If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Slow dial-up speed
My dial-up connection is only 19 KBs, best at 22. This used to work at
about 45. I use it for when my DSL isn't working. From my Sitestar ISP for my email connection: Connection speeds are base on your current line conditions or quality. You can try changing your phone cord, avoid having long phone extension cords as this can create line noise, moisture in the lines can also create problems. Failing all of those, you can always call your telephone service provider and have then check your line quality for any issues. I hope that helps. My response: The line I'm using also has a DSL signal, which I normally use for my internet connection. (The Sitestar connection is for backup.) The modem instructions say the Phone jack on the back of the modem does not require the user to attach a DSL filer because the output is already filtered from this jack. I have a splitter in this connection to feed my phone and the line to the modem we are discussing. The phone line sounds extremely quiet if I listen on the connected phone. The line to the modem we are discussing is only about 6 ' long. I removed a DSL filter from another phone and put it on this line but it didn't help. The 19 speed doesn't work. Many web sites won't load through Firefox at that speed. I could call for CenturyLink service complaining of a noisy line but I suspect it wouldn't help. They'd listen to it and say it's fine. All this worked fine months ago when I last used the dial-up connection, except the modem was directly connected to the phone line - the DSL modem was disconnected because it wasn't working, no DSL signal, the reason why I was using dial-up. Sitestar response: The only other thing you can do is make sure you have the latest modem driver or firmware for it. The modem and quality of the phone line is the only thing that dictates the speed. ........... My latst theory is that there is DSL on my phone line. The filters in my DSL modem should keep this out of the Phone output of the DSL modem. As noted above, I also tried adding another DSL filter in series supplied for phones from CenturyLink. I suspect even the two filters aren't enough or the modem is so sensitive to something from the DSL signsl that the filters don't remove because it is too high or low a frequency to hear during a phone call. Perhaps when I used it at 45 KBs in the past it was because the DSL wasn't working and so was absent from the phone line. So if I use the dial-up because the DSL isn't working it will run at 45 KBs? Trouble is, there's no way to check this. Suggestions? This is all happening using XP Home if it matters. TIA -- I love a good meal! That's why I don't cook. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Slow dial-up speed
KenK wrote:
My dial-up connection is only 19 KBs, best at 22. This used to work at about 45. I use it for when my DSL isn't working. From my Sitestar ISP for my email connection: Connection speeds are base on your current line conditions or quality. You can try changing your phone cord, avoid having long phone extension cords as this can create line noise, moisture in the lines can also create problems. Failing all of those, you can always call your telephone service provider and have then check your line quality for any issues. I hope that helps. My response: The line I'm using also has a DSL signal, which I normally use for my internet connection. (The Sitestar connection is for backup.) The modem instructions say the Phone jack on the back of the modem does not require the user to attach a DSL filer because the output is already filtered from this jack. I have a splitter in this connection to feed my phone and the line to the modem we are discussing. The phone line sounds extremely quiet if I listen on the connected phone. The line to the modem we are discussing is only about 6 ' long. I removed a DSL filter from another phone and put it on this line but it didn't help. The 19 speed doesn't work. Many web sites won't load through Firefox at that speed. I could call for CenturyLink service complaining of a noisy line but I suspect it wouldn't help. They'd listen to it and say it's fine. All this worked fine months ago when I last used the dial-up connection, except the modem was directly connected to the phone line - the DSL modem was disconnected because it wasn't working, no DSL signal, the reason why I was using dial-up. Sitestar response: The only other thing you can do is make sure you have the latest modem driver or firmware for it. The modem and quality of the phone line is the only thing that dictates the speed. .......... My latst theory is that there is DSL on my phone line. The filters in my DSL modem should keep this out of the Phone output of the DSL modem. As noted above, I also tried adding another DSL filter in series supplied for phones from CenturyLink. I suspect even the two filters aren't enough or the modem is so sensitive to something from the DSL signsl that the filters don't remove because it is too high or low a frequency to hear during a phone call. Perhaps when I used it at 45 KBs in the past it was because the DSL wasn't working and so was absent from the phone line. So if I use the dial-up because the DSL isn't working it will run at 45 KBs? Trouble is, there's no way to check this. Suggestions? This is all happening using XP Home if it matters. TIA There are two issues: 1) What is the actual phone network architecture ? Note that some US telephone companies, have been replacing infrastructure with VOIP boxes. Some of which are outside your home, so you don't know they are present. VOIP can interfere with dialup modems, but regulatory requirements only exist for passing voice, and nobody cares that the modem or FAX machine doesn't work quite right. The problem could actually be caused by something outside the house. 2) Raising a voice trouble ticket with the phone company, can get them to "wring out" the line remotely, to determine it is good. Talking to a tech about your issues, might casually uncover that the present phone network simply does not support ~43K any more on dialup modems. For example, the existence of VOIP, causes 14.4K FAX machines, to only successfully send FAX info at 9.6K. There are too many errors if the FAX machine is pushed to 14.4K. And this is a result of VOIP interfering with it. If a tech has to enter the house, to debug house phone wiring, that'll likely cost you $99 for a "truck-roll". Wringing out the line up to the demarc, should be free. The fact your voice line is "dead quiet", that sounds like VOIP where the fake noise hasn't been turned on. I have an actual VOIP box here, separate from my modem, and it has a tick box to add noise to make it sound like a regular phone line. Digital transmission over VOIP can otherwise be pretty quiet and noise free. But just because the line is noise free, doesn't mean it cannot be spectrally or temporally affecting modem signals in such a way as to ruin the transmissions. The human ear is much more tolerant of things like that, than a modem is. VOIP "feels different" than a regular POTS line, in that the people on either end, tend to run the conversation half-duplex. The phone dynamics are much less forgiving of "interrupting" the other party. It could be something to do with buffer delays for packetizing the voice or something. I'm not really sure what aspect is causing it, merely that users end up behaving differently when they're working over VOIP. ******* Back when my ADSL setup here was "conventional", I had a drop in data rate. It was caused by corrosion of the outlet box in my room. The outlet is nailed to the baseboard, right above the carpeting. While the contacts in the RJ11 down there were gold plated, the metal underneath was corroded. And this made "noisy" electrical connections that cut the data rate in half. Not wanting to **** around, I drilled a hole in the floor, disconnected the entire existing wire network, and ran a private four-wire up from the demarc to the computer room. That... fixed it :-) My boss had a similar problem at his place. He debugged, and found the bad spot in his cabling, was where it passed through the foundation. By us doing our own debugging, we saved $99 on having a telco guy do it. Where I live, you're allowed to do your own in-house phone wiring, and I take full advantage of that. The hardest part of doing your own wiring, is getting wire and outlets. I ended up going to my "good" electronics store the last time, to get four conductor cable. And they also had RJ-11 junction boxes for the end of the line. The phone store no longer sells materials for the job - they did at one time. Now, the phone store only sells iPhones and related crap, since cell phones are a very lucrative business (compared to home phone). Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Slow dial-up speed
On 1 Nov 2017 17:03:54 GMT, KenK wrote:
My dial-up connection is only 19 KBs, best at 22. This used to work at about 45. I use it for when my DSL isn't working. ISPs exploit a feature in the phone system to use the digital channel to get to v.90 speeds instead of just transmitting voice level data which is capped at a theoretical max of around 19.2kbps (2400baud x 8). You will usually get less. It is possible your phone system has closed the loophole that allows v.90 transmissions. The "up" was always going to be v.34 or less since you do not have access to the digital architecture from the subscriber side. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Slow dial-up speed
wrote:
On 1 Nov 2017 17:03:54 GMT, KenK wrote: My dial-up connection is only 19 KBs, best at 22. This used to work at about 45. I use it for when my DSL isn't working. ISPs exploit a feature in the phone system to use the digital channel to get to v.90 speeds instead of just transmitting voice level data which is capped at a theoretical max of around 19.2kbps (2400baud x 8). You will usually get less. It is possible your phone system has closed the loophole that allows v.90 transmissions. The "up" was always going to be v.34 or less since you do not have access to the digital architecture from the subscriber side. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modem#...28V.90.2F92.29 "introduced competing technologies based upon the digital transmission used in telephony networks. The standard digital transmission in modern networks is 64 kbit/s but some networks use a part of the bandwidth for remote office signaling (e.g. to hang up the phone), limiting the effective rate to 56 kbit/s DS0. --- robbed bit signaling This new technology was adopted into ITU standards V.90 and is common in modern computers. The 56 kbit/s rate is only possible from the central office to the user site (downlink). In the United States, government regulation limits the maximum power output, resulting in a maximum data rate of 53.3 kbit/s. The uplink (from the user to the central office) still uses V.34 technology at 33.6 kbit/s. " The company owning the dialup pool, rents a DS1. It contains 24 DS0 time slots, each one carrying 56Kbit/s (if robbed bit signaling is assumed to be present, making certain bits unusable by the application). A DS-1 is something you can string on telephone poles, with fairly closely spaced regenerators. It used to be fairly expensive (when we got Internet at work, we could only afford 1/4 of a DS-1). In the current day, fiber would be used to get pretty close to the modem pool building, so actual archaic DS-1 wiring wouldn't be needed. There are other standards they could use. analog DS1 Ken -------- C.O. Switch -------------- Modem pool That prevents analog degradation through the network in the download direction. Just the line quality between the C.O. and the user, matters. They make no assumptions about what happens in the upload direction, the upload rate and protocol design is limited to the regular 33.6K (V34?) as a result. That's the implementation in the "prime" of 56K development. When it actually worked well. Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Slow dial-up speed
On 1 Nov 2017 17:03:54 GMT, KenK wrote:
Perhaps when I used it at 45 KBs in the past it was because the DSL wasn't working and so was absent from the phone line. So if I use the dial-up because the DSL isn't working it will run at 45 KBs? Trouble is, there's no way to check this. Suggestions? This is all happening using XP Home if it matters. TIA I just dealt with this same thing. I usually connect at 45K (using a 56K external USR modem). All of a sudden I was having trouble even getting connected, and when I did, I was at 16K maybe 21K at most. I was getting disconnected constantly. I hooked a phone to the line, and I heard a loud hum and static. Then it got worse, and half the time I could not even get a dialtone. I checked all my wiring inside the house, and I finally called the phone company. Turned out the module on the outside of the house was defective. He replaced it, and I am back to my usual 45K. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|