If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
MID:
I wrote this: David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared with you. And you responded with this: This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing. Which is a problem, for you: Message-ID: From: David_B Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100 I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level. Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT Message-ID: References: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. Message-ID: From: David_B X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100 On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote: On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT Message-ID: References: On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores 121 results! Sorry there are so many to check. Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no matches. *** end share You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit? See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as the liar you are. -- Profanity: the single language in which all programmers are expert. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
On Aug 19, 2020 at 3:28:05 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
MID: I wrote this: David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared with you. And you responded with this: This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing. Which is a problem, for you: Message-ID: From: David_B Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100 I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level. Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT Message-ID: References: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. Message-ID: From: David_B X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100 On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote: On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT Message-ID: References: On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores 121 results! Sorry there are so many to check. Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no matches. *** end share You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit? See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as the liar you are. He asked if I could find it on a list of numbers of businesses... but given how your claimed business is not real it, of course did not show up. Fair enough. But remember you DID give me permission to share it with the world: Gremlin : ----- You have my permission to post your caller ID logs, snit. ----- I do not because I sincerely think you have no idea what the implication of your comments are... I am treating you like a child and protecting you from yourself. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:44:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Aug 19, 2020 at 3:28:05 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote: MID: I wrote this: David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared with you. And you responded with this: This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing. Which is a problem, for you: Message-ID: From: David_B Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100 I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level. Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT Message-ID: References: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. Message-ID: From: David_B X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100 On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote: On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT Message-ID: References: On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores 121 results! Sorry there are so many to check. Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no matches. *** end share You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit? See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as the liar you are. He asked if I could find it on a list of numbers of businesses... Indeed, he did, as I wrote: MID: I wrote this: David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared with you. And you responded with this: "This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing." Except that he did, I also shared the MIDs as well as the posts of you both doing exactly what I wrote about; exactly what you claimed was a direct lie on my part. Not only did I provide proof! showing you lied your ****ing ass off, you also just discredited your former claim yourself! Now, you owe me two apologies. One for this lie, and the other for the bot lie, Snit. By this weekend, it'll be upto three; i'm going to compile my proof about the decoding accusation you made and call out those lies you wrote, too. Again, I'll remind you, you were better off apologizing for the first whopper of a lie you took the time to write about me. Now, I'm going to get them all, eventually, and demand an apology for every single one of them. I'm doing this because every single one you wrote shows your true nature; and that true nature doesn't match what you describe yourself as. It's the opposite of your description infact. but given how your claimed business is not real it, of course did not show up. Fair enough. And now you're projecting what you actually did sometime ago onto me. Sorry pal, but I didn't mislead anyone, my business is a legitimate one; unlike yours. and you aren't going to be able to slightly edit your own history to pass it off as that of mine, here, either. It's a known fact you ran an illegal business AND it was a miserable failure. I am not you, though. You are not going to be able to edit your own history and claim it's mine, asshat. Far too many people know all about it for you to actually pull this one off. You had a better chance with the edited video - as long as how the call was placed to you is completely ignored. And so long as you continue to completely ignore the details I've provided you and everyone else concerning the device which is linked to the number I provided you. Now, that I've got you dead to rights lying on me, again!, I already told you the cell number I provided you is a backup device. Why would you expect to see a backup number provided in advertising materials I'd be charged for, snit? Especially when you consider I have roll over already. Do I need to give you time to learn about roll over, or can we continue this conversation as is? I just want simple answers to my simple questions, snit. Remember, you said I'm a terrible troubleshooter, so let's work together then to determine how a backup cell number for a disposable phone that is fixed area to kingsport (not johnson city) could have given you it's number on your logs when it wasn't used to make contact with you? How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the wrong ****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my landline and cell display the business name as the caller name when I use them to make outbound calls (as I feel any professional should! It's free advertising AND can build a limited amount of trust with the client or potential client), and they all display Kingsport, TN for city and state; it's fixed. The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY of that information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May. Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to entertain your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work together' to figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No comments please from the spectators, even if you know what I'm doing, please, don't comment just yet on this subject G) You seem to be very interested in my business, and no doubt my personal life at this point in time. I've been candid and openly honest with you from the jump, even if you don't think so. You could simply just ask me yourself, if there's something you want to know; and if I don't feel it's private, I'll tell you, straight. You still don't realize that you're about to do some serious damage to yourself over something that's not significant in the grand scheme of things. It's all about the principle with me on this snit, it's why I'm riding your ass about those apologies. It's why I'm going to find more examples of you lying on me and demanding apologies for them as well. I'm not going to let you go, without you issuing them, snit. You owe me them, I will collect them, eventually. I can be quite the pest and I'm a diligent note taker, too. Plus, I'm known to be a very stubborn individual at times. when my mind is made up about something, it's a done deal. I've made up my mind about your lies you've been writing about me, I'm going to call you out on them, you are going to apologize for them at some point, or your credibility is going to continue to take hit after hit after hit. Either way, paco, I will win this. And you will lose. It's your destiny. It's our destiny. I'm not going to drop it, I'm not going to walk away from it, nothing you write is going to sidetrack me in any way shape or form from continuing to demand what you rightfully owe me. Which as it stands now, is presently two apologies. If you issue them before I have the third request ready, this will end. All I want is what you presently owe me, as I've told you, since I started asking you for it.If you don't, it'll be three seperate apologies required to make this end. And it's just going to climb from there as I begin taking a review of your older posts. I have an extensive database, snit. And no worries, everything on my network is using very sturdy crypto. A power down and/or reset is all that's required for the machines to forget how they are accessing the data they contain. I've also, due to your threats, taken the liberty of modding some old dead man switch code I developed a number of years ago. If for any reason, I'm not able to login to a very specific machine in a very specific way within a very specific time period, anything and everything that is available on you upto the point where I begin to fail logins gets published, raw, unfiltered, right in the open in each one of the newsgroups I selected for you previously. Call it, an insurance policy, Snit. H0H0H0. If you did manage to somehow cause a raid on my house, you'd be ensuring a self doxing of grand proportations, automated, starting with your youngest and working it's way to your oldest, then moving onto you and wifey. And then it examines each side of your family trees and those not related, but close to you And the cycle repeats until it's atleast four levels deep via common circle connection theories in use today. It's based on that concept, infact. I could literally be sitting in a jail cell, with absolutely no computer access of any kind; all of my equipment could be sitting in the IT dept, completely powered down, and what I described above would play out as described; without me touching a key and without so much as a single one of my computers running, let alone doing anything to cause this to happen to you. Remember, I'd have a solid alibi as you continued to watch your entire family tree, and those close to you, and their family trees doxed to the point of detail that anyone can read the resulting posts and take out an application for a loan using the information provided, online, no questions asked, and the sucker who was dox'd pays for it, and they are legally obligated to do so, even if you and they both know they didn't do any of the so called paperwork. Funny how technology works sometimes, isn't it? Remember, I'm in jail, my gear is completely down; thanks to your house raid you scored for me. So, I can't very well do this to you and be there at the same time, something is going to do this to you, obviously, but it won't be me. I'll eventually get my **** back, too, and some money when they find nothing of value to be used against me on any of my machines. When, if there's anything left of you that someone else hasn't already taken from you, I'll file a civil lawsuit against you for filing a fraudulent police report that cost me time money and loss of access to my gear for a period of time. I'll ensure my lawyer makes you pay me for each day I do without gear I need to do my work for a living, too. I'll also sue you for each day of wages my employees lose, because once again, we don't have the gear we need to do our jobs. The raid would hit my house and the shop, that's a matter of policy, dumb ****. And even though the officers who participate probably know me, they still have to follow official procedure. I'll just sit on my couch and sip coffee as they pack my **** up. I'll already have my lawyer on the phone, beginning the necessary paperwork to see what needs to be done in so far as who's coming to who's state. I'd prefer you come here, but i'm not completely opposed to visiting AZ again. Do you own your house? You might need to sell it to pay the judgements against you off by the time my lawyer is done with you, Snit. He charges me a damn hot price by the hour, but, I get my monies worth. I could buy a fairly decent used truck for three hours of his time, snit. He doesn't play around. He's my goto guy for any legal questions or issues I have in my personal life as well as my business life. So, I'm coming for you from multiple angles as soon as you get froggy and take that jump. Straight up, that's the gameplan. I told you, I'm going to do you a whole lot different than you've ever been done before. When i'm finished with you, you won't want anything to do with usenet, or social media for a considerable time. You won't be able to afford it when we're done with the courtroom dance, kiddo. I told you, snit, I'm a chess playing individual; I'm always thinking several moves ahead of you. It's not difficult, especially with you. I'll dig up more details to justify an apology for what you just tried doing here, too. So, make that four apologies I'll be demanding from you soon. Or, heh, two additional ones. You're at two distinct, caught you, lies you owe me for an apology now. But again, if you go ahead and face this head on, grow a pair of balls, accept responsibility for what you did, I will pursue this matter with you no more. This particular issue will finally have a status of closed-resolved, instead of open-unresolved. I really don't think that I'm being unreasonable with you here, snit. But remember you DID give me permission to share it with the world: I never did any such thing, and it doesn't matter how many times you try to twist what I wrote around. If anything, the last instructions you received would superscene any you thought you got. So, as you've been told, and told, but won't be any more, don't release the number. If you do, we begin (plural stupid, you really ****ed up with that threat; you've caused things to get blown out of spec and now various people are starting to gun for you and taking time away from things that are more important that they should be doing instead) with your youngest family member and work our way to the oldest and go from there, down each side of the tree; as I described previously. As was done to Eagle for his stalking efforts, as will be done to you, for yours. It's out of my hands as of your threat you made, yesterday way. I can just tell you what you're going to be dealing with if you try to dox me, or otherwise do anymore snarky **** outside of running your mouth here on usenet. It's a free country, you can do that all day long if you desire. But, if you opt to play doxing games with me, it's you who's going to get the doxing of a lifetime, and I don't even have to do anything to bring it to you; others you threatened but didn't realize you did are going to, the moment you make good on your implied threat, your ass is toast. That's the hole you've dug for yourself here, over your continued refusal to apologize for lies you already wrote about me. You went over the top with the threats of LE as well as your continued implied threat to try and dox me. You haven't done yourself any favors or acquired any sympathy by trying to help David with the location of my business, either, dumb****. Like a lobster, you're in a pot that's going to get very very warm in a very short period of time. And like that lobster, you're too damn stupid to crawl out of that pot before the temperature increases to the point where you're going to be cooked. You're going to bring forth your own destruction, I'm just going to sit back and watch it go down. We all are. And you brought it all upon yourself by making the threats you did, yesterday, you dumb ****ing ****. All this over a ****ing refusal to apologize for what you did. You're a real piece of ****, there, snit. You seem to have no issue causing multiple people, including your own people, a lot of unnecessary annoyance and aggravation. And for what? You're ****ing pride? What a dickhead you are. The snit circus description is appropriate for the mayhem and strife you cause, intentionally. David is a very good fit for you. He gets off on the same **** as yourself, and also likes putting others in potential harms way for his own benefit, just like you. I do not because I sincerely think you have no idea what the implication of your comments are... I am treating you like a child and protecting you from yourself. You're a liar. You're protecting your own ass by walking back your threat, is what you're doing here. You aren't fooling anyone, dip****. You're in a hell of a mess now, though. You best be thinking of a mature and adult way in which to get yourself out of it. Dumb ****. -- I'd love to, but the Prime Directive forbids it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:44:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Aug 19, 2020 at 3:28:05 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote: MID: I wrote this: David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared with you. And you responded with this: This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing. Which is a problem, for you: Message-ID: From: David_B Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100 I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level. Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT Message-ID: References: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. Message-ID: From: David_B X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100 On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote: On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT Message-ID: References: On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores 121 results! Sorry there are so many to check. Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no matches. *** end share You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit? See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as the liar you are. He asked if I could find it on a list of numbers of businesses. Snit, Message-ID: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores And Message-ID: OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores *** end evidence submission 1. You may now apologize for having claimed I was directly lying about this, because, I wasn't and you did make that claim. So about that apology then? You can't claim a misunderstanding took place this time. -- 666-A -- The Tenant of the Beast. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
On 2020-08-20, Gremlin wrote:
Snit Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:44:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Now, you owe me two apologies. One for this lie, and the other for the bot lie, Snit. By this weekend, it'll be upto three; i'm going to compile my proof about the decoding accusation you made and call out those lies you wrote, too. Sorry but you are going to have to stand in line as there are 1000's already waiting. Take a ticket and wait till hell freezes over lol! but given how your claimed business is not real it, of course did not show up. Fair enough. And now you're projecting what you actually did sometime ago onto me. Sorry pal, but I didn't mislead anyone, my business is a legitimate one; unlike yours. and you aren't going to be able to slightly edit your own history to pass it off as that of mine, here, either. It's a known fact you ran an illegal business AND it was a miserable failure. I am not you, though. You are not going to be able to edit your own history and claim it's mine, asshat. Far too many people know all about it for you to actually pull this one off. These days people Google, Yelp and such before using local businesses. Snit doesn't do well with that. Based upon Google I wouldn't hire snit to pick up dog ****. And it's almost 100 percent due to his net behavior so he has only himself to blame. How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the wrong ****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my landline and cell display the business name as the caller name when I use them to make outbound calls (as I feel any professional should! It's free advertising AND can build a limited amount of trust with the client or potential client), and they all display Kingsport, TN for city and state; it's fixed. The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY of that information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May. Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to entertain your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work together' to figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No comments please from the spectators, even if you know what I'm doing, please, don't comment just yet on this subject G) You are way over snit's head on this one. He's barely able to answer or make a phone call so explaining how the system works is way over his head. You seem to be very interested in my business, and no doubt my personal life at this point in time. I've been candid and openly honest with you from the jump, even if you don't think so. You could simply just ask me yourself, if there's something you want to know; and if I don't feel it's private, I'll tell you, straight. Like many others before you, snit is going to attempt to doxx you and use whatever data he may be able to dig up to harass you, your family, friends, employer, neighbors etc. He's done it to others and he will do it to you, or at least try. You still don't realize that you're about to do some serious damage to yourself over something that's not significant in the grand scheme of things. It's all about the principle with me on this snit, it's why I'm riding your ass about those apologies. It's why I'm going to find more examples of you lying on me and demanding apologies for them as well. I'm not going to let you go, without you issuing them, snit. You owe me them, I will collect them, eventually. Good luck. Snit is like a vermin that survives a ground zero nuclear blast. He seems to be made of teflon as many have tried to give him some of his own medicine and failed. You're a liar. You're protecting your own ass by walking back your threat, is what you're doing here. You aren't fooling anyone, dip****. You're in a hell of a mess now, though. You best be thinking of a mature and adult way in which to get yourself out of it. Dumb ****. -- Nimbus9 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
On Aug 19, 2020 at 3:44:45 PM MST, "Snit"
wrote: .... He asked if I could find it on a list of numbers of businesses... but given how your claimed business is not real it, of course did not show up. Fair enough. But remember you DID give me permission to share it with the world: Gremlin : ----- You have my permission to post your caller ID logs, snit. ----- I do not because I sincerely think you have no idea what the implication of your comments are... I am treating you like a child and protecting you from yourself. Gremlin responded to this by snipping and freaking out. Poor Gremlin -- busted in claiming to have a business that cannot be shown to exist, and being protected from his own ignorance as if he was a child. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
nimbus9 Thu,
20 Aug 2020 14:41:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 2020-08-20, Gremlin wrote: Snit Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:44:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Now, you owe me two apologies. One for this lie, and the other for the bot lie, Snit. By this weekend, it'll be upto three; i'm going to compile my proof about the decoding accusation you made and call out those lies you wrote, too. Sorry but you are going to have to stand in line as there are 1000's already waiting. Take a ticket and wait till hell freezes over lol! Damnit. My ticket # is 3015. This could take awhile. These days people Google, Yelp and such before using local businesses. Snit doesn't do well with that. Based upon Google I wouldn't hire snit to pick up dog ****. And it's almost 100 percent due to his net behavior so he has only himself to blame. Ayep. A lot of the businesses shown in the urls David provided that Snit checked against are closed and have been for years. I didn't know the information was that outdated, but, once I saw Computer Associated Technologies listed - having known the owner personally and having attended his funeral almost two decades ago, I knew the info was bad. How he expected a backup cell number to be present in the yellowpage isn't known to me, though. How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the wrong ****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my landline and cell display the business name as the caller name when I use them to make outbound calls (as I feel any professional should! It's free advertising AND can build a limited amount of trust with the client or potential client), and they all display Kingsport, TN for city and state; it's fixed. The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY of that information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May. Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to entertain your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work together' to figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No comments please from the spectators, even if you know what I'm doing, please, don't comment just yet on this subject G) You are way over snit's head on this one. He's barely able to answer or make a phone call so explaining how the system works is way over his head. I know, but that's besides the point. He offered to help me troubleshoot the issue. You seem to be very interested in my business, and no doubt my personal life at this point in time. I've been candid and openly honest with you from the jump, even if you don't think so. You could simply just ask me yourself, if there's something you want to know; and if I don't feel it's private, I'll tell you, straight. Like many others before you, snit is going to attempt to doxx you and use whatever data he may be able to dig up to harass you, your family, friends, employer, neighbors etc. I fully expect that's his gameplan yes. I've been candid about what's going to happen when he makes his move, so the only blame for the outcome will be on him. I will sleep fine. He's done it to others and he will do it to you, or at least try. I hope he does try, I'm anxious to see what he thinks when it's done to him, on a professional level - Basically, everyone is waiting for Snit to make a move, then, he's going to get pounced on, and how, from multiple angles. Good luck. Snit is like a vermin that survives a ground zero nuclear blast. He seems to be made of teflon as many have tried to give him some of his own medicine and failed. They haven't done it the way we will. We get results. You'll see. -- Sex drive: a physical craving that begins in adolescence and ends at marriage. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
Snit
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:40:17 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Aug 20, 2020 at 2:41:09 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote: ... You had a better chance with the edited video - as long as how the call was placed to you is completely ignored. I do mot give a **** how you claim the call was placed, how you think the call was placed, or what excuses you make for your ignorance and your poor troubleshooting skills. These are the facts: It's not a matter of how I claim or how I think the call was placed. I'm very familiar with the technology I used, even if you don't know anything about it. And the only way for technology which knows nothing about me to provide you a backup (not even primary cell or business landline? c'mon now, snit... that's amateur hour here) cell for your logs is if you inserted them, manually. IE: you edited video to show what wasn't there originally. https://ibb.co/fpJry4K https://youtu.be/xRvaRLlb3b8 https://youtu.be/xNvMu5fwUxQ They are indeed facts, snit. They are examples of your ability to edit video to go with whatever story you're desperately trying to peddle. You can include them with the doctored pdf file you did sometime back. And whatever else you've edited to give your bull**** story a smidgeon of credibility - only with those who don't already know about you, that is. How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the wrong ****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my landline and cell display the business name as the caller name when I use them to make outbound calls (as I feel any professional should! It's free advertising AND can build a limited amount of trust with the client or potential client), and they all display Kingsport, TN for city and state; it's fixed. The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY of that information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May. Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to entertain your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work together' to figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No comments please from the spectators, even if you know what I'm doing, please, don't comment just yet on this subject G) No response to any of my questions, then, Snit? Hard to explain away your lie when I get 'tech' with you, isn't it? You are anything BUT reasonable! But then your tantrum continues! See below! I'm certainly reasonable, considering that i've got you dead to rights lying your ass off, repeatedly, on me. And, I've asked for nothing more than an apology for these bad acts you've taken towards me. And for that, you've implied that you'll share the number I provided to you over voice; a distraction attempt on your part. won't work, I'm still going to demand those apologies, because you lied on me, multiple times now, and I want what you owe me. The snit circus description is appropriate for the mayhem and strife you cause, intentionally. David is a very good fit for you. He gets off on the same **** as yourself, and also likes putting others in potential harms way for his own benefit, just like you. Another more than 2000 words of tantrum from you. If what I wrote is too complicated, I can try to dumb it down for you, kiddo. You're a liar. You're protecting your own ass by walking back your threat, is what you're doing here. You aren't fooling anyone, dip****. You're in a hell of a mess now, though. You best be thinking of a mature and adult way in which to get yourself out of it. Dumb ... ****. You are so dishonest you cannot even imagine the idea of someone just being direct and straight forward with you, as I am being. Really? How straight forward and honest were you being here, then, Snit? MID: I wrote this: David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared with you. And you responded with this: This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing. Which is a problem, for you: Message-ID: From: David_B Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100 I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level. Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT Message-ID: References: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. Message-ID: From: David_B X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100 On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote: On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT Message-ID: References: On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores 121 results! Sorry there are so many to check. Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no matches. *** end share You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit? See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as the liar you are. I'd say you weren't being very honest at all, there, Snit. Just like the bot accusation you made against me, AND the doctored video story you're going with these days. You really like to dig holes. lol. -- Ah yes! I remember it well! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
Gremlin wrote:
nimbus9 Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:41:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 2020-08-20, Gremlin wrote: Snit Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:44:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Now, you owe me two apologies. One for this lie, and the other for the bot lie, Snit. By this weekend, it'll be upto three; i'm going to compile my proof about the decoding accusation you made and call out those lies you wrote, too. Sorry but you are going to have to stand in line as there are 1000's already waiting. Take a ticket and wait till hell freezes over lol! Damnit. My ticket # is 3015. This could take awhile. These days people Google, Yelp and such before using local businesses. Snit doesn't do well with that. Based upon Google I wouldn't hire snit to pick up dog ****. And it's almost 100 percent due to his net behavior so he has only himself to blame. Ayep. A lot of the businesses shown in the urls David provided that Snit checked against are closed and have been for years. I didn't know the information was that outdated, but, once I saw Computer Associated Technologies listed - having known the owner personally and having attended his funeral almost two decades ago, I knew the info was bad. How he expected a backup cell number to be present in the yellowpage isn't known to me, though. How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the wrong ****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my landline and cell display the business name as the caller name when I use them to make outbound calls (as I feel any professional should! It's free advertising AND can build a limited amount of trust with the client or potential client), and they all display Kingsport, TN for city and state; it's fixed. The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY of that information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May. Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to entertain your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work together' to figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No comments please from the spectators, even if you know what I'm doing, please, don't comment just yet on this subject G) You are way over snit's head on this one. He's barely able to answer or make a phone call so explaining how the system works is way over his head. I know, but that's besides the point. He offered to help me troubleshoot the issue. You seem to be very interested in my business, and no doubt my personal life at this point in time. I've been candid and openly honest with you from the jump, even if you don't think so. You could simply just ask me yourself, if there's something you want to know; and if I don't feel it's private, I'll tell you, straight. Like many others before you, snit is going to attempt to doxx you and use whatever data he may be able to dig up to harass you, your family, friends, employer, neighbors etc. I fully expect that's his gameplan yes. I've been candid about what's going to happen when he makes his move, so the only blame for the outcome will be on him. I will sleep fine. He's done it to others and he will do it to you, or at least try. I hope he does try, I'm anxious to see what he thinks when it's done to him, on a professional level - Basically, everyone is waiting for Snit to make a move, then, he's going to get pounced on, and how, from multiple angles. Good luck. Snit is like a vermin that survives a ground zero nuclear blast. He seems to be made of teflon as many have tried to give him some of his own medicine and failed. They haven't done it the way we will. We get results. You'll see. More threats from you — and yet I still protect you from your ignorant claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question. Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
Gremlin wrote:
Snit Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:40:17 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Aug 20, 2020 at 2:41:09 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote: ... You had a better chance with the edited video - as long as how the call was placed to you is completely ignored. I do mot give a **** how you claim the call was placed, how you think the call was placed, or what excuses you make for your ignorance and your poor troubleshooting skills. These are the facts: It's not a matter of how I claim or how I think the call was placed. I'm very familiar with the technology I used, even if you don't know anything about it. And the only way for technology which knows nothing about me to provide you a backup (not even primary cell or business landline? c'mon now, snit... that's amateur hour here) cell for your logs is if you inserted them, manually. IE: you edited video to show what wasn't there originally. https://ibb.co/fpJry4K https://youtu.be/xRvaRLlb3b8 https://youtu.be/xNvMu5fwUxQ They are indeed facts, snit. They are examples of your ability to edit video to go with whatever story you're desperately trying to peddle. You can include them with the doctored pdf file you did sometime back. And whatever else you've edited to give your bull**** story a smidgeon of credibility - only with those who don't already know about you, that is. How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the wrong ****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my landline and cell display the business name as the caller name when I use them to make outbound calls (as I feel any professional should! It's free advertising AND can build a limited amount of trust with the client or potential client), and they all display Kingsport, TN for city and state; it's fixed. The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY of that information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May. Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to entertain your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work together' to figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No comments please from the spectators, even if you know what I'm doing, please, don't comment just yet on this subject G) No response to any of my questions, then, Snit? Hard to explain away your lie when I get 'tech' with you, isn't it? You are anything BUT reasonable! But then your tantrum continues! See below! I'm certainly reasonable, considering that i've got you dead to rights lying your ass off, repeatedly, on me. And, I've asked for nothing more than an apology for these bad acts you've taken towards me. And for that, you've implied that you'll share the number I provided to you over voice; a distraction attempt on your part. won't work, I'm still going to demand those apologies, because you lied on me, multiple times now, and I want what you owe me. The snit circus description is appropriate for the mayhem and strife you cause, intentionally. David is a very good fit for you. He gets off on the same **** as yourself, and also likes putting others in potential harms way for his own benefit, just like you. Another more than 2000 words of tantrum from you. If what I wrote is too complicated, I can try to dumb it down for you, kiddo. You're a liar. You're protecting your own ass by walking back your threat, is what you're doing here. You aren't fooling anyone, dip****. You're in a hell of a mess now, though. You best be thinking of a mature and adult way in which to get yourself out of it. Dumb ... ****. You are so dishonest you cannot even imagine the idea of someone just being direct and straight forward with you, as I am being. Really? How straight forward and honest were you being here, then, Snit? MID: I wrote this: David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared with you. And you responded with this: This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing. Which is a problem, for you: Message-ID: From: David_B Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100 I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level. Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT Message-ID: References: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. Message-ID: From: David_B X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100 On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote: On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can read about here? https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores Not there. OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores Message-ID: From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT Message-ID: References: On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B" wrote: OK. Thanks for looking. Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores 121 results! Sorry there are so many to check. Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no matches. *** end share You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit? See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as the liar you are. I'd say you weren't being very honest at all, there, Snit. Just like the bot accusation you made against me, AND the doctored video story you're going with these days. You really like to dig holes. lol. More lies from you — and yet I still protect you from your ignorant claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question. Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote:
[....] More threats from you — and yet I still protect you from your ignorant claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question. Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number. More threats noted. :-( Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be reported to the US three letter agencies? If so, which one(s)? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
David_B wrote:
On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote: [....] More threats from you — and yet I still protect you from your ignorant claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question. Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number. More threats noted. :-( Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be reported to the US three letter agencies? If so, which one(s)? Frankly he is likely just lying — but there might be value in letting the FBI know. They can forward to other agencies if needed. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
FromTheRafters
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:27:03 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Shadow was thinking very hard : On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:36:34 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: David_B brought next idea : On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote: [....] More threats from you - and yet I still protect you from your ignorant claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question. Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number. More threats noted. :-( Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be reported to the US three letter agencies? If so, which one(s)? Send all reports directly to the WMS. Women's Missionary Society? Waste Management System. Here, we have roadside pick-up. ROFLMFAO! -- All about snit read below: https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
FromTheRafters
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:50:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Shadow formulated on Sunday : On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:27:03 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: Shadow was thinking very hard : On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:36:34 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: David_B brought next idea : On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote: [....] More threats from you - and yet I still protect you from your ignorant claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question. Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number. More threats noted. :-( Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be reported to the US three letter agencies? If so, which one(s)? Send all reports directly to the WMS. Women's Missionary Society? Waste Management System. Here, we have roadside pick-up. They probably have too much rubbish to deal with. BD's contribution will probably crash their system. IMHO []'s They claim that Gremlin lies, yet they are willing to submit what they think are lies to the so-called 'three letter agencies' just to harass him. This would be an abuse of those 'see something, say something' reporting systems. Best to cut out the middle-man and toss them in the trash themselves locally. Heh, What they were threatening to do didn't make much sense to me either. I'm glad you just called it like it is though, an attempt to harass me. I'm interested in reading snits reponse to this, but I suspect if one is forthcoming, it's going to claim you misunderstood him, you can't read, and your troubleshooting skills are crappy. -- All about snit read below: https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)
Steve Carroll "Steve
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:11:42 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 2020-08-23, FromTheRafters wrote: Shadow formulated on Sunday : On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:27:03 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: Shadow was thinking very hard : On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:36:34 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: David_B brought next idea : On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote: [....] More threats from you Â- and yet I still protect you from your ignorant claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question. Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number. More threats noted. :-( Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be reported to the US three letter agencies? If so, which one(s)? Send all reports directly to the WMS. Women's Missionary Society? Waste Management System. Here, we have roadside pick-up. They probably have too much rubbish to deal with. BD's contribution will probably crash their system. IMHO []'s They claim that Gremlin lies, yet they are willing to submit what they think are lies to the so-called 'three letter agencies' just to harass him. It's actually worse than that, first, they incite people, then they report them. Snit used to make a huge (whining) deal about 'what happens on usenet stays on usenet', except when *he* (hypocritically) decided otherwise. This is the reason I recommend people kf me, because I'm going to continue pointing out what he is as long as he keeps doing it. Prior to 'meeting' DB, I've never seen anyone else do what Snit does. You guys thought you had a very special and unique case right? I told you, we have our own version of your snit here, it's known as David Brooks. -- All about snit read below: https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|