![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail
edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I am supposed to buy a new motherboard and another copy of win xp, thereby keeping up Bill (love him to bits) Gates to the life style he has become accustomed, just so that I can carry on using a single system that ain't moved anywhere and is only used by the single self same person, whose fault cannot be blamed if the motherboard decides it wants to go to motherboard heaven? Thanks, David |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No you are incorrect
"David Sewell" wrote in message ... I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I am supposed to buy a new motherboard and another copy of win xp, thereby keeping up Bill (love him to bits) Gates to the life style he has become accustomed, just so that I can carry on using a single system that ain't moved anywhere and is only used by the single self same person, whose fault cannot be blamed if the motherboard decides it wants to go to motherboard heaven? Thanks, David |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Sewell wrote:
I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I am supposed to buy a new motherboard and another copy of win xp, Only if you are a sucker. thereby keeping up Bill (love him to bits) Gates to the life style he has become accustomed, just so that I can carry on using a single system that ain't moved anywhere and is only used by the single self same person, whose fault cannot be blamed if the motherboard decides it wants to go to motherboard heaven? MS can disappear off the face of the earth today, and there is nothing that could put a dent in the life style that Billy G. has become accustomed. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You paid less for an OEM version and as a consequence you do not
receive the benefits of a Retail Version. OEM versions of Windows XP are non-transferrable and if your motherboard dies, so does your OEM license. Microsoft does not sell OEM versions to end-users, only Retail Versions. -- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows XP - Shell/User Microsoft Newsgroups Get Windows XP Service Pack 2 with Advanced Security Technologies: http://www.microsoft.com/athome/secu...xp/choose.mspx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "David Sewell" wrote: | I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail | edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build | my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now | dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I | am supposed to buy a new motherboard and another copy of win xp, thereby | keeping up Bill (love him to bits) Gates to the life style he has become | accustomed, just so that I can carry on using a single system that ain't | moved anywhere and is only used by the single self same person, whose fault | cannot be blamed if the motherboard decides it wants to go to motherboard | heaven? | | Thanks, | David |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please, but you might tell me where I'm incorrect thanks, sir...
Genuine thanks from the UK! David "Keith AH" wrote in message ... No you are incorrect "David Sewell" wrote in message ... I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I am supposed to buy a new motherboard and another copy of win xp, thereby keeping up Bill (love him to bits) Gates to the life style he has become accustomed, just so that I can carry on using a single system that ain't moved anywhere and is only used by the single self same person, whose fault cannot be blamed if the motherboard decides it wants to go to motherboard heaven? Thanks, David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You sound like a Linux troll!
Not much wrong with that! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not sure what MS expects you to do (we debate this constantly here),
but some of our MVP's do believe you should bury your XP with the dead MoBo. However, you are in no way compelled to do this. Recently, my motherboard died, and I decided to Clean Install my OEM XP because of the new hardware and other issues. Activation was no problem whatsoever. Activation of an OEM installation after the death of a MoBo has never been a problem. At worst, a 5 minute phone call would be required. Keep in mind that the information linking your software license with your hardware is only kept on the MS servers for 120 days. After that, it's a clean slate. Let your common sense be your guide. "kurttrail" wrote in message ... David Sewell wrote: I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I am supposed to buy a new motherboard and another copy of win xp, Only if you are a sucker. thereby keeping up Bill (love him to bits) Gates to the life style he has become accustomed, just so that I can carry on using a single system that ain't moved anywhere and is only used by the single self same person, whose fault cannot be blamed if the motherboard decides it wants to go to motherboard heaven? MS can disappear off the face of the earth today, and there is nothing that could put a dent in the life style that Billy G. has become accustomed. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ROBOT
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You got it.
Low-end Robot. "David Sewell" wrote in message ... ROBOT |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Sewell wrote:
You sound like a Linux troll! Not much wrong with that! Except the LinTrolls don't like me! LOL! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is copied direct from the OEM license
Generally, you may upgrade or replace all of the hardware components on your customer's computer and the end user may maintain the license for the original Microsoft® OEM operating system software, with the exception of an upgrade or replacement of the motherboard. An upgrade of the motherboard is considered to result in a "new personal computer" to which Microsoft® OEM operating system software cannot be transferred from another computer. If the motherboard is upgraded or replaced, for reasons other than a defect, then a new computer has been created and the license of new operating system software is required. If the motherboard is replaced because it is defective, you do NOT need to acquire a new operating system license for the PC. The reason for this licensing rule primarily relates to the end-user license agreement (EULA) and the support of the software covered by that EULA. The EULA is a set of usage rights granted to the end-user by the PC manufacturer and relates only to rights for that software as installed on that particular PC. The System Builder is required to support the software on that individual PC. Understanding that end users, over time, upgrade their PC with different components, Microsoft needed to have one base component "left standing" that would still define that original PC. Since the motherboard contains the CPU and is the "heart and soul" of the PC, when the motherboard is replaced (for reasons other than defect) a new PC is essentially created. The original System Builder, therefore, can not be expected to support this new PC that they in effect, did not manufacture. "David Sewell" wrote in message ... Please, but you might tell me where I'm incorrect thanks, sir... Genuine thanks from the UK! David "Keith AH" wrote in message ... No you are incorrect "David Sewell" wrote in message ... I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I am supposed to buy a new motherboard and another copy of win xp, thereby keeping up Bill (love him to bits) Gates to the life style he has become accustomed, just so that I can carry on using a single system that ain't moved anywhere and is only used by the single self same person, whose fault cannot be blamed if the motherboard decides it wants to go to motherboard heaven? Thanks, David |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read it all. Hence my subject heading "Win xp oem activation hits me
clear as mud!" Sorry, have you heard of the plain english society? Maybe there should (if it does not already exist) be an American version.... Sorry guys........ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Sewell wrote:
I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I am supposed to buy a new motherboard If the original is out of warranty, certainly. Unless you know someone that's giving away motherboards? and another copy of win xp, No, of course not. Where'd you ever get such a silly idea? -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once. - RAH |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith AH wrote:
This is copied direct from the OEM license Generally, you may upgrade or replace all of the hardware components on your customer's computer and the end user may maintain the license for the original Microsoft® OEM operating system software, with the exception of an upgrade or replacement of the motherboard. An upgrade of the motherboard is considered to result in a "new personal computer" to which Microsoft® OEM operating system software cannot be transferred from another computer. If the motherboard is upgraded or replaced, for reasons other than a defect, then a new computer has been created and the license of new operating system software is required. If the motherboard is replaced because it is defective, you do NOT need to acquire a new operating system license for the PC. The reason for this licensing rule primarily relates to the end-user license agreement (EULA) and the support of the software covered by that EULA. The EULA is a set of usage rights granted to the end-user by the PC manufacturer and relates only to rights for that software as installed on that particular PC. The System Builder is required to support the software on that individual PC. Understanding that end users, over time, upgrade their PC with different components, Microsoft needed to have one base component "left standing" that would still define that original PC. Since the motherboard contains the CPU and is the "heart and soul" of the PC, when the motherboard is replaced (for reasons other than defect) a new PC is essentially created. The original System Builder, therefore, can not be expected to support this new PC that they in effect, did not manufacture. Where did you get that, as it sounds like the System Builder License, NOT the END USERS LICENSE AGREEMENT! What is the difference? The End User, like the OP, NEVER agreed to be held to the terms of the SYSTEM BUILDERS LICENSE! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a theory that the microsoft help staff are as punch drunk as the rest
of us. " |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shutoff or clear "as you type" feature | tobyroaner | The Basics | 1 | February 3rd 05 02:25 AM |
How to clear IE Address bar's window? | Labunski | Windows XP Help and Support | 1 | January 17th 05 12:51 AM |
XP Home Activation | Mad@MS | General XP issues or comments | 10 | November 29th 04 01:15 PM |
XP will not let me remove these devices in Network Adapters Section | Butch Hoornstra | Networking and the Internet with Windows XP | 5 | September 28th 04 02:04 AM |
Activation Connection | Amanda | Windows XP Help and Support | 0 | August 2nd 04 02:33 PM |