![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Carl G" cgerving@ecenetDOTcom wrote in message
... We wnt to build a total new pc Don't say "total new pc". Think of it as an "ongoing upgrade" and you're in the clear for whatever it is you want to do. -- Bob Kanyak's Doghouse http://www.kanyak.com |
Ads |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kurttrail wrote:
BBUNNY wrote: Leythos wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:51:19 +0100, Alias wrote: "Leythos" wrote in message news ![]() "Leythos" wrote OEM installs are "licensed" to the first computer they are installed on, there is no moving the "License" to another computer according to the OEM license. same computer, only upgraded or repaired. That's why I said OPINION and not fact. So, how about lending us your opinion on what you have to change to make it a different computer? -- remove 999 in order to email me Buy a Dell, then a Hewlett Packard, then an Emachine with XP OEM installed on all three....Then you have 3 different Computers. Changing any one item or numerous items does not constitute a _new_ computer.....Period......I paid for a full OEM version of XP and I am entitled to use the version.....period.....The OEM version that I purchased is not the same _discounted crippled_ version that is preinstall on a Dell dude. Actually, a Dell CD can be easily modified so that it works just like a generic OEM CD. Probably so, but the point is that there are some monopoly issues here. How can Dell sell a PC for US$399 with a $100 operating system installed???? I would have a hard time building a PC buying used parts from garage sales and only counting the price of the parts used. This is a matter of Slick Willie saying let's F&^%$ Joe Sixpack and give our rich relative (OEM CORP) all the finacial breaks. This whole deal with the EULA has a far greater impact then meets the eye of the casual user. From what I read the Europeans and Asians are not falling for it. |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:20:10 +0200, Opinicus wrote: "Leythos" wrote Take a guess at it like I did. I don't want to get into the wrong/right part of this discussion, just the part about what makes a computer a computer. This is quite an epistemological question, especially for a microsoft.public newsgroup. "What makes a cheese a Parmesan?" or "What makes a brandy a Cognac?" Those are easy questions to answer. How about: "What makes a human being a human being?" Rather less easy. "What makes a computer a computer" is maybe not quite as tough as that but it's right up there. Not as hard as you might think - what's the one thing that ties all the "Parts" together? The motherboard. Change the motherboard and you can change anything with it, change the CPU and you may have to change motherboards, same with RAM. According to your logic, the case/enclosure is what holds it together. Even the on/off button. |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:13:44 -0500, BBUNNY wrote: Leythos wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:20:10 +0200, Opinicus wrote: "Leythos" wrote Take a guess at it like I did. I don't want to get into the wrong/right part of this discussion, just the part about what makes a computer a computer. This is quite an epistemological question, especially for a microsoft.public newsgroup. "What makes a cheese a Parmesan?" or "What makes a brandy a Cognac?" Those are easy questions to answer. How about: "What makes a human being a human being?" Rather less easy. "What makes a computer a computer" is maybe not quite as tough as that but it's right up there. Not as hard as you might think - what's the one thing that ties all the "Parts" together? The motherboard. Change the motherboard and you can change anything with it, change the CPU and you may have to change motherboards, same with RAM. According to your logic, the case/enclosure is what holds it together. Even the on/off button. Not so, you can (and I have) tested computers without the Case/Enclosure. Apply a little logic here if you will. That right! You are the thing that ties the computer together, The End User! What good is a computer without the human operator. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Imagine if a computer was everything that is in the tower.
"Opinicus" wrote in message ... "Leythos" wrote Take a guess at it like I did. I don't want to get into the wrong/right part of this discussion, just the part about what makes a computer a computer. This is quite an epistemological question, especially for a microsoft.public newsgroup. "What makes a cheese a Parmesan?" or "What makes a brandy a Cognac?" Those are easy questions to answer. How about: "What makes a human being a human being?" Rather less easy. "What makes a computer a computer" is maybe not quite as tough as that but it's right up there. -- Bob Kanyak's Doghouse http://www.kanyak.com |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This whole EULA reads just like a (do not remove this tag)
on a mattress. I am going to do what I do in the privacy of my home.....period..... LOL! But removing the tag, boy you live dangerously! I here the MIAA, will break your knee caps for that! ;_) I've always been hesitant about removing mattress tags. But as for Microsoft's EULA ... pffffft! |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It even has a little icon on the upper left hand side of the monitor that
says "My Computer". It doesn't say "Microsoft's computer that I am licensed to use" or "My Licence", now does it? Wait. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do have to retract some of what i stated about microsoft. I just read
something on znet news and Gates stated windows users will have free use of their antispyware. So my conspiracy theorizing about the spy and virus writing is only now half way. Actually the microsfot antispyware is pretty good. ![]() "Carl G" cgerving@ecenetDOTcom wrote in message ... Thanks for all the info guys -- Carl G "Carl G" cgerving@ecenetDOTcom wrote in message ... Hi guys If i buy a microsoft OEM version of XP Home ,can i transfer it from one pc to another like i would be able to do with a upgrade copy. I want to install xp on my daughters pc now but in the near future she wants to build a new pc. So can we transfer the oem copy to the new home built pc.She has home built pc now,wants a bigger one. Thanks -- Carl G |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Leythos wrote: While you may not like it, if you buy a Dell or HP or EMACHINE OEM XP installed, if you change the motherboard to a non-Dell (or other than the same vendors board) motherboard it makes the system a non-Dell system and as such the OEM software sold with the Dell system is not really valid any longer. Since many of the OEM installs and restore CD sets are tied to the BIOS, even something as simple as flashing with a non-branded BIOS can invalidate the OEM license - what you have to do is determine if the system still meets the vendors Warranty requirement (not necessarily being under warranty, but if it was new with the hardware you have in it currently, would it be covered under warranty). As an example, if you bought a NEW Dell today, and in 30 days changed out the motherboard for an ASUS XYZ board, you would no longer quality for support/warranty under the OEM's contract, so that would technically invalidate your OEM installation of the software. Now, if you got a Full Licensed copy of XP, then it doesn't matter at all. The OEM version IS the same as the BIOS locked version - the difference is that the BIOS locked version has a boot loader on the CD that won't let you extract XP unless it finds the vendors BIOS on the machine in question - it's still the same XP. -- This is a really good discussion and one for the legalese books. Bravo! I find myself in the predicament Lythos has hinted to in this discussion. I have an Emachines with an OEM Windows XP Restore CD. I recently have been in the process of upgrading the hard drive, drivers, RAM, etc., all of which have given me no significant problems. However, when I was in the process of upgrading my Motherboard's BIOS Windows XP screamed at me first chance it had to reactivate. This only hints at future trouble when I try to reinstall Windows XP with the manufacturers OEM CD if what Leythos has stated here is true. All due to a BIOS update that was necessary as it provided fixes for my currently installed processor as well as some other known issues. It is virtually the same piece of hardware, only updated. Doesn't seem fair to me. To summarize I find myself disliking the EULA , Microsoft's OEM, and OEM PC manufacturers more and more. The way I see it, you still paid good money for the system and there should be no way in the world that they should be allowed to give a consumer a crippled OS package. My theory is if you stop buying it, maybe they'll change their tunes. Or perhaps switch to an alternate OS entirely. My 2 cents. Tony |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Normally updating the BIOS is not a problem as long as you use a BIOS from
the OEM. As long as you stay with the same motherboard and correct BIOS source, there will be no problem unless you consider a 5 minute call to activate a problem. And the call may not be necessary. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ wrote in message oups.com... Leythos wrote: While you may not like it, if you buy a Dell or HP or EMACHINE OEM XP installed, if you change the motherboard to a non-Dell (or other than the same vendors board) motherboard it makes the system a non-Dell system and as such the OEM software sold with the Dell system is not really valid any longer. Since many of the OEM installs and restore CD sets are tied to the BIOS, even something as simple as flashing with a non-branded BIOS can invalidate the OEM license - what you have to do is determine if the system still meets the vendors Warranty requirement (not necessarily being under warranty, but if it was new with the hardware you have in it currently, would it be covered under warranty). As an example, if you bought a NEW Dell today, and in 30 days changed out the motherboard for an ASUS XYZ board, you would no longer quality for support/warranty under the OEM's contract, so that would technically invalidate your OEM installation of the software. Now, if you got a Full Licensed copy of XP, then it doesn't matter at all. The OEM version IS the same as the BIOS locked version - the difference is that the BIOS locked version has a boot loader on the CD that won't let you extract XP unless it finds the vendors BIOS on the machine in question - it's still the same XP. -- This is a really good discussion and one for the legalese books. Bravo! I find myself in the predicament Lythos has hinted to in this discussion. I have an Emachines with an OEM Windows XP Restore CD. I recently have been in the process of upgrading the hard drive, drivers, RAM, etc., all of which have given me no significant problems. However, when I was in the process of upgrading my Motherboard's BIOS Windows XP screamed at me first chance it had to reactivate. This only hints at future trouble when I try to reinstall Windows XP with the manufacturers OEM CD if what Leythos has stated here is true. All due to a BIOS update that was necessary as it provided fixes for my currently installed processor as well as some other known issues. It is virtually the same piece of hardware, only updated. Doesn't seem fair to me. To summarize I find myself disliking the EULA , Microsoft's OEM, and OEM PC manufacturers more and more. The way I see it, you still paid good money for the system and there should be no way in the world that they should be allowed to give a consumer a crippled OS package. My theory is if you stop buying it, maybe they'll change their tunes. Or perhaps switch to an alternate OS entirely. My 2 cents. Tony |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote: Normally updating the BIOS is not a problem as long as you use a BIOS from the OEM. As long as you stay with the same motherboard and correct BIOS source, there will be no problem unless you consider a 5 minute call to activate a problem. And the call may not be necessary. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ Herein is where the problem lies, Emachines does not issue updates for BIOS on my system. I was referred to the motherboard maufacturer for this purpose. So it is not a bona fide Emachine BIOS, it is the motherboard manufaturer's BIOS. Now, if what Leythos stated is true then I will not be able to reinstall Windows XP using the OEM CD as the BIOS lock string has changed. There would be no reinstallation, or activation. That is unless I reinstalled the Emachine's original OEM BIOS. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Contact Emachines tech support to see where you get a BIOS update.
If they refer to the actual motherboard manufacturer, that BIOS should work OK. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ wrote in message oups.com... Herein is where the problem lies, Emachines does not issue updates for BIOS on my system. I was referred to the motherboard maufacturer for this purpose. So it is not a bona fide Emachine BIOS, it is the motherboard manufaturer's BIOS. Now, if what Leythos stated is true then I will not be able to reinstall Windows XP using the OEM CD as the BIOS lock string has changed. There would be no reinstallation, or activation. That is unless I reinstalled the Emachine's original OEM BIOS. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:51:37 GMT, Leythos wrote:
Not as hard as you might think - what's the one thing that ties all the "Parts" together? The motherboard. Change the motherboard and you can change anything with it, change the CPU and you may have to change motherboards, same with RAM. But for any given CPU and other components, there are often many motherboards available that will (give or take a bit) not change the performance or features of the computer at all. For example an Asus A8V + AMD64 3000+ vs an Abit AV8 + AMD64 3000+. Even with the same motherboard type, there will usually be slight revision differences between the first off the line, and the last ever made. For the "casual" user, I suspect the defining aspect of a "computer" is often the case (or perhaps the keyboard/mouse/screen). |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Leythos" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:28:50 +0000, jmw wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:51:37 GMT, Leythos wrote: Not as hard as you might think - what's the one thing that ties all the "Parts" together? The motherboard. Change the motherboard and you can change anything with it, change the CPU and you may have to change motherboards, same with RAM. Actually, you could say the same about the power supply. Without it, not one motherboard in the universe will work and you will never hear the Windows wave file. But for any given CPU and other components, there are often many motherboards available that will (give or take a bit) not change the performance or features of the computer at all. For example an Asus A8V + AMD64 3000+ vs an Abit AV8 + AMD64 3000+. Even with the same motherboard type, there will usually be slight revision differences between the first off the line, and the last ever made. Yes, but an A8V is not the same as an AV8, so it's a different computer. No, it isn't. It's a different motherboard. I've installed thousands of motherboards in machines over the years, the motherboard was the single deciding factor in what made the computer what it really is a unit. Sure, you can update the BIOS, install faster CPU's (in some) and more RAM, but those actions don't change the capabilities of the motherboard in general. Also, moving from a PC-DL Deluxe to a SE7501 or the other way around is a BIG change even though both are Dual CPU boards. For the "casual" user, I suspect the defining aspect of a "computer" is often the case (or perhaps the keyboard/mouse/screen). But, that's only because the "casual" user is usually completely ignorant. Ignorant of YOUR definition? So what? There *is* no definition of what a computer is nowadays. Now, if you want to be logical, the EULA means that you cannnot install the same copy of Windows on two machines. Period. I have changed motherboards and had no problem activating so how do you explain that? It only took one phone call to the MS people who obviously disagree with you. They count. You don't. -- Alias Use the Reply to Sender feature of your news reader program to email me. Utiliza Responder al Remitente para mandarme un mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Not "burning" to Cd after SP2 upgrade | \old\ devildog | Windows XP Help and Support | 0 | November 30th 04 05:18 PM |
Not able to "burn" to Cd after SP2 upgrade | \old\ devildog | General XP issues or comments | 0 | November 30th 04 05:14 PM |
SP2 Upgrade No Go | Peter | Windows Service Pack 2 | 10 | August 25th 04 01:42 AM |
XP Upgrade problem | Neal | General XP issues or comments | 21 | July 27th 04 08:07 AM |
XP Upgrade problem | Neal | General XP issues or comments | 0 | July 19th 04 11:39 PM |