|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#151
May 27th 19, 12:48 AM
posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/24/19 10:50 PM, Snit wrote:
T wrote: On 5/24/19 8:53 PM, Snit wrote: Conservative, including myself, follow the teachings on a particular Republican Christian preacher by the name of Martin Luther King. So you are a liberal. Great. Not by a hundred million miles. What he taught after was inclusion. We are all Americans and should treat each other as such. Class warfare, race and poverty pimps, identity politics are all contrary to his teaching. He certainly did not teach hate. Sounds like we have much in common, except I am not a sock. So no, I am not a member of your religion. I am an atheist. Be whatever religion pleases you. Make sure you have not subsituted Liberalism as your religoun. From you writings, it does sound like it. Okay, you think we are on same page, lets discuss some disgusting, BLATANT racism in the country: 1) Destruction of the black family. Liberals show up every election says yelling racist and here is some handouts. The handouts have destroyed the black family. The only group of folks in this country with a higher out of wedlock birth rate are reservation based Indians. This has resulted in YUGE amounts of black on black crime. Some of the largest black cities in this country are actually prisons. Neighborhoods are red lined for crime not based on race, but on out of wedlock births. Oh ya, and Liberals blame the white man for this. Well guess what? (Legal) Nigerian immigrants to this country have a lower out of wedlock rate, a higher education rate, and a higher average living standard than whites. And Liberals don't give a ****. It is all about power. The end justifies the means. Ya, it is the "white man" responsible for this. They just got the wrong white men. It is white liberals. 2) racial preferences / reverse discrimination. Instead of having everyone complete based on merit, special set asides are given for race. This makes for incompetent people being elevated to positions they do not deserve and makes everyone around them think that they are idiots, including their own race. Do you really want an affirmative action doctor working on you? You want to die? 3) Apartheid Rev. King dream was not to have us live Balkanized from each other but as Americans. Now Liberals are pushing separation. And not to mention telling minorities that they are "Victims", thus keeping them down and out of being included in the American family. 4) Genocide What did your Saint Sanger call Black children? Hint, it was "Human Weeds". It is not a mistake that the majority of Planned Parenthood's butcher shops are in black communities. Nearly 50% of Black children are murdered this way. These children are God Image and Likeness your are butchering. Do you notice that NONE of the above have ANYTHING to do with Trump, Conservatives, and Christians? They all are Liberals. Liberals are the most racist *******s on the face of this earth. By, the way, speaking of racism, I could use some of that "White Privilege" that racist Liberals keep accusing me of. Where do I go to find it? Conservatives want Blacks (and other minorities) to understand that the are first and foremost that they are "Americans". So, no Snit, we are millions of miles apart. We stand with Reverend King. Liberals give King lip service and go and do the opposite. I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal." I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood. I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice. I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today! I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of "interposition" and "nullification" -- one day right there in Alabama little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers. --Reverend King "Sisters and brothers". This is what Conservative want. Yes, I know, the Soviet style cold war propaganda your side drinks says different. You are being lied to. -T 
|
| Ads |
|
#152
May 27th 19, 12:52 AM
posted to alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
|
|
#153
May 27th 19, 12:54 AM
posted to alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/24/19 8:06 PM, Snit wrote:
Equal*rights*are*offensive*to*him. I am a strong believer in equal rights under the law. That you state otherwise is your religious Axiom and, speaking of lies, a lie at that. I am also a strong believer in equal protection under the law.
|
|
#155
May 27th 19, 01:09 AM
posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/26/19 4:48 PM, T wrote:
On 5/24/19 10:50 PM, Snit wrote: T wrote: On 5/24/19 8:53 PM, Snit wrote: Conservative, including myself, follow the teachings on a particular Republican Christian preacher by the name of Martin Luther King. So you are a liberal. Great. Not by a hundred million miles. But you follow liberal causes. Fair enough... people need not be so simple as to be liberal or conservative. What he taught after was inclusion.* We are all Americans and should treat each other as such. Class warfare, race and poverty pimps, identity politics are all contrary to his teaching.* He certainly did not teach hate. Sounds like we have much in common, except I am not a sock. So no, I am not a member of your religion. I am an atheist. Be whatever religion pleases you. Make sure you have not subsituted Liberalism as your religoun.* From you writings, it does sound like it. What quote made you think that? Okay, you think we are on same page, lets discuss some disgusting, BLATANT racism in the country: 1)* Destruction of the black family. Ah, you are Carrol. You gave it away. Liberals show up every election says yelling racist and here is some handouts. Cite. The handouts have destroyed the black family. What handouts? Things like allowing Trump to pay zero in taxes as we surely cover more food expenses for him than we do ANY poor family of four. The only group of folks in this country with a higher out of wedlock birth rate are reservation based Indians. This has resulted in YUGE amounts of black on black crime.* Some of the largest black cities in this country are actually prisons. Neighborhoods are red lined for crime not based on race, but on out of wedlock births. This assumes you want to see the liberal idea of contraception being free and readily accessible come true. Oh ya, and Liberals blame the white man for this. Cite. Well guess what?* (Legal) Nigerian immigrants to this country have a lower out of wedlock rate, a higher education rate, and a higher average living standard than whites. New immigra1nts are not likely to have the same family background, nor have been a part of the same system. Unless you think this is genetic why would this be at all a surprise to you? And Liberals don't give a ****. Cite. It is all about power. Cite. The end justifies the means. On this we disagree. * Ya, it is the "white man" responsible for this. I disagree with you on that, too. They just got the wrong white men.* It is white liberals. I disagree with your blame game. 2) racial preferences / reverse discrimination. Instead of having everyone complete based on merit, special set asides are given for race.* This makes for incompetent people being elevated to positions they do not deserve and makes everyone around them think that they are idiots, including their own race. Do you really want an affirmative action doctor working on you?* You want to die? I do not back affirmative action, not with colleges or voting. Do you back the Electoral College and the Senate with their special entitlements akin to affirmative action? 3)* Apartheid Rev. King dream was not to have us live Balkanized from each other but as Americans.* Now Liberals are pushing separation. Cite. And not to mention telling minorities that they are "Victims", thus keeping them down and out of being included in the American family. Noting how there is bigotry is not calling people victims, Mr. Sock who sounds exactly like Carroll. 4)* Genocide What did your Saint Sanger call Black children? I have no such Saint. Hint, it was "Human Weeds".* It is not a mistake that the majority of Planned* Parenthood's butcher shops are in black communities.* Nearly 50% of Black children are murdered this way. These children are God Image and Likeness your are butchering. You are against Planned Parenthood even though it has been shown to reduce the number of abortions. Are you against other measures to reduce the number of abortions? Do you notice that NONE of the above have ANYTHING to do with Trump, Conservatives, and Christians? You talked about handouts, which have a lot to do with each of those groups. They all are Liberals.* Liberals are the most racist *******s on the face of this earth. Cite. Oh, and now YOU are doing as you accused and telling people they are victims. By, the way, speaking of racism, I could use some of that "White Privilege" that racist Liberals keep accusing me of.* Where do I go to find it? Assuming you are white, Carroll, how has your skin color impacted your life in negative ways? Racial Discrimination in the US http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...1.00230.x/full —— The meta-analysis shows with strong consistency that minority suspects are more likely to be arrested than White suspects. —— https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/crimin..._Shootings.pdf —— Specifically, we are persuaded by evidence that both police officers and members of the general public display unconscious biases that lead them to be quicker to “shoot” images of armed black people than of armed white people in computer‐based simulations testing shoot/don’t‐shoot decision‐making. —— http://www.rshroff.com/uploads/6/2/3...383/frisky.pdf —— We further find that blacks and Hispanics were disproportionately stopped in these low hit rate contexts, a phenomenon that we trace to two factors: (1) lower thresholds for stopping individuals—regardless of race—in high-crime, predominately minority areas, particularly public housing; and (2) lower thresholds for stopping minorities relative to similarly situated whites. —— https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazi...ng-while-black —— “Stop and frisk” isn’t just a reality in New York City. New data shows how police target African Americans on highways across America. —— http://sfblueribbonpanel.com/sites/d..._Exec_Summ.pdf —— While the SFPD’s policies prohibiting biased policing are in line with best practices, available statistics indicate racial disparities in its stops, searches, and arrests. Black and Hispanic people are more likely to be searched without consent than any other group, and of those searched, Black and Hispanic people had the lowest “hit rates” (i.e., the rate at which searches found contraband). —— http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman...hed/frisk9.pdf —— In the period for which we had data, the NYPD’s records indicate that they were stopping blacks and Hispanics more often than whites, in comparison to both the populations of these groups and the best estimates of the rate of crimes committed by each group. After controlling for precincts, this pattern still holds. More specifically, for violent crimes and weapons offenses, blacks and Hispanics are stopped about twice as often as whites. —— http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...272.x/abstract —— The pattern of racially selective enforcement suggests the potential for systemic violations of the Fourteenth Amendment's prohibition on racial discrimination. —— http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...190.x/abstract —— The racial skew, questionable constitutionality, and limited efficiency of marijuana enforcement in detecting serious crimes suggest that nonwhite New Yorkers bear a racial tax from contemporary policing strategy, a social cost not offset by any substantial observed benefits to public safety. —— https://ccrjustice.org/sites/default...ffreyFagan.pdf —— Specifically, I provide evidence that the NYPD has engaged in patterns of unconstitutional stops of City residents that are more likely to affect Black and Latino citizens. —— http://policingequity.org/wp-content...07-08-1130.pdf —— That racially disparate crime rate is an insufficient explanation of racially disparate use of force rates for this sample of police departments. Given that these departments range widely in size and represent urban cities, suburban counties, and transportation police in geographically diverse jurisdictions, the results are suggestive that these findings may generalize beyond the sample. —— http://journals.plos.org/plosone/art...l.pone.0141854 —— The results provide evidence of a significant bias in the killing of unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans, in that the probability of being {black, unarmed, and shot by police} is about 3.49 times the probability of being {white, unarmed, and shot by police} on average. Furthermore, the results of multi-level modeling show that there exists significant heterogeneity across counties in the extent of racial bias in police shootings, with some counties showing relative risk ratios of 20 to 1 or more. Finally, analysis of police shooting data as a function of county-level predictors suggests that racial bias in police shootings is most likely to emerge in police departments in larger metropolitan counties with low median incomes and a sizable portion of black residents, especially when there is high financial inequality in that county. There is no relationship between county-level racial bias in police shootings and crime rates (even race-specific crime rates), meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates. —— https://www.washingtonpost.com/ampht...ice-yes-but-no —— “The only thing that was significant in predicting whether someone shot and killed by police was unarmed was whether or not they were black. ... Crime variables did not matter in terms of predicting whether the person killed was unarmed.” —— https://chicagopatf.org/wp-content/u..._4_13_16-1.pdf —— Moreover, black and Hispanic drivers were searched approximately four times as often as white drivers, yet CPD’s own data show that contraband was found on white drivers twice as often as black and Hispanic drivers. —— https://www.aclu-il.org/en/press-rel...ing-new-report —— The data reveals, as an example, that statewide across Illinois, African American and Latino drivers are nearly twice as likely as white drivers to be asked during a routine traffic stop for "consent" to have their car searched. Yet white motorists are 49% more likely than African American motorists to have contraband discovered during a consent search by law enforcement, and 56% more likely when compared to Latinos. —— https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/u...ing-black.html —— Officers were more likely to stop black drivers for no discernible reason. And they were more likely to use force if the driver was black, even when they did not encounter physical resistance. —— http://www.nber.org/papers/w22399.pdf —— On non-lethal uses of force, blacks and Hispanics are more than fifty percent more likely to experience some form of force in interactions with police. Adding controls that account for important context and civilian behavior reduces, but cannot fully explain, these disparities. —— https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/08/u...or-blacks.html —— African-Americans are far more likely than whites and other groups to be the victims of use of force by the police, even when racial disparities in crime are taken into account. —— http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/...48550616633505 —— Regression analyses confirmed that police used less force with highly stereotypical Whites, and this protective effect was stronger than the effect for non-Whites. Results suggest that intragroup bias is a protective factor for Whites, but not for non-Whites, providing an additional route through which racial disparities in policing operate. —— https://www.justice.gov/sites/defaul...r_12-16-11.pdf —— Analysis of limited data suggests that, in certain precincts, S.P.D. officers may stop a disproportionate number of people of color where no offense or other police incident occurred. —— https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-restore-trust —— And in Oakland, Calif., a new study found that if you are African American and encounter a police officer, there is a 25 percent chance you will be handcuffed, often in front of family or friends, even though you are not being arrested. —— http://www.politifact.com/punditfact...kely-get-respo —— The resumes with white-sounding names spurred 50 percent more callbacks than the ones with black-sounding names. —— http://www.pnas.org/content/114/41/10870.full —— We find no change in the levels of discrimination against African Americans since 1989, although we do find some indication of declining discrimination against Latinos. The results document a striking persistence of racial discrimination in US labor markets. —— http://fortune.com/2016/07/19/mortga...al-disparities —— Blacks Are Still Significantly Less Likely to Get Approved for a Mortgage than Whites —— https://phys.org/news/2015-08-africa...ess-local.html —— Study shows African Americans discriminated against in access to US local public services —— https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...black-men.html —— Black boys raised in America, even in the wealthiest families and living in some of the most well-to-do neighborhoods, still earn less in adulthood than white boys with similar backgrounds, according to a sweeping new study that traced the lives of millions of children. White boys who grow up rich are likely to remain that way. Black boys raised at the top, however, are more likely to become poor than to stay wealthy in their own adult households. … The research makes clear that there is something unique about the obstacles black males face. The gap between Hispanics and whites is narrower, and their incomes will converge within a couple of generations if mobility stays the same. Asian-Americans earn more than whites raised at the same income level, or about the same when first-generation immigrants are excluded. Only Native Americans have an income gap comparable to African-Americans. But the disparities are widest for black boys. —— https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/da...our_ground.pdf —— Stand-Your-Ground is losing ground for racial minorities' health A paper in this issue analyzing the impact of Stand-Your-Ground laws revealed a disturbing pattern of racial bias. Individuals (i.e., defendants) in Florida were more likely to avoid charges if the victim was Black or Latino but not if the victim was white. Indeed, individuals are nearly two times more likely to be convicted in a case that involves White victims compared to those involving Black and Latino victims. —— https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publicatio...aspx?ID=265405 —— The study found that White-on-Black homicides were more likely to be ruled justified (11.4 percent) while Black-on-White homicides were least likely to be ruled justified (1.2 percent). The findings also revealed that for White-on-Black, Black-on-Black, and White-on-White homicides, the presence of a stand your ground law was associated with a statistically significant increase in the likelihood that these homicides would be ruled justified, while the change in likelihood for Black-on-White homicides was not significant. The study also used the attributes from the Trayvon Martin case to determine the effects of race on homicide rulings and found the following attributes – single shooter, single victim, both male, both are strangers, and use of a firearm – contributed significantly to the presence of racial disparities in rulings of justifiable homicide. … The findings from the study indicate that race plays a significant factor in justifiable homicide rulings, and that this effect increases in States with stand your ground laws. —— Conservatives want Blacks (and other minorities) to understand that the are first and foremost that they are "Americans". You keep separating them out and speaking of them being victims, Carroll. So, no Snit, we are millions of miles apart.* We stand with Reverend King. You back his liberal message. OK. Liberals give King lip service and go and do the opposite. Cite. ***** I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up ***** and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold ***** these truths to be self-evident, that all men are ***** created equal." ***** I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, ***** the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave ***** owners will be able to sit down together at the table ***** of brotherhood. ***** I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, ***** a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering ***** with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an ***** oasis of freedom and justice. ***** I have a dream that my four little children will one day ***** live in a nation where they will not be judged by the ***** color of their skin but by the content of their character. ***** I have a dream today! ***** I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its ***** vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping ***** with the words of "interposition" and "nullification" -- one ***** day right there in Alabama little black boys and black girls ***** will be able to join hands with little white boys and white ***** girls as sisters and brothers. ***** --Reverend King "Sisters and brothers".* This is what Conservative want. Yet you keep focusing on race and speaking of victims. Yes, I know, the Soviet style cold war propaganda your side drinks says different.* You are being lied to. -T -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
|
|
#156
May 27th 19, 01:10 AM
posted to alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/26/19 4:54 PM, T wrote:
On 5/24/19 8:06 PM, Snit wrote: Equal*rights*are*offensive*to*him. I am a strong believer in equal rights under the law. Yet you focus on race and being a victim, and you (Steve Carroll) have the biggest victim mentality I have ever seen. That you state otherwise is your religious Axiom and, speaking of lies, a lie at that. I am also a strong believer in equal protection under the law. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
|
|
#157
May 27th 19, 01:11 AM
posted to alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/26/19 4:57 PM, T wrote:
On 5/25/19 9:42 AM, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 5/24/2019 9:05 PM, wrote: On Fri, 24 May 2019 19:32:47 -0700, T wrote: On 5/24/19 7:09 PM, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 5/24/2019 8:03 PM, T wrote: On 5/24/19 3:45 PM, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 5/24/2019 3:01 PM, T wrote: On 5/22/19 8:43 AM, chrisv wrote: Bucky Breeder wrote: (snipped, unread) Don't need to read more right-wing lies, thanks. Hmmmmm.* Violate an Axiom? After weeks of his dodging the communist tag I've given he/she/it, he still doesn't deny that he isn't one, ergo, he is a communist. I am not entirely sure of that.* Regressive refuse to dialog/debate. So, who knows what he believes in and what he stands for.* And since their belief system is religious in nature, they react to outsiders as heretics and just get angry. Although I give give you that most Regressives would make a Communist blush. I've lurked in here for over two years, and he has never said which religious beliefs he has. Liberalism is a religoun.* It tells you what you can wear, who you can speak to, who you have to hate, what you can drive, what yo can eat, what you can think, who you can murder. Total bull****. Its restrictions are worse than a Christian at Lent. His reaction to both of us is not as a fellow American who needs to be debated with, but as a heretics. Wrong.I don't think anything of you except that you're narrow minded. Do you notice that they will not discuss issues?* They only have hate.* They really do not belong in a Republic. Broader brush than usual. Yet you can't discuss the issues properly.* Why is that? Liberals no longer believe in the free exchange of ideas. Cite. This is not new in human history: Gleichschaltung – the restructuring of German society and government into streamlined, centralized hierarchies of power, with the intention of gaining total control and co-ordination of all aspects of society. Duke University’s notable historian, Claudia Koonz, described the institutionalized Gleichschaltung of the National Socialist government as comprehensive in scope and depth. For the Nazis, Gleichschaltung meant absolute unequivocal conformity and obedience. Such uniform programming of thought was part propaganda induced, partly the result of the Gestapo enforcement mechanism, and part social pressure from every direction; it was of paramount importance to act uniformly if one wanted to remain a member of the Volksgenossen. Much like the Trump's nationalism. By the way, the National in Nazi is all about: National resolution, not Nationalism. Cite. Hitler:* “National socialism derives from each of two camps the pure idea that characterises it: National resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism from the teaching of Marxism.” [January, 1934] Schoenbaum,* p.57 -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
|
|
#158
May 27th 19, 01:52 AM
posted to alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge
In article , wrote:
Liberals no longer believe in the open exchange of idea. not at all true, but if it was, it would make you a liberal.
|
|
#159
May 27th 19, 02:03 AM
posted to alt.test, misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple,deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge
In article
T wrote: On 5/25/19 9:38 AM, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 5/24/2019 8:46 PM, T wrote: On 5/24/19 7:08 PM, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 5/24/2019 5:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 24 May 2019 16:45:32 -0600, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 5/24/2019 3:01 PM, T wrote: On 5/22/19 8:43 AM, chrisv wrote: Bucky Breeder wrote: (snipped, unread) Don't need to read more right-wing lies, thanks. Hmmmmm.=C2=A0 Violate an Axiom? After weeks of his dodging the communist tag I've given he/she/it, = he still doesn't deny that he isn't one, ergo, he is a communist. If he did deny it you would call him a liar. You've denied being a fascist but that is not believable. Easy, I'm a patriot keeping his vows of oath to this country. Which, you haven't said one way or the other for yourself. The refuse to discuss and debate, so it is hard to figure out what they really believe, other than they hate the other side. My guess, since none of them would criticize Antifaschistische Aktion because they have a grudging admiration for them. If does not help that their Mr. touchy-feely-skinny-dip-in-front-of- female-secret-service-agents Joe Biden called Antifa "a courageous group of Americans.=E2=80=9D=C2=A0 And he is their "Moderate" candidat= e. Cite: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=3Dbiden+pr...Dbrave&ia=3Dw= eb =20 That and the fact that Barr is now investigating his dealings with the = Russians (private companies of course). =20 Plus the public disclosure of what he finds.=C2=A0 Should be very inter= esting. =20 =20 Oh holy s*** have you seen the number of $$$ his son has been receiving from foreign operators. Can we say "bribery"? Then again Hillary got away with a ton of that when she was secretary of state. Why not Swampman Joe? I dealt with classified in the military. Had I pulled 1/1000 th of what Hillary pulled, my bones would still be in jail 500 years rom today. One law for Democratic Elite and one law for the rest of us.
|
|
#160
May 27th 19, 02:13 AM
posted to alt.test, misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple,deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge
In article
nospam wrote: In article , wrote: Liberals no longer believe in the open exchange of idea. not at all true, but if it was, it would make you a liberal.
|
|
#161
May 27th 19, 03:33 AM
posted to alt.test, misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple,deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge
In article
Snit wrote: On 5/26/19 4:57 PM, T wrote: On 5/25/19 9:42 AM, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 5/24/2019 9:05 PM, wrote: On Fri, 24 May 2019 19:32:47 -0700, T wrote: On 5/24/19 7:09 PM, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 5/24/2019 8:03 PM, T wrote: On 5/24/19 3:45 PM, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 5/24/2019 3:01 PM, T wrote: On 5/22/19 8:43 AM, chrisv wrote: Bucky Breeder wrote: (snipped, unread) Don't need to read more right-wing lies, thanks. Hmmmmm. Violate an Axiom? After weeks of his dodging the communist tag I've given he/she/it, he still doesn't deny that he isn't one, ergo, he is a communist. I am not entirely sure of that. Regressive refuse to dialog/debate. So, who knows what he believes in and what he stands for. And since their belief system is religious in nature, they react to outsiders as heretics and just get angry. Although I give give you that most Regressives would make a Communist blush. I've lurked in here for over two years, and he has never said which religious beliefs he has. Liberalism is a religoun. It tells you what you can wear, who you can speak to, who you have to hate, what you can drive, what yo can eat, what you can think, who you can murder. Total bull****. Its restrictions are worse than a Christian at Lent. His reaction to both of us is not as a fellow American who needs to be debated with, but as a heretics. Wrong.I don't think anything of you except that you're narrow minded. Do you notice that they will not discuss issues? They only have hate. They really do not belong in a Republic. Broader brush than usual. Yet you can't discuss the issues properly. Why is that? Liberals no longer believe in the free exchange of ideas. Cite. This is not new in human history: Gleichschaltung – the restructuring of German society and government into streamlined, centralized hierarchies of power, with the intention of gaining total control and co-ordination of all aspects of society. Duke University’s notable historian, Claudia Koonz, described the institutionalized Gleichschaltung of the National Socialist government as comprehensive in scope and depth. For the Nazis, Gleichschaltung meant absolute unequivocal conformity and obedience. Such uniform programming of thought was part propaganda induced, partly the result of the Gestapo enforcement mechanism, and part social pressure from every direction; it was of paramount importance to act uniformly if one wanted to remain a member of the Volksgenossen. Much like the Trump's nationalism. By the way, the National in Nazi is all about: National resolution, not Nationalism. Cite. Hitler: “National socialism derives from each of two camps the pure idea that characterises it: National resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism from the teaching of Marxism.” [January, 1934] Schoenbaum, p.57 -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
|
|
#162
May 27th 19, 03:56 AM
posted to alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge
On Sun, 26 May 2019 20:52:59 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , wrote: Liberals no longer believe in the open exchange of idea. not at all true, but if it was, it would make you a liberal. +
|
|
#163
May 27th 19, 05:52 AM
posted to alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/26/19 5:11 PM, Snit wrote:
On 5/26/19 4:57 PM, T wrote: Yet you can't discuss the issues properly.* Why is that? Liberals no longer believe in the free exchange of ideas. Cite. Take your pick: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=antifa+and...t=brave&ia=web Also look for key words "By all means necessary". It is almost impossible for a Conservative speaker to speak at a college campus these days. And don't forget the "safe zones" where snow flakes can be safe from opinions they disagree with. This is not new in human history: Gleichschaltung – the restructuring of German society and government into streamlined, centralized hierarchies of power, with the intention of gaining total control and co-ordination of all aspects of society. Duke University’s notable historian, Claudia Koonz, described the institutionalized Gleichschaltung of the National Socialist government as comprehensive in scope and depth. For the Nazis, Gleichschaltung meant absolute unequivocal conformity and obedience. Such uniform programming of thought was part propaganda induced, partly the result of the Gestapo enforcement mechanism, and part social pressure from every direction; it was of paramount importance to act uniformly if one wanted to remain a member of the Volksgenossen. Much like the Trump's nationalism. Exactly the opposite. Stop drinking the Soviet style propaganda about him and think, for yourself. If you want an example, listen to Biden's announcement speech. What an absolute liar (Charlottesville). Do you need a cite for that or can you look for it yourself on You Tube? By the way, the National in Nazi is all about: National resolution, not Nationalism. Cite. I did. It is right below this. Would you like some more? Hitler:* “National socialism derives from each of two camps the pure idea that characterises it: National resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism from the teaching of Marxism.” [January, 1934] Schoenbaum,* p.57
|
|
#164
May 27th 19, 05:54 AM
posted to alt.test,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/26/19 7:33 PM, Support wrote:
ersonal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. Actually, Snit is a gentleman, even though he passionately disagrees with me. The other Regressives just call you a liar, ignorant, stupid and such rather than discussing the issues. Snit just asks for a cite. Although he is not long on any information, he does give some.
|
|
#165
May 27th 19, 06:09 AM
posted to alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/26/19 5:10 PM, Snit wrote:
On 5/26/19 4:54 PM, T wrote: On 5/24/19 8:06 PM, Snit wrote: Equal*rights*are*offensive*to*him. I am a strong believer in equal rights under the law. Yet you focus on race and being a victim, Blacks (and increasingly others) are told they are victims, which dispirits them and keep them from trying to become "brothers and sisters" (King) with the rest of us. I share Rev. King's dream. This is Apartheid. As far as me being a victim, I have only been a (verified) victim of racism in hiring once in my life. It sucked. But, I never said anything about it here before now. Perhaps you mistook me being sarcastic as complaining to be a victim? Our laws need to be enforced across the board. You mug someone, I don't care for what reason or what color they or you are, it is the Grey Bar motel for you. No exceptions. No "some are more equal than others". and you (Steve Carroll) have the biggest victim mentality I have ever seen. Who is Steve Carroll? You usually do not name call, so I am asking you to clarify. That you state otherwise is your religious Axiom and, speaking of lies, a lie at that. I am also a strong believer in equal protection under the law. So, do you then support the Barr investigation? Do you want the Justice department to stop being used as a political weapon and become non-political again? What is your stance on the Steele Dossier? It was Hillary's campaign that paid for two Russian agents to spread absolute lies and falsehood in our election (Russian collusion). And CIA and Justice Department office knew it was fake and presented it to the FISA courts a fact. Tons of law were broken. Actual crimes were committed. A whole bunch of these ass holes need to go to jail. Is this okay with you because it was your side breaking the laws? If so, maybe you are starting to become a conservative?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
