Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!

Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:20 -0500, Tom wrote:


"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 06:59:29 -0600, Susan wrote:

What does this have to do with Windows XP?

Well, trolls, like terrorists desire to destroy things. There are
several trolls in these groups that seek only the destruction of
them and/or MS and it's methods.

Really, isn't calling other pirates and thieves a form of trolling?

Not if the admit to being a pirate and/or thief or supporting those
actions.

I never admitted to any such thing! YOU ARE THE ONE THAT CALL MY THOSE
THINGS IN OTHER THREADS!

My interpretation of "fair use" of software has never been legally found
to be a form of piracy or theft, yet you continue to label those that
want to "fairly use" their software as pirates and thieves.

You are the real troll in this group!


Since the MSMVPHOS is actually an off-topic thread, what did you
expect?

That you would continue on as usual!

And you help continue it with your posts too - what next?

LOL! Are you asking him out on a date?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Tom wrote:
"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:26 -0500, Tom wrote:


"Leythos" wrote in message
news On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:58:54 -0500, Tom wrote:

He was given an honorable discharge, cased closed, I showed you
the document
dated 1978, and it was made official in 2001. You either respect
or you Honorable Discharges.

Don't you find it odd that, and I had my dates wrong I think, he
was discharged in 72, I think her service was 67-72, 6 years, so,
as a matter
of record his paperwork should indicate 72. Only someone that's had
their
service record changed would have a date after their EAOS.

Kerry's service started (voluntarily) in "66".

And it was state side until there was a political reason to go to
Nam.
If you check the facts, Carter was in office from 76-80 and Carter
gave amnesty to all the dishonorable and draft dodgers which meant
their service records were amended in the time period that you
indicate above. Not one previously HONORABLE discharge had to be
amended to make it HONORABLE.

So, Ford pardoned a criminal, that allowed him to keep some kind of
honor, but that is ok, since it is a presidential right to do so,
as was Carters. If you don't like it, then bitch at congress to
change the president's power in such cases.

And the criminal isn't hiding the fact that he was a criminal either.
Kerry is hiding the fact that he didn't get an Honorable discharge -
big difference.


Again, so, since Bush is hiding 6 months of what he actually did
during his sefvice. there a commanders that don't ever remember hin
being on duty during that certain period. How honorable!

Come on, you seem like a bright person, are you seeing the truth
now. Now you know why he won't release his records.

Do you know why Bush won't own up to being AWOL for 6 months, and
cannot (actually will not) provide records to show what he was
doing, though he was honorably discharged. You keep ignoring that
by the way; so it honorable at how Bush got away from Nam through
power contacts while actually NOT doing his total duty?

I don't ignore Bush's service record, there's nothing in it that
isn't legit - and he wasn't AWOL at all, even CNN recanted that
after they reported it.

Hmm do search at http://factcheck.org/default.aspx and see what his
serving status was.


Before you try and explain how valiant and honorable he WAS and
how his medals stand, explain why any respectable service member
that was given an HONORABLE Discharge at the time of the
separation would want to hide it.

I don't know, again, he got it regardless of yours or my dislike.
The fact remains he got it legally and it is honorable, refer to
congress again for changes. But you don't acknowledge whether or
not our comedian

Nope, he didn't get it legally, it was the first discharge that he's
hiding and that was also legal - why is he hiding it - ask yourself
that instead of hiding from it. His OTH was converted to H
(possibly) by Carter's actions, that doesn't change the fact that he
was discharged with an OTH and is clearly hiding from it. Just like
he's trying to hide how he got out of combat, you see no proof that
anyone (other than himself) put him in for those Purple Hearts.

Prove it (the 3rd request now) that he put himself in for the hearts!


and cheat served honorably, though he got that type of discharge.
You should be appalled at him for avoiding (again through
connections) real combat duty based on how you hold such a high
regard for those (as yourself) that have been there.

I actually do have issues with people using their connections to
limit their service stay or to pull strings, never said I didn't.
What I care more about is people asking me to trust them with the
nation and then hiding the fact that they were not Honorably
discharged from the service. There is a big difference between
pulling strings and getting a OTH discharge.

But he was honorably discharged when asked at the time!


I would rather take George into battle than Kerry, at least I know
one would not run away in a time of need.


Yes, a guy who actually thinks that doing what he does, will somehow
find honor with god.

Yes, you honor a patron of god, who served his country while others
proably died in his stead due to his cowardice to actually do REAL
combat, where Kerry ACTUALLY volunteered for that service. You
complain about honor, while ignoring the honor in a volunteer, who
wasn't afraid to use his freedom of speech you say he shouldn't have,
that just as easily could have avoided doing combat duty ala Bush.

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine,
smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man
who avoided real combat duty through the POWER channel, yes, I can
see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You
are a hypocrite!

And a sycophantic Troll for his corporate and political masters. If
there really was a Dracula, Lamethos would be Renfield.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite.
i don't know if you are this type of person specifically,
but here is the BEST example i have seen in years.

Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the
following to his opponents:

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke
pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who
avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your standing
would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!


Tom wrote:
"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:26 -0500, Tom wrote:


"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:58:54 -0500, Tom wrote:

He was given an honorable discharge, cased closed, I showed you the
document
dated 1978, and it was made official in 2001. You either respect or you
Honorable Discharges.

Don't you find it odd that, and I had my dates wrong I think, he was
discharged in 72, I think her service was 67-72, 6 years, so, as a
matter
of record his paperwork should indicate 72. Only someone that's had
their
service record changed would have a date after their EAOS.

Kerry's service started (voluntarily) in "66".

And it was state side until there was a political reason to go to Nam.


If you check the facts, Carter was in office from 76-80 and Carter gave
amnesty to all the dishonorable and draft dodgers which meant their
service records were amended in the time period that you indicate
above. Not one previously HONORABLE discharge had to be amended to make
it HONORABLE.

So, Ford pardoned a criminal, that allowed him to keep some kind of
honor, but that is ok, since it is a presidential right to do so, as
was Carters. If you don't like it, then bitch at congress to change the
president's power in such cases.

And the criminal isn't hiding the fact that he was a criminal either.
Kerry is hiding the fact that he didn't get an Honorable discharge - big
difference.



Again, so, since Bush is hiding 6 months of what he actually did during his
sefvice. there a commanders that don't ever remember hin being on duty
during that certain period. How honorable!


Come on, you seem like a bright person, are you seeing the truth now.

Now you know why he won't release his records.

Do you know why Bush won't own up to being AWOL for 6 months, and cannot
(actually will not) provide records to show what he was doing, though he
was honorably discharged. You keep ignoring that by the way; so it
honorable at how Bush got away from Nam through power contacts while
actually NOT doing his total duty?

I don't ignore Bush's service record, there's nothing in it that isn't
legit - and he wasn't AWOL at all, even CNN recanted that after they
reported it.


Hmm do search at http://factcheck.org/default.aspx and see what his serving
status was.


Before you try and explain how valiant and honorable he WAS and how his
medals stand, explain why any respectable service member that was given
an HONORABLE Discharge at the time of the separation would want to hide
it.

I don't know, again, he got it regardless of yours or my dislike. The
fact remains he got it legally and it is honorable, refer to congress
again for changes. But you don't acknowledge whether or not our comedian

Nope, he didn't get it legally, it was the first discharge that he's
hiding and that was also legal - why is he hiding it - ask yourself that
instead of hiding from it. His OTH was converted to H (possibly) by
Carter's actions, that doesn't change the fact that he was discharged
with an OTH and is clearly hiding from it. Just like he's trying to hide
how he got out of combat, you see no proof that anyone (other than
himself) put him in for those Purple Hearts.


Prove it (the 3rd request now) that he put himself in for the hearts!


and cheat served honorably, though he got that type of discharge. You
should be appalled at him for avoiding (again through connections) real
combat duty based on how you hold such a high regard for those (as
yourself) that have been there.

I actually do have issues with people using their connections to limit
their service stay or to pull strings, never said I didn't. What I care
more about is people asking me to trust them with the nation and then
hiding the fact that they were not Honorably discharged from the service.
There is a big difference between pulling strings and getting a OTH
discharge.


But he was honorably discharged when asked at the time!


I would rather take George into battle than Kerry, at least I know one
would not run away in a time of need.



Yes, a guy who actually thinks that doing what he does, will somehow find
honor with god.

Yes, you honor a patron of god, who served his country while others proably
died in his stead due to his cowardice to actually do REAL combat, where
Kerry ACTUALLY volunteered for that service. You complain about honor, while
ignoring the honor in a volunteer, who wasn't afraid to use his freedom of
speech you say he shouldn't have, that just as easily could have avoided
doing combat duty ala Bush.

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot,
and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real
combat duty through the POWER channel, yes, I can see where a man of your
standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!

JW wrote:
Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite.
i don't know if you are this type of person specifically,
but here is the BEST example i have seen in years.

Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the
following to his opponents:

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine,
smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man
who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your
standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!

Bill Clinton was our best president since FDR.

GWB is our worst president since Hoover!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Thank you. it's always nice to have somebody like you prove my point.


kurttrail wrote:
JW wrote:

Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite.
i don't know if you are this type of person specifically,
but here is the BEST example i have seen in years.

Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the
following to his opponents:

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine,
smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man
who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your
standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!


Bill Clinton was our best president since FDR.

GWB is our worst president since Hoover!

Did I say I love Bill Clinton? Since I didn't, how does that make me an
opponent? Itdoesn't mean any such thing, my words are what the discussion is
about, not being pro or con concerning political preferences. (If you only
knew my voting record).

I think Lamethos liked having his balls cleaned by you though!

"JW" wrote in message
...
Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite.
i don't know if you are this type of person specifically,
but here is the BEST example i have seen in years.

Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the
following to his opponents:

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke
pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who
avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your standing
would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!


Tom wrote:
"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:26 -0500, Tom wrote:


"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:58:54 -0500, Tom wrote:

He was given an honorable discharge, cased closed, I showed you the
document
dated 1978, and it was made official in 2001. You either respect or
you
Honorable Discharges.

Don't you find it odd that, and I had my dates wrong I think, he was
discharged in 72, I think her service was 67-72, 6 years, so, as a
matter
of record his paperwork should indicate 72. Only someone that's had
their
service record changed would have a date after their EAOS.

Kerry's service started (voluntarily) in "66".

And it was state side until there was a political reason to go to Nam.


If you check the facts, Carter was in office from 76-80 and Carter gave
amnesty to all the dishonorable and draft dodgers which meant their
service records were amended in the time period that you indicate
above. Not one previously HONORABLE discharge had to be amended to make
it HONORABLE.

So, Ford pardoned a criminal, that allowed him to keep some kind of
honor, but that is ok, since it is a presidential right to do so, as
was Carters. If you don't like it, then bitch at congress to change the
president's power in such cases.

And the criminal isn't hiding the fact that he was a criminal either.
Kerry is hiding the fact that he didn't get an Honorable discharge - big
difference.



Again, so, since Bush is hiding 6 months of what he actually did during
his sefvice. there a commanders that don't ever remember hin being on
duty during that certain period. How honorable!


Come on, you seem like a bright person, are you seeing the truth now.

Now you know why he won't release his records.

Do you know why Bush won't own up to being AWOL for 6 months, and cannot
(actually will not) provide records to show what he was doing, though he
was honorably discharged. You keep ignoring that by the way; so it
honorable at how Bush got away from Nam through power contacts while
actually NOT doing his total duty?

I don't ignore Bush's service record, there's nothing in it that isn't
legit - and he wasn't AWOL at all, even CNN recanted that after they
reported it.


Hmm do search at http://factcheck.org/default.aspx and see what his
serving status was.


Before you try and explain how valiant and honorable he WAS and how his
medals stand, explain why any respectable service member that was given
an HONORABLE Discharge at the time of the separation would want to hide
it.

I don't know, again, he got it regardless of yours or my dislike. The
fact remains he got it legally and it is honorable, refer to congress
again for changes. But you don't acknowledge whether or not our comedian

Nope, he didn't get it legally, it was the first discharge that he's
hiding and that was also legal - why is he hiding it - ask yourself that
instead of hiding from it. His OTH was converted to H (possibly) by
Carter's actions, that doesn't change the fact that he was discharged
with an OTH and is clearly hiding from it. Just like he's trying to hide
how he got out of combat, you see no proof that anyone (other than
himself) put him in for those Purple Hearts.


Prove it (the 3rd request now) that he put himself in for the hearts!


and cheat served honorably, though he got that type of discharge. You
should be appalled at him for avoiding (again through connections) real
combat duty based on how you hold such a high regard for those (as
yourself) that have been there.

I actually do have issues with people using their connections to limit
their service stay or to pull strings, never said I didn't. What I care
more about is people asking me to trust them with the nation and then
hiding the fact that they were not Honorably discharged from the service.
There is a big difference between pulling strings and getting a OTH
discharge.


But he was honorably discharged when asked at the time!


I would rather take George into battle than Kerry, at least I know one
would not run away in a time of need.



Yes, a guy who actually thinks that doing what he does, will somehow find
honor with god.

Yes, you honor a patron of god, who served his country while others
proably died in his stead due to his cowardice to actually do REAL
combat, where Kerry ACTUALLY volunteered for that service. You complain
about honor, while ignoring the honor in a volunteer, who wasn't afraid
to use his freedom of speech you say he shouldn't have, that just as
easily could have avoided doing combat duty ala Bush.

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke
pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who
avoided real combat duty through the POWER channel, yes, I can see where
a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!

"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:20:33 -0500, Tom wrote:


"Alias" wrote in message
...
It's useless to reply to Leythos. It's like trying to talk to a rock.
The
truth probably is that he voted for Kerry and has a cracked version on
every one of his 100 computers he brags about except the one with Linux.
I
say this because the lady protesteth waaaaaaaaaay too much.

Alias

I don't believe that he has how many whatnot PC/servers in his home, and
his
abilities. here is testament to my disbelief, when he hinted that a new
MOBO
would need drivers!

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...df92f68491d7cc

"A change in motherboard, while it can be done with a repair/reinstall as
I
clearly stated, is best done with a full reinstall due to the number of
changes in drivers and other functions."

I said that and I stand by it - the user had already tried a repair and it
failed, his next option was a reinstall since the repair didn't work -
what have you offered him that worked?


He didn't say his repair install failed, only that he got a BSOD after
putting in the new MOBO the after the repair, but that his system again
worked with the original MOBO. Seems to me that something was mangled anyway
in his system. The fact that it gave him a BSOD could have been caused by
any number if thing besides your assumptions, e.g. badly seated
pins/connectors, MOBO BIOS setup, etc.

I have performed 4 repair installs of XP having changed out the MOBO for a
few folks I know. The only thing I needed to do was update the chipset
drivers after the install. Any modern MOBO will use the built-in XP chipset
drivers when Windows is installed. But your new install logic using the
forced need to install new drivers is only done in Windows, and cannot be
accomplished beforehand. So, a repair install works just fine in many cases,
saving settings, and 3rd party installed programs, something a fresh install
cannot do.

JW wrote:
kurttrail wrote:
JW wrote:

Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite.
i don't know if you are this type of person specifically,
but here is the BEST example i have seen in years.

Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the
following to his opponents:

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine,
smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A
man who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of
your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!


Bill Clinton was our best president since FDR.

GWB is our worst president since Hoover!

Thank you. it's always nice to have somebody like you prove my point.

LOL! You had a point? What was it? Any married man's first
inclination would be to lie about getting a blow job from another woman.

The only people Clinton really hurt were his family.

Bush's lies have hurt many families.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:42:58 -0500, Tom wrote:

I think Lamethos liked having his XXXXX cleaned by you though!

Why is it that your kind can hold a discussion without resorting to
foul or abusive comments that don't add anything to the discussion?

By not being able converse without using attack methods and constantly
using snide comments, you only show the level of maturity you have and
lessen your position.

So I guess you are saying that you didn't enjoy the ball-cleaning? ;-)

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:44:05 -0500, kurttrail wrote:

Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:42:58 -0500, Tom wrote:

I think Lamethos liked having his XXXXX cleaned by you though!

Why is it that your kind can hold a discussion without resorting to
foul or abusive comments that don't add anything to the discussion?

By not being able converse without using attack methods and constantly
using snide comments, you only show the level of maturity you have and
lessen your position.

So I guess you are saying that you didn't enjoy the ball-cleaning? ;-)

No, I'm saying that I don't understand your types, where you can only
inject insults and trollings into threads.

Well, having the potty mind you do, you turned my comment to JW into a dirty
thing. Where did I say "balls" were organic organs on the male animal
species. I could have been talking about JWs golf balls for all you know.

you are clearly struggling to make any sense.

you said
"Did I say I love Bill Clinton ? "

No. in fact, nobody asked you.

you said
" ...how does that make me an opponent ?"

it doesn't. but that's not the point (the 2-faced hypocrisy).
so, besides the fact that nobody asked you,
you clearly cannot see the point that was made.

you said
"(If you only knew my voting record.)"

nobody was talking about voting records, and the fact is, nobody here
cares about your voting record. it's irrelevant.

in fact, indications from your remarks suggest you very probably are
nothing more than a well-educated foul-mouthed teenager, not even old
enough to vote yet, masquerading as an adult. but you were tricked into
giving away your true identity, when you revealed that you are learning
how to disagree with somebody, using language you newly learned from the
wall of your grade school bathroom.

now go back to class. i was not talking to you before, and since you
are furious, vulgar and irrelevant, your juvenile behavior will no
longer receive a response.



Tom wrote:
Did I say I love Bill Clinton? Since I didn't, how does that make me an
opponent? Itdoesn't mean any such thing, my words are what the discussion is
about, not being pro or con concerning political preferences. (If you only
knew my voting record).

I think Lamethos liked having his balls cleaned by you though!





JW wrote:
Thank you. it's always nice to have somebody like you prove my point.


kurttrail wrote:

JW wrote:

Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite.
i don't know if you are this type of person specifically,
but here is the BEST example i have seen in years.

Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the
following to his opponents:

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine,
smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man
who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your
standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!



Bill Clinton was our best president since FDR.

GWB is our worst president since Hoover!

Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:44:05 -0500, kurttrail wrote:

Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:42:58 -0500, Tom wrote:

I think Lamethos liked having his XXXXX cleaned by you though!

Why is it that your kind can hold a discussion without resorting to
foul or abusive comments that don't add anything to the discussion?

By not being able converse without using attack methods and
constantly using snide comments, you only show the level of
maturity you have and lessen your position.

So I guess you are saying that you didn't enjoy the ball-cleaning?
;-)

No, I'm saying that I don't understand your types, where you can only
inject insults and trollings into threads.

LOL! You are the one trolling in MY thread! And if you don't like
being called names or being insulted, then you get off the effin'
USENET, Lameboy!

You are an insult to the whole effin' human race, and I think we need to
pass a law that allows the post-birth arbortion of YOUR TYPE! Those
that step into the flames and don't expect to get burned!

"BOO! HOO! The bad men called me a name after I acted like a complete
idiot on the USENET! BOO HOO!"

See Ya, CryBabyThos! :-p

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

JW wrote:
you are clearly struggling to make any sense.

you said
"Did I say I love Bill Clinton ? "

No. in fact, nobody asked you.

you said
" ...how does that make me an opponent ?"

it doesn't. but that's not the point (the 2-faced hypocrisy).
so, besides the fact that nobody asked you,
you clearly cannot see the point that was made.

you said
"(If you only knew my voting record.)"

nobody was talking about voting records, and the fact is, nobody here
cares about your voting record. it's irrelevant.

in fact, indications from your remarks suggest you very probably are
nothing more than a well-educated foul-mouthed teenager, not even old
enough to vote yet, masquerading as an adult. but you were tricked
into giving away your true identity, when you revealed that you are
learning how to disagree with somebody, using language you newly
learned from the wall of your grade school bathroom.

now go back to class. i was not talking to you before, and since you
are furious, vulgar and irrelevant, your juvenile behavior will no
longer receive a response.


Vulgarity is in the mind of the beholder. So the question you should be
asking yourself is why is your filled with Vulgarity?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

"JW" wrote in message
...
you are clearly struggling to make any sense.

you said
"Did I say I love Bill Clinton ? "

No. in fact, nobody asked you.

Umm, you mentioned for "those that love Bill Clinton" and injected into this
thread, I followed inline. Of course your reply is inline with the acts like
Lamethos, so I am not surprised.


you said
" ...how does that make me an opponent ?"

it doesn't. but that's not the point (the 2-faced hypocrisy).
so, besides the fact that nobody asked you,
you clearly cannot see the point that was made.

Not clearly made, noting the hypocrisy Lamethos has exhibited, and you
ignored by not reading the thread.


you said
"(If you only knew my voting record.)"

nobody was talking about voting records, and the fact is, nobody here
cares about your voting record. it's irrelevant.

Of course not, but your point about Clinton lovers was also relevant to the
topic at hand, since Clinton was never mentioned, let alone evenmentioning
politics, or party lines. You just posted non-sequitur.


in fact, indications from your remarks suggest you very probably are
nothing more than a well-educated foul-mouthed teenager, not even old
enough to vote yet, masquerading as an adult. but you were tricked into
giving away your true identity, when you revealed that you are learning
how to disagree with somebody, using language you newly learned from the
wall of your grade school bathroom.

And this is the assumption of a lesser educated older texan red colluge
schooled male woman abuser alcoholic.


now go back to class. i was not talking to you before, and since you are
furious, vulgar and irrelevant, your juvenile behavior will no longer
receive a response.

I am finished with school, but I find it interesting that your colluge has
these neat, if not insane sweats,"T"s, caps, and whatnots for sale:

http://www.cafepress.com/thewhitehouse/417452


Tom wrote:
Did I say I love Bill Clinton? Since I didn't, how does that make me an
opponent? Itdoesn't mean any such thing, my words are what the discussion
is about, not being pro or con concerning political preferences. (If you
only knew my voting record).

I think Lamethos liked having his balls cleaned by you though!





JW wrote:
Thank you. it's always nice to have somebody like you prove my point.


kurttrail wrote:

JW wrote:

Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite.
i don't know if you are this type of person specifically,
but here is the BEST example i have seen in years.

Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the
following to his opponents:

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine,
smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man
who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your
standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!



Bill Clinton was our best president since FDR.

GWB is our worst president since Hoover!

Depends on where you live...here I am definitely buying the roads.


"Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message
...
Since you don't own the software, yes you do need instructions. You cannot
unilaterally declare the software yours. When you buy a license plate for your
car you are licensing the car to use the public roads, but you are not buying the
roads.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)" wrote in message
...
I bought the "software" and got the license. I didn't buy the license, and get the
software. I will use MY software as I see fit! I know how to use it. I don't need
no damn instructions from within the package telling me when, where, how and why.

--
Regards,

Richard Urban

aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)

If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!


"Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message
...
Software has become a term applied to a lot of things. You still have to read
the license to understand the difference between the generic term and the
specifics of a published edition. Even open software is licensed.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)" wrote in
message ...
What Alias is getting at is that all web sites, and stores, sell you software.
Don't they all have software departments, T.V. departments, appliance
departments etc.

Yet after they have sold you the "software", they try to tell you that you have
bought a license. Well, people DID NOT buy it in the license department - did
they?

Based upon that fact, and that even Microsoft offers you software downloads
(not license downloads) I think I also am going to begin to state that I OWN
the "software". The license that was in the package is ancillary to the fact of
my purchase, and I don't really have to even read it.

The software is mine, whether I have a license or not!

--
Regards,

Richard Urban

aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)

If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!


"Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message
...
I have a degree in English from the University of Texas Arlington and my
comprehension skills are fine. If you install software without reading through
the EULA then the problem is not comprehension, but reading at all.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"Alias" wrote in message
...

"Colin Barnhorst" wrote

If you can read the website, you can read the EULA. If you just click
through it during an install, that's your issue.

Huh? I didn't say anything about reading or clicking through the scammy EULA,
now did I, sport? Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Is English not
your first language? The web sites I was referring to and I made it clear by
typing *computer web sites" say *software*, not "licences". Yaknow, the ones
that sell Microsoft *Software*?
--
Alias



--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"Alias" wrote in message
...

"Colin Barnhorst" wrote

You were sold the licenses, not the software.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)

We know about the licencing scam. It's a scam. It's highway robbery. EVERY
computer web site says "software", not "licences".

Alias