If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:17:09 -0400, Ricky Jimenez
wrote: On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:13:51 -0400, Paul wrote: Run HDTune, and look at the SMART tab. That will give info about your hard drive. If there is a hard drive health problem, tell us what you see (not all the "yellow marks" in there are valid ones). And if you're getting "error 5" when using HDTune, then the program needs to be run as administrator (elevated), to gain access to hardware. Ia m not familiar with the program Paul and I didn't see a Smart tab although a S.M.A.R.T. feature is listed on the Info tab. Nothing came up on the Health tab after running the benchmark. But here is what I got on the benchmark tab to the right of the graph. HD Tune: WDC WD1001FAES-75W7A Benchmark Transfer Rate Minimum : 44.3 MB/sec Transfer Rate Maximum : 136.1 MB/sec Transfer Rate Average : 101.5 MB/sec Access Time : 16.5 ms Burst Rate : 119.0 MB/sec CPU Usage : -1.0% I downloaded the trial version of HD Tune Pro 5.5 and got this: HD Tune Pro: WDC WD1001FAES-75W7A Benchmark Test capacity: full Read transfer rate Transfer Rate Minimum : 54.6 MB/s Transfer Rate Maximum : 136.1 MB/s Transfer Rate Average : 102.3 MB/s Access Time : 16.9 ms Burst Rate : 156.3 MB/s CPU Usage : 26.9% HD Tune Pro: WDC WD1001FAES-75W7A Health ID Current Worst ThresholdData Status (01) Raw Read Error Rate 200 200 51 0 ok (03) Spin Up Time 171 170 21 4408 ok (04) Start/Stop Count 99 99 0 1678 ok (05) Reallocated Sector Count 200 200 140 0 ok (07) Seek Error Rate 100 253 0 0 ok (09) Power On Hours Count 84 84 0 11709 ok (0A) Spin Retry Count 100 100 0 0 ok (0B) Calibration Retry Count 100 100 0 0 ok (0C) Power Cycle Count 99 99 0 1668 ok (C0) Unsafe Shutdown Count 200 200 0 25 ok (C1) Load Cycle Count 200 200 0 1652 ok (C2) Temperature 108 102 0 39 ok (C4) Reallocated Event Count 200 200 0 0 ok (C5) Current Pending Sector 200 200 0 0 ok (C6) Offline Uncorrectable 200 200 0 0 ok (C7) Interface CRC Error Count 200 200 0 0 ok (C8) Write Error Rate 200 200 0 0 ok (F0) Head Flying Hours 85 85 0 11387 ok (F1) Unknown Attribute 200 200 0 53309123953 ok (F2) Unknown Attribute 200 200 0 98787959083 ok Health Status : ok |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
Ricky Jimenez wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:17:09 -0400, Ricky Jimenez wrote: On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:13:51 -0400, Paul wrote: Run HDTune, and look at the SMART tab. That will give info about your hard drive. If there is a hard drive health problem, tell us what you see (not all the "yellow marks" in there are valid ones). And if you're getting "error 5" when using HDTune, then the program needs to be run as administrator (elevated), to gain access to hardware. Ia m not familiar with the program Paul and I didn't see a Smart tab although a S.M.A.R.T. feature is listed on the Info tab. Nothing came up on the Health tab after running the benchmark. But here is what I got on the benchmark tab to the right of the graph. HD Tune: WDC WD1001FAES-75W7A Benchmark Transfer Rate Minimum : 44.3 MB/sec Transfer Rate Maximum : 136.1 MB/sec Transfer Rate Average : 101.5 MB/sec Access Time : 16.5 ms Burst Rate : 119.0 MB/sec CPU Usage : -1.0% I downloaded the trial version of HD Tune Pro 5.5 and got this: HD Tune Pro: WDC WD1001FAES-75W7A Benchmark Test capacity: full Read transfer rate Transfer Rate Minimum : 54.6 MB/s Transfer Rate Maximum : 136.1 MB/s Transfer Rate Average : 102.3 MB/s Access Time : 16.9 ms Burst Rate : 156.3 MB/s CPU Usage : 26.9% HD Tune Pro: WDC WD1001FAES-75W7A Health ID Current Worst ThresholdData Status (01) Raw Read Error Rate 200 200 51 0 ok (03) Spin Up Time 171 170 21 4408 ok (04) Start/Stop Count 99 99 0 1678 ok (05) Reallocated Sector Count 200 200 140 0 ok (07) Seek Error Rate 100 253 0 0 ok (09) Power On Hours Count 84 84 0 11709 ok (0A) Spin Retry Count 100 100 0 0 ok (0B) Calibration Retry Count 100 100 0 0 ok (0C) Power Cycle Count 99 99 0 1668 ok (C0) Unsafe Shutdown Count 200 200 0 25 ok (C1) Load Cycle Count 200 200 0 1652 ok (C2) Temperature 108 102 0 39 ok (C4) Reallocated Event Count 200 200 0 0 ok (C5) Current Pending Sector 200 200 0 0 ok (C6) Offline Uncorrectable 200 200 0 0 ok (C7) Interface CRC Error Count 200 200 0 0 ok (C8) Write Error Rate 200 200 0 0 ok (F0) Head Flying Hours 85 85 0 11387 ok (F1) Unknown Attribute 200 200 0 53309123953 ok (F2) Unknown Attribute 200 200 0 98787959083 ok Health Status : ok That part looks fine. SMART looks good. A benchmark of your drive, is shown here. http://obrazki.elektroda.net/19_1289733876.jpg The blue line has: 1) Classical stair-step behavior. The platter has a "zoned" layout. 2) Slowdown as a function of platter circumference versus track number. That's why the curve has the general form that it does. 3) Sample plot has no wide downward spikes. If you see downward spikes that last for a significant distance, that means there is a bad spot in the disk, where the spike shows up. Tiny spikes are benchmark anomalies. The sample plot has no anomalies to speak of. 4) You can see a few seek time dots, fall outside the general trend area, but I don't consider that to be an issue. I don't think I have any drive here, that's completely clean that way. So some other piece of hardware, is delaying the startup. Or some other activity that is happening in parallel. I would try to find any log that records driver installation, to see if something like that is happening on each and every boot. (Like, hardware enum got deleted, and hardware needs to be rediscovered on each boot.) Make a thorough inventory of hardware in the computer. USB memory card reader ? TV Tuner card ? Anything which is out of the ordinary. It's also possible (but unlikely), that some card has an interrupt storm problem. I have a RealTek based network card here. When I run it under Linux now, Linux reports an interrupt storm. That would cause excessive time wastage, clearing the interrupts. Effectively reducing the available CPU speed for other things. My network card is based on RTL8169SC. Since getting that report from Linux, I pulled the card (it was left there from some benchmarking I was doing). You could run a Linux LiveCD, fire up a Terminal and run dmesg and check the startup log to see if any anomalous behavior is detected by the Linux drivers as they start up. The "dmesg" log is a relatively verbose log, compared to what Windows would offer you. I've discovered a few things that way. Windows has the Performance Monitor, which displays counters the OS keeps. (Available from Win2K onwards.) I think there is at least one counter, which gives an overall interrupt count per second. If that was over 10,000 per second, then there would be a serious hardware problem. You can have a fair number of interrupts per second, if you alt-tab out of a game, and the game keeps conversing with the video card. But it won't get to the 10,000 per second level that way. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/...onitor/1046916 Paul |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:56:22 -0400, AlDrake
wrote: On 4/20/2013 5:08 PM, Mellowed wrote: On 4/20/2013 1:06 PM, AlDrake wrote: On 4/20/2013 12:05 PM, Ken Blake wrote: On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:15:28 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote: On 19/04/2013 9:38 PM, AlDrake wrote: IMHO it's time for a reinstall. The time you can spend trying to get it back to where is was isn't worth the trouble. From my experience I keep a spare SSD ready to slide in and start over. Feels good to have it so fast again. Rather lazy, as this will happen again, so it's better to understand why it's happened in the first place. Ditto! A very strong ditto! Ya, RIIIIIGtt. Let's see just how long it takes to talk about this and eventually fix it. I would have the OS reinstalled many times over by now, fixed and have moved on. Get over yourself. I have far better things to do than spend any time taking out the trash. Do any of you actually think a business would spend any time playing kids games? Time is money. ??? This isn't about Al. Most of us would like to understand a problem. Time is not money here. You should just take the computer to a shop then pick it up when fixed so that you could make the best of your time. Your time is obviously more valuable then getting to understand a computer. I offered a solution that is far more efficient than spending countless hours fixing something that could have been avoided from the start is proper care had been taken. I stand by my solution even if it's unpopular. Your point is valid. I can usually fix all problems but if it is going to take too much time to fix a complex problem then I might reinstall the system as you suggested. My customers don't like high repair bills, so for me it is whatever is the fasted way to get the job done (properly) and keep my customers happy. I can't spend too many hours on a job or it doesn't pay, gotta get it fixed and out the door! Time is indeed money! A lot of people get seperation anxiety when the don't have their computers so there is often some pressure to get the job done. Jimmy L |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:16:46 -0700, Krypto wrote:
Download and install Malwarebytes & Superantispyware from http://ninite.com/ and scan the computer. First Malwarebytes then Superantispyware or the other way around just not both at once. :-) Why download from a third party site like ninite.com? SUPERAntispyware Free can be downloaded from http://www.superantispyware.com/downloadfile.html?productid=SUPERANTISPYWAREFREE and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware can be downloaded he http://downloads.malwarebytes.org/mbam-download.php -- s|b |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
On 4/21/2013 3:23 AM, Jim wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:56:22 -0400, AlDrake wrote: On 4/20/2013 5:08 PM, Mellowed wrote: On 4/20/2013 1:06 PM, AlDrake wrote: On 4/20/2013 12:05 PM, Ken Blake wrote: On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:15:28 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote: On 19/04/2013 9:38 PM, AlDrake wrote: IMHO it's time for a reinstall. The time you can spend trying to get it back to where is was isn't worth the trouble. From my experience I keep a spare SSD ready to slide in and start over. Feels good to have it so fast again. Rather lazy, as this will happen again, so it's better to understand why it's happened in the first place. Ditto! A very strong ditto! Ya, RIIIIIGtt. Let's see just how long it takes to talk about this and eventually fix it. I would have the OS reinstalled many times over by now, fixed and have moved on. Get over yourself. I have far better things to do than spend any time taking out the trash. Do any of you actually think a business would spend any time playing kids games? Time is money. ??? This isn't about Al. Most of us would like to understand a problem. Time is not money here. You should just take the computer to a shop then pick it up when fixed so that you could make the best of your time. Your time is obviously more valuable then getting to understand a computer. I offered a solution that is far more efficient than spending countless hours fixing something that could have been avoided from the start is proper care had been taken. I stand by my solution even if it's unpopular. Your point is valid. I can usually fix all problems but if it is going to take too much time to fix a complex problem then I might reinstall the system as you suggested. My customers don't like high repair bills, so for me it is whatever is the fasted way to get the job done (properly) and keep my customers happy. I can't spend too many hours on a job or it doesn't pay, gotta get it fixed and out the door! Time is indeed money! A lot of people get seperation anxiety when the don't have their computers so there is often some pressure to get the job done. Jimmy L Good point. This is basically all I was saying from the start and I was all of a sudden guilty of being lazy. I tried to point out that I have a life beyond 7 but it seems most in this groups have no life and rather spend it indoors playing. Sad............. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:55:40 -0400, Stan Brown wrote:
So will Cleanmgr, which (a) comes with Windows and (b) won't frack up your System Registry. Neither will CCleaner if you don't let it. And if you do, chances are small your registry will be f*cked. In any case, it's always a good idea to create a backup (image) /before/ messing with the registry. But I don't believe a registry cleaner will make a computer go faster... -- s|b |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:37:00 +0100, Scott wrote:
Get a solid state drive. +1 -- s|b |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
On 4/21/2013 6:18 AM, AlDrake wrote:
On 4/21/2013 3:23 AM, Jim wrote: On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:56:22 -0400, AlDrake wrote: On 4/20/2013 5:08 PM, Mellowed wrote: On 4/20/2013 1:06 PM, AlDrake wrote: On 4/20/2013 12:05 PM, Ken Blake wrote: On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:15:28 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote: On 19/04/2013 9:38 PM, AlDrake wrote: IMHO it's time for a reinstall. The time you can spend trying to get it back to where is was isn't worth the trouble. From my experience I keep a spare SSD ready to slide in and start over. Feels good to have it so fast again. Rather lazy, as this will happen again, so it's better to understand why it's happened in the first place. Ditto! A very strong ditto! Ya, RIIIIIGtt. Let's see just how long it takes to talk about this and eventually fix it. I would have the OS reinstalled many times over by now, fixed and have moved on. Get over yourself. I have far better things to do than spend any time taking out the trash. Do any of you actually think a business would spend any time playing kids games? Time is money. ??? This isn't about Al. Most of us would like to understand a problem. Time is not money here. You should just take the computer to a shop then pick it up when fixed so that you could make the best of your time. Your time is obviously more valuable then getting to understand a computer. I offered a solution that is far more efficient than spending countless hours fixing something that could have been avoided from the start is proper care had been taken. I stand by my solution even if it's unpopular. Your point is valid. I can usually fix all problems but if it is going to take too much time to fix a complex problem then I might reinstall the system as you suggested. My customers don't like high repair bills, so for me it is whatever is the fasted way to get the job done (properly) and keep my customers happy. I can't spend too many hours on a job or it doesn't pay, gotta get it fixed and out the door! Time is indeed money! A lot of people get seperation anxiety when the don't have their computers so there is often some pressure to get the job done. Jimmy L Good point. This is basically all I was saying from the start and I was all of a sudden guilty of being lazy. I tried to point out that I have a life beyond 7 but it seems most in this groups have no life and rather spend it indoors playing. Sad............. You really go out of your way to justify your point of view. There is a HUGE difference between a business decision (Jimmy L) and somebody trying to understand and fix their computer. And you say that because somebody wants to understand the problem they have no life??? Now that is really SAD. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:16:13 +0200, "s|b" wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:16:46 -0700, Krypto wrote: Download and install Malwarebytes & Superantispyware from http://ninite.com/ and scan the computer. First Malwarebytes then Superantispyware or the other way around just not both at once. :-) Why download from a third party site like ninite.com? SUPERAntispyware Free can be downloaded from http://www.superantispyware.com/downloadfile.html?productid=SUPERANTISPYWAREFREE and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware can be downloaded he http://downloads.malwarebytes.org/mbam-download.php Why download from a third party site like ninite.com? SUPERAntispyware Free can be downloaded from Have you looked at Ninite.com? The site has many useful free installers for the most common things you need. You can pick several programs and you get one installer that installs them all onto your computer consecutively with no spyware, no Ask toolbars etc. Great site if you need to install several items fast or even just to get an installer for one program. The nice part is that you just click install, no boxes to check or uncheck, no toolbars, just a smooth installation of your programs and you can find most of them on ONE site, Ninite.com When I redo a system I go to Ninite and download one installer that might put 10 or more programs on my computer. Just one click and the install is all done in a short time with no interaction on your part. You should check it out, it really saves a lot of time. You will find everything from browsers, messaging apps, Itunes. quicktime, Java, Flash, .net, Shockwave, imaging programs like Infranview, Gimp, Picassa, Document readers like Foxit, Libreoffice, Adobe Reader. Security programs like Malwarebytes, Superantispyware and so many more programs all in ONE place and super easy to install. No need to hunt all over the net, most of the common free programs are there. So to answer your question: That's why I use Ninite.com. Krypto |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 12:05:34 -0700, Krypto wrote:
So to answer your question: That's why I use Ninite.com. Tnx. To be honest, I was already convinced after I read ' no Ask toolbars'. :-) -- s|b |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:21:01 +0200, "s|b" wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:37:00 +0100, Scott wrote: Get a solid state drive. +1 The OP has a software problem that needs to be addressed. If the OP has done CHKDSK, looked at the device manager etc. and all is well then he doesn't need a new drive, he just needs to isolate the problem. Perhaps as has been suggested he should just reinstall the system or install a backup that he 'should' have made when all was good. Of course if he switched to a SSD then his problems would be gone because he would install a new system on the SSD, if he cloned his system and put it on the SSD then there is a very good chance that his problem would still exist. The speed of the hard drive during startup is not the problem. SSD's are faster but on a normal system we are only talking 30 seconds or so not the 5 minutes that the OP says it takes to boot. Nope, there is definitely some software problem. Maybe a hardware problem but I doubt it. The OP says that he has had his system for 3 years and now it is slow to boot. Why am I not suprised? I would guess that many things have been installed and uninstalled in that period of time and probably some of it is still left behind as junk. The system needs to be cleaned thorougly. Manually clean the registry. Get rid of all traces of old programs and any other programs that are not needed. Check the event viewer for problems. Scan for malware. Do a selective startup using msconfig. Disable all non microsoft startup items and see if the computer is faster to boot. etc., etc. All the common steps to fix a slow computer have already been suggested. There is no magic program that will fix everything, but there are common steps that a person takes to narrow down the problem and eliminate it. SSD's are nice but not the solution to the problem the OP has. Jim |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
In ,
Ken Blake typed: On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:38:59 -0600, "Buffalo" wrote: Before using the Registry cleaner function in Ccleaner, I would back up the Registry and also make a Restore point. Yes, if someone insists on using a registry cleaner (*any* registry cleaner), it's always wise to do that. *However*, if the registry cleaner screws things up badly enough, the system may be unbootable, so it's not great to rely on that. It's ALWAYS a good idea to back up before doing ANYTHNG to the OS, files or otherwise. In all of my many years of sercicing machines, I have NEVER had ANY cleaner mess up ANYTHING on ANY machine and also have never heard of anyone with such an experience. Your closed-mindedness to some very useful tools is an absolute cartoon many times; your posts should always be ignored as they're nothing but opportunities for you to lie about cleaners. All you need to say is to not use a no-name product with no reputation, as with anything you download from the net, not just cleaners. You're a real dummy. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
In ,
Buffalo typed: "Ken Blake" wrote in message ... On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:38:59 -0600, "Buffalo" wrote: Before using the Registry cleaner function in Ccleaner, I would back up the Registry and also make a Restore point. Yes, if someone insists on using a registry cleaner (*any* registry cleaner), it's always wise to do that. *However*, if the registry cleaner screws things up badly enough, the system may be unbootable, so it's not great to rely on that. Excellent point. Registry cleaners can cause more problems than they do good. A good backup and/or the procedure to boot up when a normal boot doesn't work, is extremely valuable, Buffalo Citations for you reg cleaner claims? Where can your words be validated with fact? Also it has nothing to do with bootless machines; I've never come across any such thing. Where are your citations? |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
In ,
s|b typed: On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:16:46 -0700, Krypto wrote: Download and install Malwarebytes & Superantispyware from http://ninite.com/ and scan the computer. First Malwarebytes then Superantispyware or the other way around just not both at once. :-) Why download from a third party site like ninite.com? SUPERAntispyware Free can be downloaded from http://www.superantispyware.com/downloadfile.html?productid=SUPERANTISPYWAREFREE and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware can be downloaded he http://downloads.malwarebytes.org/mbam-download.php Sounds to me like a 1-stop instead of a 2-stop. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Slow Booting
Twayne wrote:
In , Buffalo typed: "Ken Blake" wrote in message ... On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:38:59 -0600, "Buffalo" wrote: Before using the Registry cleaner function in Ccleaner, I would back up the Registry and also make a Restore point. Yes, if someone insists on using a registry cleaner (*any* registry cleaner), it's always wise to do that. *However*, if the registry cleaner screws things up badly enough, the system may be unbootable, so it's not great to rely on that. Excellent point. Registry cleaners can cause more problems than they do good. A good backup and/or the procedure to boot up when a normal boot doesn't work, is extremely valuable, Buffalo Citations for you reg cleaner claims? Where can your words be validated with fact? Example of such. Search time, two minutes, via Google Groups. http://groups.google.com/group/micro...B&dmode=source It's a tool for usage by experts, not for totally automated, one button registry decimation. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|