If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge
of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
On Fri, 1 May 2009 13:32:01 -0700, brickman
wrote: I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. Sounds fine to me. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
On Fri, 1 May 2009 13:32:01 -0700, brickman
wrote: I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. Sounds fine to me. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
Not of the normal range for running processes.
-- JS http://www.pagestart.com "brickman" wrote in message ... I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
Not of the normal range for running processes.
-- JS http://www.pagestart.com "brickman" wrote in message ... I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
brickman
If your figures are based on 512 mb RAM you are starting to rely on using the pagefile! This computer has 43 processess running a this time but it does depend on what they are. Why are you looking at these details? -- Hope this helps. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ brickman wrote: I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
brickman
If your figures are based on 512 mb RAM you are starting to rely on using the pagefile! This computer has 43 processess running a this time but it does depend on what they are. Why are you looking at these details? -- Hope this helps. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ brickman wrote: I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
brickman wrote:
I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. 39 here, but I have disabled a lot of unnecessary services. 46 is quite reasonable. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
brickman wrote:
I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. 39 here, but I have disabled a lot of unnecessary services. 46 is quite reasonable. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
21 here, and 159M commit charge. But then, I'm a minimalist ;-) Main issue anyway is not how many are running, but if you have a rogue with a memory-leak or continuous-loop. One such process can bring the computer to a crawl. Also bear in mind that names are not always indicative, it is perfectly possible to write a malicious process which announces itself as 'explorer' to avoid suspicion. Looking at where it's running from is more informative. "Nate Grossman" wrote: brickman wrote: I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. 39 here, but I have disabled a lot of unnecessary services. 46 is quite reasonable. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Processes
21 here, and 159M commit charge. But then, I'm a minimalist ;-) Main issue anyway is not how many are running, but if you have a rogue with a memory-leak or continuous-loop. One such process can bring the computer to a crawl. Also bear in mind that names are not always indicative, it is perfectly possible to write a malicious process which announces itself as 'explorer' to avoid suspicion. Looking at where it's running from is more informative. "Nate Grossman" wrote: brickman wrote: I have 43 processes running, CPU usage 1-3%, PF usage 541 and a commit charge of 541M / 1234M. Does this sound OK or do I need to get rid of some processes? Thank you in advance for any and all help. 39 here, but I have disabled a lot of unnecessary services. 46 is quite reasonable. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|