A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Performance and Maintainance of XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Memory Problem



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old April 27th 04, 01:52 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem


-----Original Message-----
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 12:50:13 -0700, "Jeff"
wrote:

I have developed a recent memory problem with my

system.
I have noticed that recently most of the memory on my
system is being used or "taken" by the system cache. I
have 256MB of memory, but after boot up I have
approximately 75-80MB in available memory and about

145MB
in system cache. If I monitor it, I can see the system
cache growing while the available memory shrinks.

I found a 3rd party program online that frees up the
memory to where it should be. Once I do that, the

system
cache begins taking memory again. I checked the
processes and the problem seems to be in an SVC.exe
process. Right after boot up it is around 20MB which
seems very large to me. I have checked for viruses,
spyware, etc. Nothing has worked. I would appreciate
any help you can give me.

Thanks



Nothing wrong here... by design, XP will use all the

memory it has
access to. This results in a much faster system because

you are
actually utilizing your resources rather than them just

sitting there.
Would you prefer that XP swaps that data out to your

paging file
instead of keeping it in memory? That would be a big

performance
hit...

Which would you prefer... a system that uses that

memory for whatever
it needs, or one that leaves the memory free and runs

slower?

I have found XP to be very good at managing memory

resources, freeing
up memory it has allocated for system cache as it needs

it to load and
execute applications.
.


Thanks Daniel, Just to make sure we're on the same page;
are you saying that WinXP is simply "grabbing" all of the
available RAM that it can in order to put it in system
cache so the machine runs faster? If so, great.. then I
have no problem.

Thanks,

Jeff
Ads
  #17  
Old April 27th 04, 01:54 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem


-----Original Message-----
Jeff

http://www.liutilities.com/products/...spro/processli

brary/svc/

http://securityresponse.symantec.com...er/venc/data/b

ackdoor.madfind.html

--

~~~~~~
Thanks, per your response, I ran a virus check in safe

mode with negative results. I received another response
(which I'm sure you've seen) saying this was actually
normal. Thanks for your help. I'm about due for a
reload anyway so if there is a problem, that should take
care of it. I appreciate your help.

Jeff

Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FCA

Stourport, Worcs, England
Enquire, plan and execute.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please tell the newsgroup how any
suggested solution worked for you.
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



"Jeff" wrote in

message ...
I have developed a recent memory problem with my

system.
I have noticed that recently most of the memory on my
system is being used or "taken" by the system cache.

I
have 256MB of memory, but after boot up I have
approximately 75-80MB in available memory and about

145MB
in system cache. If I monitor it, I can see the

system
cache growing while the available memory shrinks.

I found a 3rd party program online that frees up the
memory to where it should be. Once I do that, the

system
cache begins taking memory again. I checked the
processes and the problem seems to be in an SVC.exe
process. Right after boot up it is around 20MB which
seems very large to me. I have checked for viruses,
spyware, etc. Nothing has worked. I would appreciate
any help you can give me.

Thanks

.

  #18  
Old April 27th 04, 01:54 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem


-----Original Message-----
Jeff

http://www.liutilities.com/products/...spro/processli

brary/svc/

http://securityresponse.symantec.com...er/venc/data/b

ackdoor.madfind.html

--

~~~~~~
Thanks, per your response, I ran a virus check in safe

mode with negative results. I received another response
(which I'm sure you've seen) saying this was actually
normal. Thanks for your help. I'm about due for a
reload anyway so if there is a problem, that should take
care of it. I appreciate your help.

Jeff

Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FCA

Stourport, Worcs, England
Enquire, plan and execute.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please tell the newsgroup how any
suggested solution worked for you.
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



"Jeff" wrote in

message ...
I have developed a recent memory problem with my

system.
I have noticed that recently most of the memory on my
system is being used or "taken" by the system cache.

I
have 256MB of memory, but after boot up I have
approximately 75-80MB in available memory and about

145MB
in system cache. If I monitor it, I can see the

system
cache growing while the available memory shrinks.

I found a 3rd party program online that frees up the
memory to where it should be. Once I do that, the

system
cache begins taking memory again. I checked the
processes and the problem seems to be in an SVC.exe
process. Right after boot up it is around 20MB which
seems very large to me. I have checked for viruses,
spyware, etc. Nothing has worked. I would appreciate
any help you can give me.

Thanks

.

  #19  
Old April 27th 04, 01:54 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem


-----Original Message-----
Jeff

http://www.liutilities.com/products/...spro/processli

brary/svc/

http://securityresponse.symantec.com...er/venc/data/b

ackdoor.madfind.html

--

~~~~~~
Thanks, per your response, I ran a virus check in safe

mode with negative results. I received another response
(which I'm sure you've seen) saying this was actually
normal. Thanks for your help. I'm about due for a
reload anyway so if there is a problem, that should take
care of it. I appreciate your help.

Jeff

Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FCA

Stourport, Worcs, England
Enquire, plan and execute.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please tell the newsgroup how any
suggested solution worked for you.
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



"Jeff" wrote in

message ...
I have developed a recent memory problem with my

system.
I have noticed that recently most of the memory on my
system is being used or "taken" by the system cache.

I
have 256MB of memory, but after boot up I have
approximately 75-80MB in available memory and about

145MB
in system cache. If I monitor it, I can see the

system
cache growing while the available memory shrinks.

I found a 3rd party program online that frees up the
memory to where it should be. Once I do that, the

system
cache begins taking memory again. I checked the
processes and the problem seems to be in an SVC.exe
process. Right after boot up it is around 20MB which
seems very large to me. I have checked for viruses,
spyware, etc. Nothing has worked. I would appreciate
any help you can give me.

Thanks

.

  #20  
Old April 27th 04, 01:54 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem


-----Original Message-----
Jeff

http://www.liutilities.com/products/...spro/processli

brary/svc/

http://securityresponse.symantec.com...er/venc/data/b

ackdoor.madfind.html

--

~~~~~~
Thanks, per your response, I ran a virus check in safe

mode with negative results. I received another response
(which I'm sure you've seen) saying this was actually
normal. Thanks for your help. I'm about due for a
reload anyway so if there is a problem, that should take
care of it. I appreciate your help.

Jeff

Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FCA

Stourport, Worcs, England
Enquire, plan and execute.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please tell the newsgroup how any
suggested solution worked for you.
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



"Jeff" wrote in

message ...
I have developed a recent memory problem with my

system.
I have noticed that recently most of the memory on my
system is being used or "taken" by the system cache.

I
have 256MB of memory, but after boot up I have
approximately 75-80MB in available memory and about

145MB
in system cache. If I monitor it, I can see the

system
cache growing while the available memory shrinks.

I found a 3rd party program online that frees up the
memory to where it should be. Once I do that, the

system
cache begins taking memory again. I checked the
processes and the problem seems to be in an SVC.exe
process. Right after boot up it is around 20MB which
seems very large to me. I have checked for viruses,
spyware, etc. Nothing has worked. I would appreciate
any help you can give me.

Thanks

.

  #21  
Old April 27th 04, 01:54 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem


-----Original Message-----
Jeff

http://www.liutilities.com/products/...spro/processli

brary/svc/

http://securityresponse.symantec.com...er/venc/data/b

ackdoor.madfind.html

--

~~~~~~
Thanks, per your response, I ran a virus check in safe

mode with negative results. I received another response
(which I'm sure you've seen) saying this was actually
normal. Thanks for your help. I'm about due for a
reload anyway so if there is a problem, that should take
care of it. I appreciate your help.

Jeff

Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FCA

Stourport, Worcs, England
Enquire, plan and execute.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please tell the newsgroup how any
suggested solution worked for you.
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



"Jeff" wrote in

message ...
I have developed a recent memory problem with my

system.
I have noticed that recently most of the memory on my
system is being used or "taken" by the system cache.

I
have 256MB of memory, but after boot up I have
approximately 75-80MB in available memory and about

145MB
in system cache. If I monitor it, I can see the

system
cache growing while the available memory shrinks.

I found a 3rd party program online that frees up the
memory to where it should be. Once I do that, the

system
cache begins taking memory again. I checked the
processes and the problem seems to be in an SVC.exe
process. Right after boot up it is around 20MB which
seems very large to me. I have checked for viruses,
spyware, etc. Nothing has worked. I would appreciate
any help you can give me.

Thanks

.

  #22  
Old April 27th 04, 01:54 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem


-----Original Message-----
Jeff

http://www.liutilities.com/products/...spro/processli

brary/svc/

http://securityresponse.symantec.com...er/venc/data/b

ackdoor.madfind.html

--

~~~~~~
Thanks, per your response, I ran a virus check in safe

mode with negative results. I received another response
(which I'm sure you've seen) saying this was actually
normal. Thanks for your help. I'm about due for a
reload anyway so if there is a problem, that should take
care of it. I appreciate your help.

Jeff

Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FCA

Stourport, Worcs, England
Enquire, plan and execute.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please tell the newsgroup how any
suggested solution worked for you.
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



"Jeff" wrote in

message ...
I have developed a recent memory problem with my

system.
I have noticed that recently most of the memory on my
system is being used or "taken" by the system cache.

I
have 256MB of memory, but after boot up I have
approximately 75-80MB in available memory and about

145MB
in system cache. If I monitor it, I can see the

system
cache growing while the available memory shrinks.

I found a 3rd party program online that frees up the
memory to where it should be. Once I do that, the

system
cache begins taking memory again. I checked the
processes and the problem seems to be in an SVC.exe
process. Right after boot up it is around 20MB which
seems very large to me. I have checked for viruses,
spyware, etc. Nothing has worked. I would appreciate
any help you can give me.

Thanks

.

  #23  
Old April 27th 04, 01:54 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem


-----Original Message-----
Jeff

http://www.liutilities.com/products/...spro/processli

brary/svc/

http://securityresponse.symantec.com...er/venc/data/b

ackdoor.madfind.html

--

~~~~~~
Thanks, per your response, I ran a virus check in safe

mode with negative results. I received another response
(which I'm sure you've seen) saying this was actually
normal. Thanks for your help. I'm about due for a
reload anyway so if there is a problem, that should take
care of it. I appreciate your help.

Jeff

Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FCA

Stourport, Worcs, England
Enquire, plan and execute.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please tell the newsgroup how any
suggested solution worked for you.
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



"Jeff" wrote in

message ...
I have developed a recent memory problem with my

system.
I have noticed that recently most of the memory on my
system is being used or "taken" by the system cache.

I
have 256MB of memory, but after boot up I have
approximately 75-80MB in available memory and about

145MB
in system cache. If I monitor it, I can see the

system
cache growing while the available memory shrinks.

I found a 3rd party program online that frees up the
memory to where it should be. Once I do that, the

system
cache begins taking memory again. I checked the
processes and the problem seems to be in an SVC.exe
process. Right after boot up it is around 20MB which
seems very large to me. I have checked for viruses,
spyware, etc. Nothing has worked. I would appreciate
any help you can give me.

Thanks

.

  #24  
Old April 27th 04, 02:01 PM
Ron Martell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem

wrote:


Thanks Daniel, Just to make sure we're on the same page;
are you saying that WinXP is simply "grabbing" all of the
available RAM that it can in order to put it in system
cache so the machine runs faster? If so, great.. then I
have no problem.


Yes. Daniel gave you the correct information.

Windows XP will, by design, always attempt to find some use, anything
that might potentially be of some benefit, for every bit of the
installed RAM rather than just leaving that RAM sitting there idly
going to rot and doing absolutely no good for anybody.

And just as soon as some better use comes along for some of that RAM
then Windows will instantaneously drop the more trivial usages so as
to free up whatever is now required.

Free memory should more properly be referred to as *useless* memory
because that is what it represents - memory for which Windows has so
far been totally unable to find any beneficial use for.

There are a number of so-called memory freeing utilities out there,
some free others requiring payment. Without exception these utilities
are totally without merit. There are all totally incapable of
performing any beneficial function for Windows XP under any
circumstances.

Hope this clarifies the situation.

Good luck


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
  #25  
Old April 27th 04, 02:01 PM
Ron Martell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem

wrote:


Thanks Daniel, Just to make sure we're on the same page;
are you saying that WinXP is simply "grabbing" all of the
available RAM that it can in order to put it in system
cache so the machine runs faster? If so, great.. then I
have no problem.


Yes. Daniel gave you the correct information.

Windows XP will, by design, always attempt to find some use, anything
that might potentially be of some benefit, for every bit of the
installed RAM rather than just leaving that RAM sitting there idly
going to rot and doing absolutely no good for anybody.

And just as soon as some better use comes along for some of that RAM
then Windows will instantaneously drop the more trivial usages so as
to free up whatever is now required.

Free memory should more properly be referred to as *useless* memory
because that is what it represents - memory for which Windows has so
far been totally unable to find any beneficial use for.

There are a number of so-called memory freeing utilities out there,
some free others requiring payment. Without exception these utilities
are totally without merit. There are all totally incapable of
performing any beneficial function for Windows XP under any
circumstances.

Hope this clarifies the situation.

Good luck


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
  #26  
Old April 27th 04, 02:01 PM
Ron Martell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem

wrote:


Thanks Daniel, Just to make sure we're on the same page;
are you saying that WinXP is simply "grabbing" all of the
available RAM that it can in order to put it in system
cache so the machine runs faster? If so, great.. then I
have no problem.


Yes. Daniel gave you the correct information.

Windows XP will, by design, always attempt to find some use, anything
that might potentially be of some benefit, for every bit of the
installed RAM rather than just leaving that RAM sitting there idly
going to rot and doing absolutely no good for anybody.

And just as soon as some better use comes along for some of that RAM
then Windows will instantaneously drop the more trivial usages so as
to free up whatever is now required.

Free memory should more properly be referred to as *useless* memory
because that is what it represents - memory for which Windows has so
far been totally unable to find any beneficial use for.

There are a number of so-called memory freeing utilities out there,
some free others requiring payment. Without exception these utilities
are totally without merit. There are all totally incapable of
performing any beneficial function for Windows XP under any
circumstances.

Hope this clarifies the situation.

Good luck


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
  #27  
Old April 27th 04, 02:01 PM
Ron Martell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem

wrote:


Thanks Daniel, Just to make sure we're on the same page;
are you saying that WinXP is simply "grabbing" all of the
available RAM that it can in order to put it in system
cache so the machine runs faster? If so, great.. then I
have no problem.


Yes. Daniel gave you the correct information.

Windows XP will, by design, always attempt to find some use, anything
that might potentially be of some benefit, for every bit of the
installed RAM rather than just leaving that RAM sitting there idly
going to rot and doing absolutely no good for anybody.

And just as soon as some better use comes along for some of that RAM
then Windows will instantaneously drop the more trivial usages so as
to free up whatever is now required.

Free memory should more properly be referred to as *useless* memory
because that is what it represents - memory for which Windows has so
far been totally unable to find any beneficial use for.

There are a number of so-called memory freeing utilities out there,
some free others requiring payment. Without exception these utilities
are totally without merit. There are all totally incapable of
performing any beneficial function for Windows XP under any
circumstances.

Hope this clarifies the situation.

Good luck


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
  #28  
Old April 27th 04, 02:01 PM
Ron Martell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem

wrote:


Thanks Daniel, Just to make sure we're on the same page;
are you saying that WinXP is simply "grabbing" all of the
available RAM that it can in order to put it in system
cache so the machine runs faster? If so, great.. then I
have no problem.


Yes. Daniel gave you the correct information.

Windows XP will, by design, always attempt to find some use, anything
that might potentially be of some benefit, for every bit of the
installed RAM rather than just leaving that RAM sitting there idly
going to rot and doing absolutely no good for anybody.

And just as soon as some better use comes along for some of that RAM
then Windows will instantaneously drop the more trivial usages so as
to free up whatever is now required.

Free memory should more properly be referred to as *useless* memory
because that is what it represents - memory for which Windows has so
far been totally unable to find any beneficial use for.

There are a number of so-called memory freeing utilities out there,
some free others requiring payment. Without exception these utilities
are totally without merit. There are all totally incapable of
performing any beneficial function for Windows XP under any
circumstances.

Hope this clarifies the situation.

Good luck


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
  #29  
Old April 27th 04, 02:01 PM
Ron Martell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem

wrote:


Thanks Daniel, Just to make sure we're on the same page;
are you saying that WinXP is simply "grabbing" all of the
available RAM that it can in order to put it in system
cache so the machine runs faster? If so, great.. then I
have no problem.


Yes. Daniel gave you the correct information.

Windows XP will, by design, always attempt to find some use, anything
that might potentially be of some benefit, for every bit of the
installed RAM rather than just leaving that RAM sitting there idly
going to rot and doing absolutely no good for anybody.

And just as soon as some better use comes along for some of that RAM
then Windows will instantaneously drop the more trivial usages so as
to free up whatever is now required.

Free memory should more properly be referred to as *useless* memory
because that is what it represents - memory for which Windows has so
far been totally unable to find any beneficial use for.

There are a number of so-called memory freeing utilities out there,
some free others requiring payment. Without exception these utilities
are totally without merit. There are all totally incapable of
performing any beneficial function for Windows XP under any
circumstances.

Hope this clarifies the situation.

Good luck


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
  #30  
Old April 27th 04, 02:01 PM
Ron Martell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Memory Problem

wrote:


Thanks Daniel, Just to make sure we're on the same page;
are you saying that WinXP is simply "grabbing" all of the
available RAM that it can in order to put it in system
cache so the machine runs faster? If so, great.. then I
have no problem.


Yes. Daniel gave you the correct information.

Windows XP will, by design, always attempt to find some use, anything
that might potentially be of some benefit, for every bit of the
installed RAM rather than just leaving that RAM sitting there idly
going to rot and doing absolutely no good for anybody.

And just as soon as some better use comes along for some of that RAM
then Windows will instantaneously drop the more trivial usages so as
to free up whatever is now required.

Free memory should more properly be referred to as *useless* memory
because that is what it represents - memory for which Windows has so
far been totally unable to find any beneficial use for.

There are a number of so-called memory freeing utilities out there,
some free others requiring payment. Without exception these utilities
are totally without merit. There are all totally incapable of
performing any beneficial function for Windows XP under any
circumstances.

Hope this clarifies the situation.

Good luck


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.