A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » The Basics
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

xp sending info microshaft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #106  
Old April 17th 03, 01:08 PM
Ghost
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default xp sending info microshaft

In article m,
"Kadaitcha Man" wrote:

Ghost wrote:

And, since M$ is an American comapny, they are bound by US
law....


Total ****ing crap. A company is bound by the laws of the countries it is
operating in, you stupid wankstain. If company A is based in country B and
commits a crime in country C, it is certainly liable to the laws of country
C. If the crime commited in country C is also a crime in country B, then
company A would also be liable in country B. I take it you have absolutely
no ****ing idea why companies are given legal entity status, hmmm?

For example, in the US it seems quite legal to cook your books and make
false statements to the tune of tens of billions of dollars... Enron,
Worldcom, et al. If those US companies had offices here and those frauds
were perpetrated here by those offices, the local directors would have been
given an opportunity of watching endless reruns of Seinfeld for 25 to 30
years.



And if the country where the crime was committed does not have specific
laws to cover that crime, then the law of the home country applies.

In other owrds- if a DOS was committed by M$ in a country who has no laws
agaisnt DOS, then the US law could and would apply because M$ is a US
based company.

Why in the hell are we going on with this endless freaking thread!
Ads
  #107  
Old April 17th 03, 01:08 PM
Ghost
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default xp sending info microshaft

In article m,
"Kadaitcha Man" wrote:

Ghost wrote:

And, since M$ is an American comapny, they are bound by US
law....


Total ****ing crap. A company is bound by the laws of the countries it is
operating in, you stupid wankstain. If company A is based in country B and
commits a crime in country C, it is certainly liable to the laws of country
C. If the crime commited in country C is also a crime in country B, then
company A would also be liable in country B. I take it you have absolutely
no ****ing idea why companies are given legal entity status, hmmm?

For example, in the US it seems quite legal to cook your books and make
false statements to the tune of tens of billions of dollars... Enron,
Worldcom, et al. If those US companies had offices here and those frauds
were perpetrated here by those offices, the local directors would have been
given an opportunity of watching endless reruns of Seinfeld for 25 to 30
years.



And if the country where the crime was committed does not have specific
laws to cover that crime, then the law of the home country applies.

In other owrds- if a DOS was committed by M$ in a country who has no laws
agaisnt DOS, then the US law could and would apply because M$ is a US
based company.

Why in the hell are we going on with this endless freaking thread!
  #108  
Old April 17th 03, 10:23 PM
Kadaitcha Man
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default xp sending info microshaft

Ghost wrote:
In article m,
"Kadaitcha Man" wrote:


And if the country where the crime was committed does not have
specific laws to cover that crime, then the law of the home country
applies.


No. Not so. You assume that that applies to all countries. It does not.
Such is your ****headedness that you make broad generalisations sufficient
enough to prove that you are a ****tard.

In other owrds- if a DOS was committed by M$ in a country who has no
laws agaisnt DOS, then the US law could and would apply because M$ is
a US based company.


Which is, in essence, what I wrote, is it not, head****?

Why in the hell are we going on with this endless freaking thread!


Because I want it to.


  #109  
Old April 17th 03, 10:23 PM
Kadaitcha Man
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default xp sending info microshaft

Ghost wrote:
In article m,
"Kadaitcha Man" wrote:


And if the country where the crime was committed does not have
specific laws to cover that crime, then the law of the home country
applies.


No. Not so. You assume that that applies to all countries. It does not.
Such is your ****headedness that you make broad generalisations sufficient
enough to prove that you are a ****tard.

In other owrds- if a DOS was committed by M$ in a country who has no
laws agaisnt DOS, then the US law could and would apply because M$ is
a US based company.


Which is, in essence, what I wrote, is it not, head****?

Why in the hell are we going on with this endless freaking thread!


Because I want it to.


  #112  
Old April 18th 03, 07:38 PM
Rabid_Roach
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default xp sending info microshaft


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 03:34:31 GMT, (Ghost) wrote:



Stop arguing your uninformed opinion. They cannot disable the OS- it

is
Denial of Service, a felony.


Whether it is a felony depends on the laws of the country it is in. It

isnt
a DOS as you well know in any case. The computer can still work. It is

just
a disabling of a program. If you CHOOSE to make it your ONLY OS that's

your
choice. If you have, say, a dual boot XP/Linux, your computer still

works.

They cannot do it, even if you are in Australia. I am sure the

aussies
have a similar law, but even if they dont, the US law will cover that
action since they are an American owned corporation.

Not really sure if that is a thing in Australia at all but it isnt a

DOS so
it is really not the subject. Likely a real DOS is against the law but

I
dont know for sure.



Gregh... you are right about that.. you really do not know for sure...
before you post, try researching and learning... it is DOS under the laws
of the US. And, since M$ is an American comapny, they are bound by US
law....

This is the end of this thread as far as I am concerned- you are not the
type to learn- you know what you know, I will not confuse you further

with
the facts... lol





http://boston.internet.com/news/article.php/1485861


LAW HA!



And just why would an administrator for a Bank no less, have a server with
propritary/highly secure information connected to the net without an
aduquate firewall in place? Sounds like one place I'm not putting any of my
money.


  #113  
Old April 18th 03, 07:38 PM
Rabid_Roach
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default xp sending info microshaft


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 03:34:31 GMT, (Ghost) wrote:



Stop arguing your uninformed opinion. They cannot disable the OS- it

is
Denial of Service, a felony.


Whether it is a felony depends on the laws of the country it is in. It

isnt
a DOS as you well know in any case. The computer can still work. It is

just
a disabling of a program. If you CHOOSE to make it your ONLY OS that's

your
choice. If you have, say, a dual boot XP/Linux, your computer still

works.

They cannot do it, even if you are in Australia. I am sure the

aussies
have a similar law, but even if they dont, the US law will cover that
action since they are an American owned corporation.

Not really sure if that is a thing in Australia at all but it isnt a

DOS so
it is really not the subject. Likely a real DOS is against the law but

I
dont know for sure.



Gregh... you are right about that.. you really do not know for sure...
before you post, try researching and learning... it is DOS under the laws
of the US. And, since M$ is an American comapny, they are bound by US
law....

This is the end of this thread as far as I am concerned- you are not the
type to learn- you know what you know, I will not confuse you further

with
the facts... lol





http://boston.internet.com/news/article.php/1485861


LAW HA!



And just why would an administrator for a Bank no less, have a server with
propritary/highly secure information connected to the net without an
aduquate firewall in place? Sounds like one place I'm not putting any of my
money.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.