If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 2000 Pro / What browser to use
I was gonna post this to the Windows 2000 newsgroup, but it appears to
be dead. I'm running Windows 2000 pro on an old computer, which would not handle XP. It works fine, except the browser IE6 is old, (and I dont like IE). I installed Firefox 6.02. I'd like to upgrade Firefox to the highest version that will run on Win 2000. What version is that? I cant seem to find anywhere a list that says which Firefox works on what operating systems. Or maybe theere is some other browser to use. These older browsers dont work well on some websites. Thanks |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 2000 Pro / What browser to use
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 2000 Pro / What browser to use
Ant wrote:
Why not install a different OS like Linux with newer web browsers? wrote: I was gonna post this to the Windows 2000 newsgroup, but it appears to be dead. I'm running Windows 2000 pro on an old computer, which would not handle XP. It works fine, except the browser IE6 is old, (and I dont like IE). I installed Firefox 6.02. I'd like to upgrade Firefox to the highest version that will run on Win 2000. What version is that? I cant seem to find anywhere a list that says which Firefox works on what operating systems. Or maybe theere is some other browser to use. These older browsers dont work well on some websites. Thanks There is Seamonkey. And maybe a little work with the Win2K KernelEx can give the capability to run a later version. On the theory that the architecture hasn't changed enough in the browser for it to matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaMonkey http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/ Some browsers, they really are busted. They have acceleration features. Other browsers, they're only coincidentally busted, by Microsoft adding an "OS version check" somewhere. And hackers have defeated those. ******* I can't follow this stuff all that well. This forum reads like one of the "boot forums", where everything is cryptic and there are no useful recipes mere mortals can use. This is one way of running more recent browsers, depending on how they got broken. http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/1492...n2000/?page=34 If you're going to try stuff like that, make a backup copy of the OS first. Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 2000 Pro / What browser to use
In message , Paul
writes: [] There is Seamonkey. And maybe a little work with the Win2K KernelEx can give the capability to run a later version. On the theory that the architecture hasn't changed enough in the browser for it to matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaMonkey (I hadn't realised SeaMonkey is a suite, like the old Netscape Communicator, that includes browser, mail client, and news client.) http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/ (Unfortunately for the OP that only _lists_ versions, not dates or compatibilities. [It maybe does if you go into the individual versions - I didn't.]) Some browsers, they really are busted. They have acceleration features. Other browsers, they're only coincidentally busted, by Microsoft adding an "OS version check" somewhere. And hackers have defeated those. Is that your diplomatic way of saying only Microsoft browsers (i. e. IE, though presumably Edge as well) have that "feature" (drawback)? ******* I can't follow this stuff all that well. This forum reads like one of the "boot forums", where everything is cryptic and there are no useful recipes mere mortals can use. This is one way of running more recent browsers, depending on how they got broken. http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/1492...n2000/?page=34 [If Paul has difficulty following it, I didn't even bother to look (-:!] If you're going to try stuff like that, make a backup copy of the OS first. Paul John -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Never make the same mistake twice...there are so many new ones to make! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 2000 Pro / What browser to use
J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
In message , Paul writes: [] There is Seamonkey. And maybe a little work with the Win2K KernelEx can give the capability to run a later version. On the theory that the architecture hasn't changed enough in the browser for it to matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaMonkey (I hadn't realised SeaMonkey is a suite, like the old Netscape Communicator, that includes browser, mail client, and news client.) http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/ (Unfortunately for the OP that only _lists_ versions, not dates or compatibilities. [It maybe does if you go into the individual versions - I didn't.]) Some browsers, they really are busted. They have acceleration features. Other browsers, they're only coincidentally busted, by Microsoft adding an "OS version check" somewhere. And hackers have defeated those. Is that your diplomatic way of saying only Microsoft browsers (i. e. IE, though presumably Edge as well) have that "feature" (drawback)? ******* I can't follow this stuff all that well. This forum reads like one of the "boot forums", where everything is cryptic and there are no useful recipes mere mortals can use. This is one way of running more recent browsers, depending on how they got broken. http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/1492...n2000/?page=34 [If Paul has difficulty following it, I didn't even bother to look (-:!] If you're going to try stuff like that, make a backup copy of the OS first. Paul John The Wikipedia article tells you which is the last version of Seamonkey for Win2K. Some of the Microsoft tricks get applied when Visual Studio is building code for you. As far as I know, all it required is linking in a certain version of a library, for a trick to show up. An example, might be changing versions of Visual Studio ("for... support"), and then having to endure anything inserted along the way by Microsoft. I find it annoying, as I ran into it on a game demo level made available in my Win2K days. The game played in WinXP (apparently). When I tried in Win2K, there was some error message which basically amounted to "not on this OS, buddy". I found a web page which gave instructions for patching out the branch instruction for each test, and placing an x86 NOP in its place. The game loaded just fine after that, and ran *perfectly* . There was absolutely nothing about Win2K which was offensive to the program. I think you could say Microsoft wasn't high on my Christmas list after that. Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 2000 Pro / What browser to use
In message , Paul
writes: J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , Paul writes: [] [] Some browsers, they really are busted. They have acceleration features. Other browsers, they're only coincidentally busted, by Microsoft adding an "OS version check" somewhere. And hackers have defeated those. Is that your diplomatic way of saying only Microsoft browsers (i. e. IE, though presumably Edge as well) have that "feature" (drawback)? [] The Wikipedia article tells you which is the last version of Seamonkey for Win2K. OK. Some of the Microsoft tricks get applied when Visual Studio is building code for you. As far Ah, I see, so the problem may show up in other browsers if they're built using Microsoft compilers. as I know, all it required is linking in a certain version of a library, for a trick to show up. An example, might be changing versions of Visual Studio ("for... support"), and then having to endure anything inserted along the way by Microsoft. I find it annoying, as I ran into it on a game demo level made available in my Win2K days. The game played in WinXP (apparently). When I tried in Win2K, there was some error message which basically amounted to "not on this OS, buddy". I found a web page which gave instructions for patching out the branch instruction for each test, and placing an x86 NOP in its place. The game loaded Sounds _very_ tedious (-:! just fine after that, and ran *perfectly* . There was absolutely nothing about Win2K which was offensive to the program. I think you could say Microsoft wasn't high on my Christmas list after that. Another common variant of that (well, I used to come across it a lot at the 95/98 transition [I used to run 98 but with the 95 shell, which was simpler so faster and more stable], and I think occasionally at the 98/XP transition; probably less common at later transitions as the code varies more) is where the prog. itself runs (or _would_ run) absolutely fine under the earlier Windows, but the _installer_ will only run under the later one. (Ways round that: _sometimes_ you could just copy all the files over from an installation on a later-OS system - it depended on whether the installer was mostly just an unpacker, or whether it messed with registry settings and the like; or, for the 98/95 case, if you'd installed 98lite with the _option_ of switching back to the 98 shell, doing so just to run the installer and then back to 95 after the install, but that usually involved at least two reboots, so was a pain.) Paul -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf And if you kill Judi Dench, you can't go back home. - Bill Nighy (on learning to ride a motorbike [on which she would be side-saddle] for "The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel"), quoted in Radio Times 18-24 February 2012. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 2000 Pro / What browser to use
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 2000 Pro / What browser to use
On Fri, 13 May 2016 12:13:18 +0100, JJ wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2016 02:00:05 -0500, wrote: I was gonna post this to the Windows 2000 newsgroup, but it appears to be dead. I'm running Windows 2000 pro on an old computer, which would not handle XP. It works fine, except the browser IE6 is old, (and I dont like IE). I installed Firefox 6.02. I'd like to upgrade Firefox to the highest version that will run on Win 2000. What version is that? I cant seem to find anywhere a list that says which Firefox works on what operating systems. Or maybe theere is some other browser to use. These older browsers dont work well on some websites. Thanks That would be Firefox 12, according to this archived article. (long text warning) http://wayback.archive.org/web/20120128143126/http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/2012/01/end_of_firefox_win2k.html other old browsers are also available: http://www.oldapps.com/opera.php?system=Windows_2000 It seems that Opera 12.10b is OK on W2k; (2014) http://www.oldapps.com/firefox.php?system=Windows_2000 says FF10 is the last (2013) http://www.oldapps.com/seamonkey.php...m=Windows_2000 SeaMonkey 2.9.1 (2012) The webmasters have to keep fiddling; there's a lot of websites that a simple standard text browser can't access any more. Javascript, Flash, other trendy stuff, don't get me started. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|