If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:48:47 -0700, AIOEUSER
wrote: Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please Depends on what storage hardware you are using. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
On 04/11/2017 07:48 PM, AIOEUSER wrote:
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please Defraggler The one built into windows MyDefrag (it's old but works still) .... just google .... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
AIOEUSER wrote:
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please I use JKDefrag (to give large files a chance at defragmentation), then run the Windows defragmenter after that (to cover metadata that JK won't touch). For example, I've noticed lately, that windows.edb is getting better treatment (somehow) by the OS, than in months past. In terms of the "colored blocks diagram", there are still holes between the blocks, which is just fine and doesn't hurt anything. I no longer try to "squash" the blocks into a solid blue wall on the left of the diagram. If you want the block diagram to be "solid blue", like Presidents Software defragmenter used to do, that will take commercial software of some sort. And even then, some of them stop before they're finished. I have one commercial product here, which I cannot recommend (too bloated for words). At least some of the defragmenters are "technically advanced", but unfortunately, the GUI prevents you from accessing the capabilities. If you attempt to get a trial version, they'll probably want an email address, in which case you want to use your throw-away email account for that purpose. Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:48:47 -0700, AIOEUSER wrote:
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please I use the built-in defragger in Win 7. 1) Right-click on the drive and choose "Properties" 2) Select the tab "Tools" 3) Under "Defragmentation", click the button "Defragment now" -- Kind regards Ralph |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
On 04/11/2017 07:34 PM, Ralph Fox wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:48:47 -0700, AIOEUSER wrote: Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please I use the built-in defragger in Win 7. 1) Right-click on the drive and choose "Properties" 2) Select the tab "Tools" 3) Under "Defragmentation", click the button "Defragment now" Yep...works fine |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
Do any defraggers arrange things making Win 7 boot as fast as possible ?
My Win 7 is very slow booting. I have an internal Win 7 C: partition. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
AIOEUSER wrote:
Do any defraggers arrange things making Win 7 boot as fast as possible ? My Win 7 is very slow booting. I have an internal Win 7 C: partition. Windows automatically re-arranges prefetch files for faster performance. Apparently, there is an option to trigger that behavior (perhaps "defrag /b"). But instead of pursuing that, I think you should use Process Monitor to run a boot trace. It has a boot trace capability. And it might be marginally easier to use than xperf or wpa. https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/...y-slow-logons/ I think you'll find some "scanning" type activity is what is holding it up. And microscopic optimization is not going to be a match for "software stupidity". If the software insists on reading five thousand files, It's going to take time no matter what order they're placed on the hard drive. Process Monitor is here if you need a copy. https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/...processmonitor You run it, and request a boot trace. Then, reboot the computer, and the trace starts. You cannot see it tracing. However, after the desktop appears, and you feel the situation needing tracing is possibly captured, starting Process Monitor at this point in time, stops the trace and saves it as a file. For the level of analysis you need, examining the system with Autoruns would make as much sense... Except, if an AV is involved, Autoruns might not "see" that and list it. And perhaps only an actual trace would catch a whiff of it. Paul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
AIOEUSER wrote in newscjq0t$1l4l$2
@gioia.aioe.org: Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please There are loads of choices. I like Puran, which has a boot-time defrag option that can access files that are locked when Windows is fully running. TIP: if you use NTFS restore points/shadow copies, then any defrag program could clobber those if you set it to "fill gaps". http://www.puransoftware.com/Puran-Defrag.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Recommended Defragger for Win 7 Please
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:30:47 -0700, AIOEUSER
wrote: Do any defraggers arrange things making Win 7 boot as fast as possible ? My Win 7 is very slow booting. Look at what is starting up with Windows. Wean out unnecessary programs and services. A fragmented drive will make booting slower, but not so much as to make a BIG difference. Look at Black Viper's webpage and see what you can stop safely. I have an internal Win 7 C: partition. Still does not tell us if it's a HDD or a SSD. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|