If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
USB Transfer - Final result
jbm wrote:
On 06/02/2017 01:05, jbm wrote: New computer is AMD A10-8750, Quad Core, 3.8GHz/4.0 GHz with Turbo Boost and 4Mb Cache. Motherboard AMD A78 FCH, 8Gb RAM. Runs Win 10 (64-bit). 2Tb internal hard drive, 5400rpm, SATA (I think?). It has 4x USB2 and 4x USB3 sockets. (2 of the USB3 are on the front of the case, all the others on the back.) I have 2x USB2 external hard drives, 3Tb & 4Tb. I want to transfer 2.3Tb of data from the 3TB to the 4Tb. I know this is going to take a very long time. So, which is the best way to connect those two drives to effect the fastest possible transfer. The computer can be left chugging away for as long as it takes since I am still using the old computer, until the transfer is complete. Any idea how long it will take? Or would it be quicker to transfer large chunks to the internal hard drive, then push it out to the other external drive. Thanks in advance. jim Took a while to get everything set up as I wanted it (4 computers on the network, 2 desktop LAN wired - Win7 & Win10, 2 laptop wi-fi WinXP & Win7, all able to access all the others plus one 1TB drive plus one printer/scanner). Bloody wiring nightmare under the desk - 14 power sockets, 8 USB cables, 2 monitor cables, 2 sound cables), but finally got there. Then the big surprise - it all works! Connected both drives (USB3) to the back of the new computer (temporarily - one now into the old computer), and the transfer took just under 9 hours to complete. Thanks all for your advice and help. jim If that was a file-by-file transfer using hard drives, the 9 hours is probably a pretty good performance. If there had been lots of small files, it could have been worse. Paul |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
USB Transfer - Final result
On 18/03/2017 00:56, Paul wrote:
If that was a file-by-file transfer using hard drives, the 9 hours is probably a pretty good performance. If there had been lots of small files, it could have been worse. Paul Mix of files, predominately scanned photos, music and films. Sizes anywhere between a few Kb to 8Gb. Several thousands of files in all. At least it's done and out of the way. jim |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|