Is there any functionality the iTunes abomination does, for a dual-boot Win/Ubuntu PC that can't be done, better, WITHOUT iTunes?

On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 01:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Lewis wrote:

He gets a widdle chubby from posting idiotic **** to groups
He obviously masturbates whenever anyone replies to him.
Or, imaging him clawing at the keyboard one-handed ever time he posts

Lewis,

*You really should not post what your brain thinks*.
o *Seriously*.

*Your child-like fixation on masturbation is disturbing to adults.*
o Every sentence from you is about masturbation, Lewis.

Seriously.
o You should _not_ be posting what your brain thinks, Lewis.

Why do you apologists react to mere facts with instant childish hatred?
o I don't know why.

I've been studying apologists for years, where you always prove me right.
o You have only 7 responses to fact; none of which are adult.

Your basic response is to brazenly deny facts, calling all facts "lies".
o Another basic response is you supremely _hate_ the mere bearer of facts.

Why?
o I don't know why.

*I think it's as simple as facts _DESTROY_ your imaginary belief system.*
o Hence, any bearer of facts, is a danger to your entire belief system.

It's as if I told a fifth-grade bully that his Santa Claus doesn't exist.

--
Apologists react like fifth grade bullies react to destruction of their
belief system, with instant denial of facts, and than vitriolic hatred
aimed toward the bearer of facts.

On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 20:50:04 -0500, nospam wrote:

your proof shows the very opposite of what you claim, and also shows
that you're utterly incapable of simple tasks.

Apologists hate the fact that facts they literally hate... are still facts.

Your childish retorts show you _hate_ the fact that I'm correct on facts!
1. The fact is, *you have less functionality with iTunes, than without*.
2. The fact is, *you have less security with iTunes, than without*.

Apologists can't dispute facts; so apologists play childish games instead.
o You apologists brazenly deny facts - without even _reading_ the cites!

You call all facts you don't like to be "lies", simply because you have no
adult response to facts.

You call all bearers of facts "Liars" or "trolls", simply because you have
no adult response to facts.

It's what makes you an apologist after all, nospam.
o All you apologists prove to be fantastically _immune_ to simple facts.
--
Apologists hate the fact that facts they literally hate... are still facts.

Arlen Holder wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 20:50:04 -0500, nospam wrote:

your proof shows the very opposite of what you claim, and also shows
that you're utterly incapable of simple tasks.

Apologists hate the fact that facts they literally hate... are still facts.

Your childish retorts show you _hate_ the fact that I'm correct on facts!
1. The fact is, *you have less functionality with iTunes, than without*.
2. The fact is, *you have less security with iTunes, than without*.

Apologists can't dispute facts; so apologists play childish games instead.
o You apologists brazenly deny facts - without even _reading_ the cites!

You call all facts you don't like to be "lies", simply because you have no
adult response to facts.

You call all bearers of facts "Liars" or "trolls", simply because you have
no adult response to facts.

It's what makes you an apologist after all, nospam.
o All you apologists prove to be fantastically _immune_ to simple facts.

Modern macOS does not have iTunes.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

In article , Snit
wrote:


Modern macOS does not have iTunes.

only catalina, and only by name.

itunes still exists, it's just been split into multiple apps, including
music, tv and podcasts, with device syncing in the finder.

catalina finder window:
https://support.apple.com/library/co...are/images/en_
US/macos/macos-catalina-finder-iphone-sync-music-to-device.jpg

looks almost exactly the same as itunes did.

On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 09:38:37 -0800, Alan Baker wrote:

What functionality do you lose?

You Apple apologists are not like normal adults, Alan Baker.

*What part of the simplest example I gave _multiple_ times did you miss?*
o The example you deny exists is in this thread _multiple_ times alone!

*Did you even _read_ this thread before brazenly claiming facts don't exist?*
o Apologists prove to be amazingly _immune_ to facts they don't like.

--
Apologists always prove to be fantastically _immune_ to obvious facts.

In article , Arlen Holder
wrote:


What functionality do you lose?

You Apple apologists are not like normal adults, Alan Baker.

*What part of the simplest example I gave _multiple_ times did you miss?*
o The example you deny exists is in this thread _multiple_ times alone!

*Did you even _read_ this thread before brazenly claiming facts don't exist?*
o Apologists prove to be amazingly _immune_ to facts they don't like.

non-answer.

On Sat, 01 Feb 2020 18:25:37 -0500, nospam wrote:

non-answer.

Alan Baker,

*The answer was provided _multiple_ times in this thread alone.*
o All _adults_ found it; it's the apologists who brazenly deny it exist.

HINT: Search for the words "*simplest example*" since I gave Recliner,
multiple times, the simplest example that proved the point - and he -
clearly - didn't even _read_ it either - before brazenly denying the facts.

--
Apologists are fantastic at being utterly _immune_ to facts!

On 02/02/2020 00:17, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Sat, 01 Feb 2020 18:25:37 -0500, nospam wrote:

non-answer.
Alan Baker,

*The answer was provided _multiple_ times in this thread alone.*

No you haven't. You were asked a very simple question:

Why are you cross posting this in alt.os.linux?

All you did was to show your anger because you couldn't answer this
simple question and because of your embarrassment you started attacking me.

Just answer in one sentence what is the relevance of your post for Linux
users.

In article , Arlen Holder
wrote:

On Sat, 01 Feb 2020 18:25:37 -0500, nospam wrote:
non-answer.

Alan Baker,

fail #1.

*The answer was provided _multiple_ times in this thread alone.*

fail #2.

an answer was *never* provided. just a bunch of hollow and
unsupportable claims.

On Sat, 01 Feb 2020 20:00:22 -0500, nospam wrote:

an answer was *never* provided. just a bunch of hollow and
unsupportable claims.

Adults can do two things apologists never seem to be able to do:
a. Adults form a belief system which is _based_ on the facts
b. Adults don't brazenly deny facts they haven't even bothered to read

Why is it that you child-like apologists can't find the simplest facts?
o And that you apologists brazenly deny facts you didn't even read?

And yet, _every_ adult who looked instantly found them.
o It's only you childish apologists who are completely _immune_ to facts.

HINT: Search for the following, which all the _adults_ easily found!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.os.linux/PLzFxNis7jk/PiVqAhGoAgAJ
[Note it was explained _many_ times; but apologists are immune to facts!]

verbatim paste

1. Without iTunes installed on Windows, plug any number of iPods into the
USB ports, and then simply those iPods with any number of MP3 songs you
want, from anywhere you want, until you can't fit any more songs on the
iPods.

2. Then install iTunes, and try the same thing (watch what happens).

HINT: *You have _less_ functionality with iTunes, than without it.*

--
Apologists are like small children in that they are _immune_ to facts.

In article , Arlen Holder
wrote:

Adults can do many things I never seem to be able to do:

ftfy

Arlen Holder wrote:

Adults can do two things apologists never seem to be able to do:
a. Adults form a belief system which is _based_ on the facts

Adults don’t carry on with inappropriate cross posting after being asked to
stop.

On 2/1/2020 11:01 PM, None wrote:
Arlen Holder wrote:

Adults can do two things apologists never seem to be able to do:
a. Adults form a belief system which is _based_ on the facts

Adults don’t carry on with inappropriate cross posting after being asked to
stop.


Adults don't reply to trolls. They killfile them.



--
Ken

On Sat, 01 Feb 2020 23:31:59 -0500, nospam wrote:

Adults can do many things I never seem to be able to do:

ftfy

You apologists never cease to act like children when confronted with facts.
1. There is _less_ functionality with iTunes, than without.
2. There is _less_ security with iTunes, than without.

On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 09:38:37 -0800, Alan Baker wrote:

What functionality do you lose?

2. The fact is, *you have less security with iTunes, than without*.

In what way?

Don't type endlessly about cites not read...

Alan,

Do you realize how _any_ conversation with Apple apologists goes?
1. An adult states a simple fact
2. The apologist incessantly brazenly deny all facts they simply don't like
3. The adult provides references and/or examples backing up those facts
4. The apologists always fail to even _read_ those examples and/or cites
5. The adult _repeats_ the facts, cites, & references multiple times
6. The apologists continue to refute the facts sans reading the cites
... this goes on forever ...

Notice, in the end, two observations:
a. The adult provided the facts, examples, & cites from the beginning
b. The apologist never provides a single fact backing up their claims

What does this tell us:
A. The adult belief system is arguably based on reproducible facts
B. The apologists' belief system is based on exactly zero (0) facts

Happens all the time on Usenet, but more often on the Apple newsgroups.
o It doesn't happen anywhere nearly as often on the adult OS newsgroups

--
Apple apologists are fantastically _immune_ to simple things like facts.