A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows 7 » Windows 7 Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

scanner?



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 14th 17, 10:53 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,600
Default scanner?

Hi All,

W7-pro-x64

I have a customer that needs a stand alone, flat bed
scanner that will do 8-1/2" by 14".

Any favorites?

Many thanks,
-T
Ads
  #2  
Old October 15th 17, 12:24 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Paul[_32_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,873
Default scanner?

T wrote:
Hi All,

W7-pro-x64

I have a customer that needs a stand alone, flat bed
scanner that will do 8-1/2" by 14".

Any favorites?

Many thanks,
-T



EPSON WorkForce DS-1630 (B11B239201)
Duplex 1200 dpi x 1200 dpi USB Color Flatbed Scanner $280

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...9SIA1YH5799282

It's CIS, which means no depth-of-field. If you take a
textbook and lay it on the bed, none of the text near
the binding will be visible. A CCD sensor will pick up
that text on the curve, as it has depth of field. Most
scanners were CCD, many many years ago. Now, they're
all CIS, with few exceptions.

Document scanning only needs 150-300DPI, as you only
need enough resolution to meet Nyquist on media which
is printed with dots (half-tone). You count the dots,
to figure out the correct scan DPI. A "de-screen" plugin
does the best job of anti-aliasing the resulting image.
So while 600DPI optical resolution may seem restrictive,
in practice it's good enough.

For photographic paper or negatives, you can find a
smaller scanner with 6400DPI, dual illumination for
dust and scratch removal, 2 minute per page scan time,
an entirely different beast. The grain size of photographic
paper or negatives, means you can crank the res all you
want.

If you expect to be doing mostly office work, then you're stuck
with the low-res unit, because the scan times will almost
be reasonable. I own a scanner with a 2 minute scan time,
and I can tell you, it's a real damper when it comes to
scanning. Waiting and waiting... You want a scanner which
only takes a few seconds per page.

*******

You will likely have to visit a lot of web stores, to
get a good picture of what is available.

Paul
  #3  
Old October 15th 17, 01:35 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,600
Default scanner?

On 10/14/2017 04:24 PM, Paul wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

W7-pro-x64

I have a customer that needs a stand alone, flat bed
scanner that will do 8-1/2" by 14".

Any favorites?

Many thanks,
-T



EPSON WorkForce DS-1630 (B11B239201)
Duplex 1200 dpi x 1200 dpi USB Color Flatbed ScannerÂ*Â* $280

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...9SIA1YH5799282

It's CIS, which means no depth-of-field. If you take a
textbook and lay it on the bed, none of the text near
the binding will be visible. A CCD sensor will pick up
that text on the curve, as it has depth of field. Most
scanners were CCD, many many years ago. Now, they're
all CIS, with few exceptions.

Document scanning only needs 150-300DPI, as you only
need enough resolution to meet Nyquist on media which
is printed with dots (half-tone). You count the dots,
to figure out the correct scan DPI. A "de-screen" plugin
does the best job of anti-aliasing the resulting image.
So while 600DPI optical resolution may seem restrictive,
in practice it's good enough.

For photographic paper or negatives, you can find a
smaller scanner with 6400DPI, dual illumination for
dust and scratch removal, 2 minute per page scan time,
an entirely different beast. The grain size of photographic
paper or negatives, means you can crank the res all you
want.

If you expect to be doing mostly office work, then you're stuck
with the low-res unit, because the scan times will almost
be reasonable. I own a scanner with a 2 minute scan time,
and I can tell you, it's a real damper when it comes to
scanning. Waiting and waiting... You want a scanner which
only takes a few seconds per page.

*******

You will likely have to visit a lot of web stores, to
get a good picture of what is available.

Â*Â* Paul



Thank you!

She has no book to scan, but dies have stabled documents
  #4  
Old October 15th 17, 03:35 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Paul[_32_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,873
Default scanner?

T wrote:
On 10/14/2017 04:24 PM, Paul wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

W7-pro-x64

I have a customer that needs a stand alone, flat bed
scanner that will do 8-1/2" by 14".

Any favorites?

Many thanks,
-T



EPSON WorkForce DS-1630 (B11B239201)
Duplex 1200 dpi x 1200 dpi USB Color Flatbed Scanner $280

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...9SIA1YH5799282




Thank you!

She has no book to scan, but dies have stabled documents


Before you race off and do a victory lap, a
word of warning.

https://epson.com/For-Work/Scanners/...r/p/B11B239201

scan up to 8.5x11 on the platen
scan up to 8.5x14 on the ADF

If your ADF breaks, then laying the documents flat on the
platen doesn't give you a 8.5x14 scanner. The duplexing
storage area defines the 14" limit. One other scanner
with an ADF (but no duplexing function), describes their
scanner as 8.5xN, as it'll just keep grabbing an infinitely
long sheet and shove it into the output tray area.

*******

This is another Epson, probably the model replaced by the DS-1630.
It's price should be the same as the DS-1630.

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...9SIA61K53X2908

I have a lot of trouble, judging by eye, whether I'm getting
an 8.5x14 platen there. It might be another 8.5x11 platen.

*******

This one is pretty expensive (and maybe the price is wrong),
but this one right on the web page, says both the ADF and
platen scan 8.5"x14".

HP Scanjet 8270 $598 ???
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...9SIA6AU4UH5273

It has a duplex ADF so flips the paper for the second scan.
And then the paper has to be in mint condition, or the
duplex request will jam up. Maybe it runs a bit better
in simplex mode.

*******

And then the price shoots up from there. This one has an 8.5x14 platen.

DocuMate 3640 40ppm Color Duplex 8.5x14" ADF/Flatbed VRS Professional $1500+

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...82E16838152054

The prices are all over the place on this stuff.
It's like a used car lot, where the price changes
depending on whether you're wearing a skirt.

Paul
  #5  
Old October 15th 17, 05:21 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,600
Default scanner?

On 10/14/2017 07:00 PM, Wolf K wrote:
On 2017-10-14 20:35, T wrote:
On 10/14/2017 04:24 PM, Paul wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

W7-pro-x64

I have a customer that needs a stand alone, flat bed
scanner that will do 8-1/2" by 14".

Any favorites?

Many thanks,
-T


EPSON WorkForce DS-1630 (B11B239201)
Duplex 1200 dpi x 1200 dpi USB Color Flatbed ScannerÂ*Â* $280

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...9SIA1YH5799282

It's CIS, which means no depth-of-field. If you take a
textbook and lay it on the bed, none of the text near
the binding will be visible. A CCD sensor will pick up
that text on the curve, as it has depth of field. Most
scanners were CCD, many many years ago. Now, they're
all CIS, with few exceptions.

Document scanning only needs 150-300DPI, as you only
need enough resolution to meet Nyquist on media which
is printed with dots (half-tone). You count the dots,
to figure out the correct scan DPI. A "de-screen" plugin
does the best job of anti-aliasing the resulting image.
So while 600DPI optical resolution may seem restrictive,
in practice it's good enough.

For photographic paper or negatives, you can find a
smaller scanner with 6400DPI, dual illumination for
dust and scratch removal, 2 minute per page scan time,
an entirely different beast. The grain size of photographic
paper or negatives, means you can crank the res all you
want.

If you expect to be doing mostly office work, then you're stuck
with the low-res unit, because the scan times will almost
be reasonable. I own a scanner with a 2 minute scan time,
and I can tell you, it's a real damper when it comes to
scanning. Waiting and waiting... You want a scanner which
only takes a few seconds per page.

*******

You will likely have to visit a lot of web stores, to
get a good picture of what is available.

Â*Â*Â* Paul



Thank you!

She has no book to scan, but dies have stabled documents


If her printer is getting long in the tooth, it might be a better buy to
get an all-in-one now instead of replacing the printer later.
Stand-alone scanner + printer is considerably more expensive than
all-in-one. The only difference between copy and scan is software; and
adding a copy/scan engine to a printer is cheap compared to building it
into its own box.


She has a special stand alone printer for printing legal forms.
  #6  
Old October 15th 17, 05:22 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,600
Default scanner?

On 10/14/2017 07:35 PM, Paul wrote:
Â* scan up to 8.5x14 on the ADF


Poop! Thank you for the warning!
  #7  
Old October 15th 17, 05:23 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,600
Default scanner?

On 10/14/2017 07:35 PM, Paul wrote:
T wrote:
On 10/14/2017 04:24 PM, Paul wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

W7-pro-x64

I have a customer that needs a stand alone, flat bed
scanner that will do 8-1/2" by 14".

Any favorites?

Many thanks,
-T


EPSON WorkForce DS-1630 (B11B239201)
Duplex 1200 dpi x 1200 dpi USB Color Flatbed ScannerÂ*Â* $280

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...9SIA1YH5799282




Thank you!

She has no book to scan, but dies have stabled documents


Before you race off and do a victory lap, a
word of warning.

https://epson.com/For-Work/Scanners/...r/p/B11B239201


Â*Â* scan up to 8.5x11 on the platen
Â*Â* scan up to 8.5x14 on the ADF

If your ADF breaks, then laying the documents flat on the
platen doesn't give you a 8.5x14 scanner. The duplexing
storage area defines the 14" limit. One other scanner
with an ADF (but no duplexing function), describes their
scanner as 8.5xN, as it'll just keep grabbing an infinitely
long sheet and shove it into the output tray area.

*******

This is another Epson, probably the model replaced by the DS-1630.
It's price should be the same as the DS-1630.

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...9SIA61K53X2908

I have a lot of trouble, judging by eye, whether I'm getting
an 8.5x14 platen there. It might be another 8.5x11 platen.

*******

This one is pretty expensive (and maybe the price is wrong),
but this one right on the web page, says both the ADF and
platen scan 8.5"x14".

HP Scanjet 8270Â* $598 ???
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...9SIA6AU4UH5273

It has a duplex ADF so flips the paper for the second scan.
And then the paper has to be in mint condition, or the
duplex request will jam up. Maybe it runs a bit better
in simplex mode.

*******

And then the price shoots up from there. This one has an 8.5x14 platen.

DocuMate 3640 40ppm Color Duplex 8.5x14" ADF/Flatbed VRS Professional
$1500+

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...82E16838152054

The prices are all over the place on this stuff.
It's like a used car lot, where the price changes
depending on whether you're wearing a skirt.

Â*Â* Paul


Thank you!
  #8  
Old October 15th 17, 05:33 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,600
Default scanner?

On 10/14/2017 07:35 PM, Paul wrote:
This is another Epson, probably the model replaced by the DS-1630.
It's price should be the same as the DS-1630.

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...9SIA61K53X2908

I have a lot of trouble, judging by eye, whether I'm getting
an 8.5x14 platen there. It might be another 8.5x11 platen.



https://epson.com/For-Work/Scanners/...r/p/B11B190011

Maximum Scan Area:

Flatbed: 8.5" x 11.7"
ADF: 8.5" x 14"


Poop!
  #9  
Old October 16th 17, 02:23 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
mathedman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 144
Default scanner?

On 10/14/2017 4:53 PM, T wrote:
Hi All,

W7-pro-x64

I have a customer that needs a stand alone, flat bed
scanner that will do 8-1/2" by 14".

Any favorites?

Many thanks,
-T


canon's Lide 110
  #10  
Old October 17th 17, 04:44 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
J. P. Gilliver (John)[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,679
Default scanner?

In message , Paul
writes:
T wrote:
On 10/14/2017 04:24 PM, Paul wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

W7-pro-x64

I have a customer that needs a stand alone, flat bed
scanner that will do 8-1/2" by 14".

Any favorites?

Many thanks,
-T


(You should have said what the purpose was, though [a] the size you
mention suggests it's documents rather than photographs, [b] you have
confirmed that later.)
[]
storage area defines the 14" limit. One other scanner
with an ADF (but no duplexing function), describes their
scanner as 8.5xN, as it'll just keep grabbing an infinitely
long sheet and shove it into the output tray area.

[]
I have a small scanner that is like that: it's a feedthrough scanner (no
duplex), that is about standard width (A4 for Europe, 8.5" I think is
what you use in USA), but unlimited length - as Paul says, it just keeps
feeding through indefinitely. I find it handy as it's very portable -
goes in a tubular bag. The good length capability is useful for
genealogy (birth/marriage/death certificates in the UK used to be rather
long, or rather wide).

IIRR it's an Antec. I won't recommend it for you, as I suspect you want
(though not necessarily high-resolution, as someone else has said),
_accurate_ scans, and this does tend to skew a bit if you're not careful
as you feed them through.
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

Society has the right to punish wrongdoing; it doesn't have the right to make
punishment a form of entertainment. This is where things have gone wrong:
humiliating other people has become both a blood sport and a narcotic.
- Joe Queenan, RT 2015/6/27-7/3
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.