A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Windows XP Help and Support
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Only Morons.....



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old October 5th 04, 09:54 PM
Enkidu
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Only Morons.....


If you mean "install SP2 it will fix your PC" that's going too far. A
screwy PC before SP2 is likely to result in a screwy PC after SP2.

If the machine is fine, then SP2 will likely go on with no problems.

Cheers,

Cliff

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:41:04 -0700, "Bekir Ugur"
wrote:

I suggest the opposite

Check out gdi+ vuln at www.microsoft.com/security

"Jim L" wrote:

would install SP2.
DON'T DO IT.....NO MATTER WHAT....IT WILL SCREW UP YOUR PC.

--
Jim,




Ads
  #32  
Old October 6th 04, 03:00 PM
Edward W. Thompson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Only Morons.....


These so called 'statistics' are meaningless. What is the sample size
compared to the total installed? Clearly the sample size represents a
very small percentage of the installed base and that sample is itself
'skewed'.


On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 20:23:48 +0100, Charlie
wrote:

Interrogative wrote:

That is totally irrelevant to the subject. Almost everyone hasn't had a
problem.

You do your argument no good by spouting falsehoods, the actual figure
is somewhere around around 50% with 23% trashed systems, see:
http://isc.sans.org/xpsp2.php


Charlie.


  #33  
Old October 6th 04, 03:04 PM
Tom Pepper Willett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Only Morons.....

....and, it's only people who knew to post to that web site.

Tom
"Edward W. Thompson" wrote in message
...
|
| These so called 'statistics' are meaningless. What is the sample size
| compared to the total installed? Clearly the sample size represents a
| very small percentage of the installed base and that sample is itself
| 'skewed'.
|
|
| On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 20:23:48 +0100, Charlie
| wrote:
|
| Interrogative wrote:
|
| That is totally irrelevant to the subject. Almost everyone hasn't had a
| problem.
|
| You do your argument no good by spouting falsehoods, the actual figure
| is somewhere around around 50% with 23% trashed systems, see:
| http://isc.sans.org/xpsp2.php
|
|
| Charlie.
|


  #34  
Old October 6th 04, 10:40 PM
Interrogative
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Only Morons.....


"Charlie" wrote in message
...
Interrogative wrote:

That is totally irrelevant to the subject. Almost everyone hasn't had a
problem.

You do your argument no good by spouting falsehoods, the actual figure is
somewhere around around 50% with 23% trashed systems, see:
http://isc.sans.org/xpsp2.php


What a LOAD of ****! If there had been 50% troubles it would have been
worldwide news!

You do YOUR argument no good spouting CRAP!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.