If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
Thank You for your help.
I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? Thank You for your willingness to help a novice. Your help will be greatly appreciated. -- Ray10X10 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
Ray10X10 wrote:
I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? What is wrong with Outlook that came bundled in MS Office 2003? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
Ray10X10 wrote:
Thank You for your help. I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? Yes - without hesitation. Get version 2.0.0.23 for now. If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? Thank You for your willingness to help a novice. Your help will be greatly appreciated. -- 1PW |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
"Ray10X10" vacantlot.com wrote in message ... Thank You for your help. I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? Thank You for your willingness to help a novice. Your help will be greatly appreciated. -- Ray10X10 I'd recommend that you fix whatever "frequent trouble" you're having with Outlook Express. SC Tom |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:46:01 -0700, Ray10X10 vacantlot.com wrote:
Thank You for your help. I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? Thank You for your willingness to help a novice. Your help will be greatly appreciated. My default is Opera which also has its on mail system . |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
Why mask a problem by installing another program? Fix the problem and you'll
be ahead of the game. "Ray10X10" vacantlot.com wrote in message ... Thank You for your help. I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? Thank You for your willingness to help a novice. Your help will be greatly appreciated. -- Ray10X10 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:46:01 -0700, Ray10X10 vacantlot.com wrote:
Thank You for your help. I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? Thank You for your willingness to help a novice. The problem with your question is that you are asking for an opinion, not a fact. And opinions among the people in this newsgroup (as well as elsewhere) will vary widely. That's because we all work differently and have different needs in software, as well as different likes and dislikes. Other people's opinions shouldn't count to you. You should try several e-mail clients and choose the one *you* like best. But since you asked, no I personally wouldn't recommend Thunderbird. I would recommend Outlook (not Outlook Express, which is a very different program). I use Outlook 2007, but if you have Office 2003, you have Outlook 2003 and that's what I recommend you at least try. If you like Outlook Express, you should describe your problems with it in the Outlook Express newsgroup, and get help with the problems there. And by the way, this isn't a web-based forum; it's a newsgroup. You are using the awful web interface to participate in this newsgroup--it's the slowest, clunkiest, most error-prone method of using the newsgroups there is. Do yourself a favor and switch to a newsreader, such as Outlook Express, which comes with Windows XP, or Windows Mail, which comes with Vista (or again, any of the many others available; I personally use and like Forte Agent). See http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/ou...snewreader.htm -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
Ray10X10 wrote:
Thank You for your help. I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? Thank You for your willingness to help a novice. Your help will be greatly appreciated. I've been using Thunderbird happily for a couple of years. But my wife still uses Outlook Express on her computer and hasn't had any real problems with it. If you like OE, I'd suggest posting your problems to microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general. Bill |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message ... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:46:01 -0700, Ray10X10 vacantlot.com wrote: Thank You for your help. I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? Thank You for your willingness to help a novice. The problem with your question is that you are asking for an opinion, not a fact. And opinions among the people in this newsgroup (as well as elsewhere) will vary widely. That's because we all work differently and have different needs in software, as well as different likes and dislikes. Other people's opinions shouldn't count to you. You should try several e-mail clients and choose the one *you* like best. But since you asked, no I personally wouldn't recommend Thunderbird. I would recommend Outlook (not Outlook Express, which is a very different program). I use Outlook 2007, but if you have Office 2003, you have Outlook 2003 and that's what I recommend you at least try. If you like Outlook Express, you should describe your problems with it in the Outlook Express newsgroup, and get help with the problems there. And by the way, this isn't a web-based forum; it's a newsgroup. You are using the awful web interface to participate in this newsgroup--it's the slowest, clunkiest, most error-prone method of using the newsgroups there is. Do yourself a favor and switch to a newsreader, such as Outlook Express, which comes with Windows XP, or Windows Mail, which comes with Vista (or again, any of the many others available; I personally use and like Forte Agent). See http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/ou...snewreader.htm -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup I read the link and am confused by one thing (well, maybe more than one, but one stands out). In order to access newsgroups from Outlook 2003, doesn't Outlook Express have to be already installed? I read it as using OE news within OL2003. Is that correct? (I'll miss OE in Windows 7, that's for sure.) SC Tom |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:44:43 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:
"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message ... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:46:01 -0700, Ray10X10 vacantlot.com wrote: Thank You for your help. I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? Thank You for your willingness to help a novice. The problem with your question is that you are asking for an opinion, not a fact. And opinions among the people in this newsgroup (as well as elsewhere) will vary widely. That's because we all work differently and have different needs in software, as well as different likes and dislikes. Other people's opinions shouldn't count to you. You should try several e-mail clients and choose the one *you* like best. But since you asked, no I personally wouldn't recommend Thunderbird. I would recommend Outlook (not Outlook Express, which is a very different program). I use Outlook 2007, but if you have Office 2003, you have Outlook 2003 and that's what I recommend you at least try. If you like Outlook Express, you should describe your problems with it in the Outlook Express newsgroup, and get help with the problems there. And by the way, this isn't a web-based forum; it's a newsgroup. You are using the awful web interface to participate in this newsgroup--it's the slowest, clunkiest, most error-prone method of using the newsgroups there is. Do yourself a favor and switch to a newsreader, such as Outlook Express, which comes with Windows XP, or Windows Mail, which comes with Vista (or again, any of the many others available; I personally use and like Forte Agent). See http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/ou...snewreader.htm -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup I read the link and am confused by one thing (well, maybe more than one, but one stands out). Feel free to also ask any other questions you have. In order to access newsgroups from Outlook 2003, *No* version of Outlook, neither Outlook 2003 nor any other, does newsgroups. That's one of the many differences between Outlook and Outlook Express. (However note that there are third-party programs that add newsreader capability to Outlook.) However Outlook has a menu item (on the Go menu) or toolbar icon to invoke your newsreader. By default it invokes Outlook Express, but in some versions of Outlook, you can switch it to another newsreader. doesn't Outlook Express have to be already installed? Yes, but if you're running XP, Outlook Express is installed unless you've removed it. I read it as using OE news within OL2003. Is that correct? No. There's no "within" involved here. Outlook Express runs as a completely separate program, as it always does. All Outlook does here is launch Outlook Express in new sonly mode for you when you click the menu item or toolbar icon. Alternatively you could launch it yourself, with exactly the same result. (I'll miss OE in Windows 7, that's for sure.) Why? There are many other programs that do e-mail and/or newsgroups, and several of them are arguably better than Outlook Express. I've been using Outlook for e-mail and Forte Agent for newsgroups for many years, and I prefer them to Outlook Express. It's your choice, of course, and you don't have to do things my way, but I do suggest that you at least try some of the alternatives. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:44:43 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote: "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message ... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:46:01 -0700, Ray10X10 vacantlot.com wrote: Thank You for your help. I use Windows XP2, Microsoft Office 2003, Internet Explorer 6, Outlook Express, and Comcast High Speed Cable Internet. I have frequent trouble with Outlook Express. Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application? If no, what E-mail program would you recommend? Thank You for your willingness to help a novice. The problem with your question is that you are asking for an opinion, not a fact. And opinions among the people in this newsgroup (as well as elsewhere) will vary widely. That's because we all work differently and have different needs in software, as well as different likes and dislikes. Other people's opinions shouldn't count to you. You should try several e-mail clients and choose the one *you* like best. But since you asked, no I personally wouldn't recommend Thunderbird. I would recommend Outlook (not Outlook Express, which is a very different program). I use Outlook 2007, but if you have Office 2003, you have Outlook 2003 and that's what I recommend you at least try. If you like Outlook Express, you should describe your problems with it in the Outlook Express newsgroup, and get help with the problems there. And by the way, this isn't a web-based forum; it's a newsgroup. You are using the awful web interface to participate in this newsgroup--it's the slowest, clunkiest, most error-prone method of using the newsgroups there is. Do yourself a favor and switch to a newsreader, such as Outlook Express, which comes with Windows XP, or Windows Mail, which comes with Vista (or again, any of the many others available; I personally use and like Forte Agent). See http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/ou...snewreader.htm -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup I read the link and am confused by one thing (well, maybe more than one, but one stands out). Feel free to also ask any other questions you have. In order to access newsgroups from Outlook 2003, *No* version of Outlook, neither Outlook 2003 nor any other, does newsgroups. That's one of the many differences between Outlook and Outlook Express. (However note that there are third-party programs that add newsreader capability to Outlook.) However Outlook has a menu item (on the Go menu) or toolbar icon to invoke your newsreader. By default it invokes Outlook Express, but in some versions of Outlook, you can switch it to another newsreader. doesn't Outlook Express have to be already installed? Yes, but if you're running XP, Outlook Express is installed unless you've removed it. I read it as using OE news within OL2003. Is that correct? No. There's no "within" involved here. Outlook Express runs as a completely separate program, as it always does. All Outlook does here is launch Outlook Express in new sonly mode for you when you click the menu item or toolbar icon. Alternatively you could launch it yourself, with exactly the same result. (I'll miss OE in Windows 7, that's for sure.) Why? There are many other programs that do e-mail and/or newsgroups, and several of them are arguably better than Outlook Express. I've been using Outlook for e-mail and Forte Agent for newsgroups for many years, and I prefer them to Outlook Express. It's your choice, of course, and you don't have to do things my way, but I do suggest that you at least try some of the alternatives. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup Thanks for the responses, Ken! I guess what I'll miss is the comfort level of OE. I've used it since it was first released with Windows, and have never had a need to try anything else for news. But, since 7 isn't going to include a client, I'll need to use something else. I own Office 2003 which is why I was asking about the need for OE. I guess the better question would have been, "If I install OL2003 in Windows 7, am I going to able to access my newsgroups?" Without a 3rd-party news reader, I guess the answer is "No." I'm familiar with Outlook (used it for many years at work), so I knew it had no native ability to access newsgroups. I have an older version of Forte (3.something), but never really liked it. I fired it up today to see what I could do with it, and still don't like it. Maybe I'll try T'Bird for a change. SC Tom |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:42:57 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:
"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:44:43 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote: (I'll miss OE in Windows 7, that's for sure.) Why? There are many other programs that do e-mail and/or newsgroups, and several of them are arguably better than Outlook Express. I've been using Outlook for e-mail and Forte Agent for newsgroups for many years, and I prefer them to Outlook Express. It's your choice, of course, and you don't have to do things my way, but I do suggest that you at least try some of the alternatives. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup Thanks for the responses, Ken! You're welcome. Glad to help. I guess what I'll miss is the comfort level of OE. I've used it since it was first released with Windows, and have never had a need to try anything else for news. But, since 7 isn't going to include a client, I'll need to use something else. I own Office 2003 which is why I was asking about the need for OE. I guess the better question would have been, "If I install OL2003 in Windows 7, am I going to able to access my newsgroups?" Without a 3rd-party news reader, I guess the answer is "No." No, the answer isn't "no." Yes, you need a program that doesn't come with Windows 7, but no, it doesn't have to be third-party. You can download and install the Microsoft program Windows Live Mail. I don't have any experience with this, but I believe it is much like Outlook Express. I'm familiar with Outlook (used it for many years at work), so I knew it had no native ability to access newsgroups. I have an older version of Forte (3.something), but never really liked it. I fired it up today to see what I could do with it, and still don't like it. Maybe I'll try T'Bird for a change. The current version of Forte's program called "Agent" is 5.0, so if you've only looked at a 3.something version, you might find the new one very different and much better. Again, not trying to talk you into anything, but I have a couple of suggestions for you: 1. Firing it up today (even if it were the current version) doesn't give you a good enough view of any newsreader. "Today" just isn't long enough. They are all different, with different strengths and weaknesses, and to get to know those strengths and weaknesses and how well they fit into your way of working requires that you use the product for several days and play around with its different settings. Since most of these are shareware and at the every least, you should be able to get a trial version, I recommend you try each for about a week. 2. I've tried lots of newsreaders, and each one I've tried has had some features I liked better than Outlook Express's and some features I didn't like as much. I settled on Agent because it best fit my personal way of working. Sure, try Thunderbird. But also try Agent 5.0 and as many others as you have time for. Here's a list of most of what's available: http://www.newsreaders.com/win/clients.html There are a lot on that list, and undoubtedly you won't have the time and patience to try them all, but besides Agent and Mozilla, Gravity, News Rover, and NewsAgent are well-respected. I recommend that you try at least those, and others here may have other recommendations for you. 3. Most important, make your own choice, and don't listen to what I (or anyone else) likes best, other than perhaps to give the choice of someone you respect a try. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:42:57 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote: "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:44:43 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote: (I'll miss OE in Windows 7, that's for sure.) Why? There are many other programs that do e-mail and/or newsgroups, and several of them are arguably better than Outlook Express. I've been using Outlook for e-mail and Forte Agent for newsgroups for many years, and I prefer them to Outlook Express. It's your choice, of course, and you don't have to do things my way, but I do suggest that you at least try some of the alternatives. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup Thanks for the responses, Ken! You're welcome. Glad to help. I guess what I'll miss is the comfort level of OE. I've used it since it was first released with Windows, and have never had a need to try anything else for news. But, since 7 isn't going to include a client, I'll need to use something else. I own Office 2003 which is why I was asking about the need for OE. I guess the better question would have been, "If I install OL2003 in Windows 7, am I going to able to access my newsgroups?" Without a 3rd-party news reader, I guess the answer is "No." No, the answer isn't "no." Yes, you need a program that doesn't come with Windows 7, but no, it doesn't have to be third-party. You can download and install the Microsoft program Windows Live Mail. I don't have any experience with this, but I believe it is much like Outlook Express. I'm familiar with Outlook (used it for many years at work), so I knew it had no native ability to access newsgroups. I have an older version of Forte (3.something), but never really liked it. I fired it up today to see what I could do with it, and still don't like it. Maybe I'll try T'Bird for a change. The current version of Forte's program called "Agent" is 5.0, so if you've only looked at a 3.something version, you might find the new one very different and much better. Again, not trying to talk you into anything, but I have a couple of suggestions for you: 1. Firing it up today (even if it were the current version) doesn't give you a good enough view of any newsreader. "Today" just isn't long enough. They are all different, with different strengths and weaknesses, and to get to know those strengths and weaknesses and how well they fit into your way of working requires that you use the product for several days and play around with its different settings. Since most of these are shareware and at the every least, you should be able to get a trial version, I recommend you try each for about a week. 2. I've tried lots of newsreaders, and each one I've tried has had some features I liked better than Outlook Express's and some features I didn't like as much. I settled on Agent because it best fit my personal way of working. Sure, try Thunderbird. But also try Agent 5.0 and as many others as you have time for. Here's a list of most of what's available: http://www.newsreaders.com/win/clients.html There are a lot on that list, and undoubtedly you won't have the time and patience to try them all, but besides Agent and Mozilla, Gravity, News Rover, and NewsAgent are well-respected. I recommend that you try at least those, and others here may have other recommendations for you. 3. Most important, make your own choice, and don't listen to what I (or anyone else) likes best, other than perhaps to give the choice of someone you respect a try. Since I'll be in the market for and email client and newsreader all-in-one, I think I give T'Bird and Agent a try. I installed and am trying out T'Bird right now, and it's pretty darn close to OE. There are a few options missing that I liked in OE, but that's going to be the case with any of them. I'll use it for a while, then try Agent for (maybe) the 30 day period. Thanks for your suggestions. You are definitely one of the ones here that I respect your input. SC Tom |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:42:57 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote: "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:44:43 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote: (I'll miss OE in Windows 7, that's for sure.) Why? There are many other programs that do e-mail and/or newsgroups, and several of them are arguably better than Outlook Express. I've been using Outlook for e-mail and Forte Agent for newsgroups for many years, and I prefer them to Outlook Express. It's your choice, of course, and you don't have to do things my way, but I do suggest that you at least try some of the alternatives. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup Thanks for the responses, Ken! You're welcome. Glad to help. I guess what I'll miss is the comfort level of OE. I've used it since it was first released with Windows, and have never had a need to try anything else for news. But, since 7 isn't going to include a client, I'll need to use something else. I own Office 2003 which is why I was asking about the need for OE. I guess the better question would have been, "If I install OL2003 in Windows 7, am I going to able to access my newsgroups?" Without a 3rd-party news reader, I guess the answer is "No." No, the answer isn't "no." Yes, you need a program that doesn't come with Windows 7, but no, it doesn't have to be third-party. You can download and install the Microsoft program Windows Live Mail. I don't have any experience with this, but I believe it is much like Outlook Express. I'm familiar with Outlook (used it for many years at work), so I knew it had no native ability to access newsgroups. I have an older version of Forte (3.something), but never really liked it. I fired it up today to see what I could do with it, and still don't like it. Maybe I'll try T'Bird for a change. The current version of Forte's program called "Agent" is 5.0, so if you've only looked at a 3.something version, you might find the new one very different and much better. Again, not trying to talk you into anything, but I have a couple of suggestions for you: 1. Firing it up today (even if it were the current version) doesn't give you a good enough view of any newsreader. "Today" just isn't long enough. They are all different, with different strengths and weaknesses, and to get to know those strengths and weaknesses and how well they fit into your way of working requires that you use the product for several days and play around with its different settings. Since most of these are shareware and at the every least, you should be able to get a trial version, I recommend you try each for about a week. 2. I've tried lots of newsreaders, and each one I've tried has had some features I liked better than Outlook Express's and some features I didn't like as much. I settled on Agent because it best fit my personal way of working. Sure, try Thunderbird. But also try Agent 5.0 and as many others as you have time for. Here's a list of most of what's available: http://www.newsreaders.com/win/clients.html There are a lot on that list, and undoubtedly you won't have the time and patience to try them all, but besides Agent and Mozilla, Gravity, News Rover, and NewsAgent are well-respected. I recommend that you try at least those, and others here may have other recommendations for you. 3. Most important, make your own choice, and don't listen to what I (or anyone else) likes best, other than perhaps to give the choice of someone you respect a try. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Would you recommend "Thunderbird" for my E-mail Application?
"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:42:57 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote: "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:44:43 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote: (I'll miss OE in Windows 7, that's for sure.) Why? There are many other programs that do e-mail and/or newsgroups, and several of them are arguably better than Outlook Express. I've been using Outlook for e-mail and Forte Agent for newsgroups for many years, and I prefer them to Outlook Express. It's your choice, of course, and you don't have to do things my way, but I do suggest that you at least try some of the alternatives. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup Thanks for the responses, Ken! You're welcome. Glad to help. I guess what I'll miss is the comfort level of OE. I've used it since it was first released with Windows, and have never had a need to try anything else for news. But, since 7 isn't going to include a client, I'll need to use something else. I own Office 2003 which is why I was asking about the need for OE. I guess the better question would have been, "If I install OL2003 in Windows 7, am I going to able to access my newsgroups?" Without a 3rd-party news reader, I guess the answer is "No." No, the answer isn't "no." Yes, you need a program that doesn't come with Windows 7, but no, it doesn't have to be third-party. You can download and install the Microsoft program Windows Live Mail. In fact, he could go ahead and download IE6 and then use its OE6 if he didn't mind a little extra baggage along for the ride. Then adding IE7 or 8 after that will leave OE6 still working. I didn't think it'd work, but it did. It worked out fine on an Acer I just got done with last week. Got a thank you from him today; checked headers & it was written in OE6. Regards, Twayne` I don't have any experience with this, but I believe it is much like Outlook Express. I'm familiar with Outlook (used it for many years at work), so I knew it had no native ability to access newsgroups. I have an older version of Forte (3.something), but never really liked it. I fired it up today to see what I could do with it, and still don't like it. Maybe I'll try T'Bird for a change. The current version of Forte's program called "Agent" is 5.0, so if you've only looked at a 3.something version, you might find the new one very different and much better. Again, not trying to talk you into anything, but I have a couple of suggestions for you: 1. Firing it up today (even if it were the current version) doesn't give you a good enough view of any newsreader. "Today" just isn't long enough. They are all different, with different strengths and weaknesses, and to get to know those strengths and weaknesses and how well they fit into your way of working requires that you use the product for several days and play around with its different settings. Since most of these are shareware and at the every least, you should be able to get a trial version, I recommend you try each for about a week. 2. I've tried lots of newsreaders, and each one I've tried has had some features I liked better than Outlook Express's and some features I didn't like as much. I settled on Agent because it best fit my personal way of working. Sure, try Thunderbird. But also try Agent 5.0 and as many others as you have time for. Here's a list of most of what's available: http://www.newsreaders.com/win/clients.html There are a lot on that list, and undoubtedly you won't have the time and patience to try them all, but besides Agent and Mozilla, Gravity, News Rover, and NewsAgent are well-respected. I recommend that you try at least those, and others here may have other recommendations for you. 3. Most important, make your own choice, and don't listen to what I (or anyone else) likes best, other than perhaps to give the choice of someone you respect a try. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|