If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NTFS
R.Wieser wrote:
Removed the "freeware" newsgroup, as the question is Windows only Diesel, You have to understand that NTFS isn't public/open source. ... Changes in the NTFS file system are known to occur from time to time. Some are larger than others, but, any is enough to make a driver unsafe to use for writing. Thanks for the warning. And yes, I was also assuming (mistaken, as it turns out) that NTFS was a well-documented and unencumbered filesystem. But I have to ask: As FAT32 is whoofully shortfalling in regard to being able to handle the large disks of nowerdays (even a single Terrabyte drive would easily exhaust all available drive letters), what filesystem would you advice to use on Windows if-and-when someone would not like to be bound to the OS ? I could use a(n ofcourse Linux based) NAS, but would like to keep it locally (don't really want to keep the NAS running when its not used, but have no desire to switch on (and off) two machines just to be able to use a single one). FWIW, I have a Synology (DS115j) NAS and that can power down the drive ('HDD hibernation') when the NAS isn't accessed for a given time. When the NAS is accessed again, the drive will again power/spin up. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
NTFS
Frank,
FWIW, I have a Synology (DS115j) NAS and that can power down the drive ('HDD hibernation') when the NAS isn't accessed for a given time. I've heard good things about Synology (a friend of mine doesn't want to use anything else). The problem is that I actually remove power from my computers - and other devices like printers and switches - by flipping the switch on a powerstrip (*after* I've shut down the involved machines ofcourse :-) ). Although I could imagine a setup where I automatically send a "shut down now" to the NAS and have it power-up by WOL (also automatically), I would not really like it when the shutdown either does not get generated (or for some reason takes too long) and I bring it down hard (most likely involving loss of data). Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
NTFS
In article , R.Wieser
wrote: FWIW, I have a Synology (DS115j) NAS and that can power down the drive ('HDD hibernation') when the NAS isn't accessed for a given time. I've heard good things about Synology (a friend of mine doesn't want to use anything else). overall, they're very good. there are some issues but nothing's perfect. The problem is that I actually remove power from my computers - and other devices like printers and switches - by flipping the switch on a powerstrip (*after* I've shut down the involved machines ofcourse :-) ). what for? Although I could imagine a setup where I automatically send a "shut down now" to the NAS and have it power-up by WOL (also automatically), I would not really like it when the shutdown either does not get generated (or for some reason takes too long) and I bring it down hard (most likely involving loss of data). a nas is designed to stay on all the time. the drives can be set to hibernate if desired, although background processes on the nas can sometimes prevent that. the nas can also be set to auto power-on/off on a schedule (at least synology can). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|