A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Windows 10 » Windows 10 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Windows 10 BSOD indicates a hardware problem - but what hardware is the problem?



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old March 25th 20, 04:43 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Paul[_32_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,873
Default Windows 10 BSOD indicates a hardware problem - but what hardwareis the problem?

Arlen Holder wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:59:30 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:

Since this is a new install, I don't even know where mbam.exe came from,
where I don't use Cortana search so I ran the classic "salonb" command:
c:\ dir /s/a/s/on/b c:\tmp\salonb.txt


Correction on the "salonb" options (which are extremely useful!).

The dir salonb options I ran to look for mbam.exe were "/s/a/l/on/b":
cd c:\
dir /s/a/l/on/b c:\tmp\salonb.txt

Where, if I had wanted to, a findstr for the exe could have been attached:
dir /s/a/l/on/b c:\*.* | findstr "mbem.exe"

There was no mbem.exe extent.

It's a new installation of Windows 10 Pro, version 1909, so there isn't
even the Windows Defender running yet (as it's still almost fully default).
https://i.postimg.cc/KYyt5Cms/bsod21.jpg


Mbam.exe would be some Malwarebytes software.

It was just an example of a root cause for a system service exception.

The "system service", whatever it happened to be, was probably
hooked by the mbam realtime malware protection (not the one-shot
scanner they make).

As otherwise, it might not be easy to create a system service exception,
without industrial strength (AV/malware removal) software to
destabilize it.

Well, I hope it turns out it was just a RAM issue of some sort.
As tracking down something really low level, isn't going to be
easy. For example, if you had an AV program, I would not expect
anything the AV program does, to show up in a Procmon trace
(as an ETW event). There's lots of stuff in the OS we have
no hope of debugging, and this is only going to get worse
with time (as more containerization is used in the implementation).
Just as Linux has "snaps" and they can't be debugged.
I wasn't able to gain any traction on a particular
snap package.

Paul
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.