A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows 7 » Windows 7 Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Macrium Reflect Home 7 worth buying?



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 28th 17, 06:09 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
masonc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 152
Default Macrium Reflect Home 7 worth buying?

On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:38:58 +1000, Monty wrote:

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.


Now that you mention it, please tell me what is so bad about Avast's
little ad signature that we should be stretching a thread about it?

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
And the world is on fire.
Ads
  #2  
Old July 28th 17, 07:51 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
J. P. Gilliver (John)[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,679
Default Macrium Reflect Home 7 worth buying?

In message , masonc
writes:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:38:58 +1000, Monty wrote:

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.


Now that you mention it, please tell me what is so bad about Avast's
little ad signature that we should be stretching a thread about it?

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
And the world is on fire.


1. What it was attached to isn't an email.
2. All it proves (if that) is that the email (or ...) was fine when it
left you, not when it reached us.
3. I've yet to be aware of any malware that can be included in a
text-only post (or indeed email).
4. (I think this is the one that bugs some people most!) it's preceded
by "---" rather than "-- ", which isn't a proper .sig delimiter, which
means that (for those with software that knows about such things) they
have to remove it manually from any followup/reply.

Well, you did ask (-:
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

782.55 - The Number of The Beast (including VAT)
  #3  
Old July 28th 17, 04:00 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Ken Blake[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,221
Default Macrium Reflect Home 7 worth buying?

On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:51:12 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
wrote:

In message , masonc
writes:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:38:58 +1000, Monty wrote:

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.


Now that you mention it, please tell me what is so bad about Avast's
little ad signature that we should be stretching a thread about it?

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
And the world is on fire.


1. What it was attached to isn't an email.
2. All it proves (if that) is that the email (or ...) was fine when it
left you, not when it reached us.
3. I've yet to be aware of any malware that can be included in a
text-only post (or indeed email).
4. (I think this is the one that bugs some people most!) it's preceded
by "---" rather than "-- ", which isn't a proper .sig delimiter, which
means that (for those with software that knows about such things) they
have to remove it manually from any followup/reply.



Ditto to all of the above, and most important to me, it just clutters
up the post, and makes it longer, taking longer to read.

Yes, it makes it only slightly longer, but I spend a lot of time in my
newsreader, in many newsgroups, and if you add up all the little
things that make messages slighter longer, it becomes significant.
Anything that reduce the time is good.

And another more minor point, your points above, especially 1 and 4,
make a lot of people lose their confidence in Avast, a company that
doesn't know both these things.

  #4  
Old July 28th 17, 06:28 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Mark Lloyd[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,756
Default Macrium Reflect Home 7 worth buying?

On 07/28/2017 01:51 AM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

[snip]

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
And the world is on fire.


1. What it was attached to isn't an email.
2. All it proves (if that) is that the email (or ...) was fine when it
left you, not when it reached us.
3. I've yet to be aware of any malware that can be included in a
text-only post (or indeed email).
4. (I think this is the one that bugs some people most!) it's preceded
by "---" rather than "-- ", which isn't a proper .sig delimiter, which
means that (for those with software that knows about such things) they
have to remove it manually from any followup/reply.


I think they did that on purpose, to get people to spread their spam.

Well, you did ask (-:



--
Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.us/

"As set forth by theologians, the idea of "God" is an argument that
assumes its own conclusions, and proves nothing." [Johann Most (c.
1890), popular anarchist speaker]
  #5  
Old July 29th 17, 02:13 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Stan Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,904
Default Macrium Reflect Home 7 worth buying?

On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:09:14 -0700, masonc wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:38:58 +1000, Monty wrote:

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.


Now that you mention it, please tell me what is so bad about Avast's
little ad signature that we should be stretching a thread about it?


It's an insult to the intelligence of smart people, and a dangerous
lie to stupid people.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://BrownMath.com/
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
Shikata ga nai...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.