A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Windows 10 » Windows 10 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 19th 20, 11:28 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

MID:

I wrote this:

David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


And you responded with this:

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.


Which is a problem, for you:

Message-ID:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try
to not sink to their level.


Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores


121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit?

See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much
dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done
so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as
the liar you are.



--
Profanity: the single language in which all programmers are expert.
Ads
  #2  
Old August 19th 20, 11:44 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

On Aug 19, 2020 at 3:28:05 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

MID:

I wrote this:

David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


And you responded with this:

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.


Which is a problem, for you:

Message-ID:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin
and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do
so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try
to not sink to their level.


Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:



Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:



On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores


121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits...
no
matches.

*** end share

You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit?

See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much
dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done
so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as
the liar you are.


He asked if I could find it on a list of numbers of businesses... but given
how your claimed business is not real it, of course did not show up. Fair
enough.

But remember you DID give me permission to share it with the world:

Gremlin :
-----
You have my permission to post your caller ID logs, snit.
-----

I do not because I sincerely think you have no idea what the implication of
your comments are... I am treating you like a child and protecting you from
yourself.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.


  #3  
Old August 20th 20, 10:41 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:44:45 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 19, 2020 at 3:28:05 PM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

MID:

I wrote this:

David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he
shared with you.


And you responded with this:

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.


Which is a problem, for you:

Message-ID:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of
their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I
disagree with, say Gremlin
and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere
when I do
so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am
honest, and I try to not sink to their level.


Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you
can read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this
weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:




Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses
you can read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses
you can read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he-
https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this
weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:




On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he-
https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four
digits... no
matches.

*** end share

You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit?

See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much
dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having
done so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly
showing you as the liar you are.


He asked if I could find it on a list of numbers of businesses...


Indeed, he did, as I wrote:
MID:

I wrote this:

David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he
shared with you.

And you responded with this:

"This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing."

Except that he did, I also shared the MIDs as well as the posts of
you both doing exactly what I wrote about; exactly what you claimed
was a direct lie on my part.

Not only did I provide proof! showing you lied your ****ing ass off,
you also just discredited your former claim yourself!

Now, you owe me two apologies. One for this lie, and the other for
the bot lie, Snit. By this weekend, it'll be upto three; i'm going to
compile my proof about the decoding accusation you made and call out
those lies you wrote, too.

Again, I'll remind you, you were better off apologizing for the first
whopper of a lie you took the time to write about me. Now, I'm going
to get them all, eventually, and demand an apology for every single
one of them. I'm doing this because every single one you wrote shows
your true nature; and that true nature doesn't match what you
describe yourself as. It's the opposite of your description infact.

but given how your claimed business is not real it, of course did
not show up. Fair enough.


And now you're projecting what you actually did sometime ago onto me.
Sorry pal, but I didn't mislead anyone, my business is a legitimate
one; unlike yours. and you aren't going to be able to slightly edit
your own history to pass it off as that of mine, here, either. It's a
known fact you ran an illegal business AND it was a miserable
failure. I am not you, though. You are not going to be able to edit
your own history and claim it's mine, asshat. Far too many people
know all about it for you to actually pull this one off.

You had a better chance with the edited video - as long as how the
call was placed to you is completely ignored. And so long as you
continue to completely ignore the details I've provided you and
everyone else concerning the device which is linked to the number I
provided you.

Now, that I've got you dead to rights lying on me, again!, I already
told you the cell number I provided you is a backup device. Why would
you expect to see a backup number provided in advertising materials
I'd be charged for, snit? Especially when you consider I have roll
over already. Do I need to give you time to learn about roll over, or
can we continue this conversation as is? I just want simple answers
to my simple questions, snit. Remember, you said I'm a terrible
troubleshooter, so let's work together then to determine how a backup
cell number for a disposable phone that is fixed area to kingsport
(not johnson city) could have given you it's number on your logs when
it wasn't used to make contact with you?

How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells
number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the wrong
****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my landline and
cell display the business name as the caller name when I use them to
make outbound calls (as I feel any professional should! It's free
advertising AND can build a limited amount of trust with the client
or potential client), and they all display Kingsport, TN for city and
state; it's fixed. The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY
of that information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first
place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May.

Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you
didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to entertain
your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work together' to
figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No comments please
from the spectators, even if you know what I'm doing, please, don't
comment just yet on this subject G)

You seem to be very interested in my business, and no doubt my
personal life at this point in time. I've been candid and openly
honest with you from the jump, even if you don't think so. You could
simply just ask me yourself, if there's something you want to know;
and if I don't feel it's private, I'll tell you, straight.

You still don't realize that you're about to do some serious damage
to yourself over something that's not significant in the grand scheme
of things. It's all about the principle with me on this snit, it's
why I'm riding your ass about those apologies. It's why I'm going to
find more examples of you lying on me and demanding apologies for
them as well. I'm not going to let you go, without you issuing them,
snit. You owe me them, I will collect them, eventually.

I can be quite the pest and I'm a diligent note taker, too. Plus, I'm
known to be a very stubborn individual at times. when my mind is made
up about something, it's a done deal. I've made up my mind about your
lies you've been writing about me, I'm going to call you out on them,
you are going to apologize for them at some point, or your
credibility is going to continue to take hit after hit after hit.
Either way, paco, I will win this. And you will lose. It's your
destiny. It's our destiny. I'm not going to drop it, I'm not going to
walk away from it, nothing you write is going to sidetrack me in any
way shape or form from continuing to demand what you rightfully owe
me. Which as it stands now, is presently two apologies.

If you issue them before I have the third request ready, this will
end. All I want is what you presently owe me, as I've told you, since
I started asking you for it.If you don't, it'll be three seperate
apologies required to make this end. And it's just going to climb
from there as I begin taking a review of your older posts. I have an
extensive database, snit. And no worries, everything on my network is
using very sturdy crypto.

A power down and/or reset is all that's required for the machines to
forget how they are accessing the data they contain. I've also, due
to your threats, taken the liberty of modding some old dead man
switch code I developed a number of years ago. If for any reason, I'm
not able to login to a very specific machine in a very specific way
within a very specific time period, anything and everything that is
available on you upto the point where I begin to fail logins gets
published, raw, unfiltered, right in the open in each one of the
newsgroups I selected for you previously.

Call it, an insurance policy, Snit. H0H0H0. If you did manage to
somehow cause a raid on my house, you'd be ensuring a self doxing of
grand proportations, automated, starting with your youngest and
working it's way to your oldest, then moving onto you and wifey. And
then it examines each side of your family trees and those not
related, but close to you And the cycle repeats until it's atleast
four levels deep via common circle connection theories in use today.

It's based on that concept, infact. I could literally be sitting in a
jail cell, with absolutely no computer access of any kind; all of my
equipment could be sitting in the IT dept, completely powered down,
and what I described above would play out as described; without me
touching a key and without so much as a single one of my computers
running, let alone doing anything to cause this to happen to you.

Remember, I'd have a solid alibi as you continued to watch your
entire family tree, and those close to you, and their family trees
doxed to the point of detail that anyone can read the resulting posts
and take out an application for a loan using the information
provided, online, no questions asked, and the sucker who was dox'd
pays for it, and they are legally obligated to do so, even if you and
they both know they didn't do any of the so called paperwork.

Funny how technology works sometimes, isn't it? Remember, I'm in
jail, my gear is completely down; thanks to your house raid you
scored for me. So, I can't very well do this to you and be there at
the same time, something is going to do this to you, obviously, but
it won't be me. I'll eventually get my **** back, too, and some money
when they find nothing of value to be used against me on any of my
machines. When, if there's anything left of you that someone else
hasn't already taken from you, I'll file a civil lawsuit against you
for filing a fraudulent police report that cost me time money and
loss of access to my gear for a period of time. I'll ensure my lawyer
makes you pay me for each day I do without gear I need to do my work
for a living, too. I'll also sue you for each day of wages my
employees lose, because once again, we don't have the gear we need to
do our jobs. The raid would hit my house and the shop, that's a
matter of policy, dumb ****.

And even though the officers who participate probably know me, they
still have to follow official procedure. I'll just sit on my couch
and sip coffee as they pack my **** up. I'll already have my lawyer
on the phone, beginning the necessary paperwork to see what needs to
be done in so far as who's coming to who's state. I'd prefer you come
here, but i'm not completely opposed to visiting AZ again.

Do you own your house? You might need to sell it to pay the
judgements against you off by the time my lawyer is done with you,
Snit. He charges me a damn hot price by the hour, but, I get my
monies worth. I could buy a fairly decent used truck for three hours
of his time, snit. He doesn't play around. He's my goto guy for any
legal questions or issues I have in my personal life as well as my
business life.

So, I'm coming for you from multiple angles as soon as you get froggy
and take that jump. Straight up, that's the gameplan. I told you, I'm
going to do you a whole lot different than you've ever been done
before. When i'm finished with you, you won't want anything to do
with usenet, or social media for a considerable time. You won't be
able to afford it when we're done with the courtroom dance, kiddo.

I told you, snit, I'm a chess playing individual; I'm always thinking
several moves ahead of you. It's not difficult, especially with you.

I'll dig up more details to justify an apology for what you just
tried doing here, too. So, make that four apologies I'll be demanding
from you soon. Or, heh, two additional ones. You're at two distinct,
caught you, lies you owe me for an apology now.

But again, if you go ahead and face this head on, grow a pair of
balls, accept responsibility for what you did, I will pursue this
matter with you no more. This particular issue will finally have a
status of closed-resolved, instead of open-unresolved.

I really don't think that I'm being unreasonable with you here, snit.

But remember you DID give me permission to share it with the
world:


I never did any such thing, and it doesn't matter how many times you
try to twist what I wrote around. If anything, the last instructions
you received would superscene any you thought you got. So, as you've
been told, and told, but won't be any more, don't release the number.

If you do, we begin (plural stupid, you really ****ed up with that
threat; you've caused things to get blown out of spec and now various
people are starting to gun for you and taking time away from things
that are more important that they should be doing instead) with your
youngest family member and work our way to the oldest and go from
there, down each side of the tree; as I described previously. As was
done to Eagle for his stalking efforts, as will be done to you, for
yours. It's out of my hands as of your threat you made, yesterday
way. I can just tell you what you're going to be dealing with if you
try to dox me, or otherwise do anymore snarky **** outside of running
your mouth here on usenet. It's a free country, you can do that all
day long if you desire.

But, if you opt to play doxing games with me, it's you who's going to
get the doxing of a lifetime, and I don't even have to do anything to
bring it to you; others you threatened but didn't realize you did are
going to, the moment you make good on your implied threat, your ass
is toast. That's the hole you've dug for yourself here, over your
continued refusal to apologize for lies you already wrote about me.
You went over the top with the threats of LE as well as your
continued implied threat to try and dox me.

You haven't done yourself any favors or acquired any sympathy by
trying to help David with the location of my business, either,
dumb****. Like a lobster, you're in a pot that's going to get very
very warm in a very short period of time. And like that lobster,
you're too damn stupid to crawl out of that pot before the
temperature increases to the point where you're going to be cooked.

You're going to bring forth your own destruction, I'm just going to
sit back and watch it go down. We all are. And you brought it all
upon yourself by making the threats you did, yesterday, you dumb
****ing ****. All this over a ****ing refusal to apologize for what
you did. You're a real piece of ****, there, snit. You seem to have
no issue causing multiple people, including your own people, a lot of
unnecessary annoyance and aggravation. And for what? You're ****ing
pride? What a dickhead you are.

The snit circus description is appropriate for the mayhem and strife
you cause, intentionally. David is a very good fit for you. He gets
off on the same **** as yourself, and also likes putting others in
potential harms way for his own benefit, just like you.

I do not because I sincerely think you have no idea what the
implication of your comments are... I am treating you like a child
and protecting you from yourself.


You're a liar. You're protecting your own ass by walking back your
threat, is what you're doing here. You aren't fooling anyone,
dip****. You're in a hell of a mess now, though. You best be thinking
of a mature and adult way in which to get yourself out of it. Dumb
****.


--
I'd love to, but the Prime Directive forbids it.
  #4  
Old August 20th 20, 10:41 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:44:45 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 19, 2020 at 3:28:05 PM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

MID:

I wrote this:

David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he
shared with you.


And you responded with this:

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.


Which is a problem, for you:

Message-ID:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of
their own weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I
disagree with, say Gremlin
and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere
when I do
so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am
honest, and I try to not sink to their level.


Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you
can read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this
weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:




Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses
you can read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses
you can read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he-
https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this
weekend !! Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:




On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he-
https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four
digits... no
matches.

*** end share

You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit?

See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much
dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having
done so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly
showing you as the liar you are.


He asked if I could find it on a list of numbers of businesses.


Snit,

Message-ID:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses
you can read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

And

Message-ID:
OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he-
https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

*** end evidence submission 1.

You may now apologize for having claimed I was directly lying about
this, because, I wasn't and you did make that claim.

So about that apology then? You can't claim a misunderstanding took
place this time.



--
666-A -- The Tenant of the Beast.
  #5  
Old August 20th 20, 03:41 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
nimbus9
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

On 2020-08-20, Gremlin wrote:
Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:44:45 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:


Now, you owe me two apologies. One for this lie, and the other for
the bot lie, Snit. By this weekend, it'll be upto three; i'm going to
compile my proof about the decoding accusation you made and call out
those lies you wrote, too.


Sorry but you are going to have to stand in line as there are 1000's
already waiting.
Take a ticket and wait till hell freezes over lol!


but given how your claimed business is not real it, of course did
not show up. Fair enough.


And now you're projecting what you actually did sometime ago onto me.
Sorry pal, but I didn't mislead anyone, my business is a legitimate
one; unlike yours. and you aren't going to be able to slightly edit
your own history to pass it off as that of mine, here, either. It's a
known fact you ran an illegal business AND it was a miserable
failure. I am not you, though. You are not going to be able to edit
your own history and claim it's mine, asshat. Far too many people
know all about it for you to actually pull this one off.


These days people Google, Yelp and such before using local businesses.
Snit doesn't do well with that. Based upon Google I wouldn't hire
snit to pick up dog ****. And it's almost 100 percent due to his
net behavior so he has only himself to blame.


How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells
number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the wrong
****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my landline and
cell display the business name as the caller name when I use them to
make outbound calls (as I feel any professional should! It's free
advertising AND can build a limited amount of trust with the client
or potential client), and they all display Kingsport, TN for city and
state; it's fixed. The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY
of that information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first
place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May.

Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you
didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to entertain
your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work together' to
figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No comments please
from the spectators, even if you know what I'm doing, please, don't
comment just yet on this subject G)


You are way over snit's head on this one. He's barely able to answer or make
a phone call so explaining how the system works is way over
his head.

You seem to be very interested in my business, and no doubt my
personal life at this point in time. I've been candid and openly
honest with you from the jump, even if you don't think so. You could
simply just ask me yourself, if there's something you want to know;
and if I don't feel it's private, I'll tell you, straight.


Like many others before you, snit is going to attempt to doxx you and use
whatever data he may be able to dig up to harass you, your family, friends,
employer, neighbors etc.

He's done it to others and he will do it to you, or at least try.




You still don't realize that you're about to do some serious damage
to yourself over something that's not significant in the grand scheme
of things. It's all about the principle with me on this snit, it's
why I'm riding your ass about those apologies. It's why I'm going to
find more examples of you lying on me and demanding apologies for
them as well. I'm not going to let you go, without you issuing them,
snit. You owe me them, I will collect them, eventually.


Good luck. Snit is like a vermin that survives a ground zero nuclear blast.
He seems to be made of teflon as many have tried to give him some of his
own medicine and failed.



You're a liar. You're protecting your own ass by walking back your
threat, is what you're doing here. You aren't fooling anyone,
dip****. You're in a hell of a mess now, though. You best be thinking
of a mature and adult way in which to get yourself out of it. Dumb
****.




--
Nimbus9
  #6  
Old August 20th 20, 05:29 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

On Aug 19, 2020 at 3:44:45 PM MST, "Snit"
wrote:
....

He asked if I could find it on a list of numbers of businesses... but given
how your claimed business is not real it, of course did not show up. Fair
enough.

But remember you DID give me permission to share it with the world:

Gremlin :
-----
You have my permission to post your caller ID logs, snit.
-----

I do not because I sincerely think you have no idea what the implication of
your comments are... I am treating you like a child and protecting you from
yourself.


Gremlin responded to this by snipping and freaking out. Poor Gremlin -- busted
in claiming to have a business that cannot be shown to exist, and being
protected from his own ignorance as if he was a child.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.


  #7  
Old August 22nd 20, 06:30 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

nimbus9 Thu,
20 Aug 2020 14:41:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2020-08-20, Gremlin wrote:
Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:44:45
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:


Now, you owe me two apologies. One for this lie, and the other
for the bot lie, Snit. By this weekend, it'll be upto three; i'm
going to compile my proof about the decoding accusation you made
and call out those lies you wrote, too.


Sorry but you are going to have to stand in line as there are
1000's already waiting.
Take a ticket and wait till hell freezes over lol!


Damnit. My ticket # is 3015. This could take awhile.

These days people Google, Yelp and such before using local
businesses. Snit doesn't do well with that. Based upon Google I
wouldn't hire snit to pick up dog ****. And it's almost 100
percent due to his net behavior so he has only himself to blame.


Ayep. A lot of the businesses shown in the urls David provided that
Snit checked against are closed and have been for years. I didn't
know the information was that outdated, but, once I saw Computer
Associated Technologies listed - having known the owner personally
and having attended his funeral almost two decades ago, I knew the
info was bad. How he expected a backup cell number to be present in
the yellowpage isn't known to me, though.

How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells
number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the
wrong ****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my
landline and cell display the business name as the caller name
when I use them to make outbound calls (as I feel any
professional should! It's free advertising AND can build a
limited amount of trust with the client or potential client), and
they all display Kingsport, TN for city and state; it's fixed.
The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY of that
information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first
place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May.

Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you
didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to
entertain your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work
together' to figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No
comments please from the spectators, even if you know what I'm
doing, please, don't comment just yet on this subject G)


You are way over snit's head on this one. He's barely able to
answer or make a phone call so explaining how the system works is
way over his head.


I know, but that's besides the point. He offered to help me
troubleshoot the issue.

You seem to be very interested in my business, and no doubt my
personal life at this point in time. I've been candid and openly
honest with you from the jump, even if you don't think so. You
could simply just ask me yourself, if there's something you want
to know; and if I don't feel it's private, I'll tell you,
straight.


Like many others before you, snit is going to attempt to doxx you
and use whatever data he may be able to dig up to harass you, your
family, friends, employer, neighbors etc.


I fully expect that's his gameplan yes. I've been candid about what's
going to happen when he makes his move, so the only blame for the
outcome will be on him. I will sleep fine.

He's done it to others and he will do it to you, or at least try.


I hope he does try, I'm anxious to see what he thinks when it's done
to him, on a professional level - Basically, everyone is waiting for
Snit to make a move, then, he's going to get pounced on, and how,
from multiple angles.

Good luck. Snit is like a vermin that survives a ground zero
nuclear blast. He seems to be made of teflon as many have tried to
give him some of his own medicine and failed.


They haven't done it the way we will. We get results. You'll see.


--
Sex drive: a physical craving that begins in adolescence and ends at
marriage.
  #8  
Old August 22nd 20, 06:30 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

Snit
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:40:17 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 20, 2020 at 2:41:09 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

...
You had a better chance with the edited video - as long as how
the call was placed to you is completely ignored.


I do mot give a **** how you claim the call was placed, how you
think the call was placed, or what excuses you make for your
ignorance and your poor troubleshooting skills. These are the
facts:


It's not a matter of how I claim or how I think the call was placed.
I'm very familiar with the technology I used, even if you don't know
anything about it.

And the only way for technology which knows nothing about me to
provide you a backup (not even primary cell or business landline?
c'mon now, snit... that's amateur hour here) cell for your logs is
if you inserted them, manually. IE: you edited video to show what
wasn't there originally.

https://ibb.co/fpJry4K
https://youtu.be/xRvaRLlb3b8
https://youtu.be/xNvMu5fwUxQ


They are indeed facts, snit. They are examples of your ability to
edit video to go with whatever story you're desperately trying to
peddle. You can include them with the doctored pdf file you did
sometime back. And whatever else you've edited to give your bull****
story a smidgeon of credibility - only with those who don't already
know about you, that is.

How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells
number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the
wrong ****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my
landline and cell display the business name as the caller name
when I use them to make outbound calls (as I feel any
professional should! It's free advertising AND can build a
limited amount of trust with the client or potential client), and
they all display Kingsport, TN for city and state; it's fixed.
The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY of that
information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first
place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May.

Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you
didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to
entertain your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work
together' to figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No
comments please from the spectators, even if you know what I'm
doing, please, don't comment just yet on this subject G)


No response to any of my questions, then, Snit? Hard to explain away
your lie when I get 'tech' with you, isn't it?

You are anything BUT reasonable! But then your tantrum continues!
See below!


I'm certainly reasonable, considering that i've got you dead to
rights lying your ass off, repeatedly, on me. And, I've asked for
nothing more than an apology for these bad acts you've taken towards
me. And for that, you've implied that you'll share the number I
provided to you over voice; a distraction attempt on your part.
won't work, I'm still going to demand those apologies, because you
lied on me, multiple times now, and I want what you owe me.

The snit circus description is appropriate for the mayhem and
strife you cause, intentionally. David is a very good fit for
you. He gets off on the same **** as yourself, and also likes
putting others in potential harms way for his own benefit, just
like you.


Another more than 2000 words of tantrum from you.


If what I wrote is too complicated, I can try to dumb it down for
you, kiddo.

You're a liar. You're protecting your own ass by walking back
your threat, is what you're doing here. You aren't fooling
anyone, dip****. You're in a hell of a mess now, though. You best
be thinking of a mature and adult way in which to get yourself
out of it. Dumb

...
****.


You are so dishonest you cannot even imagine the idea of someone
just being direct and straight forward with you, as I am being.


Really? How straight forward and honest were you being here, then,
Snit?

MID:

I wrote this:

David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


And you responded with this:

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.


Which is a problem, for you:

Message-ID:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try
to not sink to their level.


Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores


121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit?

See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much
dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done
so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as
the liar you are.

I'd say you weren't being very honest at all, there, Snit. Just like
the bot accusation you made against me, AND the doctored video story
you're going with these days. You really like to dig holes. lol.



--
Ah yes! I remember it well!
  #9  
Old August 22nd 20, 07:30 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

Gremlin wrote:
nimbus9 Thu,
20 Aug 2020 14:41:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2020-08-20, Gremlin wrote:
Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:44:45
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:


Now, you owe me two apologies. One for this lie, and the other
for the bot lie, Snit. By this weekend, it'll be upto three; i'm
going to compile my proof about the decoding accusation you made
and call out those lies you wrote, too.


Sorry but you are going to have to stand in line as there are
1000's already waiting.
Take a ticket and wait till hell freezes over lol!


Damnit. My ticket # is 3015. This could take awhile.

These days people Google, Yelp and such before using local
businesses. Snit doesn't do well with that. Based upon Google I
wouldn't hire snit to pick up dog ****. And it's almost 100
percent due to his net behavior so he has only himself to blame.


Ayep. A lot of the businesses shown in the urls David provided that
Snit checked against are closed and have been for years. I didn't
know the information was that outdated, but, once I saw Computer
Associated Technologies listed - having known the owner personally
and having attended his funeral almost two decades ago, I knew the
info was bad. How he expected a backup cell number to be present in
the yellowpage isn't known to me, though.

How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells
number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the
wrong ****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my
landline and cell display the business name as the caller name
when I use them to make outbound calls (as I feel any
professional should! It's free advertising AND can build a
limited amount of trust with the client or potential client), and
they all display Kingsport, TN for city and state; it's fixed.
The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY of that
information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first
place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May.

Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you
didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to
entertain your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work
together' to figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No
comments please from the spectators, even if you know what I'm
doing, please, don't comment just yet on this subject G)


You are way over snit's head on this one. He's barely able to
answer or make a phone call so explaining how the system works is
way over his head.


I know, but that's besides the point. He offered to help me
troubleshoot the issue.

You seem to be very interested in my business, and no doubt my
personal life at this point in time. I've been candid and openly
honest with you from the jump, even if you don't think so. You
could simply just ask me yourself, if there's something you want
to know; and if I don't feel it's private, I'll tell you,
straight.


Like many others before you, snit is going to attempt to doxx you
and use whatever data he may be able to dig up to harass you, your
family, friends, employer, neighbors etc.


I fully expect that's his gameplan yes. I've been candid about what's
going to happen when he makes his move, so the only blame for the
outcome will be on him. I will sleep fine.

He's done it to others and he will do it to you, or at least try.


I hope he does try, I'm anxious to see what he thinks when it's done
to him, on a professional level - Basically, everyone is waiting for
Snit to make a move, then, he's going to get pounced on, and how,
from multiple angles.

Good luck. Snit is like a vermin that survives a ground zero
nuclear blast. He seems to be made of teflon as many have tried to
give him some of his own medicine and failed.


They haven't done it the way we will. We get results. You'll see.



More threats from you — and yet I still protect you from your ignorant
claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question.

Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
  #10  
Old August 22nd 20, 07:30 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

Gremlin wrote:
Snit
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:40:17 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 20, 2020 at 2:41:09 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

...
You had a better chance with the edited video - as long as how
the call was placed to you is completely ignored.


I do mot give a **** how you claim the call was placed, how you
think the call was placed, or what excuses you make for your
ignorance and your poor troubleshooting skills. These are the
facts:


It's not a matter of how I claim or how I think the call was placed.
I'm very familiar with the technology I used, even if you don't know
anything about it.

And the only way for technology which knows nothing about me to
provide you a backup (not even primary cell or business landline?
c'mon now, snit... that's amateur hour here) cell for your logs is
if you inserted them, manually. IE: you edited video to show what
wasn't there originally.

https://ibb.co/fpJry4K
https://youtu.be/xRvaRLlb3b8
https://youtu.be/xNvMu5fwUxQ


They are indeed facts, snit. They are examples of your ability to
edit video to go with whatever story you're desperately trying to
peddle. You can include them with the doctored pdf file you did
sometime back. And whatever else you've edited to give your bull****
story a smidgeon of credibility - only with those who don't already
know about you, that is.

How can a completely seperate system provide you the backup cells
number, but not either of the main numbers, AND provide you the
wrong ****ing city? Here's another cluebyfour, stupid. Both my
landline and cell display the business name as the caller name
when I use them to make outbound calls (as I feel any
professional should! It's free advertising AND can build a
limited amount of trust with the client or potential client), and
they all display Kingsport, TN for city and state; it's fixed.
The *only* system I have which doesn't share ANY of that
information (because it doesn't have it to share in the first
place) is the voIP system I used to contact you back in May.

Now, if you can just explain how that could have happened if you
didn't do what I know you did, I'll be more than happy to
entertain your theories on the subject, and perhaps we can 'work
together' to figure it out. If you're interested in doing so? (No
comments please from the spectators, even if you know what I'm
doing, please, don't comment just yet on this subject G)


No response to any of my questions, then, Snit? Hard to explain away
your lie when I get 'tech' with you, isn't it?

You are anything BUT reasonable! But then your tantrum continues!
See below!


I'm certainly reasonable, considering that i've got you dead to
rights lying your ass off, repeatedly, on me. And, I've asked for
nothing more than an apology for these bad acts you've taken towards
me. And for that, you've implied that you'll share the number I
provided to you over voice; a distraction attempt on your part.
won't work, I'm still going to demand those apologies, because you
lied on me, multiple times now, and I want what you owe me.

The snit circus description is appropriate for the mayhem and
strife you cause, intentionally. David is a very good fit for
you. He gets off on the same **** as yourself, and also likes
putting others in potential harms way for his own benefit, just
like you.


Another more than 2000 words of tantrum from you.


If what I wrote is too complicated, I can try to dumb it down for
you, kiddo.

You're a liar. You're protecting your own ass by walking back
your threat, is what you're doing here. You aren't fooling
anyone, dip****. You're in a hell of a mess now, though. You best
be thinking of a mature and adult way in which to get yourself
out of it. Dumb

...
****.


You are so dishonest you cannot even imagine the idea of someone
just being direct and straight forward with you, as I am being.


Really? How straight forward and honest were you being here, then,
Snit?

MID:

I wrote this:

David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


And you responded with this:

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.


Which is a problem, for you:

Message-ID:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try
to not sink to their level.


Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:



Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:



On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores


121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit?

See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much
dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done
so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as
the liar you are.

I'd say you weren't being very honest at all, there, Snit. Just like
the bot accusation you made against me, AND the doctored video story
you're going with these days. You really like to dig holes. lol.




More lies from you — and yet I still protect you from your ignorant claims
about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question.

Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
  #11  
Old August 22nd 20, 05:53 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
David_B[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 162
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote:
[....]
More threats from you — and yet I still protect you from your ignorant
claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question.

Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number.


More threats noted. :-(

Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be reported to
the US three letter agencies?

If so, which one(s)?

  #12  
Old August 22nd 20, 06:41 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

David_B wrote:
On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote:
[....]
More threats from you — and yet I still protect you from your ignorant
claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple question.

Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number.


More threats noted. :-(

Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be reported to
the US three letter agencies?

If so, which one(s)?



Frankly he is likely just lying — but there might be value in letting the
FBI know. They can forward to other agencies if needed.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
  #13  
Old August 29th 20, 04:49 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

FromTheRafters
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:27:03 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Shadow was thinking very hard :
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:36:34 -0400, FromTheRafters
wrote:

David_B brought next idea :
On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote:
[....]
More threats from you - and yet I still protect you from your
ignorant claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot
a simple question.

Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone
number.

More threats noted. :-(

Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be
reported to the US three letter agencies?

If so, which one(s)?

Send all reports directly to the WMS.


Women's Missionary Society?


Waste Management System. Here, we have roadside pick-up.


ROFLMFAO!


--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
  #14  
Old August 29th 20, 04:49 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

FromTheRafters
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:50:29 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Shadow formulated on Sunday :
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:27:03 -0400, FromTheRafters
wrote:

Shadow was thinking very hard :
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:36:34 -0400, FromTheRafters
wrote:

David_B brought next idea :
On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote:
[....]
More threats from you - and yet I still protect you from
your ignorant claims about tech and your inability to
troubleshoot a simple question.

Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone
number.

More threats noted. :-(

Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be
reported to the US three letter agencies?

If so, which one(s)?

Send all reports directly to the WMS.

Women's Missionary Society?

Waste Management System. Here, we have roadside pick-up.


They probably have too much rubbish to deal with. BD's
contribution will probably crash their system.
IMHO
[]'s


They claim that Gremlin lies, yet they are willing to submit what
they think are lies to the so-called 'three letter agencies' just
to harass him. This would be an abuse of those 'see something, say
something' reporting systems. Best to cut out the middle-man and
toss them in the trash themselves locally.


Heh, What they were threatening to do didn't make much sense to me
either. I'm glad you just called it like it is though, an attempt to
harass me. I'm interested in reading snits reponse to this, but I
suspect if one is forthcoming, it's going to claim you misunderstood
him, you can't read, and your troubleshooting skills are crappy.



--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
  #15  
Old August 29th 20, 04:49 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

Steve Carroll "Steve
Sun, 23 Aug 2020
15:11:42 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2020-08-23, FromTheRafters wrote:
Shadow formulated on Sunday :
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:27:03 -0400, FromTheRafters
wrote:

Shadow was thinking very hard :
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:36:34 -0400, FromTheRafters
wrote:

David_B brought next idea :
On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote:
[....]
More threats from you Â- and yet I still protect you from
your ignorant claims about tech and your inability to
troubleshoot a simple question.

Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone
number.

More threats noted. :-(

Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be
reported to the US three letter agencies?

If so, which one(s)?

Send all reports directly to the WMS.

Women's Missionary Society?

Waste Management System. Here, we have roadside pick-up.

They probably have too much rubbish to deal with. BD's
contribution will probably crash their system.
IMHO
[]'s


They claim that Gremlin lies, yet they are willing to submit what
they think are lies to the so-called 'three letter agencies' just
to harass him.


It's actually worse than that, first, they incite people, then
they report them. Snit used to make a huge (whining) deal about
'what happens on usenet stays on usenet', except when *he*
(hypocritically) decided otherwise. This is the reason I recommend
people kf me, because I'm going to continue pointing out what he
is as long as he keeps doing it. Prior to 'meeting' DB, I've never
seen anyone else do what Snit does.


You guys thought you had a very special and unique case right? I
told you, we have our own version of your snit here, it's known as
David Brooks.


--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.