[OT] Ubuntu Code of Conduct v2.0

"Mayayana" news Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:22:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

I remember reading the article, though I can't provide
a link now. If it didn't happen then isn't that worse, in
the sense that it would have seemed inconceivable then
for MS to access a Windows computer, but is written
into the license now?

The article was mostly FUD. Not entirely fiction, but, FUD for the most
part in the way in which it was described, users were led to believe.
MS wasn't breaking into their computers and it wasn't snooping on the
users. It was sending its registration information into MS when
activating, though. Nobody ever said you had to give the computer OS
your real name when you installed it though.

No! What the hell is DCOM?
At the time I'd never heard of it. Distributed Component
Object Model. A way to run software remotely. Very
handy on corporate intranets. Very risky to enable on
Internet-connected machines. The source of many
attack vectors over the years. Microsoft was trying to
break into my machine through DCOM. (That would
have been the only reason for a DCOM request.)

Well.. break into a is a little bit over the top, imo.


--
Sarcasm, because beating the living **** out of deserving people is
illegal.

On 2017-03-01, David B. wrote:
You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. As we
say in Texas, you couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions
printed on the heel. You are a canker, an open wound. I would rather
kiss a lawyer than be seen with you. You took your last vacation in the
Islets of Langerhans. ...

I have the same collection of canned insults on file. They go back decades.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Blake (Posts from Google Groups killfiled due to excess spam.)

NSA sedition and treason -- http://www.DeathToNSAthugs.com
Don't talk to cops! -- http://www.DontTalkToCops.com
Badges don't grant extra rights -- http://www.CopBlock.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 03/03/2017 02:41, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2017-03-01, David B. wrote:
You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. As we
say in Texas, you couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions
printed on the heel. You are a canker, an open wound. I would rather
kiss a lawyer than be seen with you. You took your last vacation in the
Islets of Langerhans. ...

I have the same collection of canned insults on file. They go back decades.

Indeed they do! :-

--
"Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." (Albert Schweitzer)
"The important thing is not to stop questioning."
- Albert Einstein

Roger Blake, die, ye fat and bean-fed horse. Ye are a beef-witted
tell-tale, a lily-livered very camel, an undesirable skainsmate, a
monotonic lucifer, ye bawled out:

On 2017-03-01, David B. wrote:
You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. As we
say in Texas, you couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions
printed on the heel. You are a canker, an open wound. I would rather
kiss a lawyer than be seen with you. You took your last vacation in the
Islets of Langerhans. ...

I have the same collection of canned insults on file. They go back decades.

Base sponging officer, I'll have thy head. Leave now thou vain
bibble-babble. Where will thou find a cavern dark enough to mask thy
monstrous visage? Is thy name Mouldy? Thou most lying slave. I do
find thee dankish and bigheaded. I abhor thee, thou second-rate
horse's head. Thy face is such as hath been belched on by infected
lungs. Ye issued from the rancour of a villain, a recreant and most
degenerate traitor. What shall I call thee when thou art a man. Such
bugs and goblins in thy life. Boils and plagues plaster ye over, that
ye may be abhorred farther than seen and one infect another against
the wind a mile. Certainly, there is no truth in thee. Thou would
answer very well to a whipping. Farewell, toilet-scrubbing shrewd
knave and happy fool. Ye speak yet ye say nothing. Never hung poison
on a fouler toad. Die and be damned, ye venomed harlot. How foul and
loathsome is thine image. I have seen drunkards do more than thou. Ye
heareth not, ye stirreth not, ye moveth not, the ape is dead. Courtesy
would seem to cover thy sin. Thou side-piercing sight. Thou art a
great lubbery boy. Thy complextion is perfect gallows. Thou common
hind'ring knotgrass. Ye heartless filthy rogue. Frailty, thy name is
woman. I abhor thee, thou dilatory sloth. Hang cur, hang, ye scurvy'd,
old, filthy, scurry lord. Go rot, pernicious tinker. Thou foul thief. A
monster, a very sole imperator and great general of trotting 'paritors
in apparel. Ye reek as a sacrifice. Where air comes out, air comes in,
there's none abroad so unwholesome as that ye vent. Has thou not a
brain? Farewell, caterpillar. Thou tomb of death. Ye did not flow from
honourable sources. Men are April when they woo, December when they wed.
Thou child of a billowy-headed fell-lurking cur. It is fit that I should
commit offence to thee my inferior. I do desire we may be better
strangers. Ye peasant swain. Ye hath more hair than wit, and more faults
than hairs, and more fat than faults. Thou art like the harpy, which, to
betray, dost with thine angels face, seize with thine eagle's talons. Ye
never broke any man's head but thine own, and that was against a post
when ye wast drunk. Ye speak nothing but madman. An admirable evasion of
whore master man, to lay thy goatish disposition to the charge of a
star. A dwarfish thief. Thou art lumpish, heavy, melancholy. A monster,
a very monster in apparel. Hang cur, hang, ye damnable both-sides rogue.
Thou are not worth another word, else I'd call ye knave. Thou has no
more brain than I have in mine elbows. Teeth hadst thou in thy head when
thou wast born to signify ye came to bite the world. Go, thou profane
coxcomb, I'll hear no more of ye. Say deformed low-spirited swain,
whither wouldst thou convey this growing image of thy fiend-like face.
Ye heartless bottom-feeder. Thou damnable box of envy. Away with thee
thou giglet. Thou dissembler. O ye errant quicksand of deceit, ye
dishonest bawler. Away! Thou art poison to my blood. Thy wit's as thick
as a Tewkesbury mustard. Thou odoriferous stench, sound rottenness. I
find the donkey in compound with the major part of thy syllables. I can
see thy pride peep through each part of thee. Thou cacodemon. What shall
I call thee when thou art a man? I took thee for thy better. Go rate thy
minions, mangy-dog. Slave, waxy-faced, frantic woman! O tongueless lazar
kite of Cressid's kind. Fie on thee, thou onion-eyed devil's dam. A pox
damn ye, ye muddy rascal, is that all the comfort ye bring me? What
rubbish, what offal. Thou art peevish, sullen, forward, proud,
disobedient, stubborn, lacking duty. It is fit that I should commit
offence to thee my inferior. Die, ye shard-borne passy mesaures pavin.
Thy face and thy brain go not together. Now put it, God, in the
physician's mind to help him to his grave immediately. Be packing,
biting bug-riddled mumble-news. The fiend is strong within thee. That is
the silliest stuff that I ever heard. Heaven truly knows that thou art a
bloody Nero. Thou art some fool, I am loath to beat thee. Thy mother's
name is ominous to children. Thou friend of an ill fashion. Peace, ye
shag-haired whoreson jackanape. Away, ye three inch fool. Go thou and
fill another room in hell. Ye art a dry fool, I'll have no more of
thee. I abhor thee, thou underachieving mad misleader. Ye from a child
nothing differs. Die, ye gooseberry. Say grease-covered rascal
fiddler, whither wouldst thou convey this growing image of thy
fiend-like face. Those healths will make thee and thy state look ill.
The complaints I have heard of ye I do not all believe; 'tis thy
slowness, for I know ye lack not folly to make such knaveries. Thou
poor inch of nature. On my knee I give heaven thanks that I am not
like to thee. Ye ruinous butt. Bless me, what a vile thinskin is at
the door. Thou art so leaky that we must leave thee to thy sinking. I
will give thee bloody teeth. Thy bones are hollow, impiety has made a
feast of thee. Pernicious and indubitate beggar. Say bragging
termagent, whither wouldst thou convey this growing image of thy
fiend-like face. I chastise thee, thou serpent. Men are April when
they woo, December when they wed. Base surfeiter, thy words are blunt,
and so art thou. Thou egg, thou fry of treachery. Have ye no modesty, no
maiden shame, no touch of bashfulness? Thy virginity, thy old virginity,
is like a wither'd pear: it looks ill, it eats drily. Ye tread upon my
patience. A new gilded loam doth destroy my sight. Ye from a child
nothing differ. Ye begin a new hell in thyself. Fit to govern, No, not
to live. Frailty, thy name is woman. As loathsome as a toad. Thou child
of a dread-bolted whoreson achitophel. Thou damned and luxurious
mountain goat. I abhor thee, thou art dirty and bellyless. What tempest
threw this whale with so many tons of oil in his belly, ashore at
Windsor. Peace, ye impatient Judas. O most bewildered and warped
outward-sainted deputy. Die, ye most untoward knave. The music of thine
own vain tongue doth ravish like enchanting harmony. Something is rotten
in the state of Denmark. Thou unadvised scold. Do thou amend thy face,
and I'll amend my -life. Thy beard deserves not so honourable a grave as
to stuff a botcher's cushion or to be entombed in as ass's pack saddle.
Thou bitch-wolf's son. Thou art a traitor, false to thy gods, thy
brother and thy father. Damn thee, fly-bitten tedious rogue. O, ho,
eternal devil. A fool, an idle immaterial skein of sleeve silk, one all
of luxury, a king of codpieces, a triple-turn'd whore. Dishonest varlet,
we cannot misuse thee enough. O curse of marriage, that we can call
these delicate creatures ours, and not their appetites. Bless me, what
an earth-vexing egregious dog is at the door. Oh, ye distempered rash
wanton. Ye same purpose clanger, ye sly devil, ye broker that still
breaks the pate of faith, ye daily break-vow. Where we are there's
daggers in men's smiles. Thou finch egg. Base ribaudred nag, thy words
are blunt, and so art thou. Ye destroy my sight with a new Gorgon. Whom
I shall trust as I will adders fangs? O, ho, foolish mild man. Go thou
and fill another room in hell. For I know ye to be a dangerous and
lascivious boy, who is a whale to virginity, that devours up all the fry
it finds. Thou art deformed, crooked, old and sere, ill-faced, worse
bodied, shapeless everywhere, vicious, ungentle, foolish, blunt, unkind,
stigmatical in making, worse in mind. Having flown over many knavish
professions, thou settled only on rascal. Heaven truly knows that thou
art a thing of no bowels. Thy head is not worth a hat, nor thy chin
worth a beard. Die, ye cuckold. Thou excels thy brother for a coward,
yet thy brother is reputed one of the best there is. In a retreat, he
outruns any lackey. Slave, friendless, veriest varlet that ever chewed
with a tooth! O gap-toothed vile thief. O base second-rate lackey.
Farewell, sour shame of Rome. Thou great-siz'd coward. Dissembling
harlot, thou are false in all. Ye are as a candle, the better part burnt
out. Say wall eyed slave, whither wouldst thou convey this growing image
of thy fiend-like face. Thou art a tale told by an idiot, full of sound
and fury, signifying nothing. Snakes, in my heart blood warmed, that
sting my heart. Thou Judas, thrice worse than Judas. Thou odiferous
stench. Let's meet as little as we can. So, thou rude-growing old
ruffian, didst thou disgorge thy glutton bosom?

Can that.

--
"You're a wholly evil ****er. You take the 'I am a *******' stance, and
extrapolate it out to 'I am an absolute uncaring ******* with the time
and means to make almost anyone suffer.' Whereas other people have
some faint nascent ideal about 'lines that should not be crossed', you
barge through taboo, and straight through 'unthinking prejudice', right
into "knock 'em down and then **** them over."

David Andrew Clayton to yours truly.

On 02/03/2017 23:05, Diesel wrote:
"David B."
Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:06:29 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 01/03/2017 18:32, Diesel wrote:
"David B."
Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:39:59 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 01/03/2017 15:33, Mike Duffy wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:17:25 +0000, David B. wrote:

*YOU* claim that it's bad manners but millions of people don't
hide who they are and what they do.

Here's an example:
https://be.linkedin.com/in/mieke-verburgh-429a5527

On the other hand, billions of people do not trust their
identity information with strangers.

The link was for Dustin's review. Please do not alter my posts,
Mike.

Why do you think I need to review it? I know the individual, I
worked with them.

It was the Malwarebytes team which tried, and failed, to break
your Zip, Dustin.

I wouldn't be so quick to brag about that, David.
And, it doesn't answer my question. Which was, why do you think I
need to review her linkedin page? Why are you stalking her? Looking
for dirt on me? She doesn't have any to give you, and, even if I had
anything on her, I wouldn't fork it over to you. She has a right to
her privacy and I won't help you violate that.

Not bragging, Dustin, just telling you the truth.

I'm most certainly not 'stalking' Mieke Verburgh during the month of
March last year. After watching your video I could hear her laugh as she
said "I most certainly agree that the basement is disgusting!"

Do you believe that?

If it came from someone other than you, I might. But, it wouldn't
surprise me to find out it's true, either. The file you got from me
is exactly what I told you it was. It really is a .zip file, and it
really does contain an identical byte for byte copy of the original
video file as I released it.

As I told you before, I was going to hand over instructions and the
key for the decryption process, until you started providing various
reasons for wanting it, none of which seemed to be friendly in
nature. You continue to disrespect my wishes concerning my material,
on purpose, you do this. So, I won't provide you decryption
instructions anytime soon. at the rate you're going, that cypher
should hold out well beyond my death.

FYI, I kept this ....

https://www.dropbox.com/s/7hr74lp8u5...2016.tiff?dl=0

Don't feel too bad though, I've kept our email correspondence online
since the remailer asked about a copy, some years back. AFAIK, It
hasn't been able to reverse the AZ encoding process, so it's not been
able to read any of them. If you told me that Malwarebytes couldn't
reverse that, I'd **** myself with laughter. Seriously, I would.

I never asked!

And don't take their personal info to the bank (pun intended).
Some people will be reluctant to tell you to **** off and mind
your own business simply because your prying seems a bit
psychotic. Probably a few of the life history stories you hear
are stock, built up over the years to deal with scammers and
busybodies. I'll wager that a lot of them are named 'Smith'.

Then you'd be wrong!

LOL, He's accurate, actually. Not only do I have a practiced
'stock' story to feed to people I don't know in idle chit chat, I
know many others irl who do the same to people they don't know
that walk up and ask personal questions.

Are you so ashamed of your past behavior that you cannot now bear
to have a LinkedIn profile, Dustin?

Your question doesn't even make sense, David. It's not even a
suitable deflection from the post I wrote. I've been quite candid
about my past, actually. Although I regret some aspects of it, I'm
not ashamed of it. It's in the past, it's some stuff I did, I can't
change the past, so...

You claim to be a 'professional' and a reformed character yet are afraid
to have a LinkedIn profile or be listed on Facebook.

By the same token, there's one thing I am very ashamed of, also in
the past, also unfixable, that I certainly do wish I could go back
and fix. But, there's the timeline to consider and how unfair that
would be to everyone else if I was able to do that. Various outcomes
would change, including my own. And those changes may not be for the
better.

It's nothing on paper, so I'll save you the trouble of trying to find
it. Nothing bad, or evil either. Just a poor personal decision I made
that resulted in what I feel is a loss. A loss entirely for me, not
the other individual.

I'm sure everyone makes poor personal decisions from time to time.

Just reflect on what Graham Morgan chose to do as a fine example of
same. So very sad and a totally unnecessary waste of a life. :-(

--
"Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." (Albert Schweitzer)
"The important thing is not to stop questioning."
- Albert Einstein

"David B."
Fri, 03 Mar 2017 17:36:56 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

I'm most certainly not 'stalking' Mieke Verburgh during the month
of March last year.

What do you call it?

As I told you before, I was going to hand over instructions and
the key for the decryption process, until you started providing
various reasons for wanting it, none of which seemed to be
friendly in nature. You continue to disrespect my wishes
concerning my material, on purpose, you do this. So, I won't
provide you decryption instructions anytime soon. at the rate
you're going, that cypher should hold out well beyond my death.

FYI, I kept this ....
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7hr74lp8u5...0-%20Dustin%20
Cook%20-%208%20March%202016.tiff?dl=0

I have a complete copy of the post, if you need it, David. ROFL.

I find no arrogance present though. The information provided is
accurate. The file can be unzipped, once you reverse the crypto
that's been placed on it. If Malwarebytes can't handle that crypto,
they aren't going to be doing much in terms of recovery from
ransomware if one strikes that doesn't leave the key(s) behind.

Don't feel too bad though, I've kept our email correspondence
online since the remailer asked about a copy, some years back.
AFAIK, It hasn't been able to reverse the AZ encoding process, so
it's not been able to read any of them. If you told me that
Malwarebytes couldn't reverse that, I'd **** myself with
laughter. Seriously, I would.

I never asked!

Did you show them the pic you shared with us, David? Or neglect to
mention that I told you the .zip had been encrypted beforehand. Oh,
did you think I meant with the archiving program? Nah, you couldn't
have. I specifically told you, and, it's visible in your picture that
you would have no header or other useful information to work with,
inside. Did you think I was kidding?

Your question doesn't even make sense, David. It's not even a
suitable deflection from the post I wrote. I've been quite candid
about my past, actually. Although I regret some aspects of it,
I'm not ashamed of it. It's in the past, it's some stuff I did, I
can't change the past, so...

You claim to be a 'professional' and a reformed character yet are
afraid to have a LinkedIn profile or be listed on Facebook.

Are you questioning my claim? You seem to be confusing afraid with
complete lack of interest, David. Why must I have a LinkedIn profile
and/or facekook page?

I'm sure everyone makes poor personal decisions from time to time.

You have no idea what I was writing about, and, I'm not inclined
to explain it further.

Just reflect on what Graham Morgan chose to do as a fine example
of same.

You shouldn't spread rumors, David.

So very sad and a totally unnecessary waste of a life.
:-(

Once again, you write about something you know nothing about. Very
rude of you.




--
Sarcasm, because beating the living **** out of deserving people is
illegal.

On 04/03/2017 11:57, Diesel wrote:
"David B."
Fri, 03 Mar 2017 17:36:56 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

I'm most certainly not 'stalking' Mieke Verburgh during the month
of March last year.

What do you call it?

Marcin delegated my request for help to her. Mieke and I exchanged MANY
emails regarding you and your shenanigans, Dustin.

As I told you before, I was going to hand over instructions and
the key for the decryption process, until you started providing
various reasons for wanting it, none of which seemed to be
friendly in nature. You continue to disrespect my wishes
concerning my material, on purpose, you do this. So, I won't
provide you decryption instructions anytime soon. at the rate
you're going, that cypher should hold out well beyond my death.

FYI, I kept this ....
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7hr74lp8u5...0-%20Dustin%20
Cook%20-%208%20March%202016.tiff?dl=0

I have a complete copy of the post, if you need it, David. ROFL.

I find no arrogance present though. The information provided is
accurate. The file can be unzipped, once you reverse the crypto
that's been placed on it. If Malwarebytes can't handle that crypto,
they aren't going to be doing much in terms of recovery from
ransomware if one strikes that doesn't leave the key(s) behind.

That's probably true. However, if YOU can encrypt it, I'm confident that
the TLA can decrypt it when I send it to them.

Don't feel too bad though, I've kept our email correspondence
online since the remailer asked about a copy, some years back.
AFAIK, It hasn't been able to reverse the AZ encoding process, so
it's not been able to read any of them. If you told me that
Malwarebytes couldn't reverse that, I'd **** myself with
laughter. Seriously, I would.

I never asked!

Did you show them the pic you shared with us, David? Or neglect to
mention that I told you the .zip had been encrypted beforehand. Oh,
did you think I meant with the archiving program? Nah, you couldn't
have. I specifically told you, and, it's visible in your picture that
you would have no header or other useful information to work with,
inside. Did you think I was kidding?

I've no recollection of what you are talking about.

Your question doesn't even make sense, David. It's not even a
suitable deflection from the post I wrote. I've been quite candid
about my past, actually. Although I regret some aspects of it,
I'm not ashamed of it. It's in the past, it's some stuff I did, I
can't change the past, so...

You claim to be a 'professional' and a reformed character yet are
afraid to have a LinkedIn profile or be listed on Facebook.

Are you questioning my claim? You seem to be confusing afraid with
complete lack of interest, David. Why must I have a LinkedIn profile
and/or facekook page?

Simply to be like NORMAL folk. Of course, I know you are NOT like us.

I'm sure everyone makes poor personal decisions from time to time.

You have no idea what I was writing about, and, I'm not inclined
to explain it further.

Entirely up to you. shrug

Just reflect on what Graham Morgan chose to do as a fine example
of same.

You shouldn't spread rumors, David.

I'm doing nothing of the kind.

So very sad and a totally unnecessary waste of a life.
:-(

Once again, you write about something you know nothing about. Very
rude of you.

I know that when individuals take their own lives, for whatever /they/
may perceive to be a justifiable reason, they leave a trail of misery
behind them.

I'm sure you have no understanding, yet, of the UOL. Sad. :-(

--
"Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." (Albert Schweitzer)
"The important thing is not to stop questioning."
- Albert Einstein

On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:06:04 +0000, David B. wrote:

if YOU can encrypt it, I'm confident that the TLA can decrypt it

After reading that, I'm confident that you do not understand how encrytion
works. Here is a hint, David. Last year, the FBI tried to have a court
order issued to Apple to hand over the backdoor keys to decrypt a telephone
suspected of having terrorist information on it.

Why did they not simply decrypt it themselves?


Simply to be like NORMAL folk.

The majority of the people on the planet do not have a LinkedIn / Facebook
account.

HTTP protocol was designed to be easy for anyone to use to set up his own
web-server without having a 3rd party in control of content & privacy. Most
of my friends who understand the technology refuse to have their on-line
presence shoe-horned into what is essentially a kiddie play area.

On 05/03/2017 02:15, Mike Duffy wrote:
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:06:04 +0000, David B. wrote:

if YOU can encrypt it, I'm confident that the TLA can decrypt it

After reading that, I'm confident that you do not understand how encrytion
works. Here is a hint, David. Last year, the FBI tried to have a court
order issued to Apple to hand over the backdoor keys to decrypt a telephone
suspected of having terrorist information on it.

Being an Apple fan, I am, of course, aware of what we were 'told' last year.

Do, please, learn something here ---
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ5HVMugXso

Why did they not simply decrypt it themselves?

You don't ACTUALLY _know_ that they didn't! ;-)

Simply to be like NORMAL folk.

The majority of the people on the planet do not have a LinkedIn / Facebook
account.

Billions *DO* though. It's great fun IMO. :-)

"Facebook's mission is to give people the power to share and make the
world more open and connected. People use Facebook to stay connected
with friends and family, to discover what's going on in the world, and
to share and express what matters to them."

Ref:
https://investor.fb.com/investor-new...s/default.aspx

HTTP protocol was designed to be easy for anyone to use to set up his own
web-server without having a 3rd party in control of content & privacy. Most
of my friends who understand the technology refuse to have their on-line
presence shoe-horned into what is essentially a kiddie play area.

Tell me, why isn't *YOUR* web site on your own, personal, server, Mike?

--
"Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." (Albert Schweitzer)
"The important thing is not to stop questioning."
- Albert Einstein

David B., a new saucy eunuch doth destroy my sight. Ye adulterate idle
creature, ye henpecked:

On 05/03/2017 02:15, Mike Duffy wrote:
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:06:04 +0000, David B. wrote:

if YOU can encrypt it, I'm confident that the TLA can decrypt it

After reading that, I'm confident that you do not understand how
encrytion
works. Here is a hint, David. Last year, the FBI tried to have a court
order issued to Apple to hand over the backdoor keys to decrypt a
telephone
suspected of having terrorist information on it.

Being an Apple fan, I am, of course, aware of what we were 'told' last
year.

Do, please, learn something here ---
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ5HVMugXso

Why did they not simply decrypt it themselves?

You don't ACTUALLY _know_ that they didn't! ;-)

Simply to be like NORMAL folk.

The majority of the people on the planet do not have a LinkedIn /
Facebook
account.

Billions *DO* though. It's great fun IMO. :-)

1.8 billion is not billions.

--
"You're a wholly evil ****er. You take the 'I am a *******' stance, and
extrapolate it out to 'I am an absolute uncaring ******* with the time
and means to make almost anyone suffer.' Whereas other people have
some faint nascent ideal about 'lines that should not be crossed', you
barge through taboo, and straight through 'unthinking prejudice', right
into "knock 'em down and then **** them over."

David Andrew Clayton to yours truly.

"David B."
Sat, 04 Mar 2017 18:06:04 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 04/03/2017 11:57, Diesel wrote:
"David B."
Fri, 03 Mar 2017 17:36:56 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

I'm most certainly not 'stalking' Mieke Verburgh during the
month of March last year.

What do you call it?

Marcin delegated my request for help to her. Mieke and I exchanged
MANY emails regarding you and your shenanigans, Dustin.

I wasn't aware that Malwarebytes was into taking cracking jobs that
aren't malware related. One would think, with all the problems
evident in v3 of their software package; they'd be more focused on
fixing that. Based on what you've shared concerning Mieke's 'expert'
opinion though, they shouldn't even try getting into the cracking
business.


That's probably true. However, if YOU can encrypt it, I'm
confident that the TLA can decrypt it when I send it to them.

You really are an idiot, then. You might wanna google the words and
study the subject in a bit more detail if you really think what you
wrote.


--
Sarcasm, because beating the living **** out of deserving people is
illegal.

On 05/03/2017 10:54, Diesel wrote:
"David B."
Sat, 04 Mar 2017 18:06:04 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 04/03/2017 11:57, Diesel wrote:
"David B."
Fri, 03 Mar 2017 17:36:56 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

I'm most certainly not 'stalking' Mieke Verburgh during the
month of March last year.

What do you call it?

Marcin delegated my request for help to her. Mieke and I exchanged
MANY emails regarding you and your shenanigans, Dustin.

I wasn't aware that Malwarebytes was into taking cracking jobs that
aren't malware related.

It WAS done as a special favor, Dustin. Marcin is another one of my
LinkedIn contacts! ;-)

One would think, with all the problems
evident in v3 of their software package; they'd be more focused on
fixing that. Based on what you've shared concerning Mieke's 'expert'
opinion though, they shouldn't even try getting into the cracking
business.

You might well be right about that.

That's probably true. However, if YOU can encrypt it, I'm
confident that the TLA can decrypt it when I send it to them.

You really are an idiot, then. You might wanna google the words and
study the subject in a bit more detail if you really think what you
wrote.

Perhaps the British guys would have more success. What do you think,
Dustin? Do you REALLY think it's impossible?

--
"Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." (Albert Schweitzer)
"The important thing is not to stop questioning."
- Albert Einstein

On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:04:27 +0000, David B. wrote:

You don't ACTUALLY _know_ that they didn't! ;-)

I know that it is extrememly unlikely. If you say otherwise, you simply do
not understand the mathematics behind modern encryption. The only reason I
won't say 'impossible' is pedantic mathematical correctness.


Tell me, why isn't *YOUR* web site on your own, personal, server, Mike?

It costs money, David. My solution is the best of both worlds. I have
complete control over my content as long as I do not violate the terms of
service. Most of these have to do with legal reasons, and since have no
desire to break any laws, it fits my needs perfectly. (I.e. Complete
control over content down to the byte level.)


With facebook, the terms of service are more restrictive, the site operator
has no regard for the privacy of the user, and each user is reduced to a
cookie cutout. That's okay for grannies too busy with their needlework, or
younsters too lazy to learn. But not for me, thank-you.

--
http://mduffy.x10host.com/index.htm

"David B." news:y9TuA.36015$i7.7425
@fx30.fr7 Sun, 05 Mar 2017 12:04:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop,
wrote:

I wasn't aware that Malwarebytes was into taking cracking jobs
that aren't malware related.

It WAS done as a special favor, Dustin. Marcin is another one of my
LinkedIn contacts! ;-)

I'm surprised that you asked Malwarebytes for a special favor to help
you in your stalking efforts against one of their own, formally. It's
also surprising to me that they tried to do so. Knowing about you, n
all. Perhaps the posts/comments I've written concerning how useless
the newest creation is is causing them financial issues? If so, they
need only fix the software to recover. I haven't written anything
about the program which is negative that isn't true. Assisting others
in attacking me for the purposes of discrediting and/or rumor
spreading won't help them a bit. Despite what you might think, My
word still carries weight in the IT world and people do follow the
advice I give. I'm not surprised they were not able to complete the
mission for you, though. Especially when you told me who was assigned
to assist you.

I'm not sure if it's even possible to have less respect for Marcin at
this point than I did previously. Very unprofessional to be doing you
any favors concerning an ex employee. Ah well. Not only have they
become shady as hell concerning the product claims, it seems they
aren't professional anymore concerning internal company
information/employee records. Their stock holders are going to hate
me before this year is done. They might want my head before the
end of summer. LOL!

One would think, with all the problems evident in v3 of their
software package; they'd be more focused on fixing that. Based on
what you've shared concerning Mieke's 'expert' opinion though,
they shouldn't even try getting into the cracking business.

You might well be right about that.

Oh, I know. I know a lot more about Mieke than she does me, or you do
her/me for that matter. Unlike them, I'm not going to air dirty
laundry for your benefit. Enjoy your email correspondence.

That's probably true. However, if YOU can encrypt it, I'm
confident that the TLA can decrypt it when I send it to them.

You really are an idiot, then. You might wanna google the words
and study the subject in a bit more detail if you really think
what you wrote.

Perhaps the British guys would have more success. What do you
think, Dustin? Do you REALLY think it's impossible?

David, google the words I used. Your question indicates that you
haven't done so, or, you have, but are unable to process the
information returned. Save me some time and aggravation, come clean.
Which is it?




--
Sarcasm, because beating the living **** out of deserving people is
illegal.

"David B."
Sat, 04 Mar 2017 18:06:04 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 04/03/2017 11:57, Diesel wrote:
"David B."
Fri, 03 Mar 2017 17:36:56 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
FYI, I kept this ....
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7hr74lp8u5...%20-%20Dustin%
20 Cook%20-%208%20March%202016.tiff?dl=0
Did you show them the pic you shared with us, David? Or neglect
to mention that I told you the .zip had been encrypted
beforehand. Oh, did you think I meant with the archiving program?
Nah, you couldn't have. I specifically told you, and, it's
visible in your picture that you would have no header or other
useful information to work with, inside. Did you think I was
kidding?

I've no recollection of what you are talking about.

No? The picture you were kind enough to share, David. It plainly states
that the .zip file in question is encrypted. Did you share that factoid
with Malwarebytes when you asked for help?

You've had the file for a year now. Yet, have not been able to extract
it's contents. As I told you, nearly a year ago, that's plainly visible
in the picture you shared: "You'll get access to the contents when/if
*I* decide you may."



--
Sarcasm, because beating the living **** out of deserving people is
illegal.