Microsoft end of support dates

Snit
Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:15:26 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 10, 2020 at 12:53:55 PM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

On 10/08/2020 18:08, Snit wrote:
On Aug 10, 2020 at 8:35:43 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

On 10/08/2020 02:12, Gremlin LIED*

I've yet to make a single false accusation against David.

Yes, Dustin - you have!

You claim I 'm a drinker and a drunk. I am *NOT* so.

I've been 'on the wagon' since 21 March 2018 :-)

He lies pretty much non-stop.

He repeats claims Carroll makes as if they were true then AFTER
asks me to verify if they are true or not. But if he really
thought I was lying it would not matter what I said, and even if
he did not it would not change the fact he
made claims about my personal life he only later asked about.

And he insists that when he called me -- a call HE let you and
others know about -- that somehow I would not have info in my
call records. I do. If he keeps insisting I do not then clearly
he has no issue with me posting a version of this image with all
things unblocked accept the number he called:

https://ibb.co/5jv8X2x

He really is just unable to stop making up stories.

Everything you say appears to be accurate and 100% correct.

I cannot imagine why he would make up a story that is trivial to
show as false. But even with him lying non-stop I will not show
that image unblocked without him saying he knows that image cannot
exist. It comes directly from my online call log. Maybe he is not
aware people have such things?

I didn't make up any stories. Fact is, you forged the contents of the
image and I can easily demonstrate you having done that, too. I can
easily call you from ANY number using *67 ahead of it and the results
on your caller ID would be the same as they were when I called you.

Do you know how caller ID even works snit? In order for it to show
you information of some kind on the caller, the phone carrier has to
have callers information to share with you - unless, as I do, you use
a pay as you go, with cash, plan; and the cell phone company has no
idea who you are. So, there's nothing for them to give caller ID when
you make outbound calls with it. Aside from the number itself, and
again, that's only if I don't block it using *67 code ahead of the
number im calling. That being said, if someone who had the number I
was assigned previously 'registered' it with their cell provider, the
caller ID record would have that individuals name, but, still, for
what should be obvious reasons by now, not mine.

I take my privacy seriously, Snit, all the way down to the cell phone
I use and how I use it, and what it's allowed to know about me. So,
there's absolutely NO WAY it can give anyone my name when I call with
it, it doesn't know my name, and the carrier doesn't either. I buy a
reloadable card, with cash. When I want to be 'totally professional'
I call from the business phone, which doesn't use my name, but the
business name. People put my cell in their phones with my name, but,
it's not because my cell provides it. That has to be done by them.

The device I used to call you with is something along the lines of
voIP, but it's not something I pay for, so it doesn't know anything
about me as a person, either. It's quite a bit like dialpad was when
it was an open, free to use for twenty minute phone calls beta. That
didn't provide useful caller ID information either. There's literally
no phone number available to you via caller ID. it's why you had to
ASK ME for one during our conversation.

I could relatively easily have someone video me calling you again,
and using nothing more than *67 on an actual cell phone, evading your
caller ID, just like I did the first time around - except that I
didn't use a phone the first time. I'd ask for you to tell me what
your caller ID says about the call, knowing full well, it isn't
telling anything more than unknown caller. Prepaid cell phones which
don't require you in any way getting personal with the carrier or
provider. Snit, are you at all familiar with them?

Let's see you dig yourself out of this one. There's no
misunderstanding ruse you can use this time around.


--
I don't want anybody else; when I think about you I touch myself