If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
David wrote:
On 05/01/2020 20:55, Joel wrote: David wrote: On 05/01/2020 20:41, Snit wrote: I am pretty sure he was kidding. I was. ;-) I've enjoyed 'talking' to you, Snit. You are a breath of fresh air on Usenet! Snit is a good man, a friend of mine. Those who attack him either don't understand him, or are simply full of hatred. That's good to hear, Joel. :-) Thanks for speaking up in his favour. I'm glad to see you doing so, as well. We need more rationality in the endless bickering about him. For the life of me I can't understand why the haters are so obsessed. -- Joel Crump |
Ads |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
Andre wrote in news:5569827128@
3c88f27d1a8f44539b77d9cb4e792892.local: On 5 Jan 2020 at 21:17:10 CET, "Snit" wrote: Downloaded and playing with now. Seems good -- though clearly in beta form. Have suggestions I will post later (to the beta forum). It's in alpha, not beta. Get ready for Steve Carroll to join the beta team and create massive problems by attacking everything snit does. Best to block Steve Carroll if he tries to join. |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
On 05/01/2020 23:04, Joel wrote:
David wrote: On 05/01/2020 20:55, Joel wrote: David wrote: On 05/01/2020 20:41, Snit wrote: I am pretty sure he was kidding. I was. ;-) I've enjoyed 'talking' to you, Snit. You are a breath of fresh air on Usenet! Snit is a good man, a friend of mine. Those who attack him either don't understand him, or are simply full of hatred. That's good to hear, Joel. :-) Thanks for speaking up in his favour. I'm glad to see you doing so, as well. We need more rationality in the endless bickering about him. For the life of me I can't understand why the haters are so obsessed. You may also join us in my group if you wish, Joel! Here's where you'll find me:- http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=157826583400 Enjoy the images at the link. Follow-Up set to 'acw'. -- David |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
On 1/5/20 4:01 PM, David wrote:
On 05/01/2020 21:15, Snit wrote: Joel wrote: David wrote: On 05/01/2020 20:41, Snit wrote: I am pretty sure he was kidding. I was. ;-) I've enjoyed 'talking' to you, Snit. You are a breath of fresh air on Usenet! Snit is a good man, a friend of mine.Â* Those who attack him either don't understand him, or are simply full of hatred. I spent years not countering the false accusations of sock usage. I seriously underestimated the number of people who bought into the “everyone is Snit” gag. 'Snit' is a somewhat odd-sounding pseudonym. Would you care to explain the origin? I'm not demanding, just mildly interested. It really matters not one jot. From an old gag when I was in high school and then college in Las Vegas... stood for "Southern Nevada Institute of Technology". Now just use it out of habit and to keep a consistent name. You can find "Snit" being used by me going back to 1994 or so (though with different emails). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
On 1/5/20 4:04 PM, Joel wrote:
David wrote: On 05/01/2020 20:55, Joel wrote: David wrote: On 05/01/2020 20:41, Snit wrote: I am pretty sure he was kidding. I was. ;-) I've enjoyed 'talking' to you, Snit. You are a breath of fresh air on Usenet! Snit is a good man, a friend of mine. Those who attack him either don't understand him, or are simply full of hatred. That's good to hear, Joel. :-) Thanks for speaking up in his favour. I'm glad to see you doing so, as well. We need more rationality in the endless bickering about him. For the life of me I can't understand why the haters are so obsessed. I cannot understand why people would focus on me so much. I have some knowledge about a few things but am a pretty crappy scripter and not a programmer. What is the obsession for? But whatever... happy to be talking more about tech here. Actually making a video as I type this -- Linux is installing in a VM. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
On 1/5/2020 10:42 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 05/01/2020 17.21, nospam wrote: In article , Carlos E.R. wrote: There seems to be a division of opinions on all of this. So, who would be the authority on this topic? The creators of Android, which is google. They are not the authority. they are for the products they create. Nope. In terms of "what is Linux", they aren't. But you are, eh? |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
On 1/5/2020 8:25 AM, flatfish+++ wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:03:20 +0000, David wrote: On 05/01/2020 07:43, Diesel wrote: David Fri, 03 Jan 2020 22:36:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 03/01/2020 21:46, Diesel wrote: What of the post did you understand? That I'm FAR better off with Apple macOS :-D How so? "The integration between applications on the desktop, with each other and the OS services, and the integration with my iOS devices, is a huge plus." I couldn't phrase things any better than Snit! Thanks, Snit! :-D Snit's actually on point about this. Example for me, I use Windows, however I do have an iPhone and last year purchased an Apple Watch 4 which BTW is an amazing device. So, getting it working involved charging the watch and placing it near the iPhone. It picked up and configured networking, applications, configuration options as they were set on my iPhone and so forth. I was impressed. Now would I pay 3x the going rate for a Mac as compared to a PC for that type of integration? Or even more since I build my own systems. Probably not, but the Apple watch is not much more expensive than the other alternatives and it's the only one, currently, with an approved ECG measuring capability, at least in USA. I have heard that it saved some peoples lives when having a heart attack by dialing 911 and letting the dispatcher know where you are at. The guy woke up at the hospital wondering what happened. However there is no denying that Apple has the integration between devices down to a science, as long as the user is willing to fork over the cash for that option and many do. |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
On 1/5/2020 8:27 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
On 2020-01-05, flatfish+++ wrote: On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:03:20 +0000, David wrote: On 05/01/2020 07:43, Diesel wrote: David Fri, 03 Jan 2020 22:36:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 03/01/2020 21:46, Diesel wrote: What of the post did you understand? That I'm FAR better off with Apple macOS :-D How so? "The integration between applications on the desktop, with each other and the OS services, and the integration with my iOS devices, is a huge plus." I couldn't phrase things any better than Snit! Thanks, Snit! :-D Snit's actually on point about this. Example for me, I use Windows, however I do have an iPhone and last year purchased an Apple Watch 4 which BTW is an amazing device. So, getting it working involved charging the watch and placing it near the iPhone. It picked up and configured networking, applications, configuration options as they were set on my iPhone and so forth. I was impressed. Now would I pay 3x the going rate for a Mac as compared to a PC for that type of integration? Or even more since I build my own systems. Probably not, but the Apple watch is not much more expensive than the other alternatives and it's the only one, currently, with an approved ECG measuring capability, at least in USA. However there is no denying that Apple has the integration between devices down to a science, as long as the user is willing to fork over the cash for that option and many do. If Apple didn't have that it would be pointless. Their hardware their software, what else? I would say in this case the iwatch is required for lone seniors. Much better than the other devices. But not much else. |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Rocks- 2020 Version
On 1/4/2020 11:51 PM, William Unruh wrote:
On 2020-01-05, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 1/3/2020 8:54 PM, nospam wrote: In article , vallor wrote: I have built Preamps and power amps of both types and prefer the solid state ones hands down. i also did long ago. i never much cared for designing analog circuits. A good portion of solid state circuits are analog. a much larger portion of them are digital. Not in the sense of power amplification. A lot of integrated circuit designers do the analog work inside the chip that goes out to the power amps. The power amps are analog and will always be analog. Just less analog design to do at that point. Well, class D is sort of digitial (pulse width modulation). The only thing that would be classed as I know is some IPS units that put out staircase power for PCs... I don't like them because of the problems they created for wifes iMac... makes it run funny at times. Best not to introduce spikes to the iMac. |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
On 06/01/2020 01.51, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 1/5/2020 10:42 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: On 05/01/2020 17.21, nospam wrote: In article , Carlos E.R. wrote: There seems to be a division of opinions on all of this. So, who would be the authority on this topic? The creators of Android, which is google. They are not the authority. they are for the products they create. Nope. In terms of "what is Linux", they aren't. But you are, eh? Nope. -- Cheers, Carlos. |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
On 2020-01-05 8:45 p.m., Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 06/01/2020 01.51, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 1/5/2020 10:42 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: On 05/01/2020 17.21, nospam wrote: In article , Carlos E.R. wrote: There seems to be a division of opinions on all of this. So, who would be the authority on this topic? The creators of Android, which is google. They are not the authority. they are for the products they create. Nope. In terms of "what is Linux", they aren't. But you are, eh? Nope. I am here To help muddy the waters. If a Studebaker auto has a Chevy 283 V8 engine, is it a studebaker or a Chevy??? :-) Rene |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
Rene Lamontagne wrote:
On 2020-01-05 8:45 p.m., Carlos E.R. wrote: On 06/01/2020 01.51, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 1/5/2020 10:42 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: On 05/01/2020 17.21, nospam wrote: In article , Carlos E.R. wrote: There seems to be a division of opinions on all of this. So, who would be the authority on this topic? The creators of Android, which is google. They are not the authority. they are for the products they create. Nope. In terms of "what is Linux", they aren't. But you are, eh? Nope. I am here To help muddy the waters. If a Studebaker auto has a Chevy 283 V8 engine, is it a studebaker or a Chevy??? :-) Rene It is semantic distinction that adds nothing to the understanding. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Rocks- 2020 Version
AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 1/4/2020 11:51 PM, William Unruh wrote: On 2020-01-05, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 1/3/2020 8:54 PM, nospam wrote: In article , vallor wrote: I have built Preamps and power amps of both types and prefer the solid state ones hands down. i also did long ago. i never much cared for designing analog circuits. A good portion of solid state circuits are analog. a much larger portion of them are digital. Not in the sense of power amplification. A lot of integrated circuit designers do the analog work inside the chip that goes out to the power amps. The power amps are analog and will always be analog. Just less analog design to do at that point. Well, class D is sort of digitial (pulse width modulation). The only thing that would be classed as I know is some IPS units that put out staircase power for PCs... I don't like them because of the problems they created for wifes iMac... makes it run funny at times. Best not to introduce spikes to the iMac. You're referring to a UPS (uninterruptable power supply). They come in modified sine and pure sine. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/...fig2_261048059 You will also find a lot of fanciful waveform diagrams, not all of which are correct. https://imeon-energy.com.au/wp-conte...-sine-wave.png ******* Inverters produce square waves (cheap ones, from the past). And in the dim and distant past, square waves were OK for a lot of the "naive" loads, like a light bulb perhaps. ******* Modified sine and square waves were bad for some of the first Active PFC ATX power supplies. You could get "coil noise" from the front end, indicating it wasn't happy or wasn't the right design for it. Later, the Active PFC front end was changed (somehow), to make these supplies less upset by non-sine signals. The first PFC was designed on an algorithm of "the current draw waveform should look like the voltage waveform from the line". This was intended to reshape the current draw waveform, as well as bring it into phase with the voltage waveform. If you were at the campsite, and connected a desktop PCs to a car battery plus a 200W inverter (square wave), the desktop PC with APFC would go nuts. In some cases, the PSU would switch itself off. Or, it could make "weird noises" in the coils because of the PFC trying to make a square current waveform, from a square voltage waveform. The modern designs must be doing something different. Summary: If you know a PC has a power supply which is bad for this sort of thing, stick with pure sine UPS boxes. This one, for example, runs *two minutes* at full power according to the advert text near the bottom of the main pane. So naturally, you're not expecting miracles for $190/$210 or whatever the real price is. The spec tab gives a different number. https://www.newegg.com/cyberpower-cp...-133-_-Product AVR VA Rating 1350 VA Watts 810 Watts Full Load: 3 Minutes Half Load: 9 Minutes 10.40" x 3.90" x 14.20" Weight 20.30 lbs. This one is $369.99. You're paying by the pound. The formfactor of the battery, may be easier to find a knockoff battery for it later. https://www.newegg.com/apc-smc1500c-...=pure+sine+ups AVR VA Rating 1440 VA Watts 900 Watts Full load: 4 Minutes Half load: 11 Minutes 8.45" x 6.70" x 17.30" Weight 45.00 lbs. You can test this with 9 x 100W lightbulbs, because the filaments will be hot during switchover, and there won't be nearly as large a load surge as with cold light bulbs. 900W of incandescent light bulbs would draw 1800W when cold. Neither unit mentions switching time, which is likely to be 8msec to 15msec. These aren't double conversion supplies with zero switchover. Finding a cooling fan on a UPS, is a hint it's a double conversion type. Paul |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
Rene Lamontagne wrote:
I am here To help muddy the waters. If a Studebaker auto has a Chevy 283 V8 engine, is it a studebaker or a Chevy???Â* :-) Well if you want to put it sort of in terms of the Linux kernel, the Chevy 283 V8 engine does not cease being a Chevy 283 V8 engine when you do so. -- Take care, Jonathan ------------------- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Why Linux Sucks - 2020 Version
On 05/01/2020 23:19, Snit wrote:
On 1/5/20 4:01 PM, David wrote: On 05/01/2020 21:15, Snit wrote: Joel wrote: David wrote: On 05/01/2020 20:41, Snit wrote: I am pretty sure he was kidding. I was. ;-) I've enjoyed 'talking' to you, Snit. You are a breath of fresh air on Usenet! Snit is a good man, a friend of mine.Â* Those who attack him either don't understand him, or are simply full of hatred. I spent years not countering the false accusations of sock usage. I seriously underestimated the number of people who bought into the “everyone is Snit” gag. 'Snit' is a somewhat odd-sounding pseudonym. Would you care to explain the origin? I'm not demanding, just mildly interested. It really matters not one jot. From an old gag when I was in high school and then college in Las Vegas... stood for "Southern Nevada Institute of Technology". Now just use it out of habit and to keep a consistent name. You can find "Snit" being used by me going back to 1994 or so (though with different emails). Thank you. Did you know? .... There is a Shree Narayan Institute of Technology (SNIT), a college in Khargone, India https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snit -- David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|