Win10 boot problems swapping HDDs

On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:02:36 +0000, David
wrote:

The words had not been written by me.

And yet you posted them as if they were, and you had
"researched" the subject.
OK, start reading. Start with "WTF is DNS" and work up from
there.
I expect it'll take a couple of days before you understand
enough to write about DNS hijacking IN YOUR OWN WORDS, so bye. See you
in a couple of days ...

---------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

61 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On 2019-11-21 15:02, David wrote:
On 21/11/2019 18:42, nospam wrote:
In article , David
wrote:


Notice how he can1t explain how the router was hacked and then
was not
hacked when he did the second download. Why, it1s almost as if
he ****ed
up
something the first time and un****ed it by erasing the volume and
downloading a new copy. That would be the very definition of
PEBCK. He
won1t admit it, of course.

*DNS hijacking and why is it harmful*?

A DNS hijack means that someone has intentionally modified the
settings
on your router without your consent.

not necessarily.

as usual, you haven't a clue what you're babbling about.

With what do you disagree?

read it again.

snip arrogance

Are you suggesting that someone might Unintentionally modify things?

i'm not suggesting.

i'm *telling* you in no uncertain terms that you have absolutely no
clue whatsoever about this and pretty much everything else.

You criticised the words on the F-secure website.

No. He has criticised your ignorant use of the words written on the
F-secure website. You don't know what you're babbling about.


https://www.f-secure.com/us-en/home/...router-checker

The words had not been written by me.

We know.

In article , David
wrote:

Notice how he can1t explain how the router was hacked and then was not
hacked when he did the second download. Why, it1s almost as if he
****ed up
something the first time and un****ed it by erasing the volume and
downloading a new copy. That would be the very definition of PEBCK. He
won1t admit it, of course.

*DNS hijacking and why is it harmful*?

A DNS hijack means that someone has intentionally modified the settings
on your router without your consent.

not necessarily.

as usual, you haven't a clue what you're babbling about.

With what do you disagree?

read it again.

snip arrogance

Are you suggesting that someone might Unintentionally modify things?

i'm not suggesting.

i'm *telling* you in no uncertain terms that you have absolutely no
clue whatsoever about this and pretty much everything else.

You criticised the words on the F-secure website.

i did no such thing and you do not understand what those words mean.

In article , Panthera Tigris Altaica
wrote:


*DNS hijacking and why is it harmful*?

A DNS hijack means that someone has intentionally modified the
settings
on your router without your consent.

not necessarily.

as usual, you haven't a clue what you're babbling about.

With what do you disagree?

read it again.

snip arrogance

Are you suggesting that someone might Unintentionally modify things?

i'm not suggesting.

i'm *telling* you in no uncertain terms that you have absolutely no
clue whatsoever about this and pretty much everything else.

You criticised the words on the F-secure website.

No. He has criticised your ignorant use of the words written on the
F-secure website. You don't know what you're babbling about.

exactly, and i'll add he doesn't know what he's reading about either.

On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:02:36 +0000, David wrote:

You criticised the words on the F-secure website.

The words had not been written by me.

Thanks for admitting that you copy/pasted the text. Next, you might admit
that you have no clue what it actually means. Nah, you probably won't admit
to what everyone already knows.


--

Have you been approached by David Brooks (DB, ~DB~, and 50+ other nyms)?

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended that you visit he

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
https://web.archive.org/web/20191103112509/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

David news Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:51:15 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 20/11/2019 17:46, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-11-19 19:48, Char Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:29:06 +0000, David
wrote:

So which of these was responsible for putting onto my
machine?!!

Win.Dropper.Johnnie-6567749-0

Win.Trojan.Winlock-6629293-0

Win.Trojan.Generic-6629273-0

Win.Malware.Speedingupmypc-6718419-0

Win.Packer.WwpackV-1

Win.Downloader.Aiis-6803892-0

As before, I'm left wondering why nothing is ever *your* fault.
Nothing is
ever *your* responsibility. It's really quite remarkable.



In this case it's criminal, actionable, defamation of character
and is but the latest in a long string of similar actions, which
would demonstrate to the court a pattern of such behaviour. Not
only would he be legally liable because of this post, the court
would increase the punishments because of the pattern of bad
behaviour over a period in excess of a decade and which has
resulted in his being banned several times by fora who don't want
him posting his venom on their sites. All of those posts, and all
posts he had made on usenet, including his empty threats, would
be considered.


All this is simply playing in your mind - it's not reality!

Yes, you did.

I made no defamation of character statement. shakes head in
disbelief

Read it again. *I asked a question*! ;-)

Actually, you CLAIMED that I placed windows malware on your mac based
computer. That's defamation of character.




--
Anything preying on your mind would starve to death.

Panthera Tigris Altaica
Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:35:38 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2019-11-20 12:59, Shadow wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:36:23 +0000, David
wrote:

*So which of these was Dustin responsible for putting onto my
machine*?!!

That was a *TEASE* - and you took it, hook, line and sinker! :-D

We prefer the term *LIE*, and there's NOTHING funny about
sliming innocent people on public forums.

He partially sobered up (he's never completely sober) and realised
that he'd committed an actionable crime and now he's trying to
back off.

He pulled something similar when he threatened another posters kids
with a firearm, that he claimed at the time he had full permission to
be in possession of. He ducked the police for a considerable amount of
time, pretending not to trust the emails they were sending him. When he
finally had to meet one in person to go over the threat, he wasn't able
to produce any firearm, and the police had no record of him ever having
permission to have one as a civilian. In other words, he lied his ass
off about that too.



--
She was engaged to a boyfriend with a wooden leg but broke it off.

On 22/11/2019 09:12, Diesel wrote:
David news Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:51:15 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 20/11/2019 17:46, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-11-19 19:48, Char Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:29:06 +0000, David
wrote:

So which of these was responsible for putting onto my
machine?!!

Win.Dropper.Johnnie-6567749-0

Win.Trojan.Winlock-6629293-0

Win.Trojan.Generic-6629273-0

Win.Malware.Speedingupmypc-6718419-0

Win.Packer.WwpackV-1

Win.Downloader.Aiis-6803892-0

As before, I'm left wondering why nothing is ever *your* fault.
Nothing is
ever *your* responsibility. It's really quite remarkable.



In this case it's criminal, actionable, defamation of character
and is but the latest in a long string of similar actions, which
would demonstrate to the court a pattern of such behaviour. Not
only would he be legally liable because of this post, the court
would increase the punishments because of the pattern of bad
behaviour over a period in excess of a decade and which has
resulted in his being banned several times by fora who don't want
him posting his venom on their sites. All of those posts, and all
posts he had made on usenet, including his empty threats, would
be considered.


All this is simply playing in your mind - it's not reality!

Yes, you did.

I did what? Enter your head and eat away in your brain like a worm?

https://www.livescience.com/spiromet...orm-brain.html

I made no defamation of character statement. shakes head in
disbelief

Read it again. *I asked a question*! ;-)

Actually, you CLAIMED that I placed windows malware on your mac based
computer. That's defamation of character.

Your character has been tarnished from the very first day you decided to
hurt other people, Dustin.

Such a waste of a life. :-(

On 2019-11-22 05:09, David wrote:
On 22/11/2019 09:12, Diesel wrote:
David news Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:51:15 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 20/11/2019 17:46, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-11-19 19:48, Char Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:29:06 +0000, David
wrote:

So which of these was responsible for putting onto my
machine?!!

Win.Dropper.Johnnie-6567749-0

Win.Trojan.Winlock-6629293-0

Win.Trojan.Generic-6629273-0

Win.Malware.Speedingupmypc-6718419-0

Win.Packer.WwpackV-1

Win.Downloader.Aiis-6803892-0

As before, I'm left wondering why nothing is ever *your* fault.
Nothing is
ever *your* responsibility. It's really quite remarkable.



In this case it's criminal, actionable, defamation of character
and is but the latest in a long string of similar actions, which
would demonstrate to the court a pattern of such behaviour. Not
only would he be legally liable because of this post, the court
would increase the punishments because of the pattern of bad
behaviour over a period in excess of a decade and which has
resulted in his being banned several times by fora who don't want
him posting his venom on their sites. All of those posts, and all
posts he had made on usenet, including his empty threats, would
be considered.


All this is simply playing in your mind - it's not reality!

Yes, you did.

I did what? Enter your head and eat away in your brain like a worm?

https://www.livescience.com/spiromet...orm-brain.html

I made no defamation of character statement. shakes head in
disbelief

Read it again. *I asked a question*! ;-)

Actually, you CLAIMED that I placed windows malware on your mac based
computer. That's defamation of character.

Your character has been tarnished from the very first day you decided to
hurt other people, Dustin.

You have failed to refute his statement. As I can and have read your
original statements, it is clear that he was entirely correct and that
you are lying.


Such a waste of a life. :-(


Yes, you have wasted your life. You have wasted your dead son's life.
You are a very sick individual in serious need of professional medical
and mental help.

David
Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:09:31 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/11/2019 09:12, Diesel wrote:
David news Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:51:15 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 20/11/2019 17:46, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-11-19 19:48, Char Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:29:06 +0000, David
wrote:

So which of these was responsible for putting onto my
machine?!!

Win.Dropper.Johnnie-6567749-0

Win.Trojan.Winlock-6629293-0

Win.Trojan.Generic-6629273-0

Win.Malware.Speedingupmypc-6718419-0

Win.Packer.WwpackV-1

Win.Downloader.Aiis-6803892-0

As before, I'm left wondering why nothing is ever *your*
fault. Nothing is
ever *your* responsibility. It's really quite remarkable.



In this case it's criminal, actionable, defamation of character
and is but the latest in a long string of similar actions,
which would demonstrate to the court a pattern of such
behaviour. Not only would he be legally liable because of this
post, the court would increase the punishments because of the
pattern of bad behaviour over a period in excess of a decade
and which has resulted in his being banned several times by
fora who don't want him posting his venom on their sites. All
of those posts, and all posts he had made on usenet, including
his empty threats, would be considered.


All this is simply playing in your mind - it's not reality!

Yes, you did.

I did what?

You falsely accused me of planting malware on your computers, twice
recently. Now, you're doing a **** poor job of trying to backpeddle.



https://www.livescience.com/spiromet...orm-brain.html

I made no defamation of character statement. shakes head in
disbelief

Read it again. *I asked a question*! ;-)

Actually, you CLAIMED that I placed windows malware on your mac
based computer. That's defamation of character.

Your character has been tarnished from the very first day you
decided to hurt other people, Dustin.

Your personal opinion, which isn't based on reality has nothing to do
with your original statement where you defamed me by falsely claiming
I'd placed malware on your machine.

Such a waste of a life. :-(

Your life has been a total waste, I agree. Atleast one of your
offspring would agree that your genepool leaves much to be desired;
that is, had it been a decent enough genepool for him to still be
alive today. Did his unexpected loss contribute to your already
existing drinking problem? I'd be willing to bet it did. I'd be
willing to go a step further and state that your idea of grieving is
to see how fast you can get to the bottom of your next bottle.

Does it still bother you to know that had you been a little more of a
parent, and less of a drunk, and took him to the hospital, they would
have most likely found this issue before it became a fatal one for
him? That's some love you showed your kid there, David.

You've written some very ****ed up **** about my parents and what you
think my upbringing was like, but you know what? My parents were
smart enough not to deny me medical assistance which would have saved
my life. I'm still here as a result of their superior to your
parenting skills, and your kid, due to your neglect, is not.



--
'Be afraid....be very afraid...'

On 22/11/2019 21:26, Diesel wrote:
I've got you at the end of the day. I've got you, good.

The *ONLY* way, Dustin, is for you to have used your *BLACK HAT HACKER*
skillz.

*Whose* computer(s) did you hack?

Not mine of course - we have your word that you didn't hack mine! :-)

David
Fri, 22 Nov 2019 22:21:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/11/2019 21:26, Diesel wrote:
I've got you at the end of the day. I've got you, good.

The *ONLY* way, Dustin, is for you to have used your *BLACK HAT
HACKER* skillz.

*Whose* computer(s) did you hack?

Not mine of course - we have your word that you didn't hack mine!
:-)

Your latest accusation doesn't even make sense, David.

So, I'll ask again:

How do I know anything about a relationship you've confirmed existed
and has been destroyed if one or more persons you know in real life
didn't tell me all about it?

Go ahead, David, others are wanting to know about this too; I'm
getting emails about it. G How do I know what I should not know,
could not possibly know, if one or more people you know in real life
didn't fork me the information, David?

And, why did you accuse me of hacking your computers when I
originally disclosed the fact you're a real life, drunkard, using
your own real life details to prove it; details I'd have no knowledge
of, if I was as you claimed, lying. The problem for you is, I'm not
lying about it, and the more you try and state otherwise, but
contradict yourself with your side of the story; while avoiding my
question, the more obvious it is for others that you are indeed,
lying your ****ing ass off, and I have breached your inner circle.





--
110 people once tied for second prize in the Powerball Lottery after
playing the same lucky numbers from a fortune cookie.

On 22 Nov 2019, David wrote
(in article ):

On 22/11/2019 21:26, Diesel wrote:
I've got you at the end of the day. I've got you, good.

The *ONLY* way, Dustin, is for you to have used your *BLACK HAT HACKER*
skillz.

*Whose* computer(s) did you hack?

Not mine of course - we have your word that you didn't hack mine! :-)

errmm... you denied that the event in question had happened. so... how,
exactly, did he manage to use ‘black hat hacker skillz’ to hack his way
onto someone’s computer and get info on something which never happened?

The simplest explanation is that the incident did happen, that you really did
destroy at least one real-life relationship (other than that between you and
the son you murdered, filicide) and that the person in question really did
talk to Dustin.

On 23/11/2019 04:57, Diesel wrote:
David
Fri, 22 Nov 2019 22:21:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/11/2019 21:26, Diesel wrote:
I've got you at the end of the day. I've got you, good.

The *ONLY* way, Dustin, is for you to have used your *BLACK HAT
HACKER* skillz.

*Whose* computer(s) did you hack?

Not mine of course - we have your word that you didn't hack mine!
:-)

Your latest accusation doesn't even make sense, David.

So, I'll ask again:

How do I know anything about a relationship you've confirmed existed
and has been destroyed if one or more persons you know in real life
didn't tell me all about it?

*WHO* told you?

Go ahead, David, others are wanting to know about this too; I'm
getting emails about it. G How do I know what I should not know,
could not possibly know, if one or more people you know in real life
didn't fork me the information, David?

You either hacked into someone's computer or you are lying.

And, why did you accuse me of hacking your computers when I
originally disclosed the fact you're a real life, drunkard, using
your own real life details to prove it; details I'd have no knowledge
of, if I was as you claimed, lying. The problem for you is, I'm not
lying about it, and the more you try and state otherwise, but
contradict yourself with your side of the story; while avoiding my
question, the more obvious it is for others that you are indeed,
lying your ****ing ass off, and I have breached your inner circle.

You have *NOT* "breached my inner circle".

If you *HAD* done so, you would KNOW that I don't drink alcohol. :-P

On 23 Nov 2019, David wrote
(in article ):

On 23/11/2019 04:57, Diesel wrote:
David
Fri, 22 Nov 2019 22:21:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/11/2019 21:26, Diesel wrote:
I've got you at the end of the day. I've got you, good.

The *ONLY* way, Dustin, is for you to have used your *BLACK HAT
HACKER* skillz.

*Whose* computer(s) did you hack?

Not mine of course - we have your word that you didn't hack mine!
-)

Your latest accusation doesn't even make sense, David.

So, I'll ask again:

How do I know anything about a relationship you've confirmed existed
and has been destroyed if one or more persons you know in real life
didn't tell me all about it?

*WHO* told you?

Someone formerly close to you who’s now as disgusted with you as all normal
people.


Go ahead, David, others are wanting to know about this too; I'm
getting emails about it. G How do I know what I should not know,
could not possibly know, if one or more people you know in real life
didn't fork me the information, David?

You either hacked into someone's computer

unlikely. He’d have had to

1 identify persons, multiple, in your ‘inner circle’

2 hacked into their systems until he found some good stuff

3 there would have to have been good stuff to be got... so how did he know
what to look for and where to go to find it?

or you are lying.

it sure looks as though you are lying. Oh. wait. are you breathing? Then
you’re lying.,



And, why did you accuse me of hacking your computers when I
originally disclosed the fact you're a real life, drunkard, using
your own real life details to prove it; details I'd have no knowledge
of, if I was as you claimed, lying. The problem for you is, I'm not
lying about it, and the more you try and state otherwise, but
contradict yourself with your side of the story; while avoiding my
question, the more obvious it is for others that you are indeed,
lying your ****ing ass off, and I have breached your inner circle.

You have *NOT* "breached my inner circle".

it’s clear that he has. Filicide.



If you *HAD* done so, you would KNOW that I don't drink alcohol. :-P

oh, you’ve been posting while drunk for a looooooong time, that’s _very_
clear.