![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2020-09-07, Gremlin wrote:
Snit Sun, 06 Sep 2020 21:45:09 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Sep 6, 2020 at 1:58:25 PM MST, "Mike Easter" wrote: Bobby wrote: regarding the phone call between Gremlin and snit. Personally I don't have it figured out yet. And I'm not looking for winners or losers; I'm looking to solve a puzzle. To me it is pretty simple: Yes, it is. You got caught lying about my involvement with the bot. I grilled you for an apology. you wrote another lie, I busted you again for that one too. I grilled you for an apology for that one as well. I've succesfully proven you're a liar who doesn't even care to save the lies for big stories, you'll lie about simple **** just as easily. And when you're caught and the pressure isn't taken off of you, you'll resort to trying to intimidate your victim via doxing, besmirchment, stalking, and sliming them. You've yet to do anything different. You will lie your ass off, it doesn't matter how many times others point out the fallacies in your stories, you'll stick to it. Even when you're busted dead to rights, you'll still ignore the facts and proclaim you didn't do what the evidence is clearly showing you did! You couldn't possibly be any more dishonest with yourself and others, snit. Considering your direct experience with snit is limited, at least in terms of time, that's an excellent deconstruction of snit and how snit trolls. Snit is like a circuit that has a piece of solder bridging 2 traces on a board and that prevents a certain function from operating correctly. In snit's case, that function is the ability to fully and unconditionally admit when he is wrong and to apologize for his error. The key word is unconditionally. There is always a condition, a string, a trap attached to a snit admission or apology. Always. The best part of snit is he is like a living document. For whatever reason, snit will join a group or blog and within a very short time the unrest begins. Someone will invariably discover the snit lists, post them and the chaos will be triggered. Sit back, observe and give it a little time and snit will actually begin to behave almost exactly like the various snit lists describe him to be. That's why I say he is like a living document. Those messages were mostly written a decade or more ago and to this day, snit still proves that he is what he claims. The most recent example is talk.politics.guns, where the group turned to **** when snit started posting. He's mostly ignored there, so he moved on to ACW and the same thing, chaos and disruption occurred here. And it's the same thing that happened in CSMA and continues to happen in COLA, which is almost dead ATM because the good posters have left. At some point people do figure snit out and KF him. And once again snit becomes predictable when he gets ignored. He will start his RainMain process, posting the same reply multiple times day after day to various posts. As a last ditch effort snit will unleash his sock puppet army, invade the group in a final battle, Armageddon of sorts, to bury the group by causing fed up people to move on. That is what he did in CSMA, another almost dead group partially due to snit's trolling. Get ready for it because the signs are there. -- pothead |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|