A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Windows 10 » Windows 10 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

tl;dr:



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old May 26th 18, 01:01 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Shadow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,638
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:47:56 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll take the
pressure off you.


What pressure ?
It's a fact page, people love to visit it. I know I do.

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Ads
  #32  
Old May 26th 18, 04:19 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 937
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

"David B."
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:

On 24-May-18 5:31 PM, Diesel wrote:
"David B." wrote:

The site is NOT safe according to this warning.

You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware
of the fact that the tool you used is well known for generating
false positives and other errors. You've also been told that
it's a false positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various
urls have been provided which back the statements up.

Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this?

"Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden"


Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other
sites and forums where you have been BANNED.

I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do
the same for *me*.


Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll take
the pressure off you.


What pressure? Are you so drunk as to think you're actually
convincing anyone not to visit the site and learn more about you? If
so, you're a damn fool!

The amount of people who respond to you in a negative manner is
growing. It's going to continue to grow because you won't stop doing
what you do. You're oblivious to the fact that the majority of people
do NOT condone or appreciate in any possible way what you typically
do. And the following is but one example of it:

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700

Btw, you also lied in the post you wrote; You blamed your deletion of
the audio track from the original file you didn't preserve on me as
well as claimed I have a lisp or other speech issue? I don't. So you
actually lied twice, copyright infringed my video (you've done that
so many times now, I've actually lost count) via a usenet post where
you admitted it was to make it difficult if not impossible to remove
and yet, still think you aren't deserving of the page hosted at
tekrider. I really don't understand your reasoning.


--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
================================================== =
purrpetmeorIscratchyoureyesoutpurr - common feline term
  #33  
Old May 26th 18, 04:19 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 937
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

"David B."
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

[snip]

You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of
the fact that the tool you used is well known for generating
false positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's
a false positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have
been provided which back the statements up.


Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this?


How is the tekrider site misleading people, David?

When posts like this exist:

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700

It's rather difficult to deny that the contents of this:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Are true.

Not only did you copyright infringe my work (again), you *lied* about
the reason the audio track is missing (well twice actually, but,
let's not dwell on specifics rofl). All in the same post, no less.

And, that's not your original post doing it. That's your second one
(that I'm aware of, anyway) the first was where you also admitted to
posting it to usenet to make it very difficult if not impossible for
me to remove. You're an admitted copyright infringing stalker (who's
had others content removed by administrators when you knowingly
infringed their work) so it's only natural you'd continue to do it
via other means. Especially since your impotent otherwise concerning
options to deal with me.

So really, how and in what possible way is anything provided via:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Not true about you? Please, be specific!



--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
================================================== =
For centuries, the English have had a love affair with all types of
hunting. Early one morning, a fellow was blasting away at a clump of
brush on a grouse hunt.
Suddenly an outraged gentleman appeared and said "See here old man,
you almost shot my wife with that volley."
The hunter, properly shamed replied, "So sorry old chap. Here, have
a go at mine, over there."
  #34  
Old May 26th 18, 04:19 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 937
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

David B. STALKER wrote:

On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:
[....]
Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this?

"Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden"

Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other
sites and forums where you have been BANNED.

I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do
the same for *me*.


Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll
take the pressure off you.


LOL! The only reason you even HAVE this 'Special Page' is because
you have *earned it.* Everything on the page is true. You have
(often) been told the page will go away if and when you *STOP
STALKING*.


I wouldn't expect that to happen anytime soon...

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700

One of several usenet sharing posts of his. The only issue is, he's
sharing something he *knows he doesn't have permission* to be
sharing. And! in that particular post, tried to blame me for his own
Mac editing ****ups! The original video wasn't done with anything
Apple, AND, had a working audio track; where incidently nobody else
claimed I had a lisp..(too funny) Only David has made such a claim.
And we all know how reliable those are.

It's a damn shame that he feels the need to do that, as it prevents
me from sharing some pretty cool (imho) videos of my doing various
things or semi showing off the work I've done on various projects.

I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip
file which does contain the original video file.

I really cannot tell you how proud I was to read his post with shared
contents of a discussion between him and the lead malware researcher
of Malwarebytes. His post only helps to prove that what I've written
about Malwarebytes for several years now IS infact, true. They aren't
a replacement for AV, and, there crypto skills leave much to be
desired too; I've never seen someone forgo all known crypto analysis
methods and instead, opt for simply trying to unzip an encrypted file
with known, standard, archiving tools; and when it obviously fails to
accomplish this task, declare the file to be garbage of some kind and
not being what I told him it was.

I know for a fact that because David had no idea of what she was
writing about, he didn't take into consideration what sort of
exposure it was going to provide for the support of my argument. Had
he known, He would have kept the details he was so proud to share, a
secret. [g] He mistook what she wrote for slime on me. And shared it!
h0h0h0. And, icing on the cake for me, the individual he leaked a
conversation with happens to be the 'lead malware researcher' for
Malwarebytes Corporation. The company which markets a product that
boldly claims it is a replacement for your current antivirus product.
Outright, replacement. Uh huh. Proudly displaying the West Coast AV
labs certification, but, umm, the problem is; they don't do anything
with an actual virus so I can't fathom how they got AV certification?

Yes, the product doesn't know a ****ing thing about an actual virus.
It cannot do much to protect you from one. Your Antivirus knows about
them and can offer you some protection against them, as well as the
possible disinfection if you do catch a cold. Malwarebytes current
cold rememdy is the death of the bug. In this case, since this is an
actual viral beastie, that will result in the death of your computers
operating system files which are carrying it along with any other
executable program discovered to be carrying it; ASSUMING the virus
in question has a static block of code which Malwarebytes can secure
lock onto. If it's a poly/oglymorphic, sadly, the user who replaced
his/her current av with Malwarebytes as Malwarebytes suggests and
provides reasons to backup their suggestion as far as they are
concerned, is now fuxored quite nicely. They will be resorting to
backups (oh, they didn't make any? Oopsie!) or a fresh reinstall of
everything. Malwarebytes on a good day in hell might hit it once out
of every twenty or more thousand (or more) infections.

Or, the user, can admit they would actually rather use an antivirus
product, and pull one from the net, transport it's happy arse to
their infected machine and have a decent chance of saving it by just
killing the nasty cold. Obviously, their decision to make.


--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
================================================== =
Artificial Intelligence? I'll be impressed when they invent
artificial cunning.
  #35  
Old May 27th 18, 02:53 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
David B.[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip
file which does contain the original video file.


THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a
lisp, Dustin. ;-)

--
D.
  #36  
Old May 27th 18, 06:40 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
David B.[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On 27-May-18 6:20 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 12:33 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. wrote:

This is another reminder of what was found:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2...20Toolbox%20-%
20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0

It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once
again,
you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely
NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on the
*SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever*
going to
learn even the tiniest technological fact?


That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/56l2bn3wwq...re%21.JPG?dl=0


Who removed it - and why?

It is run by a web hosting company, most if not all of them also handle
email (smtp) services as well.Â* That cans be on a separate server from
the http, traffic.Â* The company made a decision to separate the
services, it can work essentially the same externally. BTS probably does
not care, there is absolutely no reason why you should.


You are probably right but tell me, FrozenNorth ....

In fact SHOW me - PLEASE! - the result YOU currently get if you use the
Sucuri facility to scan Tekrider.net

Here's the relevant site:- https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/

TIA

  #37  
Old May 27th 18, 07:15 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 937
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

"David B."
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the
.zip file which does contain the original video file.


THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T
have a lisp, Dustin. ;-)


Actually, that's not how it works. You made the claim, it's on YOU to
prove it.




--
Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim!
Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT)
to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who
has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer,
local law enforcement, etc.
https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report?
David Brooks (BoaterDave)
Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane
Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom
Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M)
Email(s): ,
  #38  
Old May 27th 18, 07:16 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Shadow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,638
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:53:43 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip
file which does contain the original video file.


THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a
lisp, Dustin.


I'm more interested in the video that proves you don't talk
through your arse all the time.
Do you have a link ?

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
  #39  
Old May 27th 18, 07:20 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Frozen North
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On 2018-05-27 1:40 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 6:20 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 12:33 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. wrote:

This is another reminder of what was found:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2...20Toolbox%20-%
20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0

It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once
again,
you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely
NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on the
*SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever*
going to
learn even the tiniest technological fact?

That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/56l2bn3wwq...re%21.JPG?dl=0


Who removed it - and why?

It is run by a web hosting company, most if not all of them also
handle email (smtp) services as well.Â* That cans be on a separate
server from the http, traffic.Â* The company made a decision to
separate the services, it can work essentially the same externally.
BTS probably does not care, there is absolutely no reason why you should.


You are probably right but tell me, FrozenNorth ....

In fact SHOW me - PLEASE! - the result YOU currently get if you use the
Sucuri facility to scan Tekrider.net

Here's the relevant site:- https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/

TIA

I could tell you or show you, but why, I am not going to scan a site I
do not have any interest in, I also do not have the required permission.

Further, I have no have idea how many times you have scanned that site,
if it is more than once, it is stalking.

My results may be different than yours, so again why?

Lastly, it is you, on another wild goose chase.
  #40  
Old May 27th 18, 09:44 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
David B.[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On 27-May-18 7:20 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 1:40 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 6:20 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 12:33 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. wrote:

This is another reminder of what was found:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2...20Toolbox%20-%
20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0

It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once
again,
you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely
NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on the
*SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever*
going to
learn even the tiniest technological fact?

That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/56l2bn3wwq...re%21.JPG?dl=0


Who removed it - and why?

It is run by a web hosting company, most if not all of them also
handle email (smtp) services as well.Â* That cans be on a separate
server from the http, traffic.Â* The company made a decision to
separate the services, it can work essentially the same externally.
BTS probably does not care, there is absolutely no reason why you
should.


You are probably right but tell me, FrozenNorth ....

In fact SHOW me - PLEASE! - the result YOU currently get if you use
the Sucuri facility to scan Tekrider.net

Here's the relevant site:- https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/

TIA

I could tell you or show you, but why, I am not going to scan a site I
do not have any interest in, I also do not have the required permission.


Sucuri does not NEED permission.

Further, I have no have idea how many times you have scanned that site,
if it is more than once, it is stalking.


You misunderstand - deliberately I fear.

It is Sucuri who has scanned Tekrider, not me.

My results may be different than yours, so again why?

Lastly, it is you, on another wild goose chase.


I hoped you would like a truthful outcome.

--
D.
  #41  
Old May 27th 18, 09:50 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
David B.[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On 27-May-18 7:16 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:53:43 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip
file which does contain the original video file.


THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a
lisp, Dustin.


I'm more interested in the video that proves you don't talk
through your arse all the time.
Do you have a link ?


Yes, thanks.

As you don't click on my links though, I'll keep it to myself.

This fellow sounds like a really nice chap. Read about him instead.

http://tekrider.net/pages/about.php

--
D.

  #42  
Old May 27th 18, 10:02 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Frozen North
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On 2018-05-27 4:44 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 7:20 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 1:40 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 6:20 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 12:33 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. wrote:

This is another reminder of what was found:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2...20Toolbox%20-%
20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0

It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means. Once
again,
you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely
NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol on
the
*SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever*
going to
learn even the tiniest technological fact?

That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/56l2bn3wwq...re%21.JPG?dl=0


Who removed it - and why?

It is run by a web hosting company, most if not all of them also
handle email (smtp) services as well.Â* That cans be on a separate
server from the http, traffic.Â* The company made a decision to
separate the services, it can work essentially the same externally.
BTS probably does not care, there is absolutely no reason why you
should.

You are probably right but tell me, FrozenNorth ....

In fact SHOW me - PLEASE! - the result YOU currently get if you use
the Sucuri facility to scan Tekrider.net

Here's the relevant site:- https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/

TIA

I could tell you or show you, but why, I am not going to scan a site I
do not have any interest in, I also do not have the required permission.


Sucuri does not NEED permission.


You go on believing that.

Further, I have no have idea how many times you have scanned that
site, if it is more than once, it is stalking.


You misunderstand - deliberately I fear.

You are mistaken. Yet again.

It is Sucuri who has scanned Tekrider, not me.

Right, blaming the tool for what you are doing with it.

My results may be different than yours, so again why?

Lastly, it is you, on another wild goose chase.


I hoped you would like a truthful outcome.

Obtained truthfully and honestly. Try again.
  #43  
Old May 27th 18, 10:04 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
David B.[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On 27-May-18 10:02 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 4:44 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 7:20 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 1:40 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 6:20 PM, Frozen North wrote:
On 2018-05-27 12:33 PM, David B. wrote:
On 27-May-18 3:57 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. wrote:

This is another reminder of what was found:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2...20Toolbox%20-%
20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0

It is a sad thing that you do not understand what that means.
Once again,
you refuse to recognize that an "smtp" configuration has absolutely
NOTHING to do with any sort of "malware." It is a mail protocol
on the
*SHARED WEB HOSTING SERVER* (which I do not use). Are you *ever*
going to
learn even the tiniest technological fact?

That does NOT explain why it is no longer there, now does it?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/56l2bn3wwq...re%21.JPG?dl=0


Who removed it - and why?

It is run by a web hosting company, most if not all of them also
handle email (smtp) services as well.Â* That cans be on a separate
server from the http, traffic.Â* The company made a decision to
separate the services, it can work essentially the same externally.
BTS probably does not care, there is absolutely no reason why you
should.

You are probably right but tell me, FrozenNorth ....

In fact SHOW me - PLEASE! - the result YOU currently get if you use
the Sucuri facility to scan Tekrider.net

Here's the relevant site:- https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/

TIA

I could tell you or show you, but why, I am not going to scan a site
I do not have any interest in, I also do not have the required
permission.


Sucuri does not NEED permission.


You go on believing that.

Further, I have no have idea how many times you have scanned that
site, if it is more than once, it is stalking.


You misunderstand - deliberately I fear.

You are mistaken.Â* Yet again.

It is Sucuri who has scanned Tekrider, not me.

Right, blaming the tool for what you are doing with it.

My results may be different than yours, so again why?

Lastly, it is you, on another wild goose chase.


I hoped you would like a truthful outcome.

Obtained truthfully and honestly.Â* Try again.


Nope.

I'm going to bed.

--
D.
  #44  
Old May 27th 18, 10:24 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Shadow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,638
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On Sun, 27 May 2018 21:50:22 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 27-May-18 7:16 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:53:43 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 26-May-18 4:19 AM, Diesel wrote:
I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip
file which does contain the original video file.

THAT video is the only version which could prove that you DON'T have a
lisp, Dustin.


I'm more interested in the video that proves you don't talk
through your arse all the time.
Do you have a link ?


Yes, thanks.

As you don't click on my links though, I'll keep it to myself.

This fellow sounds like a really nice chap. Read about him instead.

http://tekrider.net/pages/about.php


I know, I frequently visit this webpage:

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Just to check if there are any new nyms.
Nice the way the photo tilts as if it's drunk.
A public service, IMHO.

The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
  #45  
Old May 27th 18, 10:26 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Shadow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,638
Default Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)

On Sun, 27 May 2018 22:04:31 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

I'm going to bed.


Good luck. I hope you make it this time.

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.