should. You are probably right but tell me, FrozenNorth .... In fact SHOW me - PLEASE! - the result YOU currently get if you use the Sucuri facility to scan Tekrider.net Here's the relevant site:- https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/ TIA I could tell you or show you, but why, I am not going to scan a site I do not have any interest in, I also do not have the required permission. Further, I have no have idea how many times you have scanned that site, if it is more than once, it is stalking. My results may be different than yours, so again why? Lastly, it is you, on another wild goose chase. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 27-May-18 7:20 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 1:40 PM, David B. wrote: On 27-May-18 6:20 PM, Frozen North wrote: On 2018-05-27 12:33 PM, David B. wrote: On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. wrote: This is another reminder of what was found:- https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2...20Toolbox%20-% 20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0 It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once again, you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on the *SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever* going to learn even the tiniest technological fact? That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it? https://www.dropbox.com/s/56l2bn3wwq...re%21.JPG?dl=0 Who removed it - and why? It is run by a web hosting company, most if not all of them also handle email (smtp) services as well.Â* That cans be on a separate server from the http, traffic.Â* The company made a decision to separate the services, it can work essentially the same externally. BTS probably does not care, there is absolutely no reason why you should. You are probably right but tell me, FrozenNorth .... In fact SHOW me - PLEASE! - the result YOU currently get if you use the Sucuri facility to scan Tekrider.net Here's the relevant site:- https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/ TIA I could tell you or show you, but why, I am not going to scan a site I do not have any interest in, I also do not have the required permission. Sucuri does not NEED permission. Further, I have no have idea how many times you have scanned that site, if it is more than once, it is stalking. You misunderstand - deliberately I fear. It is Sucuri who has scanned Tekrider, not me. My results may be different than yours, so again why? Lastly, it is you, on another wild goose chase. I hoped you would like a truthful outcome. -- D. |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 27-May-18 7:16 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:53:43 +0100, "David B." wrote: On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote: I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip file which does contain the original video file. THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a lisp, Dustin. I'm more interested in the video that proves you don't talk through your arse all the time. Do you have a link ? Yes, thanks. As you don't click on my links though, I'll keep it to myself. This fellow sounds like a really nice chap. Read about him instead. http://tekrider.net/pages/about.php -- D. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 2018-05-27 4:44 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 7:20 PM, Frozen North wrote: On 2018-05-27 1:40 PM, David B. wrote: On 27-May-18 6:20 PM, Frozen North wrote: On 2018-05-27 12:33 PM, David B. wrote: On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. wrote: This is another reminder of what was found:- https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2...20Toolbox%20-% 20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0 It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once again, you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on the *SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever* going to learn even the tiniest technological fact? That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it? https://www.dropbox.com/s/56l2bn3wwq...re%21.JPG?dl=0 Who removed it - and why? It is run by a web hosting company, most if not all of them also handle email (smtp) services as well.Â* That cans be on a separate server from the http, traffic.Â* The company made a decision to separate the services, it can work essentially the same externally. BTS probably does not care, there is absolutely no reason why you should. You are probably right but tell me, FrozenNorth .... In fact SHOW me - PLEASE! - the result YOU currently get if you use the Sucuri facility to scan Tekrider.net Here's the relevant site:- https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/ TIA I could tell you or show you, but why, I am not going to scan a site I do not have any interest in, I also do not have the required permission. Sucuri does not NEED permission. You go on believing that. Further, I have no have idea how many times you have scanned that site, if it is more than once, it is stalking. You misunderstand - deliberately I fear. You are mistaken. Yet again. It is Sucuri who has scanned Tekrider, not me. Right, blaming the tool for what you are doing with it. My results may be different than yours, so again why? Lastly, it is you, on another wild goose chase. I hoped you would like a truthful outcome. Obtained truthfully and honestly. Try again. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 27-May-18 10:02 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 4:44 PM, David B. wrote: On 27-May-18 7:20 PM, Frozen North wrote: On 2018-05-27 1:40 PM, David B. wrote: On 27-May-18 6:20 PM, Frozen North wrote: On 2018-05-27 12:33 PM, David B. wrote: On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. wrote: This is another reminder of what was found:- https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2...20Toolbox%20-% 20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0 It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once again, you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on the *SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever* going to learn even the tiniest technological fact? That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it? https://www.dropbox.com/s/56l2bn3wwq...re%21.JPG?dl=0 Who removed it - and why? It is run by a web hosting company, most if not all of them also handle email (smtp) services as well.Â* That cans be on a separate server from the http, traffic.Â* The company made a decision to separate the services, it can work essentially the same externally. BTS probably does not care, there is absolutely no reason why you should. You are probably right but tell me, FrozenNorth .... In fact SHOW me - PLEASE! - the result YOU currently get if you use the Sucuri facility to scan Tekrider.net Here's the relevant site:- https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/ TIA I could tell you or show you, but why, I am not going to scan a site I do not have any interest in, I also do not have the required permission. Sucuri does not NEED permission. You go on believing that. Further, I have no have idea how many times you have scanned that site, if it is more than once, it is stalking. You misunderstand - deliberately I fear. You are mistaken.Â* Yet again. It is Sucuri who has scanned Tekrider, not me. Right, blaming the tool for what you are doing with it. My results may be different than yours, so again why? Lastly, it is you, on another wild goose chase. I hoped you would like a truthful outcome. Obtained truthfully and honestly.Â* Try again. Nope. I'm going to bed. -- D. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On Sun, 27 May 2018 21:50:22 +0100, "David B."
wrote: On 27-May-18 7:16 PM, Shadow wrote: On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:53:43 +0100, "David B." wrote: On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote: I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip file which does contain the original video file. THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a lisp, Dustin. I'm more interested in the video that proves you don't talk through your arse all the time. Do you have a link ? Yes, thanks. As you don't click on my links though, I'll keep it to myself. This fellow sounds like a really nice chap. Read about him instead. http://tekrider.net/pages/about.php I know, I frequently visit this webpage: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php Just to check if there are any new nyms. Nice the way the photo tilts as if it's drunk. A public service, IMHO. The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On Sun, 27 May 2018 22:04:31 +0100, "David B."
wrote: I'm going to bed. Good luck. I hope you make it this time. To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|