If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of
'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Generally, going to Start/Control Panel/Add New Hardware, it will prompt you
for what it is looking for, foremost. Added info: SM Bus Controller http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "jt3" wrote in message ... Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Unknown Devices
[[Unknown Devices helps you find what those unknown devices in Device Manager really are.]] http://www.halfdone.com/Development/UnknownDevices/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Nice find, Wes. )
-- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:NZdKc.104007$IQ4.54995@attbi_s02... Unknown Devices [[Unknown Devices helps you find what those unknown devices in Device Manager really are.]] http://www.halfdone.com/Development/UnknownDevices/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Kelly,
Oh, I've had this for a while. ;-) -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , Kelly hunted and pecked: Nice find, Wes. ) -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:NZdKc.104007$IQ4.54995@attbi_s02... Unknown Devices [[Unknown Devices helps you find what those unknown devices in Device Manager really are.]] http://www.halfdone.com/Development/UnknownDevices/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Well, well.....why did you wait so long. Nice, very nice! )
-- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:wuiKc.81039$WX.54799@attbi_s51... Kelly, Oh, I've had this for a while. ;-) -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , Kelly hunted and pecked: Nice find, Wes. ) -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:NZdKc.104007$IQ4.54995@attbi_s02... Unknown Devices [[Unknown Devices helps you find what those unknown devices in Device Manager really are.]] http://www.halfdone.com/Development/UnknownDevices/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Hadn't run across a post asking about unknown devices before.
-- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , Kelly hunted and pecked: Well, well.....why did you wait so long. Nice, very nice! ) -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:wuiKc.81039$WX.54799@attbi_s51... Kelly, Oh, I've had this for a while. ;-) -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , Kelly hunted and pecked: Nice find, Wes. ) -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:NZdKc.104007$IQ4.54995@attbi_s02... Unknown Devices [[Unknown Devices helps you find what those unknown devices in Device Manager really are.]] http://www.halfdone.com/Development/UnknownDevices/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Wesley,
Thanks for the links--I will need some time to digest it all. Still, or even more confused about the posting questions, esp. with all the repost character indications in your reply, unless it was a cut and paste. Thanks, Joe "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:fcwKc.123225$XM6.12193@attbi_s53... Hadn't run across a post asking about unknown devices before. -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , Kelly hunted and pecked: Well, well.....why did you wait so long. Nice, very nice! ) -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:wuiKc.81039$WX.54799@attbi_s51... Kelly, Oh, I've had this for a while. ;-) -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , Kelly hunted and pecked: Nice find, Wes. ) -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:NZdKc.104007$IQ4.54995@attbi_s02... Unknown Devices [[Unknown Devices helps you find what those unknown devices in Device Manager really are.]] http://www.halfdone.com/Development/UnknownDevices/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Joe,
You mean the brackets?? [[ ]] I use those instead of "quotes" to show that whatever are inside the [[brackets]] are not my words. -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Wesley, Thanks for the links--I will need some time to digest it all. Still, or even more confused about the posting questions, esp. with all the repost character indications in your reply, unless it was a cut and paste. Thanks, Joe "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:fcwKc.123225$XM6.12193@attbi_s53... Hadn't run across a post asking about unknown devices before. -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , Kelly hunted and pecked: Well, well.....why did you wait so long. Nice, very nice! ) -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:wuiKc.81039$WX.54799@attbi_s51... Kelly, Oh, I've had this for a while. ;-) -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , Kelly hunted and pecked: Nice find, Wes. ) -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:NZdKc.104007$IQ4.54995@attbi_s02... Unknown Devices [[Unknown Devices helps you find what those unknown devices in Device Manager really are.]] http://www.halfdone.com/Development/UnknownDevices/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Joe,
I can't help with the *.inf problem. I had to buy a new modem because of a similar problem. You lost me, what needs to be run from a "DOS" box? ------------------------- I just updated pcidevs.txt myself. Latest pcidevs.txt. [[This is version 481 of this file; 15-07-2004 (D-M-Y).]] Available he http://members.datafast.net.au/~dft0802/downloads.htm Craig's PCI & PnP ID's Pages http://members.datafast.net.au/~dft0802/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Wesley, I did try your suggested application, and found it of some use, mainly in that it gives a more detailed listing of all drivers and their IDs, etc., and in this particular case the 'details' provided the information that the chipset manufacturer for both cases was Nvidia, and the OEM for the 'Unknown device' was GigaByte Technologies, as well. The mbd is a GigaByte, and it uses an Nvidia chipset, so it appeared that for some reason the installation of the OEM drivers hadn't completed. Further hunting in the links (Kelly's, I think it was) you supplied suggested the use of the enhanced detail tab in Dev Mgr, which I found gave exhaustive details on what was available, enough to suggest that the 'Unknown device' was looking for a hardware id of _NVRAIDBUS, or variant thereof. This suggested that the BIOS disable wasn't sufficient to take care of the unused functions of the chipset, so, after a few rounds of the 'uninstall'--'Windows has found new hardware' game, it finally took care of those two. But since, in the process of enabling things, I decided to enable the ethernet function, since it is counted into the total for activation, which I have not yet done (OEM XP), I then came to the interesting difficulty that WinXP didn't like the OEM supplied .inf file for the controller and refused to install it. I don't yet know whether it is a GigaByte, Nvidia, or someone else-supplied problem, but at least I'm down from two problems (that I knew about) to one (that I didn't know about)! In short, for your kb, the program worked as claimed, gave some information, but I found the XP function (detail tab) provided more details. I only wish it didn't need to be run in a DOS box to get the functionality in Dev Mgr. Thanks very much, Joe "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:V3DKc.109766$JR4.40252@attbi_s54... Joe, You mean the brackets?? [[ ]] I use those instead of "quotes" to show that whatever are inside the [[brackets]] are not my words. -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Wesley, Thanks for the links--I will need some time to digest it all. Still, or even more confused about the posting questions, esp. with all the repost character indications in your reply, unless it was a cut and paste. Thanks, Joe "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:fcwKc.123225$XM6.12193@attbi_s53... Hadn't run across a post asking about unknown devices before. -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , Kelly hunted and pecked: Well, well.....why did you wait so long. Nice, very nice! ) -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:wuiKc.81039$WX.54799@attbi_s51... Kelly, Oh, I've had this for a while. ;-) -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , Kelly hunted and pecked: Nice find, Wes. ) -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "Wesley Vogel" wrote in message news:NZdKc.104007$IQ4.54995@attbi_s02... Unknown Devices [[Unknown Devices helps you find what those unknown devices in Device Manager really are.]] http://www.halfdone.com/Development/UnknownDevices/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Generally, going to Start/Control Panel/Add New Hardware, it will prompt you
for what it is looking for, foremost. Added info: SM Bus Controller http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "jt3" wrote in message ... Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Generally, going to Start/Control Panel/Add New Hardware, it will prompt you
for what it is looking for, foremost. Added info: SM Bus Controller http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "jt3" wrote in message ... Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Generally, going to Start/Control Panel/Add New Hardware, it will prompt you
for what it is looking for, foremost. Added info: SM Bus Controller http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search -- All the Best, Kelly Microsoft-MVP Windows® XP 2004 Windows MVP "Winny" Award Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm Taskbar Repair Tool Plus! http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/taskbarplus!.htm "jt3" wrote in message ... Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Unknown Devices
[[Unknown Devices helps you find what those unknown devices in Device Manager really are.]] http://www.halfdone.com/Development/UnknownDevices/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown device
Unknown Devices
[[Unknown Devices helps you find what those unknown devices in Device Manager really are.]] http://www.halfdone.com/Development/UnknownDevices/ -- Hope this helps. Let us know. Wes In , jt3 hunted and pecked: Can anyone make any suggestions as to how to discover the nature of 'Unknown Device' when everything is accounted for? In particular, having installed XP P everything that I put on it when I assembled the machine, including all the onboard devices (mdb) which are BIOS enabled all show up just fine in DevMgr but additionally there is an 'Unknown Device' attached to the PCI bus with absolutely no information as to what it may be except that it uses resources of I/O range 04D2h, and an 'SM bus controller' also hanging off the PCI bus with no information as to what it is. When not viewed by connection, but by type, they are both hung under '?Other Devices'. Unrelated to the above, except by accident, I was searching the NG subject headers with the OE edit function for incidence of 'unknown' and 'device' when I noticed that although on the first pass I found a post with such content in its header dated 7/9/04, when I tried to locate it in context of a thread, it disappeared, then I was unable to locate it with the Edit search, and *then* I noticed that there was only ONE post with a header dated 7/9/04 (and it wasn't the one I had seen previously. Can anyone tell me what gives with this? Finally, having noticed the sale of 'LookOut' to MS in the news this AM, I went to the web site (since it sounded ideal to replace the brain-dead native OE facility) to see if it would still be available, and of course, it wasn't, MS lost no time in shutting it down. Couldn't they at least have made it available for purchase, or if not that, for beta evaluation? This doesn't sound like good relations to me. Thanks for any suggestions on the Unk Dev. Joe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|